scholarly journals The Relationship Between Spectral Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition: Adult Versus Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 233121651877117 ◽  
Author(s):  
René H. Gifford ◽  
Jack H. Noble ◽  
Stephen M. Camarata ◽  
Linsey W. Sunderhaus ◽  
Robert T. Dwyer ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 1561-1571 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Kessler ◽  
Jace Wolfe ◽  
Michelle Blanchard ◽  
René H. Gifford

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between speech recognition benefit derived from the addition of a hearing aid (HA) to the nonimplanted ear (i.e., bimodal benefit) and spectral modulation detection (SMD) performance in the nonimplanted ear in a large clinical sample. An additional purpose was to investigate the influence of low-frequency pure-tone average (PTA) of the nonimplanted ear and age at implantation on the variance in bimodal benefit. Method Participants included 311 unilateral cochlear implant (CI) users who wore an HA in the nonimplanted ear. Participants completed speech recognition testing in quiet and in noise with the CI-alone and in the bimodal condition (i.e., CI and contralateral HA) and SMD in the nonimplanted ear. Results SMD performance in the nonimplanted ear was significantly correlated with bimodal benefit in quiet and in noise. However, this relationship was much weaker than previous reports with smaller samples. SMD, low-frequency PTA of the nonimplanted ear from 125 to 750 Hz, and age at implantation together accounted for, at most, 19.1% of the variance in bimodal benefit. Conclusions Taken together, SMD, low-frequency PTA, and age at implantation account for the greatest amount of variance in bimodal benefit than each variable alone. A large portion of variance (~80%) in bimodal benefit is not explained by these variables. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12185493


2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 557-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anke M. De Ruiter ◽  
Joke A. Debruyne ◽  
Michelene N. Chenault ◽  
Tom Francart ◽  
Jan P. L. Brokx

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. e308-e314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Harris ◽  
Lauren Boyce ◽  
David B. Pisoni ◽  
Valeriy Shafiro ◽  
Aaron C. Moberly

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 233121652094838
Author(s):  
Ning Zhou ◽  
Susannah Dixon ◽  
Zhen Zhu ◽  
Lixue Dong ◽  
Marti Weiner

This study examined the contribution of temporal and spectral modulation sensitivity to discrimination of stimuli modulated in both the time and frequency domains. The spectrotemporally modulated stimuli contained spectral ripples that shifted systematically across frequency over time at a repetition rate of 5 Hz. As the ripple density increased in the stimulus, modulation depth of the 5 Hz amplitude modulation (AM) reduced. Spectrotemporal modulation discrimination was compared with subjects’ ability to discriminate static spectral ripples and the ability to detect slow AM. The general pattern from both the cochlear implant (CI) and normal hearing groups showed that spectrotemporal modulation thresholds were correlated more strongly with AM detection than with static ripple discrimination. CI subjects’ spectrotemporal modulation thresholds were also highly correlated with speech recognition in noise, when partialing out static ripple discrimination, but the correlation was not significant when partialing out AM detection. The results indicated that temporal information was more heavily weighted in spectrotemporal modulation discrimination, and for CI subjects, it was AM sensitivity that drove the correlation between spectrotemporal modulation thresholds and speech recognition. The results suggest that for the rates tested here, temporal information processing may limit performance more than spectral information processing in both CI users and normal hearing listeners.


2009 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. 955-958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aniket A. Saoji ◽  
Leonid Litvak ◽  
Anthony J. Spahr ◽  
David A. Eddins

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (08) ◽  
pp. 703-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alissa Nickerson ◽  
Lisa S. Davidson ◽  
Rosalie M. Uchanski

AbstractAudibility of speech for children with hearing loss (HL) depends on the degree of HL and the fitting of the hearing aids (HAs) themselves. Many studies on cochlear implant (CI) users have demonstrated that preimplant hearing is associated with postimplant outcomes, but there have been very few reports on the fitting of HAs before surgery.The aims of this study were to characterize HA fittings and aided audibility of speech for pediatric HA users with severe to profound HL and to examine the relation between preimplant aided audibility and postimplant speech perception.A descriptive/observational and correlational study. Audiologic records of pediatric CI participants involved in a larger study examining the effects of early acoustic hearing were analyzed retrospectively; when available, these records included HA verification and speech recognition performance.The CI participants were enrolled in audiology centers and oral schools for the deaf across the United States.To determine whether deviations from prescribed DSL target were significantly greater than zero, 95% confidence intervals of the mean deviation were calculated for each frequency (250, 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz). Correlational analyses were used to examine the relationship between preimplant aided Speech Intelligibility Indices (SIIs) and postimplant speech perception in noise. Correlational analyses were also used to explore the relationship between preimplant aided SIIs and demographic data. T-tests were used to compare preimplant-aided SIIs of HAs of listeners who later became users of either sequential CIs, simultaneous CIs, or bimodal devices.Preimplant fittings of HAs were generally very close to prescriptive targets, except at 4000 Hz for those HAs with active frequency-lowering processing, and preimplant SIIs, albeit low, were correlated with postimplant speech recognition performance in noise. These results suggest that aided audibility should be maximized throughout the HA trial for later speech recognition purposes.It is recommended that HA fittings be optimized to support speech audibility even when considering implantation. In addition to the age at which HA use begins, the aided audibility itself is important in determining CI candidacy and decisions regarding bimodal HA use.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document