Diabetic Macular Edema Treated With Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection After Treatment With Other Anti-VEGF Agents (SWAP-TWO Study)—12-Month Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 364-371
Author(s):  
Cyrus Golshani ◽  
Thais F. Conti ◽  
Felipe F. Conti ◽  
Fabiana Q. Silva ◽  
Aleksandra Rachitskaya ◽  
...  

Purpose: This article reports 12-month outcomes of patients with diabetic macular edema previously treated with other antivascular endothelial growth factor agents and transitioned to fixed dosing of intravitreal aflibercept (IAI). Methods: This prospective, single-arm study enrolled patients to receive IAI 2 mg (0.05 mL) every 4 weeks until optical coherence tomography demonstrated no fluid. Patients then received fixed dosing of IAI 2 mg once every 8 weeks through 12 months. Primary outcome was mean absolute change from baseline central subfield thickness (CST) at 12 months measured by optical coherence tomography. Results: Twenty eyes were enrolled. At baseline, best-corrected visual acuity was 70.0 letters, mean CST was 419.7 µm ± 92.0, superficial capillary perfusion density (CPD) was 46.0 ± 4.2%, and deep CPD was 50.8 ± 4.3%. At 12 months, the mean CST improved to 287.2 µm ± 80.2 ( P < .001), superficial CPD decreased to 43.6 ± 4.8% ( P = .04), and deep CPD decreased to 47.6 ± 4.8% ( P = .05). Conclusions: Patients who switched to fixed dosing of IAI demonstrated significant anatomic improvements in CST at 12 months. CPD values decreased significantly both in superficial and deep layers without significant changes in vision.

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Libuse Krizova ◽  
Marta Kalousova ◽  
Ales Antonin Kubena ◽  
Oldrich Chrapek ◽  
Barbora Chrapkova ◽  
...  

Purpose. We investigated two factors linked to diabetic macular edema (DME), vitreous and serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and uric acid (UA) in patients with DME, and compared the results with changes in optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual acuity (VA).Methods. A prospective study of 29 eyes, 16 cystoid DME and nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (DR) and 13 nondiabetic controls. Biochemical analysis of vitreous and serum samples was performed and OCT scans were graded according to central retinal thickness (CRT), cube volume (CV), cube average thickness (CAT), and serous retinal detachment (SRD).Results. In DME group, intravitreal concentrations of VEGF (p<0.001), UA (p=0.038), and total protein (p<0.001) were significantly higher than in control group. In DME subjects, intravitreal UA correlated significantly with intravitreal VEGF (ƍ= 0.559,p=0.03) but not with total vitreous protein and serum UA. Increased intravitreal VEGF in DME group correlated with increase in CV (ƍ= 0.515/p=0.041). None of the OCT parameters correlated with the VA.Conclusions. The results suggest that the CV might be assessor of anti-VEGF therapy efficacy. Second, apart from VEGF, the role of UA in the pathogenesis and progression of DR should be considered.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Fujiwara ◽  
Yuki Kanzaki ◽  
Shuhei Kimura ◽  
Mio Hosokawa ◽  
Yusuke Shiode ◽  
...  

AbstractThis retrospective study was performed to classify diabetic macular edema (DME) based on the localization and area of the fluid and to investigate the relationship of the classification with visual acuity (VA). The fluid was visualized using en face optical coherence tomography (OCT) images constructed using swept-source OCT. A total of 128 eyes with DME were included. The retina was segmented into: Segment 1, mainly comprising the inner nuclear layer and outer plexiform layer, including Henle’s fiber layer; and Segment 2, mainly comprising the outer nuclear layer. DME was classified as: foveal cystoid space at Segment 1 and no fluid at Segment 2 (n = 24), parafoveal cystoid space at Segment 1 and no fluid at Segment 2 (n = 25), parafoveal cystoid space at Segment 1 and diffuse fluid at Segment 2 (n = 16), diffuse fluid at both segments (n = 37), and diffuse fluid at both segments with subretinal fluid (n = 26). Eyes with diffuse fluid at Segment 2 showed significantly poorer VA, higher ellipsoid zone disruption rates, and greater central subfield thickness than did those without fluid at Segment 2 (P < 0.001 for all). These results indicate the importance of the localization and area of the fluid for VA in DME.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document