scholarly journals Rituximab Monotherapy Is Effective for Inhibitor Eradication with Concomitant Porcine Factor VIII Followed By Emicizumab for Bleed Control in Acquired Hemophilia a

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 348-348
Author(s):  
Patrick Ellsworth ◽  
Sheh-Li Chen ◽  
Christopher Wang ◽  
Nigel S Key ◽  
Alice Ma

Abstract Introduction Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disorder in which acquired auto-antibodies to endogenous Factor VIII (FVIII) resulting in decreased FVIII activity. AHA can lead to life-threatening bleeding, with effective treatment requiring both immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and bypassing agents such as recombinant activated Factor VII (rFVIIa) or activated prothrombin complex concentrates (APCC) (Tiede et al. Haematologica 2020). Some, including our group, have begun using emicizumab as well (Knoebl et al. Blood 2020). IST is required for inhibitor eradication, but regimens are heterogenous and have not been systematically compared in the literature. While there is no standard of care IST in these patients, most patients in the literature receive multiple agents, including corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, and/or rituximab in combination. We report in a prospective cohort that for IST, rituximab monotherapy is an effective strategy. An updated treatment algorithm is offered that has been effective for treatment of these patients at our institution, which adds emicizumab therapy after initial bleed control. Methods We analyzed clinical, pharmacy, and laboratory data from 24 patients treated with rpFVIII at the University of North Carolina for AHA from July 2015 to June 2021. All patients were initially treated according to our previously established dosing algorithm with recombinant porcine FVIII, and the last five patients have received emicizumab after initial factor dosing (see Figure 1). 17 of the patients who received rituximab and were followed at our center subsequently attained inhibitor eradication, six of those received only rituximab therapy. Investigational review board approval was obtained for our data collection and analysis. Patients who did not receive rituximab, failed to reach an inhibitor level <0.5 BU, or who were lost to follow up were excluded from the analysis. For patients that fit the inclusion criteria, the time between date of the first rituximab infusion and the date of inhibitor eradication was calculated. Results All patients in our cohort who we followed until inhibitor eradication (17 of 24 patients) had eradication of inhibitors after a median of 143 days from initiation of immunosuppression. For patients treated with rituximab monotherapy for inhibitor eradication (6 of 17), this goal was reached in a median of 134.5 days (range 76-191 days). For those who received agents in addition to rituximab and have reached inhibitor eradication to date (9 of 17 patients), median days from initiation of immunosuppression to inhibitor eradication was 137.5 days (range 11-485) (P = 0.43 on Mann-Whitney test). Patients were treated as previously reported by our group per an algorithm that starts recombinant porcine FVIII without waiting for a porcine inhibitor and at lower than FDA recommended dosing. Subsequent doses for bleed control are titrated according to one-stage, clot based FVIII activity. This report also includes 5 new patients who, after initial bleed control per our algorithm, were initiated on emicizumab while awaiting inhibitor eradication. There was no correlation between time to rituximab initiation and time to inhibitor eradication in both those who received rituximab monotherapy and those who had multiple IST agents. There was also no significant difference in initial inhibitor titer between groups with median initial inhibitor titer of 104 BU in the rituximab monotherapy group, and 70 BU in the multiple IST agents group (see Figure 3). Conclusions Rituximab monotherapy appears to be an effective strategy for inhibitor eradication in acquired hemophilia A. In the context of bleed treatment with porcine factor, followed by emicizumab, a standardized, algorithmic approach can be effectively employed for these patients. Though any patients have inhibitor recurrence, as is described in the literature, with emicizumab available, bleeding can be avoided with regular monitoring. Emicizumab given while re-eradicating an inhibitor can prevent morbidity of this disease. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ellsworth: Takeda: Other: Salary supported as part of NHF-Takeda Clinical Fellowship Award. Key: Uniqure: Consultancy, Other: Participation as a clinical trial investigator; Grifols: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; BioMarin: Honoraria, Other: Participation as a clinical trial investigator; Sanofi: Consultancy. Ma: Accordant: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Emicizumab is not approved for use in Acquired Hemophilia A and this represents an OFF LABEL use of the drug.

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1128-1128
Author(s):  
Carolyne Elbaz ◽  
Katerina Pavenski ◽  
Hina Chaudhry ◽  
Jerome M. Teitel ◽  
Michelle Sholzberg

Background Patients with severe congenital hemophilia A (CHA) have a 25-40% lifetime risk of alloantibody (inhibitor) development to FVIII. Patients with acquired hemophilia A (AHA) spontaneously develop neutralizing autoantibodies to factor VIII. In both cases, patients require pro-hemostatic therapy with bypassing agents: recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) and more recently recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII). Anti-human FVIII (hFVIII) inhibitors typically bind to the A2 and C2 domains of the FVIII molecule. RpFVIII is an effective pro-hemostatic treatment for AHA and CHA given the immunologic difference in the A2 and C2 domains of the rpFVIII while maintaining sufficient hFVIII homology to act as an effective cofactor to human FIX in the intrinsic tenase. However, some anti-hFVIII antibodies cross-react with rpFVIII and may interfere with its hemostatic function. Cross-reacting antibodies were reported in 35% of subjects in a phase II/III trial prior to initiation of rpFVIII. Moreover, de novo rpFVIII inhibitors may develop during or after the treatment with rpFVIII and may affect its hemostatic function. Here we describe the largest case series to date on baseline cross-reactivity of rpFVIII inhibitors and post-treatment de novo inhibitor development in patients with CHA and AHA to address the paucity of published literature in this area. Aim First, we describe the frequency of baseline cross-reacting rpFVIII inhibitors in patients with AHA and CHA (with inhibitors) at our institution. Second, we describe the effect of baseline rpFVIII antibodies on FVIII recovery after treatment with rpFVIII. We also describe the frequency and timing of de novo rpFVIII inhibitor development after exposure to rpFVIII. Methods Institutional research ethics board approval was obtained. Electronic charts of patients admitted to our institution with AHA or CHA who underwent testing for rpFVIII inhibitors were reviewed retrospectively. RpFVIII inhibitor assay is performed in the special coagulation laboratory using the Nijmegen modified Bethesda assay. The patient sample is initially heat-treated at 57 Results Twenty-seven patients (7 CHA, 20 AHA) underwent testing for porcine inhibitors since assay availability in 2016. 61% (5/7 CHA, 11/20 AHA) of patients had a detectable rpFVIII inhibitor prior to exposure to rpFVIII; median titer 1.6 BU/ml (range 0.6-192). Eight patients with AHA with baseline cross-reacting inhibitors received rpFVIII. Of those, three achieved an initial FVIII recovery beyond 100% (132%, 148% and 177%) after approximately 100U/kg of rpFVIII and all three had very low anti-rpFVIII Bethesda titers (0.70, 0.85 and 0.9 BU/ml). Five patients did not achieve a FVIII recovery above 50% (46%, 46%, 40%, 36% and 0%) despite approximately 100U/kg of rpFVIII. Most patients who received rpFVIII were tested weekly for the duration of their treatment or hospital stay. Upon discharge, patients who were seen in clinic for follow up were tested for anti-hFVIII and anti-rpFVIII. Two AHA patients without a baseline inhibitor who received rpFVIII treatment developed a de novo inhibitor after 20 days (1 BU/ml) and 133 days (12 BU/ml), respectively. One AHA patient had a rise in baseline anti-rpFVIII titer after exposure to rpFVIII. Conclusion In conclusion, we found that 61% of patients with AHA and CHA tested for rpFVIII inhibitors had a detectable baseline cross-reacting inhibitor which is higher than previously described. Of those patients with a baseline inhibitor treated with rpFVIII, only 37.5% of patients had an appropriate rise in FVIII. Finally, 13% of patients without baseline inhibitors developed a de novo inhibitor after exposure to rpFVIII, an incidence comparable to previously published findings. Disclosures Pavenski: Bioverativ: Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria; Ablynx: Honoraria, Research Funding. Teitel:BioMarin: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Octapharma: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sholzberg:Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Baxter: Honoraria, Research Funding; Baxalta: Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Recombinant porcine factor VIII is used to treated patients with congenital hemophilia A with allo inhibitors


Blood ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 669-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiji Nogami ◽  
Midori Shima ◽  
John C. Giddings ◽  
Kazuya Hosokawa ◽  
Masanori Nagata ◽  
...  

Abstract Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor antibodies are classified into 2 groups according to the kinetic pattern of FVIII inactivation. Type 2 antibodies are more commonly observed in patients with acquired hemophilia A and do not completely inhibit FVIII activity; in most cases, substantial levels of circulating FVIII are detected. Three type 2 autoantibodies from patients who had normal levels of FVIII antigen despite having low levels of FVIII activity were studied. The antibodies reacted exclusively with the light chain of FVIII but not with the C2 domain, and their epitopes were therefore ascribed to the regions in the A3-C1 domains. Heavy and light chains of FVIII were detected in plasma-derived immune complexes extracted by using protein G Sepharose. Direct binding assays using anhydro-activated protein C (anhydro-APC), a catalytically inactive derivative of activated protein C (APC) in which the active-site serine is converted to dehydroalanine, were used to examine the relation between immune complexes and APC. The intact FVIII, 80-kd light chain, and 72-kd light chain bound in a dose-dependent manner to anhydro-APC, with Kdvalues of 580, 540, and 310 nM, respectively, whereas no appreciable binding was detected for the heavy chain. The 3 autoantibodies blocked FVIII binding to anhydro-APC by approximately 80% and consequently inhibited APC-induced FVIII proteolytic inactivation. These antibodies also bound to a synthetic peptide, His2009-Val2018, which contains the APC binding site. The findings suggest that binding of type 2 autoantibodies, recognizing residues His2009 to Val2018, protects FVIII from APC-mediated proteolysis and might contribute to the presence of FVIII immune complexes in the circulation.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 205-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Tiede ◽  
Jan-Malte Blumtritt ◽  
Robert Klamroth ◽  
Saskia Gottstein ◽  
Katharina Holstein ◽  
...  

Abstract Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare autoimmune disorder caused by neutralizing autoantibodies against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII:C). Immunosuppressive treatment may result in remission of disease over a period of days to months. Until remission, patients are at high risk of bleeding and complications from immunosuppression. Prognostic parameters to predict remission and the time needed to achieve remission could be helpful to guide treatment intensity, but have not been established so far. GTH-AH01/2010 was a prospective multicenter cohort study using a standardized immunosuppressive treatment protocol. The primary study endpoint was time to achieve partial remission (PR, defined as FVIII:C activity >50 IU/dl after cessation of any hemotherapy for >24h, and no active bleeding). Secondary endpoints were time to achieve complete remission (CR, defined as PR plus negative FVIII:C inhibitor, steroid tapered to <15 mg/d prednisolone, and cessation of any other immunosuppressive treatment), and overall survival (OS). Enrolment was strictly prospective and only allowed within 7 days of starting immunosuppression. Outcome data were recorded in all patients enrolled. The treatment protocol consisted of prednisolone (100 mg/d from day 1 to the day of PR, then tapered down to <15 mg/d over 5 weeks), oral cyclophosphamide (150 mg/d, from day 21-42, unless PR was achieved), and rituximab (375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks starting on day 43, unless PR was achieved). If AHA was first diagnosed in patients previously on prednisolone >15 mg/d, or equivalent, they received prednisolone (100 mg/d) and rituximab from day 1. If cyclophosphamide was contraindicated, patients received prednisolone (100 mg/d) and rituximab from day 21. One hundred twenty-four patients from 21 treatment centers in Germany and Austria were enrolled between April 2010 and April 2013 (36 months). The patients from two centers not compliant with the treatment protocol were excluded (N=18), as were patients in whom AHA was not confirmed (N=2) or follow-up was too short at the time of this analysis (N=7). The remaining 97 patients from 17 centers were followed for a median of 256 days (interquartile range [IQR] 84-561). Median age was 74 years (IQR 64-82). AHA was associated with other autoimmune disorders (19%), malignancy (12%), pregnancy or puerperium (5%), but was most often idiopathic (66%). The median FVIII:C activity at baseline was 1 IU/dl (IQR <1-3), and the median inhibitor titer was 20 BU/ml (IQR 7.7-78). PR and CR were achieved after a median time of 35 and 102 days, respectively. Patients achieving PR prior to day 21 (N=22) compared with patients not achieving PR within 21 days (N=75) had a higher baseline FVIII:C activity (median 3 vs. <1 IU/dl, p<0.01) and a lower FVIII:C inhibitor (median 12 vs. 29 BU/ml, p<0.05). Multivariate analysis with adjustment for age, sex, underlying disorder, and WHO performance status on admission demonstrated that baseline FVIII:C activity (<1 IU/dl vs. >=1 IU/dl) had a strong impact on the time to achieve PR (HR 2.76 [95% confidence interval 1.73-4.42], p<0.001) and CR (HR 2.36 [1.34-4.14], p<0.01). Baseline FVIII:C activity was also a predictor of PR and CR when other cutoffs were used (2 or 3 IU/dl instead of 1 IU/dl), or when it was analyzed as a continuous variable in Cox regression analysis. In contrast, FVIII:C inhibitor titer assessed by the local laboratory did not affect time to PR or CR significantly. OS after 300 days, estimated by the Kaplan Meier method, was 69%. Age, WHO performance status, and FVIII:C activity at baseline were independent predictors of OS. In summary, GTH-AH 01/2010 is the largest prospective study of patients with AHA treated according to a standardized protocol. The study demonstrated a robust effect of baseline FVIII:C activity on the time needed to achieve PR and CR. Baseline FVIII:C activity, together with age and performance status, also affected OS. Therefore, baseline FVIII:C activity may be considered to guide individually tailored immunosuppression in future studies. Disclosures: Tiede: Baxter: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Biotest: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Biogen Idec: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Prednisolone, cyclophosphamid, and rituximab for immunosuppression in acquired hemophilia. Klamroth:Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Baxter: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding. Gottstein:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; Baxter: Honoraria. Holstein:Baxter: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Scharf:CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Biotest: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Baxter: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Huth-Kühne:SRH Kurpfalz Hospital and Hemophilia Center: Consultancy, Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Greil:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Miesbach:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Baxter: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Trappe:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, Travel Other; AMGEN: Research Funding, Travel, Travel Other; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, Travel, Travel Other; Mundipharma: Research Funding, Travel, Travel Other; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding, Travel Other; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Travel, Travel Other; Novartis: Research Funding, Travel Other; Cellgen: Travel, Travel Other. Knoebl:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria; Baxter: Consultancy, Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 18-18
Author(s):  
Daniel Lindsay ◽  
Jerome M. Teitel ◽  
Michelle Sholzberg

Background: Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare disorder with high morbidity and mortality that results from the development of autoantibodies against factor VIII (FVIII). To manage acute bleeding, recombinant porcine FVIII (rpFVIII) can be administered intravenously as a bolus dose of 50IU/kg to 200IU/kg depending on bleeding severity and the level of baseline cross-reacting anti-porcine FVIII inhibitors(Kruse-Jarres et al., 2017). Here we describe the efficacy of rpFVIII used as a continuous infusion (CI) and compare total product utilization to bolus infusions (BI). Methods: Retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with AHA who met the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis criteria for major bleeding and who received rpFVIII at our institution from 2015 to 2020(Kaatz, Ahmad, Spyropoulos, & Schulman, 2015). Efficacy was defined as clinical bleeding control and achievement of adequate FVIII levels. Data were collected through electronic patient records and analyzed using simple descriptive (mean ± standard deviation (SD)) and inferential statistics (T-Test, alpha=0.05). Institutional Research Ethics Board approval was obtained. Results: During the study period, 13 patients received rpFVIII (CI n=3, BI n=10). The mean age of patients receiving CI and BI was 75.3 years (SD 2.5) and 72.0 years (SD 14.5) respectively. All patients who received rpFVIII as a CI received a bolus dose ranging between 102.6IU/kg-200.8IU/kg prior to initiation of the CI. CI rates between 3.4IU/kg/hr-11.5IU/kg/hr were administered. Two of the patients receiving rpFVIII as a CI had their infusion rates adjusted according to their clinical symptoms and FVIII levels. One patient had the rpFVIII CI stopped due to an increase in anti-rpFVIII antibodies which interfered with hemostatic efficacy. Thirty-three percent of CI patients and 60% of BI patients required a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion after starting rpFVIII. Sixty-six percent of CI patients and 20% of BI patients had worsening of bleeding after initiation of rpFVIII. Lastly, rpFVIII usage in the CI group (170.4 ± 25.9 IU/kg/day) was not significantly different compared to the BI group (120.9 ± 64.4 IU/kg/day) when accounting for the duration of admission and weight of the patients (P&gt;0.05). No thromboembolic events occurred in either group while receiving rpFVIII. Conclusions: Our study shows that the total amount of rpFVIII administered to patients as a CI is not significantly different to those receiving BI. The CI group required less RBC transfusions but reported more exacerbation of bleeding. Thus, the efficacy of rpFVIII given as a CI requires further evaluation in future prospective studies. Disclosures Sholzberg: NovoNordisk: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Advisory Board, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Advisory Board, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Advisory Board, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), Porcine Sequence (OBIZUR) is a purified protein produced by recombinant DNA that is a B-domain deleted recombinant factor VIII, porcine sequence, manufactured in tissue culture in baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells. OBIZUR is indicated for the treatment of bleeding episodes in patients with Acquired Hemophilia A (AHA). OBIZUR is administered as a bolus infusion.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2224-2224
Author(s):  
Jean St. Louis ◽  
Rebecca Kruse-Jarres ◽  
Anne Greist ◽  
Amy D. Shapiro ◽  
Hedy Smith ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2224 Introduction OBI-1 is an investigational B-domain deleted recombinant porcine factor VIII (FVIII) with low cross-reactivity to anti-human FVIII antibodies. Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is caused by autoantibodies (inhibitors) against human FVIII. Patients are predominantly elderly and have co-morbidities. Current pharmacologic treatment of bleeds is guided by clinical assessment alone as there is no laboratory surrogate for efficacy. Importantly, OBI-1 efficacy can be monitored by FVIII levels in addition to clinical assessment. Methods Accur8 Auto-antibody trial (NCT01178294) is a prospective, open label, Phase 2/3 study. The primary objective is to evaluate efficacy of OBI-1 treatment for serious (life- or limb-threatening) bleeds in patients ≥18 years with AHA. FVIII levels are obtained before and within 10–20 min following initial OBI-1 dose (200U/kg) and at 2–3 h. Additional OBI-1 doses (≤400U/kg every 2–3 h) are administered to achieve target FVIII levels. The primary efficacy outcome is the control of bleeding 24 h after starting OBI-1. Results As of July, 2012, fifteen patients with severe bleeds were entered into the trial along with one individual treated under compassionate use and all had successful control of hemorrhage at 24 h and subsequent resolution of the bleed. Therapeutic FVIII activity levels were achieved and maintained with intermittent OBI-1 administration based on FVIII levels. Six serious adverse events were reported including four deaths after treatment was discontinued, all being unrelated to OBI-1 as determined by the investigators. Antibodies to OBI-1 developed in two subjects indicated with an * in the table below. However, both responded toOBI-1. Conclusions These interim results provide support for the safety and efficacy of OBI-1 in the treatment of serious bleeding episodes in AHA. Additional confirming data could establish OBI-1 as a useful treatment option for AHA. Disclosures: St. Louis: Inspiration Biopharmaceuticals Inc: Research Funding. Kruse-Jarres:Inspiration Biopharmaceiticals Inc: Research Funding. Greist:Inspiration Biopharmaceuticals Inc: Research Funding. Shapiro:Inspiration Biopharmaceuticals Inc: Research Funding. Smith:Inspiration Biopharmaceuticals Inc: Research Funding. Drebes:Inspiration Biopharmaceuticals Inc: Research Funding. Gomperts:Inspiration Biopharmaceuticals Inc: Consultancy.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Nicholas B. Abt ◽  
Michael B. Streiff ◽  
Christian B. Gocke ◽  
Thomas S. Kickler ◽  
Sophie M. Lanzkron

Objective. We present the case of a 73-year-old female, with no family or personal history of a bleeding disorder, who had a classic presentation for acquired hemophilia A. Factor VIII activity was low but detectable and a factor VIII inhibitor was undetectable.Methods. The patient’s plasma was comprehensively studied to determine the cause of the acquired coagulopathy. Using the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay, no factor VIII autoantibody was measureable despite varying the incubation time from 1 to 3 hours.Results. The aPTT was prolonged at 46.8 seconds, which did not correct in the 4 : 1 mix but did with 1 : 1 mix. Using a one stage factor VIII activity assay, the FVIII activity was 16% and chromogenic FVIII activity was also 16%. The patient was treated with recombinant FVII and transfusion, significantly reducing bleeding. Long-term therapy was initiated with cyclophosphamide and prednisone with normalization of FVIII activity.Conclusions. Physicians can be presented with the challenging clinical picture of an acquired factor VIII inhibitor without a detectable inhibitor by the Bethesda assay. Standard therapy for an acquired hemophilia A should be considered.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Collins ◽  
Francesco Baudo ◽  
Paul Knoebl ◽  
Hervé Lévesque ◽  
László Nemes ◽  
...  

Abstract Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is an autoimmune disease caused by an autoantibody to factor VIII. Patients are at risk of severe and fatal hemorrhage until the inhibitor is eradicated, and guidelines recommend immunosuppression as soon as the diagnosis has been made. The optimal immunosuppressive regimen is unclear; therefore, data from 331 patients entered into the prospective EACH2 registry were analyzed. Steroids combined with cyclophosphamide resulted in more stable complete remission (70%), defined as inhibitor undetectable, factor VIII more than 70 IU/dL and immunosuppression stopped, than steroids alone (48%) or rituximab-based regimens (59%). Propensity score-matched analysis controlling for age, sex, factor VIII level, inhibitor titer, and underlying etiology confirmed that stable remission was more likely with steroids and cyclophosphamide than steroids alone (odds ratio = 3.25; 95% CI, 1.51-6.96; P < .003). The median time to complete remission was approximately 5 weeks for steroids with or without cyclophosphamide; rituximab-based regimens required approximately twice as long. Immunoglobulin administration did not improve outcome. Second-line therapy was successful in approximately 60% of cases that failed first-line therapy. Outcome was not affected by the choice of first-line therapy. The likelihood of achieving stable remission was not affected by underlying etiology but was influenced by the presenting inhibitor titer and FVIII level.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4250-4250
Author(s):  
Rong-Fu Zhou ◽  
Yueyi Xu ◽  
Wenjin Gao

Abstract Objective: To deepen the understanding of the clinical manifestations of acquired hemophilia A for timely and correctly treatment. Methods: The clinical data of the acquired hemophilia A patients diagnosed in the hospital from Jan 2006 to Mar 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, and the relevant literature was reviewed. Results: 17 patients with acquired hemophilia A, male: female =10: 7, median age 61 years (19 to 78 years), were diagnosed and treated in the hospital with the median time from the onset to diagnosis 21 days (2 days to 6 months). Six patients had comorbidity, including hepatitis B carrying, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, diabetes, hypertension and positive autoantibodies, pemphigoid and gastric cancer, respectively. Other 11 patients were healthy before the onset. All patients had large large ecchymosis of skin, and one case was combined with hematuria, and one case with retroperitoneal hematoma. All patients had APTT extension (45s-144.7s) and the prolonged APTT could not be corrected with normal mixed plasma with and without incubation at 37℃ for 2 hours. FVIII activity was 1% - 8.9% and inhibitor titer 2 - 128 Bu/ml. All patients with bleeding were with prothrombin complex/recombinant activated coagulation factor VII, some of them with pd-coagulation factor FVIII preparations. Inhibitors were removed with prednisone acetate (1 case) + chemotherapy (1 case), prednisone acetate / + CTX (11 cases) + chemotherapy (1 case), prednisone acetate/prednisolone + mabthera (2 cases) + CTX (1 case), respectively. The removal time of inhibitor was from 8 days to 4 years. During the treatment process, two patients developed lower extremity venous thrombosis, and one patient was complicated with lung infection. Conclusion: Patients with unexplained bleeding and prolonged APTT should be conducted normal mixed plasma correction test, coagulation factor activity and inhibitor titer examination. After correctly diagnosis, bypass agents /coagulation factor VIII preparations should be given timely for hemostasis, protocol based on glucocorticoid + CTX/mabthera to remove the inhibitor and symptomatic treatment for patients with primary comorbidity disease at the same time. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 544-549
Author(s):  
Yoshiyuki Ogawa ◽  
Kunio Yanagisawa ◽  
Chiaki Naito ◽  
Hideki Uchiumi ◽  
Takuma Ishizaki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document