Segmental neurofibromatosis with compression of the spinal cord at the cervical level. Literature review and case report

Background. Neurofibromatosis is a fairly rare disease (1/3000). In 1992, V. Riccardi described seven types of neurofibromatosis. Segmental neurofibromatosis (sh), also known as type V neurofibromatosis, is an extremely rare variant characterized by the development of typical cutaneous manifestations or one body segment neurofibromas. Clinical case. Currently, the literature describes about 100 cases of sh and only one of them with compression of the spinal cord. We present our first case of this nosological form with spinal cord compression in a Russian patient. A 70-year-old patient, due to an increasing paresis in the left extremities, underwent mri of the cervical spine, which revealed solid tumors located extramedullary intra-extradurally at the level of c2-c3 vertebrae with pronounced compression of the spinal cord. At the time of hospitalization, clinical presentation was characterized by deep spastic tetraparesis (1–2 points), impairment of all types of sensitivity from the c4 level by the conductive type, and dysfunction of the pelvic organs by the type of delay. Karnofsky index was 50 %, 2 points on the Fim scale. Standard c2-c3 vertebrae laminectomy was performed. Spinal cord compression was eliminated due to the removal of intradural tumors. Subsequently, extradural tumors were removed step by step. On histological examination, tumors were represented by intertwining bundles of elongated schwann cells with wavy nuclei with pointed ends and ileogenic fibers. Mucin present in the stroma separated cells and fibers. Conclusion. Sn is a rare type of neurofibromatosis. However, from the point of view of genetics, it is most likely incorrect to attribute it to a separate type of neurofibromatosis, since the cause of its development is mosaicism of somatic cells due to mutation of the NF 1 gene. Sn is rarely manifested by the development of spinal nerves multiple neurofibromas, however, it can be accompanied by a gross neurological deficit caused by compression of the spinal cord such neurofibromas. Surgical treatment is based on basic and special surgical principles that determine the anatomical and morphological characteristics of the area of intervention, the compliance of which allows for good treatment results.

Schädelbasismetastasen mit Hirnnervenaffektionen

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund und Ziele Schädelbasismetastasen sind eine seltene Manifestation onkologischer Erkrankungen. Wenn Hirnnerven beteiligt sind, können schon kleine Läsionen erhebliche funktionelle Beeinträchtigungen hervorrufen. Spezifische klinische Charakteristika wie neurologische Symptome, assoziierte Primärtumoren, Prognose und optimale Therapie der Erkrankung sind schlecht definiert und sollen in dieser Arbeit systematisch dargestellt werden. Methoden Mit einem monozentrischen retrospektiven Ansatz wurden Schädelbasismetastasen bei Patienten, die im Zeitraum von 2006 bis 2018 behandelt wurden, detailliert hinsichtlich klinischer Charakteristika, der durchgeführten Therapie und des weiteren Erkrankungsverlaufs analysiert. Ergebnisse Insgesamt 45 Patienten mit Schädelbasismetastasen und Hirnnervenausfällen wurden erfasst. Die häufigsten Primärtumoren waren Prostatakarzinom (27 %), Mammakarzinom (22 %) und multiples Myelom (16 %). Die am häufigsten betroffenen Hirnnerven waren Nervus trigeminus (42 %), Nervus oculomotorius (33 %) und Nervus facialis (27 %). 84 % aller Patienten wiesen außerhalb der Schädelbasis liegende weitere Knochenmetastasen auf. Eine durale Infiltration oder eine Meningeosis neoplastica lagen bei je 13 % der Patienten vor. Nach Bestrahlung waren 61 % der Patienten hinsichtlich der auf die Schädelbasismetastase zurückzuführenden Symptome klinisch stabil, bei 22 % hatten sich die Symptome gebessert. Das mediane Gesamtüberleben betrug 8 Monate (Spanne: 0,4–51 Monate). Bei Patienten, die mit einer dosiseskalierten Bestrahlung behandelt wurden, bestand eine längere Überlebenszeit (16,4 Monate vs. 4,7 Monate). Dieser Effekt persistierte auch in der multivariaten Analyse unter Berücksichtigung der Faktoren Karnofsky-Index, Metastasenanzahl, Primärtumor und Bestrahlungsdosis (HR 0,37, p = 0,02). Diskussion Schädelbasismetastasen mit Hirnnervenausfällen haben ein vielgestaltiges Bild und oft eine schlechte Prognose. Um potenziell eine Überlebenszeitverbesserung zu erreichen, sind präzise Diagnostik und Therapie Voraussetzung. Prospektive kontrollierte Untersuchungen sind notwendig.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients Aged ≥70 Years: Epidemiology, Outcomes, and Risk Factors Based on the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation (DRST)

Introduction. Malignant diseases treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) predominantly occur beyond the 7 th decade of life. Numerical age per se is not regarded an adverse risk factor in alloHSCT. In an aging society, interventions historically deemed high risk are increasingly used in elder patients. Methods. Epidemiology, outcomes and risk factors of patients aged ≥70 years undergoing alloHSCT in Germany 1999-2019 and registered with the DRST/EBMT database were analyzed retrospectively. Baseline patient, disease, and transplant data were collected from MED-A forms. Centers were contacted to provide additional treatment and follow-up information. Results. Between 1999 and 2019, 1648 patients aged ≥70 years (median 72, range 70-79.7; 585 female) were transplanted in 50 German centers. More than 90% of all patients were transplanted 2010-2019. Centers transplanted between 2 and 192 patients, with 14 centers contributing <10 and 4 centers contributing >100 patients each. Most patients suffered acute leukemia (1084, 65.8%) or MDS/MPN (410, 24.9%). Karnofsky index before start of conditioning was 100% (n=230, 14%), 90% (n=651, 39.5%), 80% (n=480, 29.1%), 70% (n=94, 5.7%), <70% (n=55, 3.3%). Myeloablative conditioning was chosen in 25.6%. Total body irradiation was used for 305 patients (18.6%). Conditioning contained antithymocyteglobulin in 49.6%. Donors were unrelated for 85.5%. Median donor age was 37 (18-79) years. Patient CMV IgG was positive in 63.1% and the constellation 'negative donor, positive patient' was present in 19.9%. Median overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) was 408/ 344 days. With a median follow up of 536 days for surviving patients, Kaplan Meier estimates of OS/ DFS were 52.6%/ 48.5% and 40.9%/ 38.6% at 1 and 2 years. In a competing risk analysis, cumulative incidence of non-relapse-mortality (NRM)/ relapse (RI) was 22.2%/ 29.3% at 365 days. Frequency of acute graft versus host disease (GvHD) II-IV was 25.1% and chronic limited/ extended GvHD 11.7%/ 14.8%. Karnofsky performance score, CMV IgG matching, acute and chronic GvHD and stem cell source showed a prognostic impact on OS, DFS, RI and/ or NRM (Table 1). Underlying disease did not impact outcome, neither did age amongst patients at an age of 70-80 years. To compare with outcome in the decade below (60-69 years), an analysis after matching for underlying disease, CMV relation, and Karnofsky index included 2728 patients (each 1364 patients 60-69 and ≥70 years of age). For each year of life, univariate HR for OS and DFS were 1.01 [95%CI 1.001-1.023, p=0.035] and 1.01 [95%CI 0.99-1.02, p=n.s.], respectively, in this matched-pair analysis. The cumulative HR (OS, DFS) for both age groups was 1.16 [95%CI 1.05-1.28, p<0.01] and 1.13 [95%CI 1.02-1.24, p=0.016] for patients ≥70 years. Conclusion. AlloHSCT is increasingly used to treat elder patients in Germany with a sharp increase during the last decade. Age per se is a modest adverse risk factor for adult patients after alloHSCT with slightly increased mortality in patients 70-80 versus those at 60-69. Further research might concentrate on patient selection and further reduction of procedural toxicity. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Schetelig: Roche: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; BMS: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees . Einsele: Janssen, Celgene/BMS, Amgen, GSK, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Stelljes: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Dreger: AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; Riemser: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Wulf: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Clinigen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Scheid: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bethge: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi Biotec: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

O10 REINFORCED TENSION LINE SUTURE RESULTS IN LOW INCISIONAL HERNIA RATE AFTER CRS/HIPEC OPERATIONS

Aim Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis entails several risk factors for incisional hernia (IH). At our institution fascia closure has been performed in a 4:1 manner with a 2-0 polydiaxanone suture (the PDS-group) or a 2-0 polypropylene preceded by a reinforced tension line (RTL) suture (the RTL-group). Our hypothesis was that reinforcing the suture line results in fewer IH at one year. Material and Methods Single-center retrospective study on primary CRS/HIPEC 2004-2019. CT-diagnosed IH one year ±3 months postoperative. Additional data retrieved from clinical records and a prospective CRS/HIPEC database. Results Of 193 patients, 63 were not evaluable for IH of which two, both in the PDS-group, were reoperated for fascial dehiscence (FD). 130 patients; 83 (45 women) in the PDS- and 47 (23 women) in the RTL-group, mean age 57 years (19-77) remained. RTL-patients were five years younger (54 vs 59), had a higher Karnofsky index and less bleeding (807 vs 1409 mL). No differences regarding sex, BMI, recent midline incisions, excision of midline scars, peritoneal cancer index score, complications (Clavien-Dindo 3b or higher), neo-adjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy were found. Twelve IH (9%) were found, 11 (13%) in the PDS- and 1 (2%) in the RTL-group (p = 0.055). Conclusions Despite many potential IH risk factors, the overall IH-incidences do not seem higher than after laparotomies in general. The RTL-group showed 2% IH compared to 13% in the PDS-group. The PDS-group were further burdened by two FD. The results are clinically relevant, suggesting an advantage with RTL-closure for these patients.

The AML EBMT Cytogenetic Risk Score for Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) Is Prognostic for Outcomes of Allogeneic Stem Cell (HSCT)

Background: The AML EBMT Cytogenetic Risk score is a new prognostic model recently published (Canaani et al. Leukemia. 2019 Aug;33(8):1944-1952; Nagler el al. Am J Hematol. 2020 Jun 12) combining cytogenetics and FLT3ITD status for AML patients in complete remission (CR) at transplant time. The AML EBMT Cytogenetic Risk score is prognostic for leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). In our centre, we frequently offer in-vitro partial T-cell depleted graft (pTDEP) for patient in CR to decrease morbidity and mortality associated with graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Currently, The AML EBMT Cytogenetic Risk score has not been evaluated in this population. Aims: We investigate the impact of the AML EBMT Cytogenetic Risk score for 3 years OS, LFS, GRFS, CIR and NRM in a cohort with patients allografted with pTDEP graft. Methods: All consecutive ≥18 years patients who received a first allograft for AML between 2008 and 2018 with data available to determine The AML EBMT Cytogenetic Risk score in CR at transplant time were included. OS and LFS were investigated with the Kaplan-Meier method and we used the cumulative incidence estimator as defined by Fine and Gray to calculate CIR (with NRM as competing event), NRM (with relapse as competing event) and GvHD (with relapse as competing event). Results: 135 patients were included, median age at transplant time was 56 years (range: 19-74), 44% were female, median Karnofsky index was 90 (80-100). 21% of graft were from HLA identical, 57% from matched unrelated donor, 10% from mismatched unrelated donor and 12% from haploidentical donor. Stem cell source was peripheral blood in 89% and bone marrow in 11%. Partial in-vitro T-cell depletion (pTDEP) was performed in 40% of HSCT. Reduced-intensity (RIC) was performed in 62%. Median follow-up was 3.1 year (range 1.3-10 years) for living patients. Among the 135 patients, 4 (3%) were assigned in the favourable (Fav), 58 (43%) in the intermediate/FLT3wt (Int/FLT3wt), 36 (27%) in the intermediate/FLT3ITD (Int/FLT3ITD), and 37 (27%) in the adverse (adv) risk group. 3-years OS for Fav, Int/FLT3wt, Int/FLT3ITD and Adv was 75% (32-100%), 65% (52-77%), 60% (43-77%) and 28% (10-45%), respectively (p=0.033) (Fig 1A). 3-years LFS for Fav, Int/FLT3wt, Int/FLT3ITD and Adv was 75% (95%CI: 32-100%), 60% (47-73%), 49% (32-66%) and 25% (8-42%), respectively (p=0.028) (Fig 1B). 3-years GRFS for Fav, Int/FLT3wt, Int/FLT3ITD and Adv was 75% (32-100%), 45% (31-58%), 39% (22-55%) and 14% (0-27%), respectively (p=0.008) (Fig 1C). 3-years CIR for Fav, Int/FLT3wt, Int/FLT3ITD and Adv was 0%, 22% (11-33%), 31% (15-47%) and 56% (37-75%), respectively (p=0.02). 3-years NRM for Fav, Int/FLT3wt, Int/FLT3ITD and Adv was 25% (95%CI: 0-75%), 17% (7-28%), 21% (6-35%) and 17% (2-32%), respectively (p=0.92). 3-years grade 2-4 aGVHD for Fav, Int/FLT3wt, Int/FLT3ITD and Adv was 0%, 35% (22-47%), 19% (2-36%) and 42% (25-58%), respectively (p=0.46). 3-years cGVHD for Fav, Int/FLT3wt, Int/FLT3ITD and Adv was 25% (95%CI: 0-75%), 17% (6-27%), 22% (7-38%) and 21% (6-35%), respectively (p=0.9). In addition to The AML EBMT Cytogenetic Risk score, variables with a significance in univariate for OS with a p-value ≤0.1 (Karnofsky index [<90 vs. ≥90]; stem cell source [PBSC vs. BM] and donor type [matched vs mismatched donor]) and pTDEP were included in the multivariable model. In multivariable analysis, only the Cytogenetic Risk Score (Fav + Int/FLT3wt: ref; Int/FLT3ITD + Adv: HR: 1.8 [95%CI: 1.1-3.1], p-value 0.03) and Karnofsky index (<90: ref; ≥90: HR 1.8 [95%CI: 1.0-3.2], p-value 0.049] remain significant. Because of the low number of patients in pTDEP (53) and non-pTDEP (82), statistical analysis couldn't be performed specifically in these subgroups but pTDEP had no impact in multivariable analysis for OS. Conclusion: In the analysis of our retrospective cohort including 40% of pTDEP patients, we confirm that the AML EBMT cytogenetic risk is prognostic for relevant outcomes (OS, LFS, GRFS, CIR) of HSCT. Similarly with recently published data, we confirm this prognostic model can help physicians and patients in transplant choice and remains valid for patients undergoing HSCT with in-vitro graft manipulation. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Characteristics and Clinical Outcome of Breast Cancer Patients with Asymptomatic Brain Metastases

Background: Brain metastases (BM) have become a major challenge in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Methods: The aim of this analysis was to characterize patients with asymptomatic BM (n = 580) in the overall cohort of 2589 patients with BM from our Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Network Germany (BMBC) registry. Results: Compared to symptomatic patients, asymptomatic patients were slightly younger at diagnosis (median age: 55.5 vs. 57.0 years, p = 0.01), had a better performance status at diagnosis (Karnofsky index 80–100%: 68.4% vs. 57%, p < 0.001), a lower number of BM (>1 BM: 56% vs. 70%, p = 0.027), and a slightly smaller diameter of BM (median: 1.5 vs. 2.2 cm, p < 0.001). Asymptomatic patients were more likely to have extracranial metastases (86.7% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.003) but were less likely to have leptomeningeal metastasis (6.3% vs. 10.9%, p < 0.001). Asymptomatic patients underwent less intensive BM therapy but had a longer median overall survival (statistically significant for a cohort of HER2-positive patients) compared to symptomatic patients (10.4 vs. 6.9 months, p < 0.001). Conclusions: These analyses show a trend that asymptomatic patients have less severe metastatic brain disease and despite less intensive local BM therapy still have a better outcome (statistically significant for a cohort of HER2-positive patients) than patients who present with symptomatic BM, although a lead time bias of the earlier diagnosis cannot be ruled out. Our analysis is of clinical relevance in the context of potential trials examining the benefit of early detection and treatment of BM.

Management von Patienten mit Vestibularisschwannomen Typ IV

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Vestibularisschwannome (VS) sind benigne Tumoren, die anhand der Hannover-Klassifikation bzw. der Koos-Klassifizierung eingeteilt werden. Trotz der umfangreichen Literatur sind die Klinik und die Behandlungskonzepte speziell bei großen VS selten beschrieben. Material und Methoden Zwischen 2003 und 2018 wurden 61 Patienten mit VS Typ IV durch die Arbeitsgruppe Schädelbasischirurgie am Klinikum Dortmund behandelt. Die radiologischen und klinischen Daten wurden retrospektiv ausgewertet. Zudem erfolgte eine Subgruppenanalyse zwischen Patienten mit und ohne Kompression des IV. Ventrikels. Ergebnisse Neben einer Hörminderung bei 55 Patienten (90 %) hatten die meisten Patienten multiple Symptome wie eine Trigeminusaffektion bei 16 (26 %), eine Fazialisparese bei 7 (12 %), eine Ataxie bei 27 (45 %) und Symptome eines Hirndruckanstiegs durch einen Hydrozephalus bei 4 Patienten (7 %). Bei Patienten mit einem VS Typ IVb wurde signifikant häufiger eine Ataxie, eine tonsilläre Herniation bzw. ein Hydrozephalus festgestellt. Eine komplette Resektion wurde in 48 Patienten (78 %) erreicht und eine weitestgehende Tumorentfernung in 12 Patienten (20 %). In der Langzeituntersuchung zeigten 90 % einen günstigen Outcome bezüglich des Nervus facialis (House-und-Brackman-Grad I–III). 6 Patienten (10 %) benötigten einen dauerhaften ventrikulo-peritonealen Shunt. Mehr als 90 % der Patienten erzielten einen Karnofsky-Index > 70 %. Diskussion VS Typ IV sind häufig assoziiert mit Hydrozephalus, Ataxie, multiplen Hirnnervenausfällen und gelegentlich Zeichen eines intrakraniellen Druckanstiegs. Die primäre mikrochirurgische Resektion ist weiterhin eine entscheidende Therapieoption.

P1125IS THE SURPRISE QUESTION USEFUL AS A PREDICTOR OF MORTALITY IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS?

Background and Aims among the predictors of hemodialysis mortality, the “surprise” question (SQ) (Would you be surprised if this patient died within the next 6 or 12 months?) is a subjective variable, based on the patient's medical history, experience and knowledge. Recognized as a useful tool to identify a patient with a high risk of early mortality in Hemodialysis. Objective to assess a prognostic model of early mortality, based on clinical - biochemical parameters and the prediction of the clinician attending the patient. Method SQ is performed on 4 nurses and 4 nephrologists of the hospital hemodialysis unit, the Karnofsky Performance Scale Index of the patients is collected (KPSI 0: normal activity, KPSI 1: Unable to work, frequent medical attention, KPSI 2 : Unable to self-care, requires special care), and prospectively analyzed mortality at 6 and 12 months. Results The prevalent population studied in Hemodialysis is 180 patients, average age 69 years ± 14.1 (R 27-94), According to sex (Male 69%-Female 31%), the follow-up of the study was 1 year, we had 11 deaths 6 months and 17 deaths at 12 months, total 28 patients (15.7%). The distribution of patients according to nurses and nephrologists staff (table 1) and patients characteristics (Table 2) Conclusion: T he surprise question is a specific and sensitive instrument to predict sort-term survival in dialysis population especially in those with older age, more comorbid illnesses, lower functional status and hypoalbuminemia. of the analyzed factors; Karnofsky Index, age, surprise question and albumin have significant predictive value for mortality at 6 and 12 months. We observed that the surprise question for nephrologists Staff is closer to prediction than nursing, and with a high negative predictive value for the “group of NO surprise”

Autologous and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Patients with Richter's Syndrome: A Large Series from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Introduction. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has typically an indolent course but can undergo transformation into a more aggressive lymphoma so called Richter's syndrome. While the advent of novel targeted therapies is transforming the management of patients with CLL, these drugs failed to prevent the risk of RS. RS is associated with a very poor outcome and is thus becoming the main obstacle to long term CLL control. Autologous (auto-) and allogeneic (allo-) hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (-SCT) have been recommended as the treatment of choice in eligible patients with clonally related RS (Rossi Blood 2018) but previous experience is still limited to less than 50 cases. We here aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of both auto- and allo-SCT for patients with RS in a large cohort in a period overlapping the advent of novel agents. Methods. We report on a retrospective study of consecutive adult patients with RS who underwent auto- or allo-SCT between 2008 and 2018 in EBMT centers. Results. A total of 197 patients (M/F= 133/64) were included in the present study; 125 patients received allo-SCT and 72 auto-SCT. The main difference between these 2 cohorts was the median age at transplant that was lower in the allo- than in the auto-SCT group (median age 57 [18-71] vs 61 [39-74] years, p = 0.006). Regarding the allo-SCT cohort, median time from RS diagnosis to SCT was 10 months [1.1-322.8] and 54.2% had received >2 therapeutic lines for RS. At allo-SCT, 60 (48.4%) were in CR and 53 (42.7%) in PR or SD. Most patients received reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen (n= 90, 72.6%) and peripheral blood (89.6%) as stem cell source. Donors were related (matched, n=40 (33%) or mismatched, n=4 (3%)) or unrelated (matched, n= 76 (61%) and mismatched, n=4 (3%). A total of 41 patients (33.6%) received total body irradiation (TBI). With a median follow-up of 48 months, 2-year OS was 46% (36-55%) and 2-year PFS 38% (28-48%). Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 31% (22-40%) as was the 2-year NRM (Figure 1). Two-year CIR was significantly reduced in patients with ≤2 therapeutic lines for RS (12% (1-22%) vs 41% (26-55%); p=0.005). Performance status affected 2-y PFS (24% (7-42%) if Karnofsky index <90% vs 43% (31-54%) if ≥90%, p = 0.02) and 2-y CIR (52% (33-71%) if Karnofsky index <90% vs 25% (15-35%) if ≥90%, p = 0.004). Considering death as a competing risk, the day 100 incidence of aGVHD, 2-years limited and extensive cGVHD were 34% (25-43%), 20% (11-28%) and 33% (23-43%). Main causes of death were relapse (30%), GVHD (25%) and infection (30%). Regarding the auto-HSCT cohort, median time from RS diagnosis to HSCT was 7.8 months [2.6-102.7] and 66.7% had received >2 lines for RS. At auto-SCT, 36 (52.2%) were in CR and 36 (37.7%) in PR or SD. With a median follow-up of 18 months, 2-year OS was 69 % (56-82%) and 2-year PFS 47% (33-62%). Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 46% (32-60%) and 2-year NRM was 7% (0-13%) (Figure 2). CR patients presented better PFS (69% (50-88%) vs 29% (9-50%); p=0.002) and OS (82% (66-97%) vs 56% (35-78%) ; p=0.03). Performance status affected 2-y PFS (25% (2-48%) if Karnofsky index <90% vs 55% (38-73%) if >90%, p = 0.005) and 2-y OS (55% (29-82%) if Karnofsky index <90% vs 75% (60-90%) if >90%, p = 0.04). Disclosures Guièze: Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Byrne:Ariad/Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Finke:Riemser: Honoraria, Other: research support, Speakers Bureau; Neovii: Honoraria, Other: research support, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Honoraria, Other: research support, Speakers Bureau. Chevallier:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria.

P03.05 Could suspected Glioblastomas be Treated without Hystological Diagnosis?

BACKGROUND Probable unresectable Glioblastomas (GB) diagnosed by imaging techniques withouth anatomo-pathological (ap) confirmation could be treated under standard treatment. We reported the outcomes from this strategy in our center after tumor board evaluation. MATERIAL AND METHODS From January/10 to September/16, 303 patients (pt) with GB were assessed by tumor board, during the same period 66 patients were consecutive analyzed with suspected GB by radiological criteria without histological diagnosis. We focus in the last group and analyzed the demographic/radiological data, non-biopsy causes, treatment type (concomitant Radio-Chemotherapy (RT/Ch), exclusive RT or Ch or Best supportive care (BSC)), Karnofsky index (KI) and degree of comorbidity (Charlson index (CI)). RESULTS Sixty six patients, 17.88% of the total GB cases (with/without ap). Average age: 77 years (33–91). Biopsy: non-diagnostic in 4pt. No biopsy: 62pt; due to non medical indication (71%), localization (22.7%), voluntary (4.5%). Treatment Type: Active: 43.93%, without biopsy due to non-medical indication (44.8%) and localization (41.37%). BSC: 53.03%, without biopsy due to non-medical indication 82.85%, localization 8.5%, voluntary 5.7%. Overall survival: 11.65 months in patients with active treatment and 4.8 months in BSC, greater benefit in <70 years and KI≥ 70 with statistical signification. CONCLUSION The diagnosis of GB by radiological criteria with the new imaging techniques has a good diagnostic-therapeutic correlation. In cases where surgical intervention is not possible, standard treatment offers good results. Age and KPS are variables that allow predicting a better evolution course. Although it was not possible to obtain a histological diagnosis, in this type of cases liquid biopsy could contribute to diagnosis this type of lesions inaccessible to biopsy.