Sharing Sensitive Information: A Hidden Profile Employee Selection Exercise

2021 ◽  
pp. 237929812110269
Author(s):  
Amy C. Lewis ◽  
D’Lisa N. McKee ◽  
Melissa R. Louis

Employee selection and group decision-making skills are critical for ensuring hiring is valid, meets organizational goals, and considers ethical and legal limitations. This exercise has participants role-play members of a search committee reviewing job finalists using shared and unique information. A novel twist to traditional hidden-profile exercises is introduced by including unique information inappropriate for employment decisions (e.g., health information, an old misdemeanor charge). By uncovering unshared details and deciding whether to discuss potentially biasing information, learners practice group decision making and consider legal issues. While exploring professional guidelines and best practices, the exercise acknowledges that managers occasionally know sensitive or potentially biasing information. Although primarily an human resource activity, the exercise includes a traditional hidden-profile variant with organizational behavior learning goals. Both variants are appropriate for learners across the organizational spectrum. A teaching note for adapting the in-person exercise for synchronous or asynchronous online delivery gives detailed instructions for popular learning management systems.

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen E. Hauer ◽  
Olle ten Cate ◽  
Christy K. Boscardin ◽  
William Iobst ◽  
Eric S. Holmboe ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT  The expectation for graduate medical education programs to ensure that trainees are progressing toward competence for unsupervised practice prompted requirements for a committee to make decisions regarding residents' progress, termed a clinical competency committee (CCC). The literature on the composition of these committees and how they share information and render decisions can inform the work of CCCs by highlighting vulnerabilities and best practices.Background  We conducted a narrative review of the literature on group decision making that can help characterize the work of CCCs, including how they are populated and how they use information.Objective  English language studies of group decision making in medical education, psychology, and organizational behavior were used.Methods  The results highlighted 2 major themes. Group member composition showcased the value placed on the complementarity of members' experience and lessons they had learned about performance review through their teaching and committee work. Group processes revealed strengths and limitations in groups' understanding of their work, leader role, and information-sharing procedures. Time pressure was a threat to the quality of group work.Results  Implications of the findings include the risks for committees that arise with homogeneous membership, limitations to available resident performance information, and processes that arise through experience rather than deriving from a well-articulated purpose of their work. Recommendations are presented to maximize the effectiveness of CCC processes, including their membership and access to, and interpretation of, information to yield evidence-based, well-reasoned judgments.Conclusions


2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix C. Brodbeck ◽  
Rudolf Kerschreiter ◽  
Andreas Mojzisch ◽  
Stefan Schulz-Hardt

2006 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 1080-1093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Schulz-Hardt ◽  
Felix C. Brodbeck ◽  
Andreas Mojzisch ◽  
Rudolf Kerschreiter ◽  
Dieter Frey

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn H. Nicholson ◽  
Tim Hopthrow ◽  
Georgina Randsley de Moura

PurposeThe “Individual Preference Effect” (IPE: Faulmüller et al., 2010; Greitemeyer and Schulz-Hardt, 2003; Greitemeyer et al., 2003), a form of confirmation bias, is an important barrier to achieving improved group decision-making outcomes in hidden profile tasks. Group members remain committed to their individual preferences and are unable to disconfirm their initial suboptimal selection decisions, even when presented with full information enabling them to correct them, and even if the accompanying group processes are perfectly conducted. This paper examines whether a mental simulation can overcome the IPE.Design/methodology/approachTwo experimental studies examine the effect of a mental simulation intervention in attenuating the IPE and improving decision quality in an online individual hidden profile task.FindingsIndividuals undertaking a mental simulation achieved higher decision quality than those in a control condition and experienced a greater reduction in confidence in the suboptimal solution.Research limitations/implicationsResults suggest a role for mental simulation in overcoming the IPE. The test environment is an online individual decision-making task, and broader application to group decision-making is not tested.Practical implicationsSince mental simulation is something we all do, it should easily generalise to an organisational setting to improve decision outcomes.Originality/valueTo the authors' knowledge, no study has examined whether mental simulation can attenuate the IPE.


2009 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 568-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. Lightle ◽  
John H. Kagel ◽  
Hal R. Arkes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document