scholarly journals Treatment of Haemophilia a (HA) Patients with Inhibitors: Immune Tolerance Induction with a Single Factor VIII/Von Willebrand Factor Concentrate in an Observational Immune Tolerance Induction Study (ObsITI)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2482-2482
Author(s):  
C. Escuriola Ettingshausen ◽  
Erik Berntorp ◽  
Yesim Dargaud ◽  
Zeynep Gutowski ◽  
Claude Negrier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Von Willebrand Factor ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Immune Tolerance Induction ◽  
Inhibitor Titre ◽  
Von Willebrand ◽  
Willebrand Factor

Abstract Introduction and objectives: Development of neutralising inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII) is one of the most serious and costly complications in the treatment of HA. An ongoing international, open-label, uncontrolled, multicentre observational study, ObsITI (ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT 02207894) started in 2005 to assess immune tolerance induction (ITI), the standard of care in patients with inhibitors. The study evaluates patient- and therapy-related variables on ITI course, outcome and morbidity in HA patients with inhibitors. ObsITI satellite studies additionally look at other factors related to tolerisation. Methods and Materials: As of February 2018, 193 patients from 20 countries undergoing ITI have been recruited in ObsITI. 152 patients completed the study and 41 are ongoing. A subgroup of more than 80 prospective patients were treated exclusively during the complete ITI course with a single plasma-derived (pd) FVIII concentrate that contains von Willebrand factor (VWF) in a VWF/FVIII ratio of 0.4 (Octapharma AG). According to the recommended Bonn protocol, low responders at ITI start received 50-100 IU FVIII kg-1 daily, or every other day; high responders received 100 IU FVIII kg-1 every 12 hours. Results: In this ongoing study, the majority of patients treated with the pdFVIII/VWF product achieved a negative inhibitor titre. ITI outcome was significantly correlated with the bleeding rate during ITI, the peak titre during ITI, the inhibitor titre at start of ITI >10 BU, and the number of poor prognosis factors. Conclusion: Treatment with this particular pdFVIII/VWF concentrate, mainly according to the Bonn protocol, resulted in a high ITI success rate in HA patients with inhibitors and corroborates previously published success rates (77.1% complete/partial success in 48 inhibitor patients undergoing ITI with the same product). Disclosures Escuriola Ettingshausen: SOBI: Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biotest: Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Grifols: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; LFB: Honoraria. Berntorp:Octapharma: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy, Other: honoraria for lecturing . Negrier:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alnylam: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; LFB: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi/Bioverativ: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxalta/Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Pavlova:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; Octapharma: Honoraria. Oldenburg:Chugai: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biogen Idec: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biotest: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Swedish Orphan Biovitrum: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Natural History Of Inhibitor Recurrence Following Successful Immune Tolerance Induction

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1106-1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana G. Antun ◽  
Paul Monahan ◽  
Marilyn J. Manco-Johnson ◽  
Michael Callaghan ◽  
Guy Young ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Immune Tolerance Induction ◽  
Baxter Healthcare ◽  
Inhibitor Titer

Abstract Introduction The formation of Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitory antibodies is a major complication of hemophilia A. Currently immune tolerance induction (ITI) is successful in up to 70% of patients. Outside of the International Immune Tolerance Registry, where 6 of 128 patients had a recurrent inhibitor between 1 and 6 years, little is known about the probability of inhibitor recurrence following successful ITI. Objective To determine the probability of inhibitor recurrence and the influence of adherence to post-ITI prophylaxis on inhibitor recurrence following successful ITI. Methods All persons with hemophilia A (FVIII level < 50%) who completed ITI (defined as inhibitor titer <0.6 BU/ml) between 1/1/1998 and 8/15/2010 at 12 U.S. Hemophilia Treatment Centers were identified. Demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained through review of subject medical records and included age at start of ITI, race, ethnicity, hemophilia severity, peak inhibitor titer prior to the start of ITI and ITI regimen. For those subjects where tolerance was confirmed with measurement of FVIII half-life > 6 hours and/or FVIII recovery > 66% in addition to inhibitor titer < 0.6 BU/ml, information was also collected on post-ITI prophylaxis regimen, adherence to post-ITI prophylaxis, and the presence of a recurrent inhibitor titer (≥ 0.6 BU/ml) or last inhibitor titer prior to 8/15/2011. Adherence during the 6 months prior to inhibitor recurrence or last inhibitor titer was determined by review of pharmacy and infusion logs compared with prescribed treatment regimen. Follow-up time started when the subject was considered tolerized (normalized half-life or recovery if half-life not performed) and ended at the time of inhibitor recurrence or the last recorded inhibitor titer. Estimates of the probability of remaining inhibitor-free at 1, 3 and 5 years were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. The association between adherence (completing >80% of prescribed infusions vs. < 80% of prescribed infusions) and inhibitor recurrence was assessed using the chi-square test. Results Eighty-three male subjects were enrolled. The median age at start of ITI was 3.3 years (range: 0.08 - 39). The majority of the subjects were white (73%) and non-Hispanic (73.5%). Seventy-one (85.6%) had severe hemophilia. The median peak inhibitor titer was 8.5 BU/ml (range: 0.6 - 950). Four subjects (5%) had a prior unsuccessful course of ITI. FVIII alone was used in 85% of subjects. Sixty-seven (80.7%) met criteria for tolerance and 64 had follow-up data available, with a median follow up time of 3.4 years (range: 0.08-12.4). Forty-four subjects (68.7%) remained tolerant without a recurrent inhibitor titer after a median 4.7 years (range: 0.25-12.4) of follow-up. Twenty subjects (31.3%) had at least one inhibitor titer ≥ 0.6 BU/ml after a median of 1.6 years (range 0.08-5.7). The probability of recurrent inhibitor at 1 year is 0.15 (95% CI: [0.05, 0.20]); at 3 years is 0.30 (95% CI: [0.2, 0.4]) and 5 years is 0.35 (95% CI: [0.2, 0.5]) (Figure 1). Four subjects discontinued post-ITI prophylaxis anywhere from 6 months to greater than 6 years after tolerance was achieved, of whom 2 (50%) developed a recurrent inhibitor. Of those that remained on post-ITI prophylaxis, 41 subjects (64.1%) were adherent (took >80% of prescribed infusions) to their post-ITI prophylaxis regimen, of whom 13 (31.7%) developed a recurrent inhibitor. Twenty-three (35.9%) who were non-adherent (took <80% of the prescribed infusions) of which 7 (30.4%) subjects developed a recurrent inhibitor; no statistically significant association was found between adherence and inhibitor-free status (p=0.92). Conclusion ITI is currently the most effective treatment to eradicate FVIII inhibitors, however 5 years after completion, 30-35% of patients will have at least one inhibitor titer ≥ 0.6 BU/ml. A recurrent inhibitor is unlikely after 5 years. Adherence to post-ITI prophylaxis does not appear to be a major driver of inhibitor recurrence. It is imperative to elucidate the factors that influence the durability of successful ITI to improve quality of life and cost of treatment in these patients. Disclosures: Monahan: Baxter: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, travel support, travel support Other; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Prolor Biotech: Research Funding; Asklepios: Consultancy, Research Funding, travel support Other. Manco-Johnson:Eisai: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biogen Idec: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxter BioScience: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer HealthCare: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Carpenter:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; Grifols: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kruse-Jarres:Bayer HealthCare: Consultancy; Biogen IDEC: Consultancy; Grifols: Consultancy; Kedrion: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Baxter Healthcare: Consultancy. Ragni:Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Baxter: Research Funding; Tacere Benitec: Consultancy; Smith Kline Glaxo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biogen Idec: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Kempton:Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Baxter Healthcare: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Von Willebrand factor-containing factor VIII concentrates and inhibitors in haemophilia A

2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 931-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Lippi ◽  
Massimo Franchini
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Von Willebrand Factor ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
High Titer ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Immune Tolerance Induction ◽  
Bleeding Episodes ◽  
Von Willebrand ◽  
Willebrand Factor

SummaryThe development of inhibitors that neutralise the function of factor VIII (FVIII) is currently not only the most challenging complication associated with the treatment of haemophilia A but it also increases the disease-related morbidity as bleeding episodes do not respond to standard therapy. The main short-term goal of the treatment of inhibitor patients is to control bleeding episodes while the long-term one is to permanently eradicate the inhibitor by immune tolerance induction, particularly in the case of high-titer antibodies. Due to some in vitro studies and clinical observations, some investigators have suggested that FVIII concentrates containing von Willebrand factor (VWF) may be less immunogenic than high-purity or recombinant FVIII products. It has also been suggested that success rates for immune tolerance induction are higher when plasma-derived FVIII products are used. The currently available data from laboratory and clinical studies on the role of VWF in inhibitor development and eradication in haemophilia A is critically analysed in this review. As a result, we have not found definitive evidence supporting a role for product type on inhibitor incidence and inhibitor eradication in haemophilia A patients.

scholarly journals Immune Tolerance Induction Using Rfviiifc (Eloctate)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3531-3531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn M. Malec ◽  
Margaret V Ragni ◽  
Janna M. Journeycake ◽  
Michelle Alabek
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Immune Tolerance Induction

Abstract Introduction: Inhibitor formation affects approximately 30% of individuals with severe hemophilia A. The eradication of inhibitors using immune tolerance induction (ITI) remains the mainstay of therapy, although typically requires daily high-dose factor VIII via a port for up to a year. Extended half-life recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc, Eloctate¨) has a half-life extension 1.5-fold longer than standard recombinant FVIII (rFVIII), reducing treatment frequency, and also induces regulatory T cell response to FVIII in animal models. We hypothesized that rFVIIIFc would provide more effective ITI, specifically shortening ITI, than rFVIII. We describe ITI with rFVIIIFc in three patients with severe hemophilia A. Methods: Immune tolerance induction was initiated with rFVIIIFc (Eloctate) in three children with severe hemophilia A and an anti-FVIII inhibitor. Dosing was per MD discretion with family agreement, and performed by central venous access device or intravenous infusion via heplock. Follow-up was scheduled every 6-8 weeks, with planned determination of FVIII half-life once the anti-FVIII fell to <0.6 B.U. Tolerance was a priori defined as achieving anti-FVIII <0.6 B.U. and half-life, t½ >6 hours. FVIII half-life was determined by one-stage FVIII:C assay on citrate samples drawn pre- and 10 minutes, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-infusion of a single dose of rFVIIIFc. Once a t½ >6 hours was documented, incremental reduction to 50 IU/kg every other day or three times weekly, once there was evidence of maintenance of inhibitor neutralization and a >6 hour FVIII:C half-life. Results: Immune tolerance induction was initiated with rFVIIIFc at a dose of 100-200 IU/kg rFVIIIFc via central venous access device every other day or three times weekly per MD discretion in three children with severe hemophilia A and in anti-FVIII inhibitor > 5 B.U. (Table 1). Two patients had F8 genetic testing. In two patients, Pt 1 and Pt 3, this was the initial ITI course, and in the third child (Pt 2) this was salvage ITI after failing to achieve tolerance due to noncompliance with daily rFVIII ITI taper regimen. In two rFVIIIFc ITI was begun when anti-FVIII was < 10 B.U. Historic peak titers were 16-422 B.U. The time to anti-FVIII tolerance was 4-12 weeks Discussion: Immune tolerance induction was successful in three children with inhibitors using rFVIIIFc, including a child previously failing rFVIII ITI. The time to anti-FVIII=0 was 4-12 weeks, significantly shorter than with current rFVIII ITI. There were no adverse effects. These data indicate that rFVIIIFc safely and effectively induced immune tolerance to FVIII in children with inhibitors. Whether ITI may be accomplished more rapidly with rFVIIIFc, and the optimal dose for ITI will require prospective studies. A prospective observational study of rFVIIIFc ITI pre- and post-ITI T cell responses in children with hemophilia and inhibitors, the H emophilia I nhibitor R esponse to E loctate (HIRE) Study, is underway. Table 1. Immune Tolerance Induction with rFVIIIFc in Hemophilia A Inhibitor Patients Patient (Pt) Hemophilia Severity F8 Gene Mutation Age at Anti-FVIII Detection Peak Anti-FVIII Titer Initial ITI Dose Time toAnti-FVIII = 0 Current Anti-FVIII 1 <0.01 IU/ml Intron 22 inversion 13 months 32 B.U. 200 IU/kg QOD 12 weeks 0 B.U. 2 < 0.01 IU/ml Exon 18 nonsense variant 9 months 422 B.U. 200 IU/kg 3x/week 4 weeks 0 B.U. 3 <0.01 IU/ml Not available 10 years 16 B.U. 100 IU/kg QOD 11 weeks 0 B.U. Disclosures Malec: Baxter: Research Funding; Biogen: Research Funding. Ragni:Pfizer: Research Funding; Tacere Benitec: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Dimension: Research Funding; Vascular Medicine Institute: Research Funding; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; SPARK: Research Funding; Biomarin: Research Funding; Genentech Roche: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Biogen: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding. Journeycake:CSL, Baxalta, NovoNordisk: Consultancy; ATHN: Research Funding; Biogen: Speakers Bureau; ATHN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document