Depth of Response and Outcomes in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Abstract Background: For multiple myeloma (MM) patients, depth of response after induction therapy and after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) has been shown to be important for progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in some studies. Furthermore, the impact of minimal residual disease (MRD) on outcomes and treatment decisions has been widely discussed. We aimed to evaluate outcomes by depth of response after induction and AHCT. Methods: MM patients who received their first AHCT within 1 year of starting induction were identified from the institutional registry. MRD was assessed by non-10 color flow cytometry. Response was defined by the International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Summary statistics were used to describe the population. Kaplan-Meier methodology estimated PFS and OS by response status pre-AHCT and at post-AHCT restaging. Results: Between 2012 - 2014, 182 MM patients met our inclusion criteria, with 83% alive at last follow-up. The median age at AHCT was 60 years (range 29-76) with 57% male. By the International Staging System (ISS), 50% were stage I, 26% stage II, and 24% stage III. High risk cytogenetics were detected in 24%. Isotype was IgG in 55%, IgA 21%, Kappa Free Light Chain (KFLC) 11%, and lambda FLC (LFCL) 9%. First induction therapy included bortezomib in 90% and lenalidomide in 79%. Median time to AHCT was 5.5 months (range 2.8-11.7). The median follow-up from AHCT was 3.7 years (range 0.22 - 4.6 years), with 84% of patients receiving lenalidomide maintenance, and 9% receiving an additional autologous or allogenic transplant at relapse. Response prior to the initial AHCT was a complete remission (CR) in 13.7% (MRD negative 6.6%, positive 4.4%, unknown 2.7%), very good partial remission (VGPR) 38%, partial remission (PR) 40%, stable disease (SD) 5%, and progressive disease (PD) 4%. At post-AHCT restaging, responses had improved to 42% CR (MRD negative 23%, positive 6%, unknown 13%), 35% VGPR, 19% PR, 2% SD, and 3% PD. Median PFS from AHCT for the entire cohort was 3.2 years (95% CI 2.4 - 4 years) with 1-year and 3-year PFS 85% and 52%, respectively. Median OS was not reached (NR) (95% CI 4.4 years - NR) with 1-year and 3-year OS 97% and 88%, respectively (Figure 1). PFS from AHCT was significantly longer in patients with an MRD negative CR prior to AHCT with median PFS not reached (95% CI 1.7 - NR) compared to MRD positive/unknown CR, VGPR, and ≤ PR [3.64 years (95% CI 1.09-3.64), 3.46 years (95% CI 2.4 - NR), and 2.44 years (1.68-3.56 years), respectively, p=0.048] (Figure 2A). From post-AHCT restaging, PFS was also significantly longer in patients with an MRD negative CR prior to AHCT with median PFS not reached compared to MRD positive/unknown CR, VGPR, and ≤ PR [3.49 years (95% CI 0.86-3.49), 3.56 years (95% CI 2.5 - NR), and 2.4 years (1.6-3.33 years), respectively, p=0.026] (Figure 2B). However, there was no difference in PFS based on the post-AHCT restaging with median PFS in MRD negative CR, MRD positive/unknown CR, VGPR, and ≤ PR of 3.49 years (95% CI 2-NR), not reached (95% CI 1.4-NR), 2.96 years (95% CI 1.7-NR), and 2.86 years (95% CI 1.7 - NR) (p=0.78, Figure 2C), respectively. OS from AHCT was not significantly different by pre-AHCT response, and the median was not reached in any group (p=0.33, Figure 3A). Finally, the median OS from post-AHCT restaging by pre-AHCT response or by post-AHCT response was also not reached in any group (p=0.32 and 0.31, respectively; Figure 3B & C). Conclusion: For MM patients, AHCT deepened responses and increased the CR rate. We were unable to show a significant difference in outcomes at post AHCT restaging, which may be due to the effect of maintenance therapy, the small numbers of MRD negative patients, or the sensitivity of the MRD assay available during this time period, though potentially show that MRD positive patients do as well as MRD negative patients after AHCT. We plan to add additional patients treated in the more recent years who were assessed by more sensitive methods. Disclosures Shah: Janssen: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Korde:Amgen: Research Funding. Lesokhin:Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix, inc.: Patents & Royalties: Royalties; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mailankody:Janssen: Research Funding; Physician Education Resource: Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: CAR T cell therapies for MM, Research Funding. Landgren:Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Outcome of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-116496 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2149-2149

Author(s):

Romil Patel ◽

Neeraj Y Saini ◽

Ankur Varma ◽

Omar Hasan ◽

Qaiser Bashir ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Remission ◽

Relapsed Disease

Abstract Introduction: The role of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) in the management of patients with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM), a rare, indolent lymphoma, has not been established. We had previously published our experience with auto-HCT in a small cohort of WM patients1. Here, we present an updated analysis of auto-HCT with a larger cohort of WM patients. Methods and study population: The study cohort was comprised of 29 patients who underwent high-dose chemotherapy and auto-HCT at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to create survival curves. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the duration from date of transplant to death or last date of follow-up in living patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the duration from date of transplant to either progressive disease or death, whichever occurred first. Results: Median age at auto-HCT was 60 (range, 43-75 years). Eight patients (28%) had concurrent light chain amyloidosis (AL). Of the five patients who had MYD88 testing completed, 3 were positive for the MYD88 mutation. Additionally, of these 3 patients, 2 were also positive for CXCR4 mutation. Patients received a median of 2 lines (range 1-6) of therapy prior to auto-HCT; 3(10%) patients had primary refractory disease, 8(28%) were in first remission, and 18 (62%) had relapsed disease. Median time from transplant to last follow-up for the surviving patients was 5.3 years. Preparative regimens received by the patients were: Melphalan (n=20), BEAM-R (n=2), Busulfan/Melphalan (n=1), Cyclophosphomaide/Etoposide/total body irradiation (n=1), Thiotepa/Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide (n=1), and Carmustine/Thiotepa (n=1). Three patients further went on to receive allogeneic transplant either after relapse from auto-HCT or due to disease transformation to aggressive lymphoma. Twenty-eight patients achieved engraftment with a median time to neutrophil engraftment of 11 days (range, 10-15 days). One patient suffered primary graft failure due to progression of disease and died 84 days after transplant. Non-relapse mortality was 3.4% at 1 year. All patients were eligible for response evaluation. The median OS from diagnosis was 12.2 years. Overall response rate was 96%: complete response (n=8, 27.6%), very good partial response (n=5, 17.3%), partial response (n=15, 51.7%), and progressive disease (n=1, 3.4%). PFS and OS at 5 years were 43.3% and 62.9%, respectively. Median PFS and OS from auto-HCT were 4.1 and 7.3 years (Fig. 1A). The median OS from auto-HCT in first remission + primary refractory and relapsed disease was 8.2 years and 4.1 years, respectively.16 patients were alive at the time of censoring while 13 patients had died. Causes of death include relapsed disease (n=6), secondary malignancy (n=2), infection (n=1), chronic graft-versus-host disease (n=1), and unknown (n=3). 8 patients (28%) were positive for concurrent AL amyloidosis. The sites of amyloid involvement were kidneys (n=2), lungs (n=1), bone marrow (n=1), heart(n=1), lymph nodes(n=1), gastrointestinal tract (n=1) and subcutaneous fat aspirate(n=5). The median overall survival for patients with amyloid involvement (n=8) was 12 years. On univariate analyses, the number of chemotherapy regimens prior to transplant (≤ 2 vs >2 lines) was the strongest predictor of overall survival (p=0.03, HR 0.3, CI: 0.09-0.9, log-rank) and PFS (p=0.001, HR 0.24, CI: 0.07-0.85, log-rank). The median PFS in patients with ≤ 2 lines and > 2 lines of therapy was 71 months versus 19 months, respectively (Fig. 1B). Conclusion: Auto-HCT is safe and feasible in selected patients with WM, with a high response rate and durable remission even in patients with relapsed or refractory disease. References: Krina Patel et.al. Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia. Blood 2012 120:4533; Disclosures Thomas: Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb Inc.: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Array Pharma: Research Funding; Amgen Inc: Research Funding. Lee:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai Biopharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Orlowski:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; BioTheryX: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Champlin:Otsuka: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Patel:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Stem Cell Transplantation Can Provide Durable Disease Control in Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasia (BPDC): A Retrospective Study From the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.3077.3077 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 3077-3077

Author(s):

Sascha Dietrich ◽

Damien Roos-Weil ◽

Ariane Boumendil ◽

Emanuelle Polge ◽

Jian-Jian Luan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Nk Cell ◽

Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 3077 Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDC), formerly known as blastic NK cell lymphoma, is a rare hematopoietic malignancy preferentially involving the skin, bone marrow and lymph nodes. The overall prognosis of BPDC is dismal. Most patients show an initial response to acute leukemia-like chemotherapy, but relapses with subsequent drug resistance occur in virtually all patients resulting in a median overall survival of only 9–13 months. However, anecdotal long-term remissions have been reported in young patients who received early myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). We therefore performed a retrospective analysis of patients identified in the EBMT registry in order to evaluate the outcome of autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) or alloSCT for BPDC. Eligible were all patients who had been registered with a diagnosis of BPDC or Blastic NK cell lymphoma and had received autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) or alloSCT in 2000–2009. Centres were contacted to provide a written histopathology and immunophenotyping report and information about treatment and follow-up details. Patients who did not have a diagnostic score ≥ 2 as proposed by Garnache-Ottou et al. (BJH 2009) were excluded. RESULTS: Overall, 139 patients could be identified in the database who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (alloSCT 100, autoSCT 39). Of 74 patients for whom the requested additional information could be obtained, central review confirmed the diagnosis of BPDC in 39 patients (34 alloSCT, 5 autoSCT). The 34 patients who had undergone alloSCT had a median age of 41 years (range: 10–70 years), were transplanted from a related (n=11) or unrelated donor (n=23); received peripheral blood stem cells (n=9), bone marrow stem cells (n=19) or cord blood (n=6); and had been treated with a reduced intensity conditioning regimen (RIC, n=9) or myeloablative conditioning (MAC, n=25). Nineteen of 34 patients were transplanted in CR1. After a median follow up time of 28 months (range: 4–77+ months), 11 patients relapsed (median time to relapse: 8 months, range: 2–27 months) of whom 8 died due to disease progression. 9 patients died in the absence of relapse. No relapse occurred later than 27 months after transplant. Median disease free survival (DFS) was 15 months (range: 4–77+ months) and median overall survival (OS) was 22 months (range: 8–77+ months; Figure 1a). However, long-term remissions of up to 77 months after alloSCT could be observed. Patients allografted in CR1 tended to have a superior DFS (p=0.119) and OS (p=0.057; Figure 1b). MAC was associated with a better OS (p=0.001) which was attributable to the significantly higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) rate of patients after RIC (p=0.014), who had been significantly older (age RIC: 56 years, age MAC: 36 years, p=0.0014). The relapse rate was not different in patients after RIC and MAC, respectively. However, there was no survivor after RIC. Median age in the autoSCT group was 47 years (range: 14–62 years). Three of 5 patients were transplanted in CR1 of whom 1 patient relapsed after 8 months, 1 patient experienced treatment related mortality and 1 patient remained in CR for 28 months. The 2 remaining patients had more advanced disease at autoSCT and relapsed 4 and 8 months thereafter. CONCLUSION: AlloSCT is effective in BPDC and might provide curative potential in this otherwise incurable disease, especially when performed in CR1. However, it remains to be shown by prospective studies if the potential benefit of alloSCT in BPDC is largely due to conditioning intensity, or if there is a relevant contribution of graft-versus-leukemia activity. Disclosures: Tilly: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, Travel/accommodations/meeting expenses; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Janssen Cilag: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients Aged ≥70 Years: Epidemiology, Outcomes, and Risk Factors Based on the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation (DRST)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-152349 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3926-3926

Author(s):

Jan Frederic Weller ◽

Louisa Kaufmann ◽

Claudia Lengerke ◽

Jürgen Finke ◽

Johannes Schetelig ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Underlying Disease ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Elder Patients ◽

Karnofsky Index

Abstract Introduction. Malignant diseases treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) predominantly occur beyond the 7 th decade of life. Numerical age per se is not regarded an adverse risk factor in alloHSCT. In an aging society, interventions historically deemed high risk are increasingly used in elder patients. Methods. Epidemiology, outcomes and risk factors of patients aged ≥70 years undergoing alloHSCT in Germany 1999-2019 and registered with the DRST/EBMT database were analyzed retrospectively. Baseline patient, disease, and transplant data were collected from MED-A forms. Centers were contacted to provide additional treatment and follow-up information. Results. Between 1999 and 2019, 1648 patients aged ≥70 years (median 72, range 70-79.7; 585 female) were transplanted in 50 German centers. More than 90% of all patients were transplanted 2010-2019. Centers transplanted between 2 and 192 patients, with 14 centers contributing <10 and 4 centers contributing >100 patients each. Most patients suffered acute leukemia (1084, 65.8%) or MDS/MPN (410, 24.9%). Karnofsky index before start of conditioning was 100% (n=230, 14%), 90% (n=651, 39.5%), 80% (n=480, 29.1%), 70% (n=94, 5.7%), <70% (n=55, 3.3%). Myeloablative conditioning was chosen in 25.6%. Total body irradiation was used for 305 patients (18.6%). Conditioning contained antithymocyteglobulin in 49.6%. Donors were unrelated for 85.5%. Median donor age was 37 (18-79) years. Patient CMV IgG was positive in 63.1% and the constellation 'negative donor, positive patient' was present in 19.9%. Median overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) was 408/ 344 days. With a median follow up of 536 days for surviving patients, Kaplan Meier estimates of OS/ DFS were 52.6%/ 48.5% and 40.9%/ 38.6% at 1 and 2 years. In a competing risk analysis, cumulative incidence of non-relapse-mortality (NRM)/ relapse (RI) was 22.2%/ 29.3% at 365 days. Frequency of acute graft versus host disease (GvHD) II-IV was 25.1% and chronic limited/ extended GvHD 11.7%/ 14.8%. Karnofsky performance score, CMV IgG matching, acute and chronic GvHD and stem cell source showed a prognostic impact on OS, DFS, RI and/ or NRM (Table 1). Underlying disease did not impact outcome, neither did age amongst patients at an age of 70-80 years. To compare with outcome in the decade below (60-69 years), an analysis after matching for underlying disease, CMV relation, and Karnofsky index included 2728 patients (each 1364 patients 60-69 and ≥70 years of age). For each year of life, univariate HR for OS and DFS were 1.01 [95%CI 1.001-1.023, p=0.035] and 1.01 [95%CI 0.99-1.02, p=n.s.], respectively, in this matched-pair analysis. The cumulative HR (OS, DFS) for both age groups was 1.16 [95%CI 1.05-1.28, p<0.01] and 1.13 [95%CI 1.02-1.24, p=0.016] for patients ≥70 years. Conclusion. AlloHSCT is increasingly used to treat elder patients in Germany with a sharp increase during the last decade. Age per se is a modest adverse risk factor for adult patients after alloHSCT with slightly increased mortality in patients 70-80 versus those at 60-69. Further research might concentrate on patient selection and further reduction of procedural toxicity. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Schetelig: Roche: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; BMS: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees . Einsele: Janssen, Celgene/BMS, Amgen, GSK, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Stelljes: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Dreger: AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; Riemser: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Wulf: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Clinigen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Scheid: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bethge: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi Biotec: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Immunoparesis Recovery As Predictor Marker of Progression after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.4356.4356 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 4356-4356 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Veronica Gonzalez De La Calle ◽

Eduardo Sobejano ◽

Julio Davila ◽

Enrique M Ocio ◽

Noemi Puig ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

B Lymphocyte ◽

Disease Stage ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract BACKGROUND High dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the standard of care, especially in Europe, for young and eligible multiple myeloma patients (usually younger than 65 years old). Immunoparesis is defined as a reduction (below the lower normal limit) in the levels of 1 or 2 uninvolved immunoglobulins (Ig) and it is related to a reversible suppression of B lymphocytes that correlates inversely with disease stage. B Lymphocyte reconstitution begins at 3 months after ASCT, with maximum B lymphocyte levels at 1 year after ASCT. AIMS The goal of the present study was to investigate the role of the immunoparesis recovery after ASCT as predictor of relapse or progression in multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS We reviewed medical records of MM patients who underwent to ASCT at University Hospital of Salamanca between 1992 and 2013. The primary endpoint was time to relapse or progression from ASCT. Ig (Ig G, Ig A e Ig M) were collected at the time of diagnosis, before ASCT, every 3 months during the first year after ASCT, and every year up to 5 years after ASCT among eligible patients until the relapse or disease progression. RESULTS 106 multiple myeloma patients who underwent ASCT were included in the analysis. Conventional chemotherapy was administered as induction regimen in 69 patients (65%), whereas novel agents were used in 37 patients (35%). Most patients had immunoparesis at diagnosis (91%) and at the moment of ASCT as well (94%). After a median follow-up of 62 months, median time to progression or relapse (TTP) from ASCT was 31 months (95 % CI: 24.1 - 37.1 months). MM patients with immunoparesis 1 year after ASCT had a significantly shorter median TTP as compared with patients without immunoparesis (33.5 months vs 94.2 months; HR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.13-4.05; p=0.019). In the group of patients with reduction of both Igs, median TTP was slightly inferior than in the group with reduction of only one of them(33.5 vs 36.4 months, p=0.03). Presence of ISS 3, high-risk cytogenetics at diagnosis, less than partial response achieved before and three months after ASCT were also identified as predictors of progression. Multivariate analysis selected immunoparesis 1 year after ASCT as an independent variable for relapse or progression (HR: 5.97, 95% CI: 1.63-21.88; P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS The lack of immunoparesis recovery at 1 year after ASCT in MM patients is associated with significantly higher risk of relapse or progression and this group of patients could potentially benefit of continuous treatment after ASCT to enhance the immune recovery. Disclosures Ocio: Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Puig:The Binding Site: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Mateos:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Upfront Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Elderly Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1989.1989 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1989-1989

Author(s):

Laurent Garderet ◽

Cyrille Touzeau ◽

Anne-Marie Stoppa ◽

Denis Caillot ◽

Lionel Karlin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Median Time ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction: Previous trials have shown that autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is superior to conventional chemotherapy in terms of remission rate and PFS in younger MM patients. Concerns about toxicity and potential efficacy of ASCT in older MM patients lead most centers to limit ASCT indications to patients aged <65 years. However, at the era of novel induction regimens, and because of better patient selection and supportive care, ASCT may prove to be a valid treatment option even in older MM patients. Therefore, some investigators are questioning the widely used 65 years age limit. Patients and Methods: We prospectively analyzed the outcomes of 56 consecutive MM patients who had received ASCT between September 2012 and September 2014 in 6 institutions in France (protocol ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01671826). Patients were newly diagnosed MM. For induction therapy, all patients received a bortezomib-based induction regimen (VD, VTD, VCD, or VRD, 4 to 6 cycles) according to center's local guidelines. Mobilization was performed with G-CSF or G-CSF+cyclophosphamide and plerixafor whenever needed. High-dose chemotherapy consisted of either 140 mg/m2 or 200 mg/m2 Melphalan. A short two months consolidation phase post ASCT was allowed (lenalidomide-dexamethasone, VD, VTD, VCD or VRD). No maintenance treatment was given. Response, disease progression and relapse were defined according to the IMWG uniform response criteria. All patients signed an informed consent form according to the EBMT guidelines. Results: At time of diagnosis, median age was 67 (range, 64-74) years with 23% of patients being >70 years. There were 30 males and 26 females. The immunoglobulin subtype was IgG (n=29), IgA (n=15), light chain (n=10), other (n=2). The Salmon and Durie stage was III in 89% of cases (n=47), and the ISS score was I (n=18; 35%), II (n=19; 37%), III (n=14; 27%). Patients had high risk cytogenetics features (t(4;14) and/or del17p) in 9 cases (16%). 10% of patients had a serum creatinine level >176 micromol/L. None of the patients underwent hemodialysis. The Sorror comorbidity score was 0 (34), 1 (6), 2 (2), 3 (6), 6 (1), unknown (7). The median age at time of ASCT was 68 years, and the median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 5 months. In an intention to treat analysis, out of 56 patients, 6 patients could not proceed to ASCT because of an early infectious death (n=1), serious comorbidity (n=2), disease refractoriness to induction (n=1), and failure to collect an adequate PBSC graft (n=2). A median of 5.31x106/Kg CD34+ cells could be collected. Disease status at time of ASCT was: CR (n=12; 24%), VGPR (n=19; 38%), PR (n=17; 34%), and SD/non-responding (n=2; 4%). The conditioning regimen consisted of 140mg/m² melphalan in 18 cases (36%) and 200mg/m2 in 32 patients (64%). Moreover, 4 patients (8%) received a tandem ASCT. The median time for neutrophils and platelets engraftment was 12 days. The day-100 post ASCT non-relapse mortality was 0% and the 2-year NRM was 4.2% (95% CI:[0.3-18.3]). The overall response rate at day 100 was 96% (CR: 34%, VGPR: 47%, PR: 15%, SD/non-responsive: 4%). At 3 months post ASCT, 82% patients were able to receive the planned post ASCT consolidation treatment. After a median follow-up of 12 months, the estimated progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 2 years were 76% (95%CI: [61.6-94.1]) and 88% (95%CI: [76.7-100]), respectively. The incidences of infectious complications post ASCT, and response rates were comparable between the two melphalan dose levels (p=0.28). However, in the univariate analysis, the 200 mg/m2 melphalan conditioning group showed a better OS rate compared to the 140 mg/m2 group (1-year OS: 100% vs. 67%; p=0.012). Conclusion: These prospective multicenter results indicate that ASCT is a safe and effective treatment modality for elderly, but fit MM patients at the era of novel induction agents. Of note, patients above age 70 did not experience a worse prognosis. Thus, age per se should not be used as an exclusion criterion for ASCT. Longer follow-up data will be presented, but these results already set the frame for a randomized comparison to the non-transplant approaches in this patients' subgroup. Disclosures Garderet: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Touzeau:AbbVie: Research Funding. Stoppa:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Karlin:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Novartis, Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Extending Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation As First Line Treatment in Multiple Myeloma Patients with Severe Renal Impairment: A Retrospective Study of the Francophone Society of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4637.4637 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4637-4637 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Karine Augeul-Meunier ◽

Denis Caillot ◽

Anne-Marie Stoppa ◽

Lionel Karlin ◽

Lofti Benboubker ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Renal Impairment ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Introduction Renal impairment occurs in 20-30% of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, requiring dialysis for up to 10% of patients.Recent results ofan IFM (Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome) study confirm the effectiveness of high dose melphalan followed by Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) as first line therapy in multiple myeloma patients. Most centers exclude renal failure patients due to concerns of toxity, because data are limited for safety and toxicity to consider. This current retrospective study observes toxicity and outcome in 55 multiple myeloma patients with severe renal impairment, undergoing high dose melphalan and ASCT, in the age of bortezomib. Methods Using the PROMISE database, 55 multiple myeloma patients French SFGM-TC centers were included from January 2002 to November 2012. Characteristics of the patients presenting with creatinine clearance less than 30ml/min at time of ASCT were included. Results Median age was 61 (40-75) years old. Thirty-nine (71%) presented free light chain myeloma. Twenty-three (42%) patients were on dialysis at the time of ASCT and during hospitalization. Thirty-one (56%) patients received bortezomib as induction therapy. Melphalan dose ranged from 75mg/m² to 200mg/m². Thirty (55%) patients were treated with a dose of 140mg/m². Median delay between diagnosis and ASCT was 5.3 months. Among 50 patients evaluated for toxicity, respectively febrile neutropenia and mucositis occurred in 92% and 90% of patients. Half of the mucositiscases were grade 3-4. The median number of days before neutrophil and platelet recovery was respectively 12 days (10 - 34) and 16 days (7 - 331). Two patients experienced cardiac toxicity (grade 1-2), and 4 patients neurologic toxicity (grade 3 for one patient). Among 51 patients evaluated for response, 12 patients (24%) were at least in Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) before ASCT, including 5 in Complete Response (CR). All of them were treated with bortezomib as induction therapy. After ASCT, 30 patients (58.8%) reached at least VGPR (22 CR and 8 VGPR). Among 30 patients in VGPR or more post ASCT, 22 (73%) were treated with bortezomib before ASCT. Table 1 shows the responses. Fourteen (26%) received two ASCT. One patient died from toxicity (cerebral bleeding during second ASCT). There is no argument for dramatic response improvement with this procedure in comparison to single ASCT. After a median follow-up of 55 months, median progression free survival (PFS) was 55 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 95 months. In multivariate analysis, dose of melphalan at 140mg/m² was significantly correlated with a better PFS (p=0.006), compared to 100mg/m² (or less) and to 200mg/m². During follow-up 29 patients (54%) relapsed and 25 died. The main causes of death were relapse and disease progression (72%). There were only 3 cases of treatment related mortality (TRM). At day 100, the cumulative incidence of TRM was 6%. Among 23 dialysis patients, 6 patients (26%) became dialysis independent, but not during ASCT. Thirteen (56%) were still alive at last follow-up, and 8 (34%) experienced relapse. Median PFS for this subgroup of patients was 73 months. Conclusion With an acceptable TRM, without major toxicities, high dose melphalan (140mg/m²) following by ASCT appears to be a real benefit for multiple myeloma patients with severe renal failure. This includes patients on dialysis. Response is dramatically improved by this procedure, with median PFS similar to that of patients with normal renal function. Finally, adjunction of bortezomib as induction therapy also improves the efficacy of ASCT. Disclosures Augeul-Meunier: gilead: Consultancy; janssen: Consultancy. Karlin:amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; janssen-cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol: Consultancy; takeda: Consultancy. Benboubker:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Avet-Loiseau:sanofi: Consultancy; amgen: Consultancy; janssen: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Incidence and Clinical Features of Extramedullary Multiple Myeloma in Patients Who Underwent Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.5746.5746 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 5746-5746

Author(s):

Matthew Weinstock ◽

Yosra Aljawai ◽

Irene M. Ghobrial ◽

Elizabeth A. Morgan ◽

Jacob P. Laubach ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Medical Center ◽

Academic Medical Center ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Treatment Regimens

Abstract Background: Extramedullary disease (EMD), strictly defined as an infiltrate of clonal plasma cells at an anatomic site distant from the bone marrow or adjacent soft tissue in a patient with underlying multiple myeloma, is an uncommon manifestation of multiple myeloma. Comparatively little is known about this disease entity, with no large case series published in the last decade. Patients and Methods: 663 consecutive patients with multiple myeloma who underwent autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation at a single, large, academic medical center in the United States from January 2005 to December 2011 were assessed for the presence or absence of EMD, as well as baseline demographic and biochemical characteristics, treatment regimens, and response to therapy. Results: A cohort of 55 patients with biopsy-proven EMD was identified, comprising 8.3% of the total study population. Among the patients with EMD, 13 (23.6%) were found to have EMD at the time of initial presentation, while the remainder developed EMD during the course of their illness. Patients with EMD received a median of 5 different treatment regimens during the course of their illness, most commonly with combinations of dexamethasone, thalidomide, lenalidomide, and bortezomib, as well as autologous hemotopoietic stem cell transplantation. Patients had received a median of 3 lines of therapy prior to experiencing an extramedullary relapse. Patients with EMD had markedly elevated maximum serum LDH levels (median 613.5 units/L) and low minimum hemoglobin levels (median 7.8 g/dL). Common cytogenetic abnormalities included deletion 13q, deletion 11q, t(11;14), and deletion 17p. Available immunohistochemical data suggest that EMD specimens had frequent expression of CXCR4, CD44, and CD56. The median overall survival data of these patients was 3.2 years (range, 0.9-9.5) and the median time from diagnosis of EMD to death was 0.5 years (range, 0.002-3.2). Conclusions: This report describes a large series of multiple myeloma patients with EMD who were treated in the era of stem cell transplant at a single academic medical center. Further studies to examine the molecular characteristics of extramedullary multiple myeloma are necessary to better define this entity and characterize therapeutic options that can prolong survival in this otherwise very vulnerable population. Disclosures Ghobrial: Millennium/Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Laubach:Novartis: Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Schlossman:Millennium: Consultancy. Mitsiades:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; DFCI: patent submission on stromal co-culture technologies Patents & Royalties.

Download Full-text

Reduced Intensity Stem Cell Transplantation for Accelerated-Phase Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-152712 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 314-314

Author(s):

Nico Gagelmann ◽

Anita Badbaran ◽

Markus Ditschkowski ◽

Victoria Panagiota ◽

Bruno Cassinat ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Continuous Variable ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Reduced Intensity

Abstract Background Circulating peripheral blasts ≥1% have long been considered an unfavorable feature for patients with primary myelofibrosis. Recent findings (Masarova et al. Cancer 2020) suggested more differentiated impact of blasts on outcome. However, accelerated-phase (AP) myelofibrosis, which is currently defined by circulating blasts 10-19%, usually confers worse outcome. The outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation for AP myelofibrosis has not been evaluated yet. Patients and Methods Thirty-five out of 349 patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis undergoing reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation were reported as AP (10-19% blasts) at time of transplantation. Outcome of these patients was compared to patients with circulating blasts: 0% (n=135), 1-4% (n=146), and 5-9% (n=33). Conditioning consisted of busulfan/fludarabine, fludarabine/melphalan, or fludarabine/TBI2Gy. Results Characteristics. The median blast percentage in the AP group was 14% (10-19%). More patients in the AP group appeared to have secondary myelofibrosis (40%) compared with patients with the 0% blasts (21%), the 1-4% blasts (31%), and 5-9% blasts group (30%, P=0.08). The median hemoglobin levels decreased with blast group: 9.7g/dl (0%), 9.5g/dl (1-4%), 9.4g/dl (5-9%), and 9.0g/dl (AP). In contrast, median leukocyte counts appeared to be increased: 7.2, 9.5, 16.9, and 13.6 x 10 9/l, respectively. More patients in the AP group presented with constitutional symptoms (71%). There was no difference in frequency of driver mutations (P=0.57) and presence of high-risk mutation profile (defined as ASXL1, SRSF2, IDH1/2, EZH2; P=0.93). Most patients in each group received matched unrelated donor transplants (P=0.61). Survival. The median follow-up of all patients was 6 years. Follow-up was similar across the 4 groups (P=0.30). 5-year overall survival (95% confidence interval) according to blast group was 66% (58-73%) for the 0%, 62% (53-71%) for the 1-4%, 66% (50-81%) for the 5-9%, and 68% (53-83%) for the AP group (P=0.92). Median overall survival was not reached for all groups, except for 1-4% blasts group (17.1 years). 10-year long-term follow-up showed survival rates of 64% for the 0%, 58% for the 1-4%, 66% for the 5-9%, and 68% for the AP group. In terms of relapse-free survival, 5-year outcome was comparable (P=0.95) showing 57% (48-66%) for the 0%, 52% (43-60%) for the 1-4%, 55% (37-73%) for the 5-9%, and 52% (34-69%) for the AP group. Median relapse-free survival was 7.9 years, 5.7 years, 6.5 years, and 9.2 years, respectively. Taking blasts as continuous variable in spline function analyses on survival, no significant effect was identified overall, while after 15% blasts, risk for death appeared to increase consistently. Non-relapse mortality and relapse. In terms of non-relapse mortality, no difference was found between the groups (P=0.33). 5-year outcome was 25% (19-31%) for the 0%, 33% (25-40%) for the 1-4%, 31% (15-47%) for the 5-9%, and 17% (5-30%) for the AP group. In terms of cumulative incidence of relapse, the AP group showed 5-year outcome of 31% (15-47%) compared to 18% (12-24%) for the 0%, 16% (10-22%) for the 1-4%, and 14% (1-28%) for the 5-9% group (P=0.17). Pairwise comparison showed significant difference between AP and the other groups (P=0.03). Spline function analyses using blasts as continuous variable and 3 knots showed no significant effect on non-relapse mortality but suggested increased risk of relapse for AP myelofibrosis (P=0.04). Multivariable analysis. Adjusting for clinical (diagnosis, leukocyte and platelet counts, age, constitutional symptoms) and molecular-genetic (driver mutation genotype, high-risk mutations), Cox model on survival (with the 0% group as reference) showed comparable risk of death across blast groups with hazard ratios of 1.06 (0.70-1.62) for the 1-4%, 1.11 (0.56-2.32) for the 5-9%, and 0.95 (0.49-1.86) for the AP group. Independent factors for worse outcome were age, platelet and leukocyte counts, and CALR/MPL-unmutated genotype. Conclusion Reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation for AP myelofibrosis was associated with excellent and similar survival and non-relapse mortality in comparison with other blast groups and after adjustment for other risk factors, offering long-term survival (>10 years) for more than half of patients at AP. Relapse incidence appeared to be increased for AP myelofibrosis. Disclosures Heuser: Karyopharm: Research Funding; Tolremo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BergenBio: Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer Pharma AG: Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Thol: Pfizer: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Scott: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kroeger: Neovii: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Riemser: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Honoraria; AOP Pharma: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Characteristics of DNMT3A-R882 Mutation in AML

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-116652 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5263-5263

Author(s):

Olga Blau ◽

Franziska Behrenbeck ◽

Mirgul Bayanova ◽

Igor-Wolfgang Blau ◽

Lars Bullinger

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Standard Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Mutation Burden

Abstract Introduction Genetic mutations play an important role in the development and progression of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). One of the common aberration in AML is mutation in the epigenetic modifying gene, DNA methyltransferase 3α (DNMT3A). Despite the active investigations, the exact impact of mutation on the development of AML is not completely known. The occurrence of mutation in pre-leukemic cells explains a particular attention to DNMT3A. The most common mutation is located in codon R882 (DNMT3AR882mut). The objective of this study is to compare clinical and prognostic characteristics of AML patients in relation to presence of DNMT3AR882mut. The quantification of the mutation burden in follow up samples was performed both after standard therapy and after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). In addition, it was investigated whether the quantification of the mutational burden of DNMT3AR882mut is significant to the progression of disease. Methods Samples of 580 AML were retrospective analyzed using HRM-PCR, capillare electrophorese, and Sanger Sequencing. The median observation period was 495 days. Of 580, 69 have DNMT3AR882mut. Mutation burden was evaluated in follow-up samples by quantitative PCR. The statistical methods were selected according to sample distribution and evaluated with SPSS (significance level p <0.05). Results DNMT3A R882mut were associated with a higher level of leukocytes and blasts at diagnosis, with M4-M5 variant of AML, and with normal karyotype. It was found that NPM1 and FLT3-ITD are more frequent co-mutations that have a significant effect on the prognosis of disease. Analysis of mutation burden of DNMT3AR882mut at diagnosis showed a large spread (0.02 - 66.9 %). At the time of diagnosis, DNMT3AR882mut transcript levels did not correlate with clinical and prognostic characteristics. The mutation burden decreased after therapy, but was always visible in CR after standard therapy. In CR after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) with complete donor chimerism mutation was not detected. In relapse of AML, an increasing of the mutation burden were found in all patients, both after therapy, and after alloSCT. In relapse samples, the same mutant clone was found. Conclusion The DNMT3A mutation is a common genetic aberration in AML patients, which is associated with specific clinical and prognostic data. The presence of co-mutations, especially NPM1 and FLT3-ITD, has a significant effect on the prognosis of patients. Quantitative detection of DNMT3AR882mut at different time points of disease revealed the persistence of mutated clone after standard therapy and disappearance of DNMT3AR882mut after alloSCT. It is suggest that alloSCT is the optimal treatment option for the eradication of DNMT3AR882mut in AML patients. Disclosures Bullinger: Sanofi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Bayer Oncology: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Prospective Analysis of Bortezomib, Fludarabine and Melphalan As Conditioning Regimen Prior to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117313 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1020-1020

Author(s):

Phyllis McKiernan ◽

David S Siegel ◽

David H. Vesole ◽

Tracy Andrews ◽

Noa Biran ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Despite advances in novel myeloma treatments and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), allogeneic HSCT (alloSCT) remains the only curative option for patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). Questions remain as to the timing of alloSCT, toxicity risks and optimal conditioning regimen. The addition of bortezomib (Vel) to fludarabine (Flu) and melphalan (Mel) for conditioning prior to alloSCT is based on the demonstrated safety of Vel in combination with melphalan prior to ASCT, the synergistic effect of Vel with Mel, and the ability of Vel to selectively eliminate allo-reactive T-cells. Methods: We present a prospective Phase II study using Flu/Mel/Vel (FMV) as a conditioning regimen for alloSCT. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints include progression free survival (PFS), incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and transplant related mortality (TRM). For related donors, the conditioning regimen was Flu 30 mg/m2 days -5, -4, -3, -2, Vel 1.6 mg/m2 days -4, -1, Mel 140 mg/m2 day -2. For unrelated donors, rabbit ATG 4 mg/kg was given in divided doses days -3, -2, -1. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of methotrexate and tacrolimus. We compared pts receiving FMV to historical controls of pts receiving FM at the same dose and schedule without Vel. We also compared pts receiving FMV to all pts with MM treated with alloSCT including all regimens and donor types. The response criteria from the IMWG and M-Smart criteria were used to determine response and risk, respectively. Chi-square tests of association and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed to test for differences across groups. OS/PFS probabilities were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator with log rank-tests. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models examined factors associated with OS/PFS. Results: Of the 54 pts who received FMV, 35 (65%) were male and the median age was 56 years. Twenty-seven pts had an HLA matched sibling donor and 27 had an unrelated donor. At the time of alloSCT, 5 pts were in a CR, 27 in a VGPR, 13 in a PR, 9 had < PR. Twenty eight pts (52%) had high risk disease. Twenty-nine pts (53%) received alloSCT as salvage, defined as relapsed or refractory to ASCT, and 25 pts (46%) as consolidation after ASCT. OS was 42% at 10 years. While 32 pts developed aGVHD, only 2 had ≥ Grade 3. Of the 31 pts who developed cGVHD, 23 were graded as extensive. TRM was 5% at day 100, and 15% over 10 years. Pts in the control groups had similar baseline characteristics to the FMV group. The only significant difference was 47 pts (72%) who received FM were transplanted as salvage, and 18 (28%) as consolidation after ASCT (p=0.035). The total number of pts who did not receive FMV (non FMV) was 121, with 66 pts receiving FM. Compared to pts who received FMV, there was no difference in OS for pts who received FM or the non FMV group, 35% (p=0.55) and 48% (p=0.855) respectively. There was no difference in pts who developed aGVHD, however 9 pts (13%) had ≥ grade 3 aGVHD in the FM group (p=0.004) and 15 (12%) in the non FMV group (p=0.006). The cumulative incidence of cGVHD was similar with 51% for pts receiving FM and 60% for FMV pts (p=0.32). TRM was similar to pts who had received FMV; 18% for FM and 17% for non FMV. There were no differences between the 3 groups across disease risk, donor type, or disease status at the time of alloSCT. Multivariate analysis of the 3 groups, shows achieving a CR after alloSCT (p=0.0006) or having cGVHD (p=0.0004) predicts for improved OS, while severe aGVHD (p=0.0002) predicts for decreased OS. Discussion: While FMV was associated with a lower incidence of severe aGVHD, the addition of bortezomib to the FM backbone did not improve PFS or OS. Day 100 TRM was low for all regimens, and the addition of Vel did not impact overall TRM. For all 175 pts, those who achieve a CR after alloSCT had a significantly improved OS. This prompts the question of whether strategies should be employed post alloSCT to maximize response to a CR, and the role of achieving MRD negativity after alloSCT also needs to be elucidated. Figure Figure. Disclosures Siegel: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Biran:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Skarbnik:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text