scholarly journals The Frequency and Effect of Baseline Cross-Reacting and De Novo Inhibitors to Recombinant Porcine FVIII in Patients with Congenital and Acquired Hemophilia a

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1128-1128
Author(s):  
Carolyne Elbaz ◽  
Katerina Pavenski ◽  
Hina Chaudhry ◽  
Jerome M. Teitel ◽  
Michelle Sholzberg
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Factor Viia ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia A ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia ◽  
C2 Domains ◽  
Inhibitor Development

Background Patients with severe congenital hemophilia A (CHA) have a 25-40% lifetime risk of alloantibody (inhibitor) development to FVIII. Patients with acquired hemophilia A (AHA) spontaneously develop neutralizing autoantibodies to factor VIII. In both cases, patients require pro-hemostatic therapy with bypassing agents: recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) and more recently recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII). Anti-human FVIII (hFVIII) inhibitors typically bind to the A2 and C2 domains of the FVIII molecule. RpFVIII is an effective pro-hemostatic treatment for AHA and CHA given the immunologic difference in the A2 and C2 domains of the rpFVIII while maintaining sufficient hFVIII homology to act as an effective cofactor to human FIX in the intrinsic tenase. However, some anti-hFVIII antibodies cross-react with rpFVIII and may interfere with its hemostatic function. Cross-reacting antibodies were reported in 35% of subjects in a phase II/III trial prior to initiation of rpFVIII. Moreover, de novo rpFVIII inhibitors may develop during or after the treatment with rpFVIII and may affect its hemostatic function. Here we describe the largest case series to date on baseline cross-reactivity of rpFVIII inhibitors and post-treatment de novo inhibitor development in patients with CHA and AHA to address the paucity of published literature in this area. Aim First, we describe the frequency of baseline cross-reacting rpFVIII inhibitors in patients with AHA and CHA (with inhibitors) at our institution. Second, we describe the effect of baseline rpFVIII antibodies on FVIII recovery after treatment with rpFVIII. We also describe the frequency and timing of de novo rpFVIII inhibitor development after exposure to rpFVIII. Methods Institutional research ethics board approval was obtained. Electronic charts of patients admitted to our institution with AHA or CHA who underwent testing for rpFVIII inhibitors were reviewed retrospectively. RpFVIII inhibitor assay is performed in the special coagulation laboratory using the Nijmegen modified Bethesda assay. The patient sample is initially heat-treated at 57 Results Twenty-seven patients (7 CHA, 20 AHA) underwent testing for porcine inhibitors since assay availability in 2016. 61% (5/7 CHA, 11/20 AHA) of patients had a detectable rpFVIII inhibitor prior to exposure to rpFVIII; median titer 1.6 BU/ml (range 0.6-192). Eight patients with AHA with baseline cross-reacting inhibitors received rpFVIII. Of those, three achieved an initial FVIII recovery beyond 100% (132%, 148% and 177%) after approximately 100U/kg of rpFVIII and all three had very low anti-rpFVIII Bethesda titers (0.70, 0.85 and 0.9 BU/ml). Five patients did not achieve a FVIII recovery above 50% (46%, 46%, 40%, 36% and 0%) despite approximately 100U/kg of rpFVIII. Most patients who received rpFVIII were tested weekly for the duration of their treatment or hospital stay. Upon discharge, patients who were seen in clinic for follow up were tested for anti-hFVIII and anti-rpFVIII. Two AHA patients without a baseline inhibitor who received rpFVIII treatment developed a de novo inhibitor after 20 days (1 BU/ml) and 133 days (12 BU/ml), respectively. One AHA patient had a rise in baseline anti-rpFVIII titer after exposure to rpFVIII. Conclusion In conclusion, we found that 61% of patients with AHA and CHA tested for rpFVIII inhibitors had a detectable baseline cross-reacting inhibitor which is higher than previously described. Of those patients with a baseline inhibitor treated with rpFVIII, only 37.5% of patients had an appropriate rise in FVIII. Finally, 13% of patients without baseline inhibitors developed a de novo inhibitor after exposure to rpFVIII, an incidence comparable to previously published findings. Disclosures Pavenski: Bioverativ: Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria; Ablynx: Honoraria, Research Funding. Teitel:BioMarin: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Octapharma: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sholzberg:Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Baxter: Honoraria, Research Funding; Baxalta: Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Recombinant porcine factor VIII is used to treated patients with congenital hemophilia A with allo inhibitors

Acquired Hemophilia A: A Case Report

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 562-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Shen ◽  
Shan Wang ◽  
Julia Sessa ◽  
Adel Hanna ◽  
Alexander Axelrad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Factor Viii ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Factor Viia ◽  
Spontaneous Mutation ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Rare Disorder ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia A ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia

Hemophilia A, also known as factor VIII deficiency, is a rare disorder caused by an insufficient level of factor VIII, an essential clotting protein. Hemophilia A can be inherited or acquired. Inherited hemophilia A is caused by a mutation to the factor VIII gene on the X chromosome, which is commonly passed down from parents to children. However, in about one-third of cases, the cause is a spontaneous mutation in that gene. Acquired hemophilia A is due to an autoantibody to factor VIII, which is termed an inhibitor. This rare disorder can cause life-threatening bleeding complications. Management relies on a rapid and accurate diagnosis, control of bleeding episodes, and eradication of the inhibitor by immunosuppression therapy. Most treatment strategies are centered around anecdotal reports or small case series. This case report summarizes the successful treatment of a patient with acquired hemophilia A and major bleeding following a surgical procedure, with the use of desmopressin, recombinant factor VIIa, repeated doses of recombinant factor VIII, rituximab, and prednisone.

Critical Bleeding in Acquired Hemophilia A: Bypassing Agents or Recombinant Porcine Factor VIII?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Tiede
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Factor Viia ◽  
Indirect Evidence ◽  
Coagulation Factor ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia A ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia ◽  
Activated Prothrombin Complex Concentrate ◽  
Bypassing Agents

AbstractAcquired hemophilia A (AHA) is caused by autoantibodies neutralizing coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). In the presence of inhibitors against FVIII, acute bleeds can be managed with bypassing agents, including recombinant factor VIIa (eptacog alfa activated, NovoSeven) and activated prothrombin complex concentrate (FEIBA), as well as recombinant porcine FVIII (susoctocog alfa, Obizur). Studies comparing these agents directly are not available, and indirect evidence suggests an overall similar efficacy. Selecting an agent in clinical practice therefore depends on (1) availability of agent, (2) safety profile, (3) monitoring requirements, (4) cost, and (5) personal experience. This review examines available data and collects additional considerations to support decision making for bleeding emergencies in AHA.

scholarly journals Rituximab Monotherapy Is Effective for Inhibitor Eradication with Concomitant Porcine Factor VIII Followed By Emicizumab for Bleed Control in Acquired Hemophilia a

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 348-348
Author(s):  
Patrick Ellsworth ◽  
Sheh-Li Chen ◽  
Christopher Wang ◽  
Nigel S Key ◽  
Alice Ma
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Factor Viii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Effective Strategy ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia A ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia ◽  
Trial Investigator ◽  
Fviii Activity ◽  
Inhibitor Titer

Abstract Introduction Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disorder in which acquired auto-antibodies to endogenous Factor VIII (FVIII) resulting in decreased FVIII activity. AHA can lead to life-threatening bleeding, with effective treatment requiring both immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and bypassing agents such as recombinant activated Factor VII (rFVIIa) or activated prothrombin complex concentrates (APCC) (Tiede et al. Haematologica 2020). Some, including our group, have begun using emicizumab as well (Knoebl et al. Blood 2020). IST is required for inhibitor eradication, but regimens are heterogenous and have not been systematically compared in the literature. While there is no standard of care IST in these patients, most patients in the literature receive multiple agents, including corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, and/or rituximab in combination. We report in a prospective cohort that for IST, rituximab monotherapy is an effective strategy. An updated treatment algorithm is offered that has been effective for treatment of these patients at our institution, which adds emicizumab therapy after initial bleed control. Methods We analyzed clinical, pharmacy, and laboratory data from 24 patients treated with rpFVIII at the University of North Carolina for AHA from July 2015 to June 2021. All patients were initially treated according to our previously established dosing algorithm with recombinant porcine FVIII, and the last five patients have received emicizumab after initial factor dosing (see Figure 1). 17 of the patients who received rituximab and were followed at our center subsequently attained inhibitor eradication, six of those received only rituximab therapy. Investigational review board approval was obtained for our data collection and analysis. Patients who did not receive rituximab, failed to reach an inhibitor level <0.5 BU, or who were lost to follow up were excluded from the analysis. For patients that fit the inclusion criteria, the time between date of the first rituximab infusion and the date of inhibitor eradication was calculated. Results All patients in our cohort who we followed until inhibitor eradication (17 of 24 patients) had eradication of inhibitors after a median of 143 days from initiation of immunosuppression. For patients treated with rituximab monotherapy for inhibitor eradication (6 of 17), this goal was reached in a median of 134.5 days (range 76-191 days). For those who received agents in addition to rituximab and have reached inhibitor eradication to date (9 of 17 patients), median days from initiation of immunosuppression to inhibitor eradication was 137.5 days (range 11-485) (P = 0.43 on Mann-Whitney test). Patients were treated as previously reported by our group per an algorithm that starts recombinant porcine FVIII without waiting for a porcine inhibitor and at lower than FDA recommended dosing. Subsequent doses for bleed control are titrated according to one-stage, clot based FVIII activity. This report also includes 5 new patients who, after initial bleed control per our algorithm, were initiated on emicizumab while awaiting inhibitor eradication. There was no correlation between time to rituximab initiation and time to inhibitor eradication in both those who received rituximab monotherapy and those who had multiple IST agents. There was also no significant difference in initial inhibitor titer between groups with median initial inhibitor titer of 104 BU in the rituximab monotherapy group, and 70 BU in the multiple IST agents group (see Figure 3). Conclusions Rituximab monotherapy appears to be an effective strategy for inhibitor eradication in acquired hemophilia A. In the context of bleed treatment with porcine factor, followed by emicizumab, a standardized, algorithmic approach can be effectively employed for these patients. Though any patients have inhibitor recurrence, as is described in the literature, with emicizumab available, bleeding can be avoided with regular monitoring. Emicizumab given while re-eradicating an inhibitor can prevent morbidity of this disease. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ellsworth: Takeda: Other: Salary supported as part of NHF-Takeda Clinical Fellowship Award. Key: Uniqure: Consultancy, Other: Participation as a clinical trial investigator; Grifols: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; BioMarin: Honoraria, Other: Participation as a clinical trial investigator; Sanofi: Consultancy. Ma: Accordant: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Emicizumab is not approved for use in Acquired Hemophilia A and this represents an OFF LABEL use of the drug.

scholarly journals Experience with Continuous Infusion of Recombinant Porcine FVIII in Patients with Acquired Hemophilia a

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 18-18
Author(s):  
Daniel Lindsay ◽  
Jerome M. Teitel ◽  
Michelle Sholzberg
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bolus Dose ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia A ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia ◽  
Scientific Advisory Board ◽  
Scientific Advisory

Background: Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare disorder with high morbidity and mortality that results from the development of autoantibodies against factor VIII (FVIII). To manage acute bleeding, recombinant porcine FVIII (rpFVIII) can be administered intravenously as a bolus dose of 50IU/kg to 200IU/kg depending on bleeding severity and the level of baseline cross-reacting anti-porcine FVIII inhibitors(Kruse-Jarres et al., 2017). Here we describe the efficacy of rpFVIII used as a continuous infusion (CI) and compare total product utilization to bolus infusions (BI). Methods: Retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with AHA who met the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis criteria for major bleeding and who received rpFVIII at our institution from 2015 to 2020(Kaatz, Ahmad, Spyropoulos, & Schulman, 2015). Efficacy was defined as clinical bleeding control and achievement of adequate FVIII levels. Data were collected through electronic patient records and analyzed using simple descriptive (mean ± standard deviation (SD)) and inferential statistics (T-Test, alpha=0.05). Institutional Research Ethics Board approval was obtained. Results: During the study period, 13 patients received rpFVIII (CI n=3, BI n=10). The mean age of patients receiving CI and BI was 75.3 years (SD 2.5) and 72.0 years (SD 14.5) respectively. All patients who received rpFVIII as a CI received a bolus dose ranging between 102.6IU/kg-200.8IU/kg prior to initiation of the CI. CI rates between 3.4IU/kg/hr-11.5IU/kg/hr were administered. Two of the patients receiving rpFVIII as a CI had their infusion rates adjusted according to their clinical symptoms and FVIII levels. One patient had the rpFVIII CI stopped due to an increase in anti-rpFVIII antibodies which interfered with hemostatic efficacy. Thirty-three percent of CI patients and 60% of BI patients required a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion after starting rpFVIII. Sixty-six percent of CI patients and 20% of BI patients had worsening of bleeding after initiation of rpFVIII. Lastly, rpFVIII usage in the CI group (170.4 ± 25.9 IU/kg/day) was not significantly different compared to the BI group (120.9 ± 64.4 IU/kg/day) when accounting for the duration of admission and weight of the patients (P>0.05). No thromboembolic events occurred in either group while receiving rpFVIII. Conclusions: Our study shows that the total amount of rpFVIII administered to patients as a CI is not significantly different to those receiving BI. The CI group required less RBC transfusions but reported more exacerbation of bleeding. Thus, the efficacy of rpFVIII given as a CI requires further evaluation in future prospective studies. Disclosures Sholzberg: NovoNordisk: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Advisory Board, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Advisory Board, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Advisory Board, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), Porcine Sequence (OBIZUR) is a purified protein produced by recombinant DNA that is a B-domain deleted recombinant factor VIII, porcine sequence, manufactured in tissue culture in baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells. OBIZUR is indicated for the treatment of bleeding episodes in patients with Acquired Hemophilia A (AHA). OBIZUR is administered as a bolus infusion.

scholarly journals Acquired factor VIII deficiency in prostate adenocarcinoma presenting as multiple hematomas and hemarthrosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 2050313X2090674
Author(s):  
Akeem Lewis ◽  
Joe Joseph ◽  
Nirmal Pathak ◽  
Babak Baseri ◽  
Carol Luhrs
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Factor Viii ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Factor Viia ◽  
Prostate Adenocarcinoma ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia A ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia ◽  
Factor Viii Deficiency ◽  
Autoimmune Conditions

Acquired hemophilia A or acquired factor VIII deficiency is a rare bleeding disorder due to the presence of autoantibodies to factor VIII. It has been associated with autoimmune conditions, certain medications, and malignancy. It has a high morbidity and mortality, and early diagnosis and treatment is critically important. Acquired hemophilia A usually manifests with soft tissue bleeding, such as epistaxis, genitourinary, or gastrointestinal bleeding and rarely with hemarthrosis. In this case report, we present the management of an uncommon case of acquired hemophilia A in a patient with metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma who presented with both hemarthrosis and soft tissue bleeding. Bleeding was controlled with recombinant factor VIIa, factor VIII bypassing agent, and immunosuppressive therapy with prednisone and rituximab. Chemotherapy with docetaxel was also promptly initiated to address the underlying condition and achieve long-term remission, which is currently ongoing for 10 months.

Recombinant B-Domain Deleted Porcine Factor VIII (OBI-1) Safety and Efficacy in the Treatment of Acquired Hemophilia A: Interim Results.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2224-2224
Author(s):  
Jean St. Louis ◽  
Rebecca Kruse-Jarres ◽  
Anne Greist ◽  
Amy D. Shapiro ◽  
Hedy Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia A ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

Abstract Abstract 2224 Introduction OBI-1 is an investigational B-domain deleted recombinant porcine factor VIII (FVIII) with low cross-reactivity to anti-human FVIII antibodies. Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is caused by autoantibodies (inhibitors) against human FVIII. Patients are predominantly elderly and have co-morbidities. Current pharmacologic treatment of bleeds is guided by clinical assessment alone as there is no laboratory surrogate for efficacy. Importantly, OBI-1 efficacy can be monitored by FVIII levels in addition to clinical assessment. Methods Accur8 Auto-antibody trial (NCT01178294) is a prospective, open label, Phase 2/3 study. The primary objective is to evaluate efficacy of OBI-1 treatment for serious (life- or limb-threatening) bleeds in patients ≥18 years with AHA. FVIII levels are obtained before and within 10–20 min following initial OBI-1 dose (200U/kg) and at 2–3 h. Additional OBI-1 doses (≤400U/kg every 2–3 h) are administered to achieve target FVIII levels. The primary efficacy outcome is the control of bleeding 24 h after starting OBI-1. Results As of July, 2012, fifteen patients with severe bleeds were entered into the trial along with one individual treated under compassionate use and all had successful control of hemorrhage at 24 h and subsequent resolution of the bleed. Therapeutic FVIII activity levels were achieved and maintained with intermittent OBI-1 administration based on FVIII levels. Six serious adverse events were reported including four deaths after treatment was discontinued, all being unrelated to OBI-1 as determined by the investigators. Antibodies to OBI-1 developed in two subjects indicated with an * in the table below. However, both responded toOBI-1. Conclusions These interim results provide support for the safety and efficacy of OBI-1 in the treatment of serious bleeding episodes in AHA. Additional confirming data could establish OBI-1 as a useful treatment option for AHA. Disclosures: St. Louis: Inspiration Biopharmaceuticals Inc: Research Funding. Kruse-Jarres:Inspiration Biopharmaceiticals Inc: Research Funding. Greist:Inspiration Biopharmaceuticals Inc: Research Funding. Shapiro:Inspiration Biopharmaceuticals Inc: Research Funding. Smith:Inspiration Biopharmaceuticals Inc: Research Funding. Drebes:Inspiration Biopharmaceuticals Inc: Research Funding. Gomperts:Inspiration Biopharmaceuticals Inc: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Postpartum Acquired Hemophilia: A Rare Cause of Postpartum Hemorrhage

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srikanth Seethala ◽  
Sumit Gaur ◽  
Elizabeth Enderton ◽  
Javier Corral
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Factor Vii ◽  
Normal Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Factor Viii Inhibitor ◽  
Activity Levels ◽  
Factor Viii Activity ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia A ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia ◽  
Viii Inhibitor

A 36-year-old female started having postpartum vaginal bleeding after normal vaginal delivery. She underwent hysterectomy for persistent bleeding and was referred to our institution. An elevation of PTT and normal PT made us suspect postpartum acquired hemophilia (PAH), and it was confirmed by low factor VIII activity levels and an elevated factor VIII inhibitor. Hemostasis was achieved with recombinant factor VII concentrates and desmopressin, and factor eradication was achieved with cytoxan, methylprednisolone, and plasmapheresis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document