scholarly journals Investigation of clinical efficacy of screw fixation with cortical bone trajectory for adjacent segment disease after lumbar interbody fusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 205873922110005
Author(s):  
You-Di Xue ◽  
Chao Ma ◽  
Jie Feng ◽  
Wei-Xiang Dai ◽  
Zhao-Chuan Zhang

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of screw fixation with cortical bone trajectory for adjacent segment disease after lumbar interbody fusion. A total of 14 patients with adjacent segment disease were enrolled, and a retrospective analysis was performed. All patients experienced posterior lumbar interbody fusion of the affected segments combined with internal fixation of cortical bone trajectory screw. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and complications were recorded. Clinical outcomes was evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry disability index, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association score. X-ray and computed tomography and sagittal reconstruction were used to check regularly during the follow-up. Bone graft fusion rate was evaluated by Brantigan classification. Preoperatively, Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores were 7.0 ± 1.0, 72.2 ± 3.2, and 11.9 ± 1.3 points, respectively. At the 12th month after surgery, their scores were 1.9 ± 0.7, 28.6 ± 1.2, and 23.7 ± 0.9 points, respectively, which were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, and there were statistical significance in all differences (all p < 0.05). At the 12th month after surgery, X-ray and computed tomography showed there were no complications related to internal fixation, such as breakage and displacement. At the 12th month after surgery, according to the Brantigan classification, 10 patients were classified as Grade E, 3 as Grade D, and 1 as Grade C, with a fusion rate of 92.9%. At the final follow-up, clinical outcomes were assessed by the Stauffer-Coventry criteria: there were 10 patients with excellent outcomes, 1 with good outcomes, 3 with fair outcomes, and 0 with poor outcomes, with an excellent and good rate of 78.6%. The clinical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion combine with cortical bone trajectory screw for adjacent segment disease without removing the previous internal fixator were satisfactory, but further clinical researches were still required to explore its long-term outcome.

2019 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 470-471
Author(s):  
Yukitaka Nagamoto ◽  
Shinya Okuda ◽  
Tomiya Matsumoto ◽  
Tsuyoshi Sugiura ◽  
Yoshifumi Takahashi ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 591-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironobu Sakaura ◽  
Toshitada Miwa ◽  
Tomoya Yamashita ◽  
Yusuke Kuroda ◽  
Tetsuo Ohwada

OBJECTIVE Several biomechanical studies have demonstrated the favorable mechanical properties of the cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw. However, no reports have examined surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with CBT screw fixation for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) compared with those after PLIF using traditional pedicle screw (PS) fixation. The purposes of this study were thus to elucidate surgical outcomes after PLIF with CBT screw fixation for DS and to compare these results with those after PLIF using traditional PS fixation. METHODS Ninety-five consecutive patients underwent PLIF with CBT screw fixation for DS (CBT group; mean followup 35 months). A historical control group consisted of 82 consecutive patients who underwent PLIF with traditional PS fixation (PS group; mean follow-up 40 months). Clinical status was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale score. Fusion status was assessed by dynamic plain radiographs and CT. The need for additional surgery and surgery-related complications was also evaluated. RESULTS The mean JOA score improved significantly from 13.7 points before surgery to 23.3 points at the latest follow-up in the CBT group (mean recovery rate 64.4%), compared with 14.4 points preoperatively to 22.7 points at final follow-up in the PS group (mean recovery rate 55.8%; p < 0.05). Solid spinal fusion was achieved in 84 patients from the CBT group (88.4%) and in 79 patients from the PS group (96.3%, p > 0.05). Symptomatic adjacent-segment disease developed in 3 patients from the CBT group (3.2%) compared with 9 patients from the PS group (11.0%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS PLIF with CBT screw fixation for DS provided comparable improvement of clinical symptoms with PLIF using traditional PS fixation. However, the successful fusion rate tended to be lower in the CBT group than in the PS group, although the difference was not statistically significant between the 2 groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document