Feasibility and Outcomes of T-Cell Depleted Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory AML and High Risk MDS

Background: Survival in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is dismal. Treatment options are limited; however, a proportion of these individuals can be rescued by allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Historically, allo-SCT, especially for R/R myeloid diseases, has used myeloablative regimens and no T-cell depletion (TCD) to maximize graft-versus-leukemia effect, often restricting this approach to younger and fit pts with matched donors. The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes of in vivo T-cell depleted stem cell transplantation (TCD-SCT) in a high-risk AML and MDS population. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 141 patients with R/R AML (n=108)/high risk MDS (RAEB or CMML, n=33) who received TCD-SCT at our center from 2002-2015. Median age was 55 years (18-71) with 37 (26%) pts older than 60. Patients underwent in vivo TCD with alemtuzumab or ATG and 117 (88%) received reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC). Alemtuzumab was generally given as 100 mg total divided over 5 days whereas rabbit ATG dosing included days -1, - 3, -5 (+/- on day -7). Alemtuzumab usually partnered with matched related (n=65; 46%) or unrelated (n=53; 38%) peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts whereas ATG mostly was a component of umbilical cord grafts combined with a CD34 selected haploidentical donor (haplo-cord) (n=23; 16%). Prognostic factors such as age, HCT-CI, CIBMTR score (Duval 2010), revised disease risk index (R-DRI), donor type and pre-transplant disease status were analyzed. Multivariate cox regression models were considered from forward selection for factors with a p value <0.1 in univariate analysis. Results: Table 1 summarizes baseline characteristics. Among the 141 R/R AML or high risk MDS pts, AML predominated (77%). Sixty six (47%) pts had primary induction failure (PIF), 42 (37%) had relapse and 33 (23%) had high risk MDS. Eighty three pts (59%) had peripheral blasts at time of TCD-SCT. Cumulative incidence (CI) of relapse for all pts was 53% and non-relapse mortality was 28% at 2 yrs. Two and 5 yr PFS rates for the group were 19% and 11%, respectively. Two and 5 yr OS rates for the group were 30% and 18%, respectively. Figure 1 shows OS by disease type. Day 100 mortality was 18%. Twenty one percent developed Grade 2-4 acute GVHD (aGVHD) (6% Grade 3-4), and only 5% developed chronic GVHD (cGVHD) requiring therapy. Figure 2 shows CI of cGVHD amongst disease types. Differences in 2yr survival outcomes were not significant among prognostic factors. Specifically, age 60+ vs younger was not prognostic (PFS 24% vs 17% p=0.4, OS 29% vs 29% p=0.7). Likewise, haplo-cord did not differ relative to matched donors in outcomes (PFS 18% vs 26% p=0.2, OS 35% vs 29% p=0.5). Conclusions: Although novel therapeutic approaches are emerging for R/R AML and high risk MDS, allo-SCT remains an established option for long-term disease control. In our analysis, outcomes after in vivo TCD-SCT in R/R AML and high-risk MDS pts treated with RIC mirror published historical results (Duval 2010, Schlenk 2010) but with low rates of cGVHD. The lack of significant difference in survival outcomes amongst age groups and donor sources suggests RIC with in vivo TCD can also be utilized as a platform in older individuals and those with alternative donors. With high relapse rates in this population, better pre-transplant disease reduction, minimal residual disease monitoring and post-transplant maintenance will be critical to increase long-term cures. Disclosures Liu: Agios: Honoraria; Arog: Other: PI of clinical trial; BMS: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: PI of clinical trial. Larson:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Contracts for clinical trials; Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Odenike:Oncotherapy: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; CTI/Baxalta: Research Funding. Stock:Kite, a Gilead Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UpToDate: Honoraria; Research to Practice: Honoraria. Kline:Merck: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding. Riedell:Bayer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding. Van Besien:Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding. Bishop:Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Artz:Miltenyi: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Stem Cell Transplantation Can Provide Durable Disease Control in Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasia (BPDC): A Retrospective Study From the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.3077.3077 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 3077-3077

Author(s):

Sascha Dietrich ◽

Damien Roos-Weil ◽

Ariane Boumendil ◽

Emanuelle Polge ◽

Jian-Jian Luan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Nk Cell ◽

Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 3077 Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDC), formerly known as blastic NK cell lymphoma, is a rare hematopoietic malignancy preferentially involving the skin, bone marrow and lymph nodes. The overall prognosis of BPDC is dismal. Most patients show an initial response to acute leukemia-like chemotherapy, but relapses with subsequent drug resistance occur in virtually all patients resulting in a median overall survival of only 9–13 months. However, anecdotal long-term remissions have been reported in young patients who received early myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). We therefore performed a retrospective analysis of patients identified in the EBMT registry in order to evaluate the outcome of autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) or alloSCT for BPDC. Eligible were all patients who had been registered with a diagnosis of BPDC or Blastic NK cell lymphoma and had received autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) or alloSCT in 2000–2009. Centres were contacted to provide a written histopathology and immunophenotyping report and information about treatment and follow-up details. Patients who did not have a diagnostic score ≥ 2 as proposed by Garnache-Ottou et al. (BJH 2009) were excluded. RESULTS: Overall, 139 patients could be identified in the database who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (alloSCT 100, autoSCT 39). Of 74 patients for whom the requested additional information could be obtained, central review confirmed the diagnosis of BPDC in 39 patients (34 alloSCT, 5 autoSCT). The 34 patients who had undergone alloSCT had a median age of 41 years (range: 10–70 years), were transplanted from a related (n=11) or unrelated donor (n=23); received peripheral blood stem cells (n=9), bone marrow stem cells (n=19) or cord blood (n=6); and had been treated with a reduced intensity conditioning regimen (RIC, n=9) or myeloablative conditioning (MAC, n=25). Nineteen of 34 patients were transplanted in CR1. After a median follow up time of 28 months (range: 4–77+ months), 11 patients relapsed (median time to relapse: 8 months, range: 2–27 months) of whom 8 died due to disease progression. 9 patients died in the absence of relapse. No relapse occurred later than 27 months after transplant. Median disease free survival (DFS) was 15 months (range: 4–77+ months) and median overall survival (OS) was 22 months (range: 8–77+ months; Figure 1a). However, long-term remissions of up to 77 months after alloSCT could be observed. Patients allografted in CR1 tended to have a superior DFS (p=0.119) and OS (p=0.057; Figure 1b). MAC was associated with a better OS (p=0.001) which was attributable to the significantly higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) rate of patients after RIC (p=0.014), who had been significantly older (age RIC: 56 years, age MAC: 36 years, p=0.0014). The relapse rate was not different in patients after RIC and MAC, respectively. However, there was no survivor after RIC. Median age in the autoSCT group was 47 years (range: 14–62 years). Three of 5 patients were transplanted in CR1 of whom 1 patient relapsed after 8 months, 1 patient experienced treatment related mortality and 1 patient remained in CR for 28 months. The 2 remaining patients had more advanced disease at autoSCT and relapsed 4 and 8 months thereafter. CONCLUSION: AlloSCT is effective in BPDC and might provide curative potential in this otherwise incurable disease, especially when performed in CR1. However, it remains to be shown by prospective studies if the potential benefit of alloSCT in BPDC is largely due to conditioning intensity, or if there is a relevant contribution of graft-versus-leukemia activity. Disclosures: Tilly: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, Travel/accommodations/meeting expenses; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Janssen Cilag: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Phase I/II Study of the Deacetylase Inhibitor Panobinostat As Maintenance Therapy after an Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with High-Risk MDS or AML: The Panobest-Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.4344.4344 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 4344-4344 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Gesine Bug ◽

Andreas Burchert ◽

Eva-Maria Wagner ◽

Nicolaus Kroeger ◽

Zuzana Jedlickova ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

One Year

Abstract Background: Leukemic relapse and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remain major obstacles after an allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Panobinostat is a potent inhibitor of class I, II and IV deacetylases and has shown antileukemic as well as immunomodulatory activity. The hypothesis of our phase I/II PANOBEST trial was that panobinostat can effectively prevent relapse in patients (pts) with high-risk (HR) myeloid diseases while simultaneously reducing GvHD. We aimed to determine dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of panobinostat in adult pts with HR acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in complete hematologic remission (CR) after a reduced-intensity HSCT. Secondary objectives were evaluation of safety and tolerability of panobinostat, and overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 1 and 2 years after HSCT. Methods: In two sequential schedules, panobinostat was administered orally thrice weekly, (TIW), either every week (A) or every other week (B). In schedule A, panobinostat was started at a dose of 10 mg TIW and escalated to 30 mg TIW using a 3+3 design; in schedule B, panobinostat was given at doses of 20-40 mg TIW. Panobinostat was initiated between day +60 and +150 after HSCT and given for up to 1 year. Eligibility criteria included: ANC ≥ 1,000/μL, platelets ≥ 75,000/μL, adequate organ function and no severe GvHD. DLT was defined as prolonged G4 hematologic toxicity or any non-hematologic toxicity ≥ G3 unrelated to disease progression or intercurrent illness within 28 days of the first panobinostat dose. Results: 42 pts (37 AML, 5 MDS) were enrolled, with a median age of 52 years (range, 21-71). Cytogenetics were classified as low (n=6), intermediate-1/2 (n=20) or adverse risk (n=16) according to ELN criteria. Panobinostat was started a median of 98 days (range, 60-147) after HSCT from a matched related (n=9), matched unrelated (n=24), mismatched unrelated (n=6) or haploidentical donor (n=3). The majority of patients (n=28, 67%) were transplanted with active disease (bone marrow blasts 0-80%, median 21%, 1 pt. with extramedullary AML), 9 in CR1 (21%) and 5 in CR2 (12%). Patient and transplant characteristics were equally distributed between schedules A and B. Of 42 pts, 22 (54%) have completed one year of panobinostat, 1 remains on treatment and 19 (46%) discontinued prematurely after a median of 70 days (range, 12-342) due to adverse events (AEs) (n=10), relapse (n=6), patient decision (n=2) or prohibited comedication (n=1). To date, 24 out of 42 patients experienced panobinostat-related grade 3/4 AEs (schedule A: n=14, 67%; schedule B: n=10, 48%). The most common AEs were hematologic toxicity (G3: 14 pts, 33%; G4: 2 pts, 5%), constitutional (G3: 7 pts, 17%) and gastrointestinal symptoms (G3: 5 pts, 12%). Neurological AE and pain (G3, 2 pts each, 5%) as well as metabolic/laboratory alterations (G3: 3 pts., 7%) and renal toxicity (G3, 1 pt, 5%) were also reported. AEs were fully and rapidly reversible after interrupting panobinostat (n=24); 14 patients needed dose adjustment and no study-related deaths occurred. The RP2D was 20 mg TIW in arm A and 30 mg TIW every other week in arm B based on 5 DLTs: fatigue G3 at 20 mg, colitis and nausea/emesis G3 each at 30 mg (arm A), diarrhea and headache G3 at 40 mg each (arm B). Prophylactic or preemptive donor lymphocyte infusions (median 2, range, 1-6) were administered to 10 pts (42%, median 1.5x106 CD3+ cells/kg) in arm A and 8 pts (33%, median 0.5x106 CD3+ cells/kg) in arm B. Cumulative incidence (CI) of moderate (n=8) or severe (n=2) chronic GvHD was 24±0.4% at one year after HSCT and did not differ between both arms. There was no evidence of impaired immune reconstitution. To date, median OS and DFS have not been reached after a median follow up of 22 months (range, 6-57). At two years after HSCT, 5 patients have died from relapse (n=3), sepsis (n=1) or sudden death (n=1 at 3.5 months after study discontinuation) and CI of relapse was 21±0.5%, resulting in probabilities for 2-year OS and DFS of 88±5% and 74±7%, resp. Discussion: Panobinostat maintenance following HSCT for high-risk AML or MDS is feasible with a RP2D dose of 20 mg TIW weekly or 30 mg TIW every other week and associated with a low relapse rate. This provides a rationale for a prospective randomized trial of panobinostat as post-transplant intervention. Disclosures Bug: NordMedica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Novartis Oncology: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Other: Travel grant; TEVA Oncology: Other: Travel grant; Gilead: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Panobinostat has not been approved for maintenance therapy after an allogeneic stem cell transplantation in ANL and MDS patients . Burchert:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Bader:Neovii: Other: Institutional grants; Medac: Other: Institutional grants; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Riemser: Other: Institutional grants. Ottmann:Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Local and Systemic Effects of Immune Checkpoint Blockade on Relapsed Myeloid Malignancies Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139487 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 34-35

Author(s):

Livius Penter ◽

Yi Zhang ◽

Alexandra Savell ◽

Srinika Ranasinghe ◽

Teddy Huang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

Stem Cell ◽

T Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Infiltration ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

T Cell Infiltration

Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains an unmet medical need. The ETCTN 9204 study evaluated in 71 study subjects if immune checkpoint blockade with anti-CTLA-4 (Ipilimumab (Ipi), n = 43) or anti-PD-1 (Nivolumab (Nivo), n = 28) antibodies could stimulate graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) responses in this setting. We focused mainly on patients (pts) with relapsed AML/MDS, which constituted the majority of pts (n = 38; 54%). Ipi induced both long-term complete remissions (CR; n = 3) and transient CRs (TR; n = 3), while Nivo did not generate any CRs, but 4 patients demonstrated partial remissions (PR). To define the molecular features associated with response to Ipi, we performed bulk transcriptomic analyses of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsies of sites of AML/MDS involvement (n = 35) collected before and after Ipi treatment from 13 pts. Our analysis of matched pre- and post-Ipi samples of patients with CRs identified 50 differentially expressed genes. By gene ontology analysis, these were enriched for signatures of 'lymphocyte activation' and 'antigen-receptor signaling'. Principal component analysis using these genes separated post-Ipi CR samples as a distinct cluster, transcriptionally apart from pre-Ipi CR samples and from non-responder (NR, n = 15) pre and post-Ipi samples. Of note, post-Ipi CR samples were similar to both pre- and post-Ipi TR samples as well as samples from GvHD/toxicity biopsies (n = 9). Consistent with these findings, we detected increased CD8+ T cell abundance post-Ipi in CR but not NR samples with CIBERSORTx (pre vs post, median score 0.043 vs. 0.56, p < 0.01). Likewise, reconstruction of T cell receptor (TCR) CDR3 sequences using the tool TRUST showed an increase in TCR clonotypes per million reads post-Ipi in CR samples (pre vs post, median 0.33 vs. 1.65, p < 0.05). In sum, response to CTLA-4 blockade is characterized by transcriptional evidence of T cell infiltration and activation within the tumor microenvironment, with similar gene programs observed in the setting of GvHD. To determine if the changes within tissue sites following Ipi are also observed in peripheral blood (PB), we analyzed the immunophenotype and TCR repertoire of T cells from serially collected PB samples from pts with AML/MDS (n = 14) or non-myeloid malignancy (n = 6). In responders and non-responders, exposure to Ipi was associated with decreased naïve, increased effector memory, and increased expression of HLA-DR on central memory T cells (p < 0.05), consistent with T cell differentiation and activation. From 9 of 14 AML/MDS pts (CR = 4, NR = 5), bulk TCR sequencing before and after 1 cycle of Ipi yielded 572,017 PB TCR sequences. Only 776 clonotypes demonstrated significant change in frequency, and these TCRs were detected in greater proportion among responders (613/776 versus NR 163/776, p < 0.01). Thus, Ipi alters the differentiation states of circulating T cells irrespective of response and leads to higher TCR repertoire turnover in CR patients. Of the AML patients achieving PR following Nivo, we also observed transcriptional evidence of CD8+ T cell infiltration in one patient. This signature, however, was not detected in a second such patient. In a separate instance, we had the opportunity to dissect the molecular features of a partial response in a patient with JAK2V617F+ secondary AML following Nivo through single-cell RNA and ATAC-sequencing (scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq, 10x Genomics) of PB mononuclear cells collected serially across 6 timepoints. In total, we analyzed the transcriptomes and chromatin accessibility data from of 27,777 and 28,713 individual cells, respectively. At time of response, non-exhausted CD4+ T cells expanded while both exhausted CD8+ T cells and a malignant subpopulation with increased expression of PD-L1 and features of megakaryocytic differentiation preferentially contracted. The subsequent expansion of a PD-L1- malignant population at progression suggests that decreased leukemic PD-L1 expression was associated with relapse. Altogether, these data highlight the molecular and cellular features of successful reinvigoration of GvL using CTLA-4 blockade, from increased local T cell infiltration and activation in the leukemic microenvironment to peripheral T cell turnover. In addition, the selection of therapy-resistant subclones after PD-1 blockade underscores the need for further high-resolution studies of GvL responses. Disclosures Zeiser: Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Malinckrodt: Honoraria. Ritz:Rheos Medicines: Consultancy; LifeVault Bio: Consultancy; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Falcon Therapeutics: Consultancy; Avrobio: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Talaris Therapeutics: Consultancy; Equillium: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; TScan Therapeutics: Consultancy. Neuberg:Madrigak Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Soiffer:alexion: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Be the Match/ National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rheos Therapeutics: Consultancy; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy; Mana Therapeutics: Consultancy; Precision Bioscience: Consultancy; VOR Biopharma: Consultancy; Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cugene: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Liu:GV20 Oncotherapy: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; 3DMed Care: Consultancy; Sanofi: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Davids:AbbVie: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Research to Practice: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Surface Oncology: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Consultancy; Zentalis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Ascentage Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wu:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; BionTech: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. OffLabel Disclosure: Ipilimumab and Nivolumab were tested in the setting of relapsed hematological malignancies after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Download Full-text

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in a Large Urban Cohort of North-American Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-140812 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 21-22

Author(s):

Astha Thakkar ◽

Diego Adrianzen Herrera ◽

Shafia Rahman ◽

Zhu Cui ◽

Angelica D'Aiello ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

T Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Private Company ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Adult T Cell Leukemia

Introduction: Adult T-cell leukemia lymphoma (ATLL) is a rare hematologic malignancy caused by human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV-1) with dismal cure rates and poor response to conventional chemotherapy. Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (AlloSCT) is the only therapeutic option which may offer the chance of long-term remission and cures in a subset of patients. We sought to investigate the outcomes of transplantation in one of the largest cohorts in North America. Methods: A retrospective chart review study was conducted using the North-American ATLL and the Hematopoietic Precursor Cell transplantation databases at Montefiore Medical Center from 2011 to 2020. Variables collected include age, sex, ethnicity, ATLL subtype, molecular profile, previous treatments, conditioning regimens, type of transplant, immunosuppressive regimen, progression free survival (PFS) post-transplant and overall survival (OS) post-transplant. Results: Fourteen patients with ATLL who received an AlloSCT from 2011-2020 were identified. Fifty-seven percent (8/14) of patients were male. Seventy-one percent (10/14) of patients were African American and twenty-nine percent (4/14) were Hispanic. Median age was 51 years. Sixty-four percent (9/14) of patients had Stage IV disease at the time of diagnosis. Forty-three percent (6/14) patients had acute and fifty-seven percent (8/14) had lymphomatous ATLL. Almost all patients (92%) were treated initially with EPOCH combination chemotherapy. Twenty-eight percent (4/14) of patients received interferon/zidovudine as bridge-to-transplant. Fifty-seven percent (8/14) of patients achieved complete remission (CR) prior to AlloSCT, 7% (1/14) were in partial remission, and 28% (4/14) were relapsed or refractory. Forty-three percent (6/14) of patients received SCT from a matched-related donor (MRD), 36% (5/14) from a haplo-identical donor and 21% (3/14) from a matched-unrelated donor (MUD). Ninety-three percent (13/14) of patients received a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen pre-transplantation. Seven percent (1/14) received a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen. RIC regimens consisted of fludarabine with melphalan +/- anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or fludarabine with cyclophosphamide with total-body irradiation in doses less than 500 cGy. Patients receiving haplo-identical SCT also received post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for prevention of graft vs host disease (GVHD). The MAC regimen used included busulfan with cyclophosphamide at myeloablative doses. Twenty-eight percent (4/14) of patients relapsed post-alloSCT with a median relapse-free survival of 6 months (range 4-18 months). The median OS of the whole cohort was 27 months (8-82 months). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) developed in 28% (4/14) percent of patients. The most common manifestation was skin GVHD. Fifty-percent (7/14) of the patients are surviving to-date. Transplant-related mortality (TRM) at day 100 was 21% (3/14) of patients. Causes of death were complex and included several diagnoses in certain patients. The most frequent diagnoses associated with death were infection (28%), graft failure (14%), GVHD (14%), veno-occlusive disease of the liver (VOD) (7%), disease progression (14%) and unknown due to patient lost to follow-up (14%). The main infectious events included fungal (2), bacterial (1), and COVID-19 (1) infection. Forty-three percent (6/14) of patients remain in complete remission to date. Conclusions: Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation offers long-term survival with a TRM of 21% in a disease with an inherently dismal prognosis. AlloSCT using several graft sources, is thus, a safe and well tolerated treatment modality and offers long term remissions. Disclosures Steidl: Pieris Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Aileron Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer Healthcare: Research Funding; Stelexis Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Verma:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; acceleron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Medpacto: Research Funding; stelexis: Current equity holder in private company. Janakiram:ADC Therapeutics, FATE therapeutics, TAKEDA pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Multicenter Analysis of Treatment and Outcomes for Patient with TP53 Mutated AML in the Era of Novel Therapies; Significant Impact of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation on Survival

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147639 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 797-797

Author(s):

Talha Badar ◽

Mark R. Litzow ◽

Rory M. Shallis ◽

Jan Philipp Bewersdorf ◽

Antoine Saliba ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Novel Therapies ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Tp53 Mutations

Abstract Background: TP53 mutations occur in 10-20% of patients with AML, constitute high-risk disease as per ELN criteria, and confer poorer prognosis. Venetoclax combination therapies and CPX-351 were recently approved for AML treatment and lead to improved outcomes in subsets of high-risk AML, however the most effective approach for treatment of TP53-mutated (m) AML remains unclear. In this study we explored the clinical outcome of TP53m AML patients treated over the last 8 years as novel therapies have been introduced to our therapeutic armamentarium. Methods: We conducted a multicenter observational study in collaboration with 4 U.S. academic centers and analyzed clinical characteristics and outcome of 174 TP53m AML patients diagnosed between March 2013 and February 2021. Mutation analysis was performed on bone marrow specimens using 42, 49, 199, or 400 gene targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) panels. Patients with an initial diagnosis of AML were divided into 4 groups (GP) based on the progressive use of novel therapies in clinical trials and their approvals as AML induction therapy during different time periods: 2013-2017 (GP1, n= 37), 2018-2019 (GP2, n= 53), 2019-2020 (GP3, n= 48) and 2020-2021 (GP4, n= 36) to analyze difference in outcome. Results: Baseline characteristics were not significantly different across different GP, as shown in Table 1. Median age of patients was 68 (range [R], 18-83), 65 (R, 29-88), 69 (R, 37-90) and 70 (R, 51-97) years in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.40). The percentage of patients with de novo AML/secondary AML/therapy-related AML in GP1-4 was 40/40/20, 36/29/24, 37.5/37.5/25 and 28/52/20, respectively (p=0.82). The proportion of patients with complex cytogenetics (CG) was 92%, 89%, 96% and 94% in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.54). The median TP53m variant allele frequency (VAF) was 48% (range [R], 5-94), 42% (R, 5-91), 45% (R, 10-94) and 60% (R, 8-82) in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.38). Four (11%), 13 (24.5%), 10 (21%) and 9 (25%) patients had multiple TP53 mutations in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.33). The proportion of patients who received 3+7 (30%, 16%, 6% & 8%; p=0.01), HMA only (11%, 18%, 2% & 8%; p=0.06), venetoclax-based (2.5%, 12%, 48%, & 61%; p <0.01) and CPX-351 induction (16%, 40%, 28% & 5%; p<0.001) were varied in GP1-4, respectively. The rate of CR/CRi was 22%, 26%, 28% and 18% in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.63). Treatment related mortality during induction was observed in 3%, 7%, 10% and 17% of patients in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.18). Overall, 28 (16%) patients received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) after induction/consolidation: 22%, 15%, 17% and 11% in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.67). In subset analysis, there was no difference in the rate of CR/CRi with venetoclax-based regimens vs. others (39% vs 61%, p=0.18) or with CPX-351 vs. others (25% vs 75%, p=0.84). The median progression-free survival was 7.7, 7.0, 5.1 and 6.6 months in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.60, Fig 1A). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.4, 6.1, 4.0 and 8.0 months in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.29, Fig 1B). In univariate analysis for OS, achievement of CR/CRi (p<0.001) and alloHCT in CR1 (p<0.001) associated with favorable outcome, whereas complex CG (p=0.01) and primary refractory disease (p<0.001) associated with poor outcome. Multiple TP53 mutations (p=0.73), concurrent ASXL1m (p=0.86), extra-medullary disease (p=0.92), ≥ 3 non-TP53m mutations (p=0.72), TP53m VAF ≥ 40% vs. < 40% (p=0.25), induction with CPX-351 vs. others (p=0.59) or venetoclax-based regimen vs. others (p=0.14) did not show significance for favorable or poor OS in univariate analysis. In multivariable analysis, alloHCT in CR1 (hazard ratio [HR]=0.28, 95% CI: 0.15-0.53; p=0.001) retained an association with favorable OS and complex CG (HR 4.23, 95%CI: 1.79-10.0; p=0.001) retained an association with dismal OS. Conclusion: We present the largest experience with TP53m AML patients analyzed by NGS. Although outcomes were almost universally dismal, alloHCT appears to improve the long-term survival in a subset of these patients. Effective therapies are warranted to successfully bridge patients to alloHCT and to prolong survival for transplant ineligible patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Badar: Pfizer Hematology-Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Litzow: Omeros: Other: Advisory Board; Pluristem: Research Funding; Actinium: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Jazz: Other: Advisory Board; AbbVie: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Biosight: Other: Data monitoring committee. Shallis: Curis: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Goldberg: Celularity: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aprea: Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; DAVA Oncology: Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Research Funding; Prelude Therapeutics: Research Funding; Aptose: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Atallah: BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Foran: revolution medicine: Honoraria; gamida: Honoraria; bms: Honoraria; pfizer: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria; takeda: Research Funding; kura: Research Funding; h3bioscience: Research Funding; OncLive: Honoraria; servier: Honoraria; aptose: Research Funding; actinium: Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding; trillium: Research Funding; sanofi aventis: Honoraria; certara: Honoraria; syros: Honoraria; taiho: Honoraria; boehringer ingelheim: Research Funding; aprea: Research Funding; sellas: Research Funding; stemline: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Outcome of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-116496 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2149-2149

Author(s):

Romil Patel ◽

Neeraj Y Saini ◽

Ankur Varma ◽

Omar Hasan ◽

Qaiser Bashir ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Remission ◽

Relapsed Disease

Abstract Introduction: The role of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) in the management of patients with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM), a rare, indolent lymphoma, has not been established. We had previously published our experience with auto-HCT in a small cohort of WM patients1. Here, we present an updated analysis of auto-HCT with a larger cohort of WM patients. Methods and study population: The study cohort was comprised of 29 patients who underwent high-dose chemotherapy and auto-HCT at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to create survival curves. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the duration from date of transplant to death or last date of follow-up in living patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the duration from date of transplant to either progressive disease or death, whichever occurred first. Results: Median age at auto-HCT was 60 (range, 43-75 years). Eight patients (28%) had concurrent light chain amyloidosis (AL). Of the five patients who had MYD88 testing completed, 3 were positive for the MYD88 mutation. Additionally, of these 3 patients, 2 were also positive for CXCR4 mutation. Patients received a median of 2 lines (range 1-6) of therapy prior to auto-HCT; 3(10%) patients had primary refractory disease, 8(28%) were in first remission, and 18 (62%) had relapsed disease. Median time from transplant to last follow-up for the surviving patients was 5.3 years. Preparative regimens received by the patients were: Melphalan (n=20), BEAM-R (n=2), Busulfan/Melphalan (n=1), Cyclophosphomaide/Etoposide/total body irradiation (n=1), Thiotepa/Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide (n=1), and Carmustine/Thiotepa (n=1). Three patients further went on to receive allogeneic transplant either after relapse from auto-HCT or due to disease transformation to aggressive lymphoma. Twenty-eight patients achieved engraftment with a median time to neutrophil engraftment of 11 days (range, 10-15 days). One patient suffered primary graft failure due to progression of disease and died 84 days after transplant. Non-relapse mortality was 3.4% at 1 year. All patients were eligible for response evaluation. The median OS from diagnosis was 12.2 years. Overall response rate was 96%: complete response (n=8, 27.6%), very good partial response (n=5, 17.3%), partial response (n=15, 51.7%), and progressive disease (n=1, 3.4%). PFS and OS at 5 years were 43.3% and 62.9%, respectively. Median PFS and OS from auto-HCT were 4.1 and 7.3 years (Fig. 1A). The median OS from auto-HCT in first remission + primary refractory and relapsed disease was 8.2 years and 4.1 years, respectively.16 patients were alive at the time of censoring while 13 patients had died. Causes of death include relapsed disease (n=6), secondary malignancy (n=2), infection (n=1), chronic graft-versus-host disease (n=1), and unknown (n=3). 8 patients (28%) were positive for concurrent AL amyloidosis. The sites of amyloid involvement were kidneys (n=2), lungs (n=1), bone marrow (n=1), heart(n=1), lymph nodes(n=1), gastrointestinal tract (n=1) and subcutaneous fat aspirate(n=5). The median overall survival for patients with amyloid involvement (n=8) was 12 years. On univariate analyses, the number of chemotherapy regimens prior to transplant (≤ 2 vs >2 lines) was the strongest predictor of overall survival (p=0.03, HR 0.3, CI: 0.09-0.9, log-rank) and PFS (p=0.001, HR 0.24, CI: 0.07-0.85, log-rank). The median PFS in patients with ≤ 2 lines and > 2 lines of therapy was 71 months versus 19 months, respectively (Fig. 1B). Conclusion: Auto-HCT is safe and feasible in selected patients with WM, with a high response rate and durable remission even in patients with relapsed or refractory disease. References: Krina Patel et.al. Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia. Blood 2012 120:4533; Disclosures Thomas: Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb Inc.: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Array Pharma: Research Funding; Amgen Inc: Research Funding. Lee:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai Biopharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Orlowski:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; BioTheryX: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Champlin:Otsuka: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Patel:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of Mismatched Related Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Retrospective Study on Behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3504.3504 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3504-3504

Author(s):

Gwendolyn van Gorkom ◽

Michel van Gelder ◽

Dimitris Ziagkos ◽

Henric-Jan Blok ◽

Maria Teresa van Lint ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Related Donor ◽

Support Research

Abstract Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is a treatment for CLL that can give long disease control. Even with the availability of kinase and BCL2 inhibitors, HCT is still performed in fit patients (pts) with high-risk CLL. Almost exclusively, outcomes on matched related and unrelated donor transplantations in CLL have been published. Recently, mismatched related donors are gaining interest because of the better outcome of haploidentical HCT with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY). Methods: All pts with CLL who received a first allogeneic HCT with a mismatched related donor and whose data were available in the EBMT registry were analyzed. Median values and ranges are reported for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables. The probabilities of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test for univariate comparisons. Relapse/progression and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were analyzed together in a competing risk framework. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS and R. Results: One-hundred-seventeen pts with CLL (74% males) underwent a mismatched related donor transplantation between 1984 and 2015 (1984-1999: 10, 2000-2004: 18, 2005-2009: 23, 2010-2016: 66). Median follow-up after HCT was 8 months (range 0-187 months). Median age at transplantation was 54 years (yrs) (range 27-71 yrs). Median time from diagnosis to HCT was 67 months (range 4-207 months). Eighteen pts (17%) had previously undergone autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Disease status at HCT was CR in 16% of pts, PR in 39% and SD/PD in 45%. The Karnofsky score was known for 98 pts; 96% had a score of 70% or more at the time of HCT. Fifty-eight percent of pts received reduced-intensity conditioning, 42% myeloablative conditioning. Peripheral blood stem cells were used in 68% of pts, bone marrow in 32%. The HCT was sex matched in 41% of recipient-donor pairs. The relationship of the donor to the patient was known for 34 pts; in 53% the donor was a child, in 38% a sibling and in 6% a parent. Forty pts (38%) received PTCY as GVHD prophylaxis. In the other 77 pts various methods of T-cell depletion (TCD) were used, but not all methods were specified. At least 56% of those pts had in vivo TCD. For the whole cohort of pts OS at 2 and 5 yrs was 46% and 37%, respectively. PFS at 2 and 5 yrs was 38% and 30%, respectively. The use of PTCY did not have a significant impact on OS (49% vs. 42% at 2 yrs, 44% vs. 33% at 5 yrs, p=0.35) and PFS (45% vs. 31% at 2 yrs, 40% vs. 22% at 5 yrs, p=0.15). CI of NRM in the whole group at 2 and 5 yrs were 41% and 45%, respectively. CI of relapse at 2 and 5 yrs were 21% and 25%, respectively. The CI of NRM and relapse at 2 and 5 yrs were not statistically different in pts who received PTCY compared to other types of TCD (NRM: 38% vs. 45% at 2 yrs, 43% vs. 49% at 5 yrs, p=0.45; relapse: 17% vs. 25% at 2 yrs, 17% vs. 29% at 5 yrs, p=0.33). For the whole cohort, the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) at 100 days was 34% for grade II-IV and 16% for grade III-IV with a median time of onset of 23 days (range 4-57 days). Conclusions: Mismatched related donor HCT resulted in a 5-year PFS in 30% of the pts. This result seems only slightly inferior to matched donor transplant (5 yrs PFS 37%1). NRM was higher than expected in this cohort, but comparable to other studies on haploSCT with in vivo T-cell depleted grafts. In conclusion, a mismatched related donor HCT may be considered for high-risk chemoimmunotherapy-refractory or 17p deleted/TP53 mutated CLL pts without options for kinase and BCL2 inhibitor therapy. More data are needed to assess the value of PTCY for GVHD prophylaxis in this specific context. References: 1. Schetelig J, de Wreede L, Moreno C, et al. Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell transplantation (alloSCT): a Retrospective EBMT Analysis. Abstract WP024, EBMT meeting 2015. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ciceri: MolMed SpA: Consultancy. Foà:Ariad: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Genetech: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Hallek:Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Schetelig:Sanofi: Honoraria. Kröger:Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Neovii: Honoraria, Research Funding; Riemser: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Acute Leukemia and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in HIV-Positive Patients: 25-Years' Experience of the Rete Ematologica Lombarda (REL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125288 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3603-3603 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Chiara Cattaneo ◽

Massimo Bernardi ◽

Valentina Mancini ◽

Chiara Pagani ◽

Monica Fumagalli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Acute Leukemia ◽

Hiv Infection ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Hiv Positive ◽

Complex Karyotype ◽

Advisory Committees

Introduction. Acute leukemia (AL) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) are relatively uncommon among HIV-positive (HIV-pos) patients (pts) and epidemiologic studies are very limited. A dismal outcome for these patients has been reported in the past; however more recently an improvement of prognosis was observed using intensive approaches, such as allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) (Kwon, AIDS 2019). In order to better define the clinical characteristics of AL/HR-MDS HIV-pos pts, the feasibility of any specific treatment and the outcome in this setting, we evaluated all HIV-pos AL and HR-MDS pts diagnosed at 5 Hematology Centers participating to Rete Ematologica Lombarda (REL). Patients and Methods. We asked to the Centers to retrospectively report all cases of HIV-pos adult pts with AL or HR-MDS. We sent a database asking information about the characteristics of hematological disease, HIV infection, therapy, toxicities and outcome of pts. AL and MDS were classified according to WHO classification. The response to therapy was defined by European Leukemia Net criteria. Results. Between 1994 and 2019, 23 pts have been retrieved: 3 affected by HR-MDS, 15 by acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 5 by acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Median age at AL/MDS diagnosis was 49y (range 28-67), M/F ratio 17/6. Median CD4 count was 336/mcl (range 50-2048). HIV infection was antecedent to AL/MDS diagnosis in 20/21 evaluable cases, with a median duration of 115 months (range 0-396); these pts were already on HAART at AL/MDS diagnosis. In 6 (29%) pts AIDS was also documented (1 Kaposi sarcoma, 1 P. jirovecii pneumonia and 4 non Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma). Six (30%) of the 20 evaluable cases had an adverse cytogenetics (complex karyotype), while only 1 pt showed a favorable karyotype (inv16). NPM1 mutation was observed in 2 AML cases, FLT3 ITD and p53 mutation in 1 case each. No bcr/abl rearrangement was observed in ALL cases. Three pts (13%) did not receive any treatment due to poor performance status (1 ALL, 2 AML) and died of progressive disease after a median of 2 months (mo, 0.5-2). Two HR-MDS pts received azacytidine but they rapidly progressed after 2 courses and died at +7 and +8mo respectively. Eighteen pts were treated with intensive therapy: 17 underwent induction chemotherapy (cht) and 1 alloSCT upfront. All the pts received HAART during AL/MDS treatment. Eleven out of the 17 pts (65%) receiving induction cht achieved a complete remission (CR); 4 pts received further induction cht, which was successful in 2/4 (50%) the overall CR rate being therefore 76.5%. A further pt received venetoclax+azacytidine as fourth-line treatment and achieved a morphological CR. Ten pts (9 AML and 1 HR-MDS) underwent stem cell transplantation at first-line: 3 autologous (ASCT) and 7 allogeneic. Overall 5 out of 13 (38%) pts achieving CR after induction cht relapsed; only one of the 5 receiving salvage treatment achieved a durable CR and proceeded to salvage alloSCT. Five pts (22%) died of toxicity: 2 (1 P, jirovecii pneumonia and 1 septic shock) during induction cht (2/17, 12%), 1 during aplastic phase after ASCT (hemorrhagic stroke), 2 after alloSCT (1 aGVHD, 1 infection); overall, SCT therapy-related morality was 3/10 (30%). After a median follow up of 21mo, 10 pts are alive in CR, with a median overall survival (OS) of 17mo and a 2y OS of 41.2±22.7SEM. A trend for a better OS was observed in pts with AL/HR-MDS diagnosis in the last years (2y OS: 2011-2019: 64.2% vs 1994-2010 27.3%, p=0.12) (Fig.1), even if median age was significantly higher in the second period (55.5y vs 44.5y, p=0.02). A complex karyotype was predictive of poor outcome in pts evaluable for cytogenetics (45% vs 10%, p=0.04), whereas no correlation between age, CD4 count, HIV duration and OS was observed. Conclusions. Intensive chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation are feasible and effective in AL/HR-MDS HIV-pos pts, with an acceptable toxicity profile, similar to the HIV-neg counterpart. The more frequent curative intent approach to AL HIV-pos pts is probably the main responsible for the improved survival in the last years also in the elderly; antiviral, antibiotic and antifungal prophylactic strategy, together with a prompt diagnosis and a careful management of infectious events, should be carefully considered in this setting of pts. HIV infection responsive to HAART should no longer be considered a contraindication to standard AL/HR-MDS treatment. Disclosures Rossi: Sandoz: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

The Effect of JAK 1/2 Inhibitors on Outcomes of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112769 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5784-5784

Author(s):

Guido Lancman ◽

Kathleen Miller ◽

Shuli Li ◽

Vincent T. Ho ◽

Amir T. Fathi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Donor Type

Abstract Introduction: Ruxolitinib was the first JAK 1/2 inhibitor (JAKi) approved for myelofibrosis (MF), with several other JAKi in development. Ruxolitinib was approved on the basis of reducing splenomegaly and improving constitutional symptoms, but its effect on subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is not well understood. Retrospective studies to date have reported mixed outcomes after SCT for MF patients with previous exposure to JAKi. In this multicenter retrospective study, we report on outcomes of patients with MF treated with SCT at our institutions. Methods: We analyzed outcomes for 184 consecutive patients at three institutions who underwent SCT for primary or secondary MF. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD)-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS), all measured from the time of SCT. Cox proportional hazard regressions were fit to estimate the association between the use of JAK 1/2 inhibitors prior to SCT and OS, PFS, and GRFS, adjusting for donor type and DIPSS-plus status. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 72 patients received a JAKi prior to SCT, while 112 did not. Patients in these two groups were well-matched with respect to age, sex, DIPSS plus score, conditioning, and donor type (Table 1). Median follow-up was 31.2 months (range: 0.8-146.3 months). In univariate analysis, there was no difference in OS (JAKi: 4-yr OS 56.7% [95% CI 40.9-69.8%] vs. no JAKi: 43.6% [95% CI 32.9-53.9%], p=0.49), PFS (JAKi: 4 yr PFS 54.1% [95% CI 40.8-65.7%] vs. no JAKi: 43.9% [95% CI 33.4-53.9%], p=0.77), or GRFS (JAKi: 8-month GRFS 56.6% [95% CI 44.1-67.4%] vs. no JAKi: 50.4% [95% CI 40.4-59.5%], p=0.62) in the overall population; there was similarly no difference when comparing only intermediate-risk or only high-risk patients. In multivariate analysis, there was no difference in these outcomes for patients based on previous JAKi exposure when accounting for DIPSS plus score and donor type (related vs unrelated). Rates of acute GVHD were similar between the two groups (JAKi: 53.5% vs. no JAKi: 55.0%, p=0.88), including grade 3 or 4 acute GVHD (JAKi: 16.9% vs no JAKi: 19.8%, p=0.70). Conclusions: Our data suggest that there is no statistically significant difference in OS, PFS, GRFS, or rates of acute GVHD after SCT for MF patients based on previous JAKi treatment. This was true overall and after adjusting for DIPSS plus risk score or donor type. Given the retrospective design of our study, we were not able to assess prior response to JAKi or splenomegaly at SCT, which may influence outcomes. Given mixed results in the literature to date, we eagerly await the results of ongoing phase 2 trials of JAKi prior to SCT for MF. Disclosures Ho: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Fathi:Astellas: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Chen:Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy; REGiMMUNE: Consultancy. Hoffman:Formation Biologics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Merus: Research Funding; Summer Road: Research Funding. Mascarenhas:Novartis: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Prognostic Value of Cpss Cytogenetic Risk Classification in Patients with CMML after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Multicenter Study of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-115981 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2182-2182

Author(s):

Christian Koenecke ◽

Dirk-Jan Eikema ◽

Sheree Hazelaar ◽

Dietrich W. Beelen ◽

Victoria Potter ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Allogeneic Hsct

Abstract Introduction: The only curative treatment approach for patients with Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but disease relapse after transplantation is a major concern. Predictors for disease outcome after HSCT are limited. However, unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities have been shown to serve as predictors for relapse after transplantation. The aim of this large multicentric, international study was to retrospectively determine the impact of cytogenetic information according to the CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS) on outcome after allogeneic HSCT. Patients and Methods: Patients were selected from the EBMT database who had received a first allogeneic HSCT for the treatment of CMML between 2000 and 2015. 268 centers participated into this study. In total, 1503 patients were included. Impact of CPSS-cytogenetic classification was analyzed regarding overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality after HSCT (gray test). Results: 488 female (32.5%) and 1013 male (67.5%) patients were included to the study. Median age at HSCT was 57.6 years (range 0.3-75.4). At time of HSCT, only 422 (28.1%) patients were in complete remission, whereas 1004 (66.8%) had active disease (77 missing). Matched related donor HSCT was performed in 35.7% of the patients, matched unrelated donor HSCT in 57.6%, mismatched related in 3.3% and mismatched unrelated in 3.4%. Bone marrow (12.6%), peripheral blood (84.3%), or both (0.3%) served as the stem cell graft. Cord blood was used as a graft in 2.8%. Myeloablative preparative regimens wereused in 223 patients (15.0%), and less intensive regimens were given to 1268 patients (85.0%). Median survival of patients included into this study was 52.2 months. 637 patients had sufficient cytogenetic information according to CPSS (866 missing), complete relapse information was available in 1385 patients. 143 patients could be categorized into CPSS-high, 85 in intermediate and 375 in low risk cytogenetics, respectively. In univariate analysis high risk CPSS cytogenetic information was found to be strongly associated with OS (low 38% (32-44%), intermediate 41% (30-53%), high 26% (18-34%)), and higher cumulative incidence of relapse (low 40% (35-46%), intermediate 42% (30-54%), high 48% (39-56%)), but not with non relapse mortality (low 28% (23-33%), intermediate 25% (16-35%), high 30% (22-38%)) at 60 months (Figure 1). Conclusion: In this international, multicentric analysis we show that CMML patients with high-risk cytogenetics had significantly worse OS after HSCT than patients with intermediate or low risk cytogenetics according to CPSS. New therapeutic strategies to prevent relapse after HSCT in CMML patients with high-risk cytogenetics are needed. Disclosures Koenecke: Amgen: Consultancy; abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Beelen:Medac: Consultancy, Other: Travel Support. Finke:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Riemser: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Medac: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Neovii: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding. Niederwieser:Novartis: Research Funding; Miltenyi: Speakers Bureau. Chalandon:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel costs. Ganser:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kobbe:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding.

Download Full-text