scholarly journals Pre-Transplantation ST2 Levels and Non-Relapse Mortality after Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 30-31
Author(s):  
Lars Klingen Gjærde ◽  
Sisse Rye Ostrowski ◽  
Niels Smedegaard Andersen ◽  
Lone Smidstrup Friis ◽  
Brian Kornblit ◽  
...  

Introduction: Suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) is a prognostic plasma marker of non-relapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) when measured at day +14 [Vander Lugt MT et al., N Engl J Med, 2013] and at day +7 in combination with regenerating islet-derived 3α (REG3α) [Hartwell MJ et al., JCI Insight, 2017]. We hypothesized that also pre-transplantation ST2 levels would be associated with NRM in the first 6 months after allo-HCT. Methods: We studied 112 adult patients who underwent allo-HCT with myeloablative conditioning at Rigshospitalet between July 2015 and August 2018 (Table 1). ST2 levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays using stored EDTA plasma samples obtained at the patients' scheduled pre-transplantation visit around day -23 (±11 days) and post-transplantation at days +7 and +14 (±3 days, n = 76 and 66). Univariable linear models and Spearman's ρ were used to evaluate associations and correlations between pre-transplantation ST2 levels and patient characteristics and other prognostic markers, respectively. Cause-specific Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for NRM in the first 6 months after allo-HCT (relapse as competing risk) and grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in the first 100 days after allo-HCT (NRM and relapse as competing risks) according to pre-transplantation ST2 levels. Gray's test was used to test differences in the cumulative incidence of NRM in the first 6 months after allo-HCT according to quartiles of pre-transplantation ST2 levels. Results: The median pre-transplantation plasma ST2 level was 19.9 ng/mL (inter-quartile range: 14.6-25.7 ng/mL, Figure Panel A); levels were higher in males (β = 8.7 ng/mL, p < 0.01), but did not differ by age (p = 0.81) or by being transplanted for acute leukemia (p = 0.89). ST2 was correlated with C-reactive protein (ρ = 0.24, p = 0.01), the endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX, calculated as creatinine x lactate dehydrogenase/thrombocytes, ρ = 0.27, p < 0.01) and ferritin (ρ = 0.28, p < 0.01). Longitudinally, pre-transplantation ST2 levels were strongly correlated with ST2 levels on day +7 (ρ = 0.57, p < 0.01) and day +14 (ρ = 0.48, p < 0.01). The cumulative incidence of NRM at 6 months was 11% (n = 12); causes of death were organ failure (75%), acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD, 17%) and infection (8%). Higher pre-transplantation ST2 levels were associated with increased hazard of NRM in the first 6 months after allo-HCT (HR 1.73 per 10 ng/mL increase, 95% CI: 1.28-2.33, p < 0.01, area under the receiver operating characteristics curve = 0.61). Despite a significantly higher NRM in patients with pre-transplantation ST2 levels in the highest quartile (cumulative incidence at 6 months: 21% vs. 7% in patients with levels in the three lower quartiles, p = 0.03), there was no overall significant difference in NRM according to quartiles of pre-transplantation ST2 levels (p = 0.15, Figure Panel B). No significant association was found between pre-transplantation ST2 levels and grade II-IV acute GvHD (HR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.61-1.26, p = 0.48). Conclusion: Pre-transplantation ST2 levels were associated with increased NRM in the first 6 months after myeloablative allo-HCT, mainly driven by higher NRM in patients with pre-transplantation ST2 levels in the highest quartile. Larger studies are warranted to validate pre-transplantation ST2 levels as a prognostic marker of NRM after allo-HCT, which potentially could be used to support the choice of conditioning intensity. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2022 ◽  
pp. 106002802110681
Author(s):  
Rémi Tilmont ◽  
Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha ◽  
Nassima Ramdane ◽  
Micha Srour ◽  
Valérie Coiteux ◽  
...  

Background Defibrotide is indicated for patients who develop severe sinusoidal obstructive syndrome following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Preclinical data suggested that defibrotide carries a prophylactic effect against acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of defibrotide on the incidence and severity of aGVHD. Methods This single-center retrospective study included all consecutive transplanted patients between January 2014 and December 2018. A propensity score based on 10 predefined confounders was used to estimate the effect of defibrotide on aGVHD via inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Results Of the 482 included patients, 64 received defibrotide (defibrotide group) and 418 did not (control group). Regarding main patient characteristics and transplantation modalities, the two groups were comparable, except for a predominance of men in the defibrotide group. The median age was 55 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 40-62). Patients received allo-HCT from HLA-matched related donor (28.6%), HLA-matched unrelated donor (50.8%), haplo-identical donor (13.4%), or mismatched unrelated donor (7.0%). Stem cell source was either bone marrow (49.6%) or peripheral blood (50.4%). After using IPTW, exposure to defibrotide was not significantly associated with occurrence of aGVHD (HR = 0.97; 95% CI 0.62-1.52; P = .9) or occurrence of severe aGVHD (HR = 1.89, 95% CI: 0.98-3.66; P = .058). Conclusion and Relevance Defibrotide does not seem to have a protective effect on aGVHD in patients undergoing allo-HCT. Based on what has been reported to date and on these results, defibrotide should not be considered for the prevention of aGVHD outside clinical trials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document