scholarly journals Real-World Treatment Patterns and Adverse Events in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated with Ibrutinib in the UK: A Preliminary Analysis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5885-5885
Author(s):  
Jing Xie ◽  
Alan Yong ◽  
Catherine Waweru ◽  
Thuy Anh Sorof ◽  
Ravi K Goyal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Preliminary Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
The Uk

Introduction: Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a critical component of the B-cell receptor pathway, and is a validated target for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ibrutinib is a first-generation, covalent, small molecule BTK inhibitor approved for the treatment of CLL. We present a preliminary analysis of treatment patterns and adverse events (AEs) in patients with CLL treated with ibrutinib in a real-world setting. Methods: A retrospective chart review is being conducted among patients diagnosed with CLL and treated with ibrutinib in oncology centers throughout the UK; the target sample size for the study is 250 patients. Patients are eligible if they initiated ibrutinib after diagnosis of CLL, between January 2017 and June 2018, with at least 12 months of follow-up data available, with the exception that patients who died less than 12 months after ibrutinib initiation remained eligible. Hematology/oncology physicians reviewed medical records and completed web-based data collection forms. Baseline medical history information and data on treatment characteristics and AEs were collected. By June 2019, a total of 151 medical records (60% of the target sample size) had been abstracted. All analyses were descriptive in nature and were performed in SAS v9.4 or later (Cary, NC, USA). Results: Twenty-two physicians from specialist cancer centers or tertiary referral treatment centers (45.5%), teaching hospitals (31.8%) and non-teaching hospitals (22.7%) submitted data on ibrutinib-treated patients. The median follow-up for this interim sample of 151 patients was 16.1 months (range: 2.8-27.5 months) from ibrutinib initiation (index date) and 61.7 months (range: 11.6-264.1 months) from initial CLL diagnosis (Table 1). Median age was 71 years, 56% were male, 22.5% of patients had del(17p) mutation and 24.5% had TP53 mutations/aberrations. Of the 151 patients, 24.5% (n=37) initiated ibrutinib as first-line therapy while 75.5% (n=114) initiated ibrutinib as second- or later-line treatment. Median time to initiation of ibrutinib was 3.8 months (range: 0.3-123.7 months) for first-line therapy after initial CLL diagnosis and 22.3 months (range: 0.2-242.2 months) for second-line therapy after end of first-line therapy. Other therapies that patients received besides ibrutinib included the combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (first-line, 22.5%; second-line, 1.7%), bendamustine plus rituximab (first-line, 19.9%; second-line, 15.5%), and chlorambucil plus rituximab (first-line, 10.6%; second-line, 1.7%). The most common AEs observed during ibrutinib therapy were bruising (19.9%), cytopenias (18.5%), diarrhea (15.2%), and arthralgia (11.3%) (Table 2). Conclusion: This preliminary analysis describes patient characteristics and treatment patterns in ibrutinib-treated patients in the UK. We found that the majority of ibrutinib use was in the second-line or later, reflecting the current UK public reimbursement situation. AEs such as bruising and cytopenias were commonly reported in patients treated with ibrutinib, and future analyses from this study will determine how these AEs and others affect dosing, treatment discontinuation and healthcare resource utilization. Disclosures Xie: AstraZeneca: Employment. Yong:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Waweru:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sorof:Acerta Pharma: Employment. Goyal:RTI Health Solutions: Employment. Davis:RTI Health Solutions: Employment. Follows:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Hillmen:Apellis: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Patient Profile and Treatment Patterns in a Commercially Insured Population with Follicular Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5880-5880
Author(s):  
Nathan H Fowler ◽  
Yanni Hao ◽  
Stephen Lim ◽  
Guifang Chen ◽  
Frank Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Introduction: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the Western hemisphere. Patient characteristics and burden of FL are incomplete and vary from previous studies. This study evaluated patient profile, including patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and duration using real-world data. Methods: Using the Truven MarketScan® databases, patients with FL who were newly initiated with FL indicated regimens were identified from 1/1/2010-12/31/2013 (initial treatment identification period). Patients were selected if they were ≥18 years old, had 1 FL ICD-9 code (202.0) as primary or secondary diagnosis, at least 1 FL commonly prescribed systemic anti-cancer therapy after the diagnosis, and did not use any FL indicated regimen in the past 6 months prior to first agent included in the initial treatment identification period. These patents were followed ≥3 months or to June 30, 2018. Primary outcomes were the distribution of regimens by line, the number of patients who switched from first- to second-line therapies, and from second- to third-line therapies. The treatment duration by line of therapy and regimen were also analyzed. Discontinuation was defined as 3 months without receiving a regimen after treatment. Results: This study identified 4,970 patients who initiated treatment for FL. Of these patients, 48.1% were female (n=2,390), with a mean age of 62.0 (SD: 14.0) years. The average follow-up time was approximately 2 years (median: 733 days). In this analysis, 4,970 patients with FL received first-line therapy for 153 days (median: 94 days), 1,985 received second-line therapy (39.9% of patients who received first-line therapy) for 208 days (median: 80 days), and 664 received third-line therapy (13.4% of patients who received first-line therapy) for 117 days (median: 43 days). Of the 4,970 patients on first-line therapy, 453 (9.1%) remained on first-line therapy, 2,532 (51.0%) discontinued treatment, and 1,985 (39.9%) patients switched to the next line of therapy during the follow-up period. Of the 1,985 patients who switched to second-line therapy, 328 (16.5%) remained by the end of follow-up period, 993 (50.0%) discontinued, and 664 (33.4%) switched to the next line of therapy during the follow-up period. Of the 664 patients who switched to third-line therapy, 125 (18.8%) remained, 269 (40.5%) discontinued, and 270 (40.7%) switched to the next line of therapy. The most common first-line regimens in descending order received by patients were rituximab (n=1,478, 29.7%), R-CHOP (n=1,368, 27.5%), BR (n=1,050, 21.1%), R-CVP (n=371, 7.5%), and FCR (n=63, 1.3%). Second-line treatment regimens were (N=1,985) rituximab (n=992, 50.0%), BR (n=202, 10.2%), R-CHOP (n=138, 7.0%), and R-CVP (n=120, 6.1%). Third-line treatment regimens were (N=664) rituximab (n=228, 34.3%), BR (n=91, 13.7%), R-CHOP (n=75, 11.3%), cyclophosphamide (n=35, 5.3%) and R-CVP (n=31, 4.7%). Conclusion: This data set describes the percentage of patients that transition from first- to second-line and second- to third-line treatment for FL. The primary regimens used across the treatment lines conform to those recommended by the NCCN guidelines. In addition, smaller numbers of non-recommended regimens were reported. Disclosures Fowler: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ABBVIE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hao:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lim:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Chen:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Employment. Li:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Arcona:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment.

scholarly journals Impact of Therapy Choice on Fatigue in Adults with Immune Thrombocytopenia

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 19-20
Author(s):  
Jennifer Diraimo ◽  
Caroline Kruse ◽  
Michele P. Lambert ◽  
Alexandra Kruse
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment History ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Background:Immune thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder that is heterogeneous in presentation, disease course, treatment response, and impact on quality of life. Treatments often cause unpleasant side effects, and prolonged use can lead to tolerability issues and toxicity. Both disease symptoms and treatments available impact the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients living with this rare condition. Here, we compare self-reported fatigue and its impact among adult ITP patients and determine whether these fatigue levels differ depending on treatment status. Methods: For this study, we used three of the five surveys from the PDSA Natural History Study Registry including; treatment history and two adult QoL surveys. As of June 2020, 357 adult patients completed the survey assessing treatment history. A total of 310 adult patients completed the adult QoL (part one) survey, and 301 adults completed the adult QoL (part two) survey. Patients were stratified by 1) no treatment received 2) treated in the past 3) on therapy within the last six months; patients currently on therapy were further stratified by first and second-line therapy. Results: Among the 357 completed surveys on treatment history, 11% (n=40) reported they have never received treatment for their ITP, while 46% (n=166) have in the past, and 43% (n=158) currently receive therapy (within the last six months). Among those currently on treatment, 82% receive monotherapy; 47 (26%) use a first-line therapy (corticosteroid, IVIG, or Anti-D), and 78 (43%) are using a second-line therapy (TPO-RA, rituximab, and other second-line options). Therapies reported include TPO-RA's (41%), corticosteroids (24%), IVIG (7%), rituximab (3%), SYK inhibitor (1%), antibiotics (4%), anti-D (1%), other second-line treatments (such as MMF, dapsone etc.), and "other" therapies including complementary treatments (14%). Overall, 93 (23%) reported having had a splenectomy at some point to manage their active ITP. When asked to reflect on general tiredness, 98% of patients (n=310) reported being tired overall, with 55% reporting feeling tired 'almost always/often' regardless of treatment group or type. Those who have never been treated reported they felt tired 94% of the time, and 55% reported feeling tired 'almost always/often'. Among those who are not currently on treatment (but have received therapy in past), 99% reported feeling tired overall, and 50% reported feeling tired 'almost always/often'. Respondents using a first line therapy reported feeling tired overall 100% of the time, and reported feeling tired 53% 'almost always/often'. Respondents using a second line therapy reported feeling tired 99% of the time, and indicated they were tired 59% 'almost always/often'. There were no significant differences between these treatment types and groups identified. When asked to reflect on fatigue levels over the last seven days, collectively, 86% reported fatigue, and 30% reported experiencing it 'very much/quite a bit'. Among those who had never been treated, 85% reported fatigue, and indicated they felt fatigue 27% of the time 'very much/quite a bit'. Respondents who were not receiving treatment reported feeling fatigue 84% of the time, of which 26% was experienced 'very much/quite a bit'. Among those receiving a first line therapy, 90% reported fatigue in the last seven days, and 34% reported they experienced this 'very much/quite a bit'. Those using a second line therapy reported feeling fatigue 91% of the time, and 29% reported this was 'very much/quite a bit'. There were no significant difference among these treatment types and groups. Conclusion: Reported fatigue and overall tiredness are high among those currently on treatment, not on treatment, and those who have never been treated for their ITP. We did not find that fatigue levels were related to treatment type or group, indicating that the underlying causes may not be platelet count, or disease severity, but rather a combination of factors associated with having an unpredictable chronic disease. The multi-faceted effects of ITP often take a significant toll on patients' quality of life. The registry continues to collect data with the intent of understanding the longitudinal impact of ITP and in future with more of a sample size we can learn if these trends continue. Disclosures Kruse: CSL Behring: Other: Grant paid to PDSA; UCB: Other: Grant and consultancy fee, all paid to PDSA; Rigel: Other: Grant paid to PDSA; Principia: Other: Grant paid to PDSA; Pfizer: Other: Grant and consultancy fee, all paid to PDSA; Argenx: Other: Grant paid to PDSA; Amgen: Other: Grant and honorarium, all paid to PDSA; Novartis: Other: PDSA received payment for recruiting patients to I-WISh and for promoting I-WISh on the globalitp.org website. Grant and consultancy fee, all paid to PDSA outside the submitted work. Lambert:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shionogi: Consultancy; Dova: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Principia: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Educational Concepts in Medicine: Consultancy; Octapharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Argenix: Consultancy; ClinGen: Honoraria; Platelet Disorder Support Association (PDSA): Consultancy; 22qSociety: Consultancy; ITP Australia: Consultancy; CdLS Foundation: Consultancy; RDMD ITP study: Consultancy; Sysmex: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding.

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Following Initial Relapse in Patients with Relapsed Systemic Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3338-3338
Author(s):  
Nidhi Tandon ◽  
Surbhi Sidana ◽  
Morie A. Gertz ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Introduction Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL Amyloidosis) is a plasma cell disorder characterized by deposition of misfolded insoluble protein fibrils (composed of monoclonal κ or λ light chains) in tissues causing progressive organ dysfunction. Chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), when eligible, are standard treatment options but relapses remain inevitable for most patients. However, there is a paucity of literature describing relapsed or refractory patients. We performed a retrospective study to analyze the outcomes upon relapse and the impact of type of therapy and retreatment with the same therapy at relapse. Methods Clinical and laboratory data of 1327 consecutive patients with systemic AL amyloidosis seen at Mayo Clinic within 90 days of their diagnosis, between 2006 and 2015, was collected by chart review and analyzed retrospectively. Of these patients, 219 (16.5%) were lost to follow-up. Among the remaining 1108 patients, 366 patients experienced a documented hematological or organ relapse or progression requiring change of first line or start of second line therapy and form the current study population. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from start of second line treatment or progression mandating therapy until death from any cause or the date of last follow up. The OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test was used to estimate the difference in survival curves. Results The median age was 62.8 years (36.1 - 85.3); 63.1% were males; 64.7% / 59.3% / 11.4% had cardiac / renal / hepatic involvement and 24.2% / 32.1% / 23.3% / 20.3% had MS I/II/III/IV. The median estimated follow up for this cohort was 69.4 months (95% CI; 64.4, 76.8) from the start of first line therapy and 45.2 months (95% CI; 36.5, 50.6) from the start of second line therapy or progression requiring treatment. The median time to second line treatment or relapse /progression mandating therapy was 16.2 months (1-93) from the start of first line therapy. At relapse, 14 patients underwent ASCT, 165 were treated with proteasome inhibitor (PI) based therapy, 83 with immunomodulator (IMiD) based therapy, 33 with alkylator based therapy, 15 with a combination of PI and IMiD, 10 with steroids, 8 with other therapies and 38 did not receive treatment. Among the 366 patients, 124 (33.9%) required change or reinstitution of therapy during follow up at the time of analysis. The median time to third line treatment or relapse /progression mandating therapy was 31 months (95% CI; 24, 40.5) from the start of second line treatment. The median overall survival (OS) was 76.4 months (95% CI; 65.2, 83.6) from the start of first line therapy and 38.8 months (95% CI; 29.6, 52.6) from the start of second line therapy. The type of therapy at relapse (ASCT vs PI vs IMiD vs melphalan vs steroids and others) did not alter the time to next therapy (ASCT, 43.1m; PI, 31m; IMiD, 37m; melphalan, 20.8m; steroids and others, 20m; p=0.3) and OS (ASCT, 66.9m; PI, 51.1m; IMiD, 51.3m; melphalan, 37.2m; steroids and others, 80.7m; p=0.9) from the start of the second line treatment; as depicted in Figure 1. Retreatment with a different drug class (as the first line treatment) at relapse significantly reduced the time to next treatment (32.3m vs 22 m; p= 0.01) as compared to same therapy; but did not have any impact on survival (30.8m vs 51.1m; p = 0.5); as presented in Figure 2. Conclusion This study provides novel information about outcomes of patients with systemic AL amyloidosis who relapse or progress after first line therapy which could be useful in planning salvage therapies and designing clinical trials. Retreatment with a different therapy at relapse improves time to next therapy but does not impact OS. Hence, we conclude that the patients can fare well post relapse/ progression and can benefit from various treatment regimens including retreatment with the same agent. Disclosures Dispenzieri: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jannsen: Research Funding; pfizer: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Kapoor:Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Kumar:BMS: Consultancy; Kesios: Consultancy; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Noxxon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Skyline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Optimizing Deep Response Assessment for AL Amyloidosis Using Involved Free Light Chain Level at End of Therapy

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3227-3227
Author(s):  
Eli Muchtar ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Nelson Leung ◽  
Francis K. Buadi ◽  
David Dingli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Light Chain ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Organ Response

Abstract Introduction: Light chain burden in light chain (AL) amyloidosis is often low, making accurate response assessment challenging. Methods: AL amyloidosis patients achieving very good partial or complete response to first line therapy and had serial sFLC studies during and after completion of therapy were included (n=396). Involved free light chain (iFLC), difference in involved-to-uninvolved free light chains (dFLC) and sFLC ratio (sFLCR) were assessed at the end of first line therapy and at nadir iFLC. Survival analysis was done using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hematological progression-free survival (hemPFS) was defined as the time from diagnosis until hematological progression or death, where patients known to be alive and progression-free at the end of follow-up were censored. Hematological progression was defined according to consensus criteria or upon initiation of second line therapy, whichever came first. Results: The median iFLC and dFLC at the end of therapy was 1.7 mg/dL and 0.5 mg/dL, respectively. sFLCR normalization occurred in 70% of patients. iFLC ≤2 mg/dL and dFLC ≤0.5 mg/dL were associated with a longer hemPFS compared to their counterparts (Figure). Only iFLC ≤2 mg/dL was associated with a significantly longer overall survival (Figure). sFLCR normalization did not predict hemPFS or overall survival. Organ response was predicted by iFLC ≤2 mg/dL and dFLC ≤0.5 mg/dL (Table), with best discrimination seen with iFLC ≤2 mg/dL. Organ response was not predicted by sFLC normalization (Table). The median nadir iFLC was 1.4 mg/dL and was reached 3.9 months from the end of therapy, longer in transplanted patients compared to patients treated with non-transplant regimens (7.3 vs 1.8 months, respectively; P<0.001). iFLC ≤2 mg/dL at the completion of therapy and nadir iFLC reached >12 months from the end of therapy were favorable predictors of hemPFS/OS in a multivariate analysis. Conclusion: iFLC at the end of first line therapy better predicts for organ response and survival than dFLC among deep responders. Normalization of sFLCR does not predict for organ response or survival and should not be used as measure of therapeutic efficacy. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Dispenzieri: Celgene, Takeda, Prothena, Jannsen, Pfizer, Alnylam, GSK: Research Funding. Dingli:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Participates in the International PNH Registry (for Mayo Clinic, Rochester) for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Participates in the International PNH Registry (for Mayo Clinic, Rochester) for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding. Kapoor:Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Russell:Vyriad: Equity Ownership. Kumar:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Gertz:Alnylam: Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy; Ionis: Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy; annexon: Consultancy; janssen: Consultancy; spectrum: Consultancy, Honoraria; Research to Practice: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Prothena: Honoraria; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Functional Cure, Defined As PFS of More Than 7 Years, Is Achieved in 9% of Myeloma Patients in the Era of Conventional Chemotherapy and of First-Generation Novel Anti-Myeloma Agents; A Single-Center Experience over 20-Year Period

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1968-1968
Author(s):  
Evangelos Terpos ◽  
Maria Roussou ◽  
Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos ◽  
Nikolaos Kanellias ◽  
Despina Fotiou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Steering Committee ◽  
First Line ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Travel Grant

Abstract Advances in the management of multiple myeloma (MM) led to a significant prolongation of overall survival (OS), mainly of the younger patients; almost 10% of them experience more than 10-year OS. Although long progression-free survival (PFS) correlates with extended OS, there is very limited information for the characteristics of patients who manage to be progression-free for a long period after first-line therapy. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the characteristics of patients who achieved at least 7-year of PFS after frontline therapy and compare them with those of all other patients who were treated in a single center during the same time period. Between January 1994 and December 2010, 406 consecutive newly diagnosed MM patients received first line therapy in the Department of Clinical Therapeutics (Athens, Greece). All patients had symptomatic disease, based on the IMWG criteria of that period (at least one CRAB symptom to start anti-myeloma therapy). Thirty-six (8.8%; 23M/13F) patients achieved a PFS of at least 7 years (long PFS group) after frontline treatment. The median PFS of these 36 patients is 10 years, while the other patients had a median PFS of 22 months. Long PFS patients were younger (median age 56 vs 68 years; p<0.001), had bigger body surface area (median: 1.85 m2 vs. 1.76 m2; p=0.013) and lower ECOG performance status (score 0-1: 71% vs 52%; p=0.014) compared to all others. Long PFS patients had higher hemoglobin (11.4 g/dl vs 10.2 g/dl; p=0.001), higher platelet count (278 vs 224 x109/l; p<0.001) and higher creatinine clearance (CrCl, based on the MDRD formula: 88 vs 67 ml/min; p<0.001; no patient in the long PFS group presented with CrCl <45 ml/min at diagnosis). There was no difference between the two groups regarding percentage of patients with high LDH, presence of osteolysis, type of myeloma (IgG vs IgA vs others), levels of serum and/or urine M-protein, and percentage of plasma cell infiltration in the bone marrow. However, more patients in the long PFS group had ISS-1 or ISS-2 disease (86% vs 61%; p=0.002) and normal pattern of marrow infiltration in the MRI of the spine and pelvis (24% vs 15%; p=0.035). Regarding chromosome abnormalities at diagnosis, no patient in the long PFS group had high-risk cytogenetics (defined as presence of del17p, t(4;14) or t(14;16) vs 32% in all other patients. All patients received either conventional chemotherapy (CC) or first-generation novel anti-myeloma agent (bortezomib (B), thalidomide (T) or lenalidomide (R)-based regimens as frontline therapy. There was no difference between the two groups regarding CC versus novel agent-based induction treatment. Out of 36 long-term PFS patients, 11 (30%) received CC, 8 (22%) B-based, 8 (22%) RD, 6 (17%) T-based, and 3 (8%) VTD; 10 (28%) patients received first-line therapy participating in a clinical trial. Long PFS patients had received more often autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT, 61% vs 23%; p=0.001) as part of first line therapy; therefore, more long PFS patients had also received consolidation and/or maintenance (50% vs 15%; p=0.001). Higher proportion of patients achieved at least VGPR (74% vs 41%) or at least CR (32% vs 18%) in the long PFS group. We performed next generation flow cytometry in 23 patients of the long PFS group to evaluate minimal residual disease (MRD) and 14 (61%) of them were MRD (-) at the level of the 10-6. The probability of achieving long PFS (≥7 years) for patients who managed to be progression-free at 2, 3 and 4 years was 11.6%, 13.2% and 15.3%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, only younger age was associated with probability for long PFS (p<0.001). The median OS of the whole group of patients was 5 years; in the long-PFS group median OS has not been reached yet while in all other patients the median OS was 4.3 years. In conclusion, our study in an unselected group of patients, the majority of whom did not participate in clinical trials, showed that 9% of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma experience prolonged PFS of more than 7 years (median: 10 years) even in the era of CC or first-generation novel agents. These patients have low risk disease, mainly of ISS-1 or -2, no high-risk cytogenetics, no or mild renal impairment, and achieve deep responses after ASCT. These patients may be considered as "functionally" cured. The incorporation of novel treatment approaches may lead to a significant improvement in the probability of achievement of this "functionally" cured status. Disclosures Terpos: Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grant, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: member of steering committee, Research Funding; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grant, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: member of DMC, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grant, steering committee member, Research Funding. Kastritis:Prothena: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dimopoulos:Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria.

The Survival Outcome of the Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2738-2738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dai Chihara ◽  
Michelle A. Fanale ◽  
Mansoor Noorani ◽  
Jason R Westin ◽  
Loretta Nastoupil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Survival Outcome ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Large Cell Lymphoma

Abstract Purpose: We assessed the survival outcome of patients with anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) who experienced disease progression or relapse after first line and subsequent therapy. We sought to evaluate the impact of brentuximab vedotin (BV), and survival outcome of patients with ALCL who experienced progression after BV. Patients and Methods: A total of 176 patients (74 ALK+, 102 ALK-) initially diagnosed between 1999 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after the progression/relapse following first-line chemotherapy (PFS1 and OS1), after first salvage therapy (PFS2 and OS2) and after second salvage therapy (PFS3 and OS3) were calculated. Outcome was separately analyzed according to the ALK status focusing on the use of BV. Results: The median age of the patients was 50 (range: 18-89). With a median follow up of 64 months, 111 patients (38 ALK+, 73 ALK-) experienced progression/relapse after the first-line therapy, of which 4 ALK- patients were post upfront stem cell transplant (SCT). Thirty and 15 patients eventually underwent autologous and allogeneic SCT after salvage chemotherapy, respectively. The median PFS1 and OS1 in patients with ALK+ALCL and ALK-ALCL were 8.4 and 28.5 months, and 13.1 and 47.7 months, respectively. In patients with ALK+ALCL, the median PFS1, PFS2 and PFS3 were 53.6, 5.2 and 2.3 months, respectively. The median OS1, OS2 and OS3 were not reached, 47.3 and 6.1 months, respectively. In patients with ALK-ALCL, the median PFS1, PFS2 and PFS3 were 12.9, 3.0 and 2.0 months, respectively. The median OS1, OS2 and OS3 were 54.3, 10.8 and 5.8 months, respectively. Interestingly, there were no significant difference in PFS2 between ALK+ALCL and ALK-ALCL. However, OS2 was significantly longer in patients with ALK+ALCL, suggesting possibly continued chemosensitivity of recurrent ALK+ALCL. A total of 30 patients received BV in 1st salvage (15 patients) and after 2nd salvage (15 patients).The use of BV at 1st salvage was associated with significantly longer PFS2 and OS2 both in patients with ALK-ALCL but not with ALK+ALCL likely due to small number of cases. Mutivariate analysis adjusting baseline PIT risk factors and the duration of the response to first line therapy revealed that use of BV (at any point in the salvage setting) is significantly associated with longer OS2 (HR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.23-0.80). Overall, 12 patients experienced relapse/progression after BV treatment. The median OS after BV failure was 1.4 months (95%CI: 0.5-9.5 months) (Figure). Summary: Survival outcome for relapsed/refractory patients with ALK+ and ALK- patients is improved with BV. However, survival outcome after BV failure is very poor. A new treatment strategies to consolidate or maintain the response after BV and to develop more safe and better therapeutic options are needed. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Fanale: Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Infinity: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Molecular Templates: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Westin:Spectrum: Research Funding. Nastoupil:Celgene: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; AbbVie: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Wang:Celgene: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Idelalisib Plus Anti-CD20 Used Second Line Shows Improved PFS and Comparable Safety Compared to Later Line Therapy of Relapsed CLL

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5564-5564
Author(s):  
Jennifer R. Brown ◽  
Rebecca J Chan ◽  
Wei Ye ◽  
Guan Xing ◽  
Caroline Roudet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Anti Cd20 ◽  
Line Setting

Abstract Introduction: Idelalisib (IDELA) is a first-in-class PI3Kδ inhibitor that is approved for use in combination with rituximab for patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphoid leukemia (R/R CLL) in the United States and in combination with rituximab or ofatumumab for the same indication in the European Union. Clinical trials evaluating IDELA in the first line setting for CLL were prematurely terminated due to an increased incidence of serious adverse events (AEs) and mortality; therefore, IDELA is not indicated as a first line therapy for CLL. The safety signal observed in the treatment naïve setting has produced a prevailing view that early line use of IDELA may also lead to inferior clinical outcomes. To address this question, we evaluated the clinical benefit:risk balance for IDELA in early vs. later lines of use in the relapsed setting. Objective: To investigate clinical outcomes across sub-populations of IDELA + anti-CD20-treated patients with R/R CLL based on number of prior chemo-immunotherapy treatment regimens. Methods: Using clinical outcomes data collected in Gilead-sponsored clinical trials of patients with R/R CLL treated with IDELA + anti-CD20 (312-0116/0117, N=110, Furman et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 2014; 370:997-1007, and 312-0119, N=173, Jones et al., Lancet Haematol. 2017; 4:e114-e126), we retrospectively compared the overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and AE profile for patients previously treated with 1 prior regimen (IDELA given in the second line setting, 2L), 2 prior regimens (3L), or ≥3 prior regimens (≥4L). PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and groups were compared using a log-rank test. The incidence of AEs was compared using the Kruskal Wallis test. Results: Among 283 patients treated with IDELA + anti-CD20, 49 (17.3%) received IDELA 2L, 69 (24.4%) received it 3L, and 165 (58.3%) received it ≥4L. Patient characteristics were similar except that patients in the ≥4L group presented with Rai stage III/IV disease more frequently compared to the 2L and 3L groups (70.3% vs. 61.3% and 57.9%, respectively, Table 1). ORR was similar irrespective of the number of prior regimens (85.7% for the 2L group, 73.9% for the 3L group, and 80% for the ≥4L group, p=0.2866); however, PFS and OS were longer in the 2L group compared to the 3L and ≥4L groups (median PFS= 31.5 months, 16.6 months, and 17.3 months, respectively, [Figure 1] and median OS=47.4 months, not reached (NR), and 34.6 months, respectively). No statistically significant difference was observed across treatment setting groups in the incidence of grade 3/4 key treatment-emergent AEs, including cough, diarrhea, infection, transaminitis, and colitis (Figure 2). Conclusion: These analyses indicate that patients with R/R CLL experience comparable or improved efficacy and have a similar safety profile when IDELA + anti-CD20 regimens are used 2nd line as compared to later line, after chemo-immunotherapeutic regimens. The longer PFS and OS times for patients treated with IDELA in the 2L may reflect shorter time since diagnosis, lower stage disease, or less disease resistance in this group, but also suggest that the efficacy benefit of IDELA + anti-CD20 is greater and may therefore better offset the potential toxicity in this patient sub-group. These findings support the use of IDELA + anti-CD20 in the 2L+ setting for patients with R/R CLL following chemo-immunotherapy. Disclosures Brown: Abbvie: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Boehringer: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Loxo: Consultancy; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries: Research Funding; Invectys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Acerta / Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy. Ye:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Xing:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Roudet:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Ruzicka:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. O'Brien:TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Aptose Biosciences Inc.: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Vaniam Group LLC: Consultancy.

Patterns of Care for Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): The Connect® CLL Disease Registry

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2864-2864
Author(s):  
Jeff Sharman ◽  
Christopher R Flowers ◽  
Mark Weiss ◽  
David Grinblatt ◽  
Charles Farber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Age Group ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Abstract 2864 Introduction: Clinical trials have illuminated a number of unique treatment strategies for patients with CLL. The impact of these strategies on routine practice remains unknown as trial participants may not reflect the same population encountered outside of a clinical trial setting. Many questions remain regarding the sequencing of therapies based on age and performance status. By characterizing current patterns of care; patients, treating physicians, and regulatory agencies will be able to understand the current landscape of CLL treatment. The Connect® CLL registry was designed to report the natural history and real world management of patients receiving therapy for CLL. In this first report, we characterize the therapeutic approaches used for the treatment of patients with CLL of different age groups (i.e. < 65 years, 65–75 years, and ≥ 75 years) and with an ECOG PS status score of 0 compared to 1 or greater. Methods: Connect® CLL is a prospective, longitudinal, observational, multi-center registry conducted in community and academic research centers in the United States. At present, 237 sites are actively participating with a projected study enrollment of 1500 patients. Eligible patients are to be enrolled within 2 months of being initiated on any line of therapy; whether initial therapy or salvage therapy. Each patient will be followed for up to 60 months. Clinical data, physician choices, patient-reported health-related quality of life, response and survival are to be collected approximately every 3 months during participation. Results: A total of 607 patients have been enrolled (4% from academic sites) with a median age of 70 years. 198 were < 65 years old (age group 1), 187 were between 65–75 years old (age group 2), and 222 were ≥ 75 years old (age group 3). ECOG status varied across the three age groups, with an ECOG status score of ≥ 1 for 39%, 52%, and 70% of patients respectively. Treatment patterns varied across the age groups and by ECOG status in the 496 patients reporting therapies. The most commonly recorded first-line regimens independent of age included fludarabine (F) cyclophosphamide (C) and rituximab (R) (33%), bendamustine (B) +/− R (19%), F +/− R (15%), or investigational therapy (15%). For second-line regimens and beyond, the most frequently recorded regimen was B +/− R (30%), FCR (23%), other F-based regimens (13%), or investigational therapy (8%). The use of FCR for first-line treatment decreased significantly with increasing age group, (45%, 32%, 20%, for age group 1, 2, 3 respectively, p=0.04, spearman correlation) while use of F +/− R remained level across the age groups (14%, 15%, 15%, respectively). Compared to age group 1, first-line therapy with B +/− R in age groups 2 and 3 (15%, 22%, 21%, respectively) was higher but did not achieve statistical significance. B +/− R represented the most common treatment for all age groups (37%, 26%, 29%, respectively) as second line therapy but did not vary by age (P=0.35). The use of chlorambucil was infrequent in all age groups, but was more common in age group 3 patients compared to the others (P=0.01), in both first-line (2%, 4%, 12%, respectively) and subsequent lines of therapy (0%, 1%, 8%, respectively). Treatment assignments did not vary by ECOG PS score for patients in age group 1. First-line therapy for patients with an ECOG PS score of 0 in age groups 2 and 3 consisted of FCR (32% and 15%, respectively), F +/− R (19% and 15%, respectively), B +/− R (16% and 15%, respectively), and alkylating agents (3% and 23%, respectively). Patients in age groups 2 and 3 with ECOG PS score ≥ 1 received B +/− R regimen (33% and 22%, respectively), FCR (23% and 21%, respectively), F +/− R (14% and 10%, respectively) and alkylating agents (7% and 9%, respectively) as first-line therapy. Further description and clarification on the various treatment regimens based on the three age groups and by ECOG PS score will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: The Connect® CLL Registry is the largest prospective, multicenter registry in the United States evaluating management for patients with CLL. With the currently available data, we characterize the extent to which age and performance status are associated with treatment selection in both first-line and subsequent lines of therapy in routine practice. As enrollment increases and additional follow-up is completed, the data will provide more extensive and real world overview of the current treatment strategies used in CLL patients. Disclosures: Sharman: Celgene - consulting: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Calistoga: Honoraria; Portola pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Flowers:Consultancy: Celgene, Prescription Solutions, Spectrum (future), Seattle Genetics, Millennium (future), Genentech (unpaid): Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Weiss:Celgene: Consultancy. Grinblatt:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kay:Genenetech, Celgene, Hospira,: Research Funding. Kipps:Igenica: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbot Industries: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Lamanna:Celgene Corporation: Advisory board. Pashos:United BioSource Corporation: Research Funding. Flinn:Celgene: Research Funding. Kozloff:Celgene: Consultancy. Lerner:Celgene Connect: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Swern:Celgene: Employment. Sullivan:Celgene: Employment. Street:Celgene: Employment. Keating:Celgene Connect: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Variation in Health-Related Quality of Life by Line of Therapy of Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3926-3926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil E. Kay ◽  
Christopher R. Flowers ◽  
Mark Weiss ◽  
Nicole Lamanna ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Abstract Abstract 3926 Introduction. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients will have significant variation in signs and symptoms at initial presentation and across lines of therapy, with concomitant effect on patient health-related quality of life (HRQOL). HRQOL and other patient-reported outcomes, together with clinical outcomes, provide a more complete perspective on the burden of disease and facilitate a broader view of the impact of treatment regimens. This analysis evaluates whether the HRQOL of patients with CLL in the United States (US) varies at the time the patients are about to embark on various lines of therapy, and offers a baseline report from which subsequent longitudinal analysis post-treatment will be possible. Methods. Clinical and HRQOL data were collected in Connect®CLL, a prospective observational registry initiated in March 2010 involving centers in the US. Physicians provided data on the demographics and clinical characteristics of patients receiving therapy. HRQOL was self-reported by patients at enrollment using the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI, a symptom assessment tool), the EQ-5D (a non-disease-specific HRQOL instrument), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu, a leukemia-specific HRQOL instrument). We characterized patients who had initial (First Line), second (Second Line) or subsequent (Higher Line) treatment regimens prior to initiation of regimens. Reported mean overall and/or domain-specific BFI, EQ-5D and FACT-Leu scores were analyzed by line of therapy. Statistical significance of score differences among sub-cohorts was ascertained by ANOVA using SAS 9.1. Results. Evaluable data were reported on 1005 patients, enrolled from 161 centers (93% community, 7% academic). Patients were predominantly male (62%) and white (89%) with mean age at 69 (standard deviation [SD] 11) years. HRQOL scores by line of therapy are presented: The total FACT-Leu and FACT-G results, and the total EQ-5D Index and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) results, consistently suggest that patients initiating first line therapy have somewhat better HRQOL compared with those initiating subsequent lines of therapy. FACT-Leu total scores of patients initiating first line therapy were associated with better physical and leukemia-specific considerations, and the EQ-5D total score was associated with better mobility and pain/discomfort. Conclusions. Initial results from the Connect® CLL Registry indicate that HRQOL prior to treatment is better among patients initiating first line therapy compared to patients initiating later lines of treatment. Future analyses should be conducted to determine what clinical or other factors may be associated with the HRQOL deterioration in patients initiating subsequent lines of therapy, so as to inform clinician decision making. Also, subsequent longitudinal analyses should be undertaken to determine how HRQOL might be affected by the different lines of therapy and the specific treatment regimens, as well as by their initial HRQOL and other patient factors. Disclosures: Kay: Celgene: Research Funding. Flowers:Celgene: Consultancy; Prescription Solutions: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Millennium: Research Funding, Unpaid consultancy, Unpaid consultancy Other; Genentech: Unpaid consultancy, Unpaid consultancy Other; Gilead: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Janssen lymphoma research foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Weiss:Celgene: Consultancy. Lamanna:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Flinn:Celgene: Research Funding. Grinblatt:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kipps:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kozloff:Celgene: Consultancy. Lerner:Celgene Connect: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sharman:Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Calistoga: Honoraria; Portola pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Khan:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Street:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Swern:Celgene: Employment. Sullivan:Celgene: Employment. Pashos:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Anxiety in Adult Patients Living with ITP Stratified across Different Treatment Types and Groups

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 18-18
Author(s):  
Jennifer Diraimo ◽  
Caroline Kruse ◽  
Michele P. Lambert ◽  
Alexandra Kruse
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment History ◽  
Line Therapy

Background:Immune thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder that is heterogeneous in presentation, disease course, treatment response, and impact on quality of life. Treatments often cause unpleasant side effects, and prolonged use can lead to tolerability issues and toxicity. Disease symptoms and treatments available impact the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients living with ITP. Here, we compare anxiety and its impact among adult ITP patients and determine whether anxiety levels differ dependent on treatment. Methods: For this study, we used three of the five surveys from the PDSA Natural History Study Registry including; treatment history and two adult QoL surveys. As of June 2020, 357 adult patients completed the survey assessing treatment history. A total of 310 adult patients completed the adult QoL (part one) survey, and 301 adults completed the adult QoL (part two) survey. Patients were stratified by 1) no treatment received 2) treated in the past 3) on therapy within the last six months; patients currently on therapy were further stratified by first and second-line therapy. Results: Among the 357 completed surveys on treatment history, 11% (n=40) have never received treatment for ITP, 46% (n=166) have in past, and 43% (n=158) currently receive therapy (within the last six months). Among those currently on treatment, 82% receive monotherapy; 26% use a first-line therapy (corticosteroid, IVIG, or Anti-D), and 43% are using a second-line therapy (TPO-RA, rituximab, and other second-line options). Therapies reported include TPO-RA's (41%), corticosteroids (24%), IVIG (7%), rituximab (3%), SYK inhibitor (1%), antibiotics (4%), anti-D (1%) and other second-line treatments (such as MMF), and "other" treatments including complementary therapies (14%). Overall, 23% had a splenectomy at some point to manage their active ITP. When asked to reflect on the last seven days, patients completing the QoL survey (n=310), 66% felt anxious; 17% reported this was experienced 'almost always/often'. Among those who have never been treated, feeling anxious was reported 67% of the time; 18% reported feeling this way 'almost always/often'. A similar trend was observed in patients not currently on treatment. Among those receiving a first line therapy, anxiousness was reported 74% overall; 19% 'almost always/often'. Among those receiving a second line therapy, 72% reported feeling anxious; 9% reported feeling this way 'almost always/often'. Differences in high levels of anxiousness reported among the different treatment groups was not significant (X2= 3.4, p=.48). Difficulties focusing were reported (51%, 9% reporting this occurred 'almost always/often'). Among those who have never been treated, difficulties were reported (48%, 12%, 'almost always/often'). Those not currently receiving treatment had difficulties focusing due to anxiety (50%, 4% reporting this 'almost always/often'). Those on first line treatment indicated focus was impacted by anxiety overall (60%, 36% 'almost always/often') and those receiving second-line therapy reported (58%, 8% 'almost always/often'). Differences in high levels of anxiety affecting concentration reported among the treatment groups was significant (X2= 20.87, p=.00033), revealing a higher anxiety profile among those using corticosteroids. When difficulty with focus due to anxiety was compared between those receiving corticosteroids and those receiving a TPO-RA specifically, anxiety was significantly higher in the steroid group (X2=9.15, P=.0024); this trend was not found to be statistically significant among other second line therapies. Conclusion: The physical symptoms of ITP often guide treatment selection for patients however, providers should also focus on mitigating stress and other indicators of mental health in order to provide the best outcome and quality of life in disease course. Differences in interpretation behind the terms feeling 'anxious' vs ' anxiety affecting focus' may explain our conflicting results. Higher anxiety levels (in contrast to higher anxiousness) appeared related to treatment type in those currently receiving therapy; corticosteroid users were more impacted by their anxiety than those receiving TPO-RAs; steroids are known to interfere with mood and concentration, and this is confirmed by patients in this survey. Disclosures Kruse: CSL Behring: Other: Grant paid to PDSA; UCB: Other: Grant and consultancy fee, all paid to PDSA; Rigel: Other: Grant paid to PDSA; Principia: Other: Grant paid to PDSA; Pfizer: Other: Grant and consultancy fee, all paid to PDSA; Argenx: Other: Grant paid to PDSA; Amgen: Other: Grant and honorarium, all paid to PDSA; Novartis: Other: PDSA received payment for recruiting patients to I-WISh and for promoting I-WISh on the globalitp.org website. Grant and consultancy fee, all paid to PDSA outside the submitted work. Lambert:AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Principia: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dova: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shionogi: Consultancy; Sysmex: Research Funding; RDMD ITP study: Consultancy; ITP Australia: Consultancy; CdLS Foundation: Consultancy; 22qSociety: Consultancy; Platelet Disorder Support Association (PDSA): Consultancy; ClinGen: Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy; Argenix: Consultancy; Octapharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Educational Concepts in Medicine: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document