scholarly journals Frequent Quizzes and Student Improvement of Reading: A Pilot Study in a Community College Setting

SAGE Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 215824401878258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deniz Gokcora ◽  
Daniel DePaulo
2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerianne Babbo ◽  
Sharon Fought ◽  
Minerva Holk ◽  
Anne Marie Mulligan ◽  
Cheryl Perrone

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5S) ◽  
pp. 444-445
Author(s):  
Tinker D. Murray ◽  
Gene Power ◽  
Lisa Roslanova ◽  
James Eldridge

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela L. Eddy ◽  
Tehmina Khwaja

Purpose: This research sought to determine if the gendered discourse on community college leadership has changed since Amey and Twombly published their analysis of community college literature in 1992. Argument: More women now lead 2-year colleges than ever before, and conceptions of leadership have evolved over time; but has the language used to discuss gender and leadership in leading community college journals changed as well? This research entailed a discourse analysis of 148 journal articles published between 1990 and 2015 to identify gendered language in literature focusing on community college leadership. The language used in the scholarly examination of leadership is a reflection of the ground realities of the community college setting and provides insight into the persisting gendered constructions of leadership at 2-year colleges. Conclusion: Four main findings emerged from this research. First, masculine-normed leadership approaches remain unquestioned in the literature. Second, participatory leadership rhetoric emerged as a trend at the turn of the century. Third, women do the bulk of the writing about women leaders. Finally, ideal worker norms still prevail. The roots of authoritative leadership retain a strong hold in community colleges and intentional actions are required to achieve real change in constructions of leadership.


Author(s):  
Michael S. Dillard

This qualitative study examined the perceptions of nontraditional developmental education students in a community college setting. This study describes adult, nontraditional students' perceptions of their experiences, college supports, and best teaching practices which helped them to succeed. Interview data were obtained from four students, a supplemental instruction leader, and a program manager. Participant responses included themes about the conditions and challenges which the students face, as well as recognition of the intentional engagement practices on the part of the college infrastructure which students perceived to be most helpful and supportive to them. This data can provide valuable information to university administrators, college advisors, and classroom faculty, as well as inform future policy and practice.


Author(s):  
Jennifer Englert-Copeland

Community colleges are inherently democratizing institutions. Through their open access policies, immersion in their local communities, and mission of preparing students for transfer or the workforce, they are positioned to produce graduates who have the skills to become change agents in their communities. Incorporating civic engagement within the community college setting often presents steep challenges as a result of funding models, a national narrow-focus on completion and credential production, and the barriers their own students face. Yet despite these challenges, community colleges across the country are increasingly focusing on methods of encouraging the civic engagement of their students and are participating in high-impact practices. Research confirms that students who are engaged civically do better academically. By assessing their civic programming, community colleges can shine light on the value of civic engagement as a fundamental outcome of a community college education. Only then will these institutions fully realize their mission as America's democracy colleges.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document