scholarly journals Predictive factor for failure of conservative management in the treatment of calcific tendinitis of the shoulder

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0020
Author(s):  
Caroline Ayinon ◽  
Mark Rodosky ◽  
Dharmesh Vyas ◽  
Bryson Lesniak ◽  
Albert Lin ◽  
...  

Objectives: Calcific tendinitis of the shoulder is a painful condition characterized by the presence of calcium deposits within the tendons of the rotator cuff (RTC) and accounts for up to 7% of all presentations of shoulder pain. Conservative treatment with physical therapy (PT) and corticosteroid injection is often the first line treatment. When conservative management fails, arthroscopic surgery for removal of the calcium may be considered. Surgical removal is often followed by rotator cuff repair to address the resulting tendon defect. This study was performed to assess predictive factors for failure of conservative management as well as to characterize the rate of rotator cuff repair in the setting of calcific tendinitis. We hypothesize that larger calcific lesion would have a higher likelihood to fail conservative treatment and the majority of patients requiring surgery will require a concomitant rotator cuff repair. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who were diagnosed with calcific tendinitis at our institution between 2009 and 2019 was performed. Demographics, comorbidities, pain score (VAS), ASES, ROM and patient-reported quality of life measures were recorded and analyzed. All patients underwent a radiograph and MRI. Size of the calcific lesion was measured based on its largest diameter on radiograph. Statistical analysis included chi-square, independent t test and ANOVA. Descriptive statistics were used to report data. p<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: 239 patients were identified in the study period; 127 (53.1%) were female. Mean age was 54 years and BMI 29.2 with mean follow up of 6 months. Preoperative pain score was 6.3 and ASES score was 47.9. 160 had an intact RTC (67.2%) and 78 had a partial RTC tear (32.8%). The calcific lesion was located in the supraspinatus in 148 patients (63.8%), infraspinatus in 32 patients (13.8%), subscapularis in 9 patients (3.9%), teres minor in 1 patient (0.4%) and combined tendons in 42 patients (18.1%). 93/239 (38.9%) patients failed conservative treatment after an average of 4.4 months necessitating surgical management. Failure rate for PT was 36.6% (24/71), for subacromial corticosteroid injection was 31.6% (25/79) and 33.8% (24/71) for ultrasound guided aspiration. Among patients who underwent surgery the majority of patients, 77/93 (82.8%) required a concomitant rotator cuff repair. Sub-analysis demonstrates that calcific lesions > 1 cm was significantly associated with failure of conservative treatment (odds ratio=2.81, 95% CI 1.25-6.29, p<0.05). All patients who underwent surgery demonstrated significant improvements in pain scores (6.3 to 2.3 VAS), ASES (47.9 to 90.49), forward flexion (133° to 146.8°) and external rotation (49.2° to 57.6°) (p<0.05) postoperatively. Conclusions: Patients with calcific lesions >1 cm have a 2.8x-increased likelihood of failing conservative treatment in the setting of calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. The majority of patients who undergo surgical management for removal of the calcific deposit will require a concomitant rotator cuff repair and have significant improvements in shoulder pain and function. While conservative management is often considered a first-line treatment, the size of the lesion may play a significant role regarding whether conservative treatment will be successful, and patients should be counseled accordingly. Once surgery is decided, orthopedic surgeons should also be aware of the high likelihood of concomitant rotator cuff repair for preoperative planning and discussion.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0021
Author(s):  
Mauricio Drummond ◽  
Caroline Ayinon ◽  
Albert Lin ◽  
Robin Dunn

Objectives: Calcific tendinitis of the shoulder is a painful condition characterized by the presence of calcium deposits within the tendons of the rotator cuff (RTC) that accounts for up to 7% of cases of shoulder pain1. The most common conservative treatments typically include physical therapy (PT), corticosteroid injection (CSI), or ultrasound-guided aspiration (USA). When conservative management fails, the patient may require arthroscopic surgery to remove the calcium with concomitant rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to characterize the failure rates, defined as the need for surgery, of each of these three methods of conservative treatment, as well as to compare post-operative improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) – including subjective shoulder values (SSV) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores – based on the type of pre-operative conservative intervention provided. A secondary aim was to compare post-operative range of motion (ROM) outcomes between groups that failed conservative management. We hypothesized that all preoperative conservative treatments would have equivalent success rates, PROs, and ROM. Bosworth B. Calcium deposits in the shoulder and subacromial bursitis: a survey of 12122 shoulders. JAMA. 1941;116(22):2477-2489. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who were diagnosed with calcific tendinitis at our institution treated among 3 fellowship trained orthopedic surgeons between 2009 and 2019 was performed. VAS, SSV, and ROM in forward flexion (FF) and external rotation (ER) was abstracted from the medical records. Scores were recorded at the initial presentation as well as final post-operative follow-up visit for those who underwent surgery. The conservative treatment method utilized by each patient was recorded and included PT, CSI, or USA. Failure of conservative management was defined as eventual progression to surgical intervention. Statistical analysis included chi-square, independent t test and ANOVA. Descriptive statistics were used to report data. A p<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: 239 patients diagnosed with calcific tendinitis were identified in the study period with mean age of 54 years and follow up of at least 6 months. In all, 206 (86.2%) patients underwent a method of conservative treatment. Of these patients, 71/239 (29.7%) underwent PT, 67/239 (28%) attempted CSI, and 68/239 (28.5%) underwent USA. The overall failure rate across all treatment groups was 29.1%, with injections yielding the highest success rate of 54/67 (80.6%). Physical therapy saw the highest failure rate, with 26/71 (36.7%) proceeding to surgical intervention. Patients undergoing physical therapy were statistically more likely to require surgery compared to those undergoing corticosteroid injection (RR 1.88, p= 0.024). Of all 93 patients who underwent surgery, VAS, SSV, ROM improved significantly in all groups. On average, VAS decreased by 4.02 points (6.3 to 2.3), SSV increased by 33 points (51 to 84), FF improved by 13.8º, and ER improved 8.4º between the pre- and post-operative visits (p<0.05). The 33 patients who did not attempt a conservative pre-operative treatment demonstrated the largest post-operative improvement in VAS (-6.00), which was significantly greater than those who previously attempted PT (-3.33, p<0.05). There was a trend towards greater improvement in SSV in the pre-operative PT group (45 to 81) compared to others, but this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.47). Range of motion was not significantly affected by the method of pre-operative conservative intervention. Conclusions: Conservative treatment in the form of physical therapy, corticosteroid injection, and ultrasound-guided aspiration is largely successful in managing calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Of these, PT demonstrated the highest rate of failure in terms of requiring surgical management. PRO improvement varied among the conservative modalities used, however patients who did not attempt conservative management experienced the greatest improvements following surgery. If surgery is necessary following failed conservative treatment, excellent outcomes can be expected with significant improvements in ROM and PROs. This information should be considered by the surgeon when deciding whether to recommend conservative treatment for the management of calcific tendinitis, as well as which specific method to employ.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikio Harada ◽  
Nariyuki Mura ◽  
Masatoshi Takahara ◽  
Michiaki Takagi

Background: Complications of the fingers and hand that occur after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair (ARCR) have not been examined in detail. Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnosis and treatment of complications of the fingers and hand that occur after ARCR and to examine treatment outcomes. Methods: The case records of 40 patients (41 shoulders) who underwent ARCR using suture anchors were retrospectively reviewed to investigate complications of the fingers and hand after ARCR. Results: Twelve patients (29%) experienced numbness, pain, edema, and movement limitations of the fingers and hand. These symptoms occurred on average 1.1 months (range, 0.1-2.5 months) after ARCR. The diagnoses were cubital tunnel syndrome in 2 hands, carpal tunnel syndrome in 3 hands, and flexor tenosynovitis (TS) in 10 hands. None of the 10 hands with TS exhibited triggering of the fingers. The mean interval between treatment initiation and symptom resolution was 2.2 months for the 5 hands treated by corticosteroid injection or surgery and 5.9 months for the 7 hands treated by alternating warm and cold baths alone. None of the hands exhibited Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). Conclusion: Complications of the fingers and hand after ARCR were observed in 29%. TS was the most frequent complication. When symptoms in the fingers and hand occur after ARCR, rather than immediately suspecting CRPS, TS should be primarily suspected, including when TS symptoms such as triggering are not present, and these patients should be treated proactively using corticosteroid injections or surgery.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-58
Author(s):  
Jangwoo Kim ◽  
Yunki Ryu ◽  
Sae Hoon Kim

Although the prevalence of rotator cuff tears is dependent on the size, 11% to 94% of patients experience retear or healing failure after rotator cuff repair. Treatment of patients with failed rotator cuff repair ranges widely, from conservative treatment to arthroplasty. This review article attempts to summarize the most recent and relevant surgical options for failed rotator cuff repair patients, and the outcomes of each treatment, except arthroplasty.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 20190102
Author(s):  
Natividad Gomez-Ruiz ◽  
Maria Carmen Polidura ◽  
Ana Maria Crespo Rodriguez ◽  
Juan Arrazola García

Bilateral Adult Idiopathic Oclussion of Foramen of Monro is a rare entity, with less than 22 cases published in the literature so far, all of them symptomatic. 1 When the symptoms require it, the current first-line treatment is endoscopic foraminoplasty, sometimes associated with septum pellucidum fenestration, although some authors consider that a more conservative treatment in paucisymptomatic patients. 2 We report the case of an idiopathic biventricular hydrocephalus found incidentally in an asymptomatic 42-year-old female with temporomandibular joint disfunction. The fact that some patients with Monro foraminal stenosis may be asymptomatic increases the possibility of underdiagnosis, so we consider it a condition that radiologists should be aware of, mainly taking into account the fact that the diagnosis of this entity is usually radiologic 3 and the potential complications associated with treatment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 247301141878070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osama Elattar ◽  
Tyler Smith ◽  
Adam Ferguson ◽  
Daniel Farber ◽  
Keith Wapner

Nonsurgical management is almost always considered the first-line treatment for the vast majority of foot and ankle pathologies. Foot orthoses, shoe modifications, and therapeutic footwear are considered essential tools for successful conservative management of different foot and ankle disorders. Orthopedic foot and ankle surgeons should have a meticulous understanding of the lower extremity biomechanics as well as the pathoanatomy and the sequelae of diseases affecting the foot and/or ankle. This is essential to the understanding of the desired effects of the different inserts, orthotics, shoe modifications, or braces that may be prescribed for these conditions. In this article, we will summarize the orthoses used for treatment of the most commonly encountered foot and ankle pathologies, with the exclusion of treatment for the diabetic foot because of the unique requirements of that disease process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document