scholarly journals Uses of Braces and Orthotics for Conservative Management of Foot and Ankle Disorders

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 247301141878070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osama Elattar ◽  
Tyler Smith ◽  
Adam Ferguson ◽  
Daniel Farber ◽  
Keith Wapner

Nonsurgical management is almost always considered the first-line treatment for the vast majority of foot and ankle pathologies. Foot orthoses, shoe modifications, and therapeutic footwear are considered essential tools for successful conservative management of different foot and ankle disorders. Orthopedic foot and ankle surgeons should have a meticulous understanding of the lower extremity biomechanics as well as the pathoanatomy and the sequelae of diseases affecting the foot and/or ankle. This is essential to the understanding of the desired effects of the different inserts, orthotics, shoe modifications, or braces that may be prescribed for these conditions. In this article, we will summarize the orthoses used for treatment of the most commonly encountered foot and ankle pathologies, with the exclusion of treatment for the diabetic foot because of the unique requirements of that disease process.

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Soumya Jogi ◽  
Radha Varanai ◽  
Sravani S. Bantu ◽  
Ashish Manne

Primary malignancy of the liver or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unique in its presentation, disease process, and management. Unlike breast or colon cancer, the staging of HCC depends on performance status and baseline liver function along with pathological characteristics. Apart from traditional options like surgery and systemic therapy, effective management can be achieved in selected cases with liver transplant and locoregional therapy (LRT) like transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), and ablation. Liver study societies and cancer groups across the globe proposed guidelines to aid the treating physicians in choosing first-line treatment for liver cancer. It is tough to compare these guidelines as they differ not only in treatment recommendations but also in risk assessment (and staging). The approach to the same patient may be different in the country he or she is managed. In clinical practice, decisions are usually taken on the consensus of multidisciplinary tumor boards and do not necessarily adhere to any guidelines. In the early (and very early) stage HCC, curative options like surgery, transplant, and ablation are recommended. In intermediate stage HCC, LRT (TACE and TARE) is preferred in the first line and systemic therapy for treatment failure or residual disease. Systemic therapy, including the atezolizumab/bevacizumab combination and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) like sorafenib and lenvatinib, is used for advanced stages. Supportive care is advised for terminal stage HCC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0020
Author(s):  
Caroline Ayinon ◽  
Mark Rodosky ◽  
Dharmesh Vyas ◽  
Bryson Lesniak ◽  
Albert Lin ◽  
...  

Objectives: Calcific tendinitis of the shoulder is a painful condition characterized by the presence of calcium deposits within the tendons of the rotator cuff (RTC) and accounts for up to 7% of all presentations of shoulder pain. Conservative treatment with physical therapy (PT) and corticosteroid injection is often the first line treatment. When conservative management fails, arthroscopic surgery for removal of the calcium may be considered. Surgical removal is often followed by rotator cuff repair to address the resulting tendon defect. This study was performed to assess predictive factors for failure of conservative management as well as to characterize the rate of rotator cuff repair in the setting of calcific tendinitis. We hypothesize that larger calcific lesion would have a higher likelihood to fail conservative treatment and the majority of patients requiring surgery will require a concomitant rotator cuff repair. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who were diagnosed with calcific tendinitis at our institution between 2009 and 2019 was performed. Demographics, comorbidities, pain score (VAS), ASES, ROM and patient-reported quality of life measures were recorded and analyzed. All patients underwent a radiograph and MRI. Size of the calcific lesion was measured based on its largest diameter on radiograph. Statistical analysis included chi-square, independent t test and ANOVA. Descriptive statistics were used to report data. p<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: 239 patients were identified in the study period; 127 (53.1%) were female. Mean age was 54 years and BMI 29.2 with mean follow up of 6 months. Preoperative pain score was 6.3 and ASES score was 47.9. 160 had an intact RTC (67.2%) and 78 had a partial RTC tear (32.8%). The calcific lesion was located in the supraspinatus in 148 patients (63.8%), infraspinatus in 32 patients (13.8%), subscapularis in 9 patients (3.9%), teres minor in 1 patient (0.4%) and combined tendons in 42 patients (18.1%). 93/239 (38.9%) patients failed conservative treatment after an average of 4.4 months necessitating surgical management. Failure rate for PT was 36.6% (24/71), for subacromial corticosteroid injection was 31.6% (25/79) and 33.8% (24/71) for ultrasound guided aspiration. Among patients who underwent surgery the majority of patients, 77/93 (82.8%) required a concomitant rotator cuff repair. Sub-analysis demonstrates that calcific lesions > 1 cm was significantly associated with failure of conservative treatment (odds ratio=2.81, 95% CI 1.25-6.29, p<0.05). All patients who underwent surgery demonstrated significant improvements in pain scores (6.3 to 2.3 VAS), ASES (47.9 to 90.49), forward flexion (133° to 146.8°) and external rotation (49.2° to 57.6°) (p<0.05) postoperatively. Conclusions: Patients with calcific lesions >1 cm have a 2.8x-increased likelihood of failing conservative treatment in the setting of calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. The majority of patients who undergo surgical management for removal of the calcific deposit will require a concomitant rotator cuff repair and have significant improvements in shoulder pain and function. While conservative management is often considered a first-line treatment, the size of the lesion may play a significant role regarding whether conservative treatment will be successful, and patients should be counseled accordingly. Once surgery is decided, orthopedic surgeons should also be aware of the high likelihood of concomitant rotator cuff repair for preoperative planning and discussion.


2001 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karthikeshwar Kasirajan ◽  
John M. Marek ◽  
Mark Langsfeld

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document