Predictors of Glucocorticoid Responsiveness in Multicentric Castleman's Disease

Background: Multicentric Castleman's disease (MCD) is a rare lymphoproliferative disease accompanying various symptoms and multi-organ dysfunctions. Although anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibodies, tocilizumab and siltuximab are recommended as a therapeutic option, these treatments require patients to visit hospitals at least once a month for many years, and the drug costs are quite high. In Japan, where tocilizumab is the only biological agent covered by the medical insurance, glucocorticoid monotherapy is still an important treatment option. In fact, a part of MCD patients initially treated with glucocorticoids could be successfully controlled without adding or switching to other agents. Considering that emergence of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies which reduced therapeutic efficacy could also be a clinical problem in MCD, there would be a rationale for reserving newer agents for future relapse by using glucocorticoids as first-line treatment for potential responders. Here, we retrospectively analyzed clinical characteristics of MCD patients treated in our institution to explore factors predicting who could be successfully treated with glucocorticoid monotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed histologically confirmed Castleman's disease patients who visited the Department of Hematology and Oncology of the University of Tokyo Hospital from January 2000 to March 2020. Based on the diagnostic criteria of Castleman Disease Collaborative Network (CDCN), MCD was diagnosed when enlarged lymph nodes were present in more than 2 lymph node stations and laboratory and/or clinical diagnostic criteria were met. Unicentric Castleman's disease (UCD) was diagnosed when only one single lymph node region was involved. MCD patients who were initially treated with prednisolone (PSL) were divided into two groups: patients who continued PSL until the latest follow-up (PSL-only group) and patients who received subsequent treatment (Second-line group). Results: 8 patients with UCD and 27 patients with MCD were included in our analysis. With a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 21 MCD patients underwent first-line treatment (PSL, n=18; tocilizumab, n=3). Compared to patients who did not receive any treatment, patients who underwent treatment had marginally higher levels of CRP (7.15 mg/dl vs 4.17 mg/dl, respectively; p=0.066) and significantly lower levels of hemoglobin (9.5 g/dl vs 12.5 g/dl, respectively; p=0.036). Seven out of 18 patients initially treated with PSL had received subsequent treatments (tocilizumab, n=6; rituximab, n=1). Among the PSL-only group, biochemical responses at the latest follow-up could be assessed for 10 in 11 patients: two in complete response, five in partial response, two in stable disease, and one in progressive disease, based on the response criteria of CDCN. Compared to PSL-only group, patients classified into second-line group had higher levels of CRP (11.88 mg/dl vs 6.24 mg/dl, respectively; p=0.024) and lower hemoglobin levels (6.4 g/dl vs9.4 g/dl, respectively; p=0.033). Patients whose CRP levels were lower than 12 mg/dl before starting PSL had significantly longer time to next treatment (TTNT) (median not reached vs 0.88 years; HR, 0.078 [95%CI: 0.013-0.48], p=0.00044). Similarly, patients whose hemoglobin levels were more than 8 g/dl had marginally longer TTNT (median not reached vs 2.63 years; HR, 0.22 [95%CI: 0.040-1.17], p=0.054). In addition, patients with either Hb < 8 g/dl or CRP ≧12 mg/dl had significantly shorter TTNT (median not reached vs 2.12 years; HR, 0.090 [95%CI: 0.010-0.77], p=0.0074). The median PSL dose at the latest follow-up in PSL-only group was 3 mg per day [interquartile range: 0-5 mg per day], which would be comparably safe considering previous reports indicating that PSL dose of less than 5 mg per day was associated with lower incidence of adverse events. Conclusion: Out data suggest that glucocorticoid monotherapy has a good potential to induce sustained disease control for MCD patients with higher Hb or lower CRP levels. Furthermore, PSL doses could be tapered to safer doses among patients who could continue PSL until the latest follow-up. In contrast, the efficacy of glucocorticoids for MCD patients with lower Hb or higher CRP levels were limited. Such patients would be good candidates for novel agents such as tocilizumab or rituximab. Disclosures Honda: Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.: Speakers Bureau. Nakahara:Eisai Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Honoraria. Kurokawa:Chugai: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanwa-Kagaku: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Teijin: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Nippon Shinyaku: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bioverativ Japan: Consultancy; Shire Plc: Speakers Bureau; Jansen Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau; Ono: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Clinical and Biological Characteristics and Outcomes of Richter Transformation : A French Multicenter Study from the Filo Group

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128053 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4112-4112

Author(s):

Charline Moulin ◽

Romain Morizot ◽

Thomas Remen ◽

Hélène Augé ◽

Florian Bouclet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Long Term Survivors ◽

First Line Treatment

Introduction: About 2 to 10% of patients (pts) diagnosed with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) develop diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, so-called Richter transformation (RT)) over long-term follow-up. The outcomes of pts with RT are variable and poorly understood and there is no consensus on the best therapeutic approach. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics, outcomes and factors predictive of survival in a large series of RT from the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO). Methods: Biopsy-confirmed RT (limited to DLBCL and excluding Hodgkin lymphoma) diagnosed from 2001 to 2018 were identified from eight FILO centers. Clinical and biological characteristics of CLL and RT at diagnosis, including cytogenetics, clonal relation with the pre-existing CLL, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status, cell of origin (COO) analyzed by immunohistochemistry and RT score (Tsimberidou AM et al, J Clin Oncol, 2006) were analyzed as well as treatment and outcomes. Overall survivals (OS) were defined as time from CLL and RT diagnosis to death from any cause and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4. Results: A total of 70 CLL pts who developed RT were identified. The median age at CLL diagnosis was 62 years old (range 35-82), and 50 (71.4 %) were male. The median time to transformation was 5.5 years (range 0 to 22 years), with 12 simultaneous diagnosis of CLL and RT. Prior to RT, 20 (29%) pts had not been treated for CLL, 50 received one (n=21) or more (n= 29) line of treatment ; 6 pts had received a novel agent (ibrutinib, idelalisib or venetoclax). The median age at RT diagnosis was 68 years old (range 42-88). All biopsies were centrally reviewed; 38/58 pts (66%) had elevated LDH (>1.5N) ; 35/65 pts (54 %) had bulky disease (≥ 5 cm); 10/54 (18.5%) pts had del(17p) or TP53 mutation ; 9/42 pts (21%) had a complex karyotype (at least 3 abnormalities). The CLL and RT were clonally related in 27/27 (100%) tested pts. COO by Hans algorithm was non germinal center B cell-like (GCB) in 26/28 pts (93%). EBV was positive or detected in 5/40 (12.5%) pts. The median of Ki67 positivity was 70% (range 30% to 100%). The RT score (based at RT diagnosis on ECOG performance status 2-4, LDH >1.5 x normal, platelets<100 x 109/L, tumor size >5 cm and >1 prior therapy for CLL) was : low risk in 17 pts (31%), low-intermediate risk in 10 pts (19%), high-intermediate risk in 14 pts (25%) and high risk in 14 pts (25%). The most common first-line treatment of RT was immunochemotherapy (n=57, 87%) including R-CHOP-like regimen (n=48, 73%). Autologous or allogeneic transplantation was performed for 7 pts (11%). Response to first-line treatment was complete or partial response in 26 pts (40%), and stable disease or progression in 39 pts (60%). After a median follow-up of 8 years, 51/64 pts (80%) have died. The main causes of death were progressive DLBCL (n=36, 71%), infection (n=8, 16%) or progressive CLL (n=2, 4%). The median OS of the cohort from CLL and RT diagnosis (Figure 1) were 7.8 years and 9.5 months, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients with TP53 disruption at CLL stage, low platelets count, elevated LDH, elevated beta2-microglobulin, high ECOG score, high RT score, EBV positivity and absence of response to first-line RT treatment had worse OS. The ECOG score, platelets count and TP53 disruption remain significant in multivariate Cox-regression. Last, we compared the clinical and biological parameters of two Richter groups defined as: (i) short-term survivors (<12 months, n = 34) and (ii) long-term survivors (>48 months, n = 18). Long survival was significantly associated with elevated platelets count, low LDH, low ECOG, low RT score and response to RT first-line treatment. Discussion: The clinical outcomes of RT patients is poor and novel treatment options are needed. However, a group of long-term survivors was identified, characterized by elevated platelets count, low LDH, low ECOG, low RT score and response to immunochemotherapy. Disclosures Leblond: Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Thieblemont:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Kyte: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Cellectis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cymbalista:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Sunesis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria. Guièze:Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Broseus:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding. Feugier:gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Management of Steroid-Refractory Graft-Versus-Host Disease - a Survey By the Transplant Complications Working Party of the EBMT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-152305 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2884-2884

Author(s):

Zinaida Peric ◽

Helene Schoemans ◽

Christophe Peczynski ◽

Christian Koenecke ◽

Ivan S. Moiseev ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Working Party ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Clinical Practices ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Prospective Trials ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction: As there is limited evidence to guide management of patients with steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD) there is a broad variability of clinical practices. To document the current practice and assess the impact of emerging new drugs in SR-GVHD, Transplant Complications Working Party (TCWP) of the EBMT performed a survey among EBMT centers that covered specific treatment decisions on first- and second-line treatment of acute and chronic GVHD (aGVHD and cGVHD). Methods: The survey was conducted from December 2020 to March 2021 among EBMT centers. A questionnaire was developed by the study authors and used for data collection. It consisted of 40 questions focused on general approach in the first-line treatment, preferred second-line treatment in SR-GVHD and ancillary care in aGVHD and cGVHD. Results: 145 centers from 33 countries agreed to participate and responded to the questionnaire. First-line treatment of aGVHD was reported as rather homogenous; with most centers (68%) starting with lower doses of corticosteroids (CS) (<2mg/kg) in lower grade aGVHD (grade 2a) and most centers (88%) starting with higher doses (2mg/kg) in aGVHD grades >2b. On the other hand, the evaluation of response to CS was more heterogeneous: at 3 days in 33%, at 5 days in 30%, at 7 days in 15% of centers and depending on severity of aGVHD in most other centers. In the presence of SR-aGVHD, 50% of centers consider inclusion of patients in clinical trials. Although as much as 85% of centers reported to have a standard operating procedure (SOP) for SR-aGVHD management, only 45% (n=66) have an established one or 2-agent second-line treatment; most frequently ruxolitinib (n=46) and/or extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) (n=29). All other centers reported a very heterogeneous practice and listed multiple agents (range, 3-10) as second-line treatment options. In total, the most used agents for SR-aGVHD as shown in Figure 1A are ruxolitinib in 68%, ECP in 59%, mycophenolate-mofetil (MMF) in 27%, calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in 25%, high-dose CS (>2mg/kg) in 15%, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in 14%, etanercept in 13%, infliximab in 11% and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in 10% of centers. Clinical practice in first-line treatment of cGVHD again appeared relatively homogeneous; 58% of centers reported to treat mild forms with topical treatment only, unless affected organs could not be reached topically. In moderate/severe cGVHD, the majority (71%) of centers start with 0.5-1mg/kg of CS, in 45% with addition of CNI, while others use higher doses of CS +/- other agents. The evaluation of response was done before 4 weeks in 41% of centers, between 5-8 weeks in 41%, while a minority performed later response assessment or based the latter on organ affection/severity. In case of SR-cGVHD, 56% of centers would consider the inclusion in clinical trials, while only 65% have a SOP on management of these patients. One third of centers (35%) has an established multidisciplinary cGVHD team. Practices for SR-cGVHD again varied significantly, with most centers reporting on the use of more than 2 agents (range, 3-13) as second-line and with most applied agents as depicted in Figure 1B; ruxolitinib and ECP in 68% of centers, CNI in 40%, MMF in 37%, rituximab in 27%, imatinib in 25%, mTOR inhibitors in 23%, ibrutinib and methotrexate (MTX) in 19%, pulse of CS in 17%, MSC in 12% and PUVA therapy in 10% of centers. Conclusions:In summary, this survey revealed a rather homogenous first-line management of aGVHD and cGVHD based on steroids in the majority of centers. However, when first-line fails, the definition of SR-GVHD remains highly variable and SR-GVHD is still treated with a seemingly "trial and error" approach as demonstrated by significant variability of clinical practices among EBMT centers for second-line treatment. However, in line with recently published prospective trials, ruxolitinib comes forth as one of the most used therapeutic modalities in both SR-aGVHD and cGVHD, together with already widely administered ECP. On the contrary, ibrutinib has not emerged as standard of care in this setting. Future efforts should be invested in finding a standardized approach in SR-GVHD by directly comparing most applied second-line agents in prospective trials as well as evidence-based personalized treatment approaches. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Peric: Therakos, Servier, MSD, Astellas, Novartis, Abbvie, Pfizer: Honoraria. Schoemans: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: personal fees , Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants and personal fees; Gilead: Other: travel grants; CIBMTR: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BHS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants and personal fees , Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: personal fees; Takeda: Other: personal fees. Koenecke: Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; EUSA Pharm: Consultancy. Basak: Saventic Health: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Greinix: Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Therakos: Consultancy. Penack: Omeros: Consultancy; Shionogi: Consultancy; Priothera: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Therakos: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Neovii: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Sequential Treatments in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients without Optimal Response after Frontline Nilotinib or Dasatinib: An Italian CML Campus Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-141077 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 45-46

Author(s):

Gabriele Gugliotta ◽

Mario Annunziata ◽

Isabella Capodanno ◽

Davide Rapezzi ◽

Immacolata Attolico ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Optimal Response ◽

First Line Treatment

INTRODUCTION: Frontline therapy with second generation (2G) tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients demonstrated higher efficacy as compared to imatinib, with less patients experiencing treatment failure and progression to advanced disease. However, limited information are currently available on the management and outcome of those CML pts not achieving an optimal response to first-line treatment with a 2G-TKI. AIM: To describe the clinical outcome of CP CML patients without an optimal response to a frontline 2G-TKI that switched to alternative TKIs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis in 22 Centers cooperating within the Italian CML Campus Project. Main inclusion criteria were: 1) diagnosis of CP-CML after 2010; 2) first-line treatment with a 2G-TKI; 3) switch to second-line treatment in case of non-optimal response (either following ELN recommendations or as for clinical practice); 4) CML in CP at the time of switching to second-line treatment. The main exclusion criteria were a switch to second-line treatment for intolerance or for low adherence to therapy. RESULTS: The main findings of this analysis are summarized in the table. Seventy-one pts meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria were identified; the median age of pts at CML diagnosis was 46 (21-80) years. Sokal risk score was low, intermediate, and high in 24 (34%), 30 (42%), and 17 (24%) pts, respectively. First-line treatment was performed with nilotinib in 47 (66%) pts and dasatinib in 24 (34%) pts. According to the ELN 2020 recommendations, 51 (72%) pts fulfilled the criteria for "failure" and 20 (28%) pts those for "warning". BCR-ABL mutations were identified in 12 of 65 (18%) evaluable pts (T315I in 1 pt). Additional chromosomal abnormalities in Ph+ cells were identified in 6 of 54 (11%) evaluable pts. Second-line treatment was started after a median time of 16 (4-72) months, with ponatinib (40 pts, 56%), dasatinib (21 pts, 30%), nilotinib (7 pts, 10%), or bosutinib (3 pts, 4%). Median follow-up from start of second-line treatment was 25 (2-90) months. Best response to second-line treatment was MR2 in 18 (25%) pts and MR3 in 37 (51%) pts. Nineteen (27%) pts (13 for resistance and 6 for intolerance) switched to third-line treatment (ponatinib, 11 pts; nilotinib, 3 pts; dasatinib, 4 pts; imatinib, 1 pt), after a median time of 8 (1-72) months. Mutations were identified in 2 of 17 evaluable pts, and both patients harbored a T315I mutation. MR3 was reached by 9 (47%) of these pts. Lastly, 7 (10%) pts switched (6 for resistance and 1 for intolerance) to fourth-line treatment (asciminib, 4pts; dasatinib, 2 pts, nilotinib, 1 pt). Overall, 44 (62%) patients reached with sequential TKI treatments a MR3 (31/51 pts among "failures"; 13/20 among "warnings"). Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) was performed in 7 (9.5%) pts (6 among "failures"), after a median time of 20 (15-60) months from CML diagnosis. Progression to advanced phase occurred in 2 (3%) pts; both pts previously met the ELN2020 "failure" criteria. Estimated 4-y PFS was 92.5%. Death occurred in 3 (4%) pts (1 after progression to blast phase, 2 for cardiovascular adverse events). Estimated 4-y OS was 93.7% CONCLUSION Our findings show that CP-CML patients not achieving an optimal response to frontline 2G-TKI therapy, despite a complex management, still have a favorable prognosis and survival due to the availability of both multiple TKI options and SCT. Figure Disclosures Gugliotta: Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Galimberti:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria. Abruzzese:Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bms: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bocchia:CELGENE: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Castagnetti:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria. Di Raimondo:Amgen, Takeda, Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; GILEAD, Incyte: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cavo:Jannsen, BMS, Celgene, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Amgen, Oncopeptides, AbbVie, Karyopharm, Adaptive: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rosti:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Foà:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Saglio:Pfizer: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Breccia:Abbvie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Following Initial Relapse in Patients with Relapsed Systemic Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3338.3338 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3338-3338

Author(s):

Nidhi Tandon ◽

Surbhi Sidana ◽

Morie A. Gertz ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Martha Q. Lacy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy

Abstract Introduction Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL Amyloidosis) is a plasma cell disorder characterized by deposition of misfolded insoluble protein fibrils (composed of monoclonal κ or λ light chains) in tissues causing progressive organ dysfunction. Chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), when eligible, are standard treatment options but relapses remain inevitable for most patients. However, there is a paucity of literature describing relapsed or refractory patients. We performed a retrospective study to analyze the outcomes upon relapse and the impact of type of therapy and retreatment with the same therapy at relapse. Methods Clinical and laboratory data of 1327 consecutive patients with systemic AL amyloidosis seen at Mayo Clinic within 90 days of their diagnosis, between 2006 and 2015, was collected by chart review and analyzed retrospectively. Of these patients, 219 (16.5%) were lost to follow-up. Among the remaining 1108 patients, 366 patients experienced a documented hematological or organ relapse or progression requiring change of first line or start of second line therapy and form the current study population. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from start of second line treatment or progression mandating therapy until death from any cause or the date of last follow up. The OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test was used to estimate the difference in survival curves. Results The median age was 62.8 years (36.1 - 85.3); 63.1% were males; 64.7% / 59.3% / 11.4% had cardiac / renal / hepatic involvement and 24.2% / 32.1% / 23.3% / 20.3% had MS I/II/III/IV. The median estimated follow up for this cohort was 69.4 months (95% CI; 64.4, 76.8) from the start of first line therapy and 45.2 months (95% CI; 36.5, 50.6) from the start of second line therapy or progression requiring treatment. The median time to second line treatment or relapse /progression mandating therapy was 16.2 months (1-93) from the start of first line therapy. At relapse, 14 patients underwent ASCT, 165 were treated with proteasome inhibitor (PI) based therapy, 83 with immunomodulator (IMiD) based therapy, 33 with alkylator based therapy, 15 with a combination of PI and IMiD, 10 with steroids, 8 with other therapies and 38 did not receive treatment. Among the 366 patients, 124 (33.9%) required change or reinstitution of therapy during follow up at the time of analysis. The median time to third line treatment or relapse /progression mandating therapy was 31 months (95% CI; 24, 40.5) from the start of second line treatment. The median overall survival (OS) was 76.4 months (95% CI; 65.2, 83.6) from the start of first line therapy and 38.8 months (95% CI; 29.6, 52.6) from the start of second line therapy. The type of therapy at relapse (ASCT vs PI vs IMiD vs melphalan vs steroids and others) did not alter the time to next therapy (ASCT, 43.1m; PI, 31m; IMiD, 37m; melphalan, 20.8m; steroids and others, 20m; p=0.3) and OS (ASCT, 66.9m; PI, 51.1m; IMiD, 51.3m; melphalan, 37.2m; steroids and others, 80.7m; p=0.9) from the start of the second line treatment; as depicted in Figure 1. Retreatment with a different drug class (as the first line treatment) at relapse significantly reduced the time to next treatment (32.3m vs 22 m; p= 0.01) as compared to same therapy; but did not have any impact on survival (30.8m vs 51.1m; p = 0.5); as presented in Figure 2. Conclusion This study provides novel information about outcomes of patients with systemic AL amyloidosis who relapse or progress after first line therapy which could be useful in planning salvage therapies and designing clinical trials. Retreatment with a different therapy at relapse improves time to next therapy but does not impact OS. Hence, we conclude that the patients can fare well post relapse/ progression and can benefit from various treatment regimens including retreatment with the same agent. Disclosures Dispenzieri: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jannsen: Research Funding; pfizer: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Kapoor:Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Kumar:BMS: Consultancy; Kesios: Consultancy; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Noxxon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Skyline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

The Prognostic Utility of Serial MASS-FIX in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153326 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1619-1619

Author(s):

Nadine Abdallah ◽

David L Murray ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Prashant Kapoor ◽

Morie A. Gertz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Disease Monitoring ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Immunofixation Electrophoresis ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Background: MASS-FIX is a novel method for detection, characterization and quantification of serum and urine monoclonal proteins in multiple myeloma (MM) which uses immunoglobulin enrichment coupled with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass-spectrometry (MALDI-TOF). MASS-FIX has been endorsed by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) as an alternative to immunofixation electrophoresis for diagnosis and disease monitoring in MM and has replaced immunofixation electrophoresis in our institution. This technique has demonstrated superior sensitivity and specificity compared to conventional gel-based methods, but its prognostic value is still unknown. We designed this study to evaluate whether serum M protein monitoring by MASS-FIX has prognostic significance in predicting disease progression in patients with MM. Methods: In the first part of the study, we included patients with MM who had a documented negative MASSFIX after first-line treatment and had serial MASS-FIX data available (n=187). We then compared the time to next treatment (TTNT) between patients who became positive by MASS-FIX and those who remained negative by last follow up. In the second part, we included patients who were positive by MASS-FIX within 90 days from diagnosis and had available serial MASS-FIX data (n=203). We compared TTNT between patients who became negative by MASS-FIX and those who remained positive by last follow up. TTNT was defined as the time of initiation of the first-line treatment to the time of initiation of second-line treatment or last follow up. Results: Part 1: We included 155 patients diagnosed with MM between January 2013 and December 2019 who had a documented negative MASSFIX with first-line treatment and had serial MASSFIX data available. After a median follow up of 3.1 (95%CI: 2.6-3.5) years, 44 (28%) patients became MASSFIX positive, while 111 (72%) still had negative MASS-FIX. The median time from treatment start to negative MASSFIX was 18.0 (IQR: 6.4-33.5) months. The median TTNT was 4.1 (95%CI: 3.2 - NR) years in patients who became MASSFIX positive and not reached (NR) (95%CI: NR-NR) in patients who were MASS-FIX negative by last follow up (P<0.001). The 2-year OS was 97% and 100% in the 2 groups, respectively (P=0.27). Part 2: We included 203 patients who had positive MASSFIX within 90 days from diagnosis and available serial MASSFIX data. The median follow-up was 1.5 (95%CI: 1.5-1.7) years. By last follow up, 39 (19%) patients became MASSFIX negative while 164 (81%) still had positive MASSFIX. The median TTNT was NR (95%CI: 2.0-NR) years in patients who developed negative MASSFIX and 2.3 (95%CI: 1.9 - NR) years in patients who were still MASS-FIX positive by last follow up (P=0.03). The 2-year OS was 97% and 94% in the 2 groups, respectively (P=0.84) Conclusion: The utilization of MASS-FIX in disease monitoring of MM patients provides prognostic information; among patients who become MASS-FIX negative after first line treatment, an earlier conversion to positive MASS-FIX predicts disease progression. Similarly, persistent MASS-FIX positivity after treatment initiation predicts earlier disease progression. Larger studies and longer follow up are needed to evaluate whether the MASS-FIX is associated with overall survival. Disclosures Murray: Mayo Clinic: Other: Has received patents for the Mass-Fix technology which has been licensed to the Binding Site with potential royalties.. Dispenzieri: Sorrento Therapeutics: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kapoor: Karyopharm: Consultancy; Cellectar: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Ichnos Sciences: Research Funding; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Glaxo SmithKline: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Gertz: Akcea Therapeutics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc, Prothena: Consultancy; Akcea Therapeutics, Ambry Genetics, Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Janssen Biotech Inc, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Pfizer Inc (to Institution), Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria; Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board; Aurora Biopharma: Other: Stock option; AbbVie Inc, Celgene Corporation: Other: Data Safetly & Monitoring. Dingli: Sanofi: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Apellis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy. Kumar: Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Antengene: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche-Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Carsgen: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Tenebio: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Major Improvement of Invasive Aspergillosis Outcome Is Not Enough to Improve Overall Survival In Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: Results From a Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1244.1244 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1244-1244

Author(s):

Géraldine Salmeron ◽

Raphaël Porcher ◽

Anne Bergeron ◽

Marie Robin ◽

Regis Peffault de Latour ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Abstract 1244 Background. Voriconazole (V) treatment has been shown to improve the 12 week (W) survival rate of hematological patients (pts) with invasive aspergillosis (IA), including recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT). We investigated whether this early survival advantage could translate into a significant increase in overall survival. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive pts who received a transplant between Sept. 1997 and Dec. 2008 at Saint-Louis Hospital and were diagnosed as having IA. The temporal origin of the study was the date of IA diagnosis for each patient. Factors associated with survival were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models. Separate models were estimated for survival up to 12 W and for survival between 12 W and 24 months (M) in pts surviving longer than 12 W. The deaths of pts with and without IA were analyzed with a competing risk framework. Cumulative incidence curves were compared using Gray's tests. Results. Our study examined 89 IA pts. The median follow-up was 70 M (range, 11–130 M). Two pts did not receive any antifungal treatment and were excluded from subsequent analyses. Of the 87 pts, 42 received first-line V and 45 primarily received a lipid formulation of amphotericin B (n=25), amphotericin B deoxycholate (n=10), caspofungin (n=8) or itraconazole (n=2). The primary characteristics of pts with IA and their causes of death, separated by V as first-line treatment, are shown in the table below. The median survival was 2.6 M, and the overall survival at 24 M was 19% (95% CI 12–30 M) (see figure). Overall, the survival rates of the two groups were significantly different (P= 0.010). However, the differences in survival were quite dramatic prior to 10 M, whereas both survival curves became very close after one year. At 18 M, the numbers of surviving pts were almost identical in the two groups [19% (95% CI: 11–34%) in pts who did not receive V as first-line treatment vs. 21% (95% CI 11–38%) in pts who did]. Pts who did not receive V as a first-line treatment displayed a higher probability of dying from IA than those who did (P=0.004), whereas opposite results were found for mortality in pts without IA (P=0.006). The 24-M cumulative incidence of death from IA was 47% (95% CI 31–61%) in the no V group and 19% (95% CI 9–33%) in the group treated with V. The 24-M cumulative incidence of death in pts without IA was 4% (95% CI 7–14%) in the no V group and 27% (95% CI 14–42%) in pts treated with V. The probability of death from another cause, with IA, was similar in both groups (29% vs. 36% at 24 M; P=0.46). After adjusting for donor type, conditioning regimen, progressive GVHD at diagnosis of IA and cumulated steroid dose (mg/kg) in the W preceding IA diagnosis, administration of V as first-line treatment was found to decrease the risk of death during the first 12 W by approximately 70% [HR=0.31 (95% CI 0.16–0.60); P=0.0005]. Conversely, analysis of mortality between 12 W and 24 M failed to identify any significant predictor of risk of death; however, only 24 pts died during this period. Conclusions. The finding that first-line treatment with V, which is associated with a tremendous improvement in IA outcome, does not translate into an increase in overall survival (even in the context of early diagnosis) is striking. Diagnosis of IA following HSCT, whatever the outcome, appears to be a strong marker for poor long-term prognosis. Disclosures: Bergeron: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau, none; Merck: Speakers Bureau, none; Schering: Speakers Bureau, none. Sulahian:Pfizer: Research Funding, non; Merck: Research Funding, none. Ribaud:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, none; Schering: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau, none; Gilead: Speakers Bureau, none.

Download Full-text

Clinicopathological Features of Nodular Sclerosis-Type Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma In the Elderly: Multicenter Study of Hodgkin Lymphoma In Japan

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2677.2677 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2677-2677

Author(s):

Naoko Asano ◽

Tomohiro Kinoshita ◽

Koichi Ohshima ◽

Tadashi Yoshino ◽

Nozomi Niitsu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Research Funding ◽

The Elderly ◽

Clinicopathological Features ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Abstract 2677 Background: Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL), which is characterized by the presence of Hodgkin and Reed Sternberg (H-RS) cells in a background of non-neoplastic inflammatory cells, is divided into four histological subgroups, nodular sclerosis (NSCHL), mixed cellularity (MCCHL), lymphocyte-rich, and lymphocyte depletion. While NSCHL in young adults is characterized by a mediastinal mass and good prognosis, the clinicopathological characteristics of NSCHL in the elderly (NSCHL-e) remain uncertain. Patients and methods: Enrolled patients were diagnosed with CHL between 1986 and 2006 as part of the Hodgkin Lymphoma's Multicenter Study Group. To better characterize NSCHL-e, we compared the clinicopathological profiles of 84 NSCHL-e patients aged 50 or over with 237 NSCHL-y patients aged 49 or younger and 302 with MCCHL. Results: The total of 743 CHL patients consisted of 496 men and 247 women with a median age of 48 years (range, 15– 89 years). The pathological diagnoses were NSCHL in 324 patients (43%) and MCCHL in 303 (41%). NSCHL patients showed a bimodal age distribution, with an initial peak in their 20s and a second small peak in their 60s. We categorized the former as NSCHL-y (49 or younger) and the latter as NSCHL-e (50 and over). NSCHL-e patients were characterized by male predominance and a more advanced clinical stage (53%) than NSCHL-y. Immunophenotypically, H-RS cells had the prototypic immunophenotype of CD15+ CD30+ and Pax5+. NSCHL-e cases showed a significantly higher rate of CD20 (24%) than NSCHL-y (8%, P = 0.001). Furthermore, H-RS cells in 29 of 75 (39%) patients with NSCHL-e were positive for EBV RNA transcripts by in situ hybridization, whereas only 7% of NSCHL-y cases were EBER-positive (P < 0.0001) (Table). Regarding NSCHL-e and MCCHL, no significant difference between these patients was seen in clinical characteristics. Immunophenotypically, NSCHL-e patients showed significantly higher rates for CD3 and TIA-1, while MCCHL patients showed higher EBV positivity (75%). Fifty-five of 63 patients received systemic multi-agent chemotherapy as first-line treatment, consisting of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbacin (ABVD) in 38 patients; CHOP in 8; C-MOPP in 8; and BEACOPP in 1. Overall, 51 patients responded to first-line treatment, 39 with complete response and 12 with partial response. Disease-specific survival of NSCHL-e was poorer than that of NSCHL-y (P < 0.001) but similar to that of MCCHL (P = 0.43) (Figure). Conclusion: NSCHL-e is characterized by an unfavorable prognosis and different clinicopathological features to NSCHL-y, which is considered as typical NSCHL. A number of cases of NSCHL-e might have been associated with MCCHL, with most being EBV-positive. These results suggest the limitations of current histological subgroupings for CHL. Disclosures: Matsushita: Pfizer CO.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxter Co.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Predictors of Early Relapse Following Initial Therapy for Systemic Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2082.2082 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2082-2082

Author(s):

Nidhi Tandon ◽

Surbhi Sidana ◽

Morie A. Gertz ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Martha Q. Lacy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Light Chain ◽

Research Funding ◽

Initial Therapy ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Early Relapse ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL Amyloidosis) is a monoclonal plasma cell proliferative disorder that is characterized by tissue deposits of misfolded insoluble κ or λ light chain derived amyloid fibrils, leading to organ dysfunction. The prognosis of patients depends on the number and severity of organ involvement, especially cardiac involvement. Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), if eligible, alkylator (melphalan) and novel drugs like proteasome inhibitors (PI) and immunomodulators (IMiD) have improved the overall survival (OS) during the past decades. But still, nearly half of the patients die within a year of diagnosis. We analyzed the factors predicting early relapse / progression or death (within 12 months) after first line therapy for systemic AL amyloidosis. Methods Clinical and laboratory data of all consecutive patients with systemic AL amyloidosis seen at Mayo Clinic within 90 days of their diagnosis, between 2006 and 2015, was collected by chart review and analyzed retrospectively. Patients who died within 3 months of starting the first line treatment were excluded from analysis. Early relapse (ER) was defined as relapse / progression requiring treatment change / re-institution or death within 12 months of starting first line treatment. Patients in the cohort with ER were compared with patients with a follow up of more than 12 months who had a relapse / progression beyond 12 months or had continuing response at the time of analysis. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi - square and Fisher's exact test and continuous variables using Kruskal- Wallis test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Multivariate analysis was done using logistic regression model. Results Seven hundred and eighty six patients with newly diagnosed systemic AL amyloidosis met the study criteria and were included in the analysis. Among these, 230 (29.3%) patients had ER within 12 months of starting initial therapy while 556 (70.7%) patients either relapsed after 1 year or had continuing response at the time of analysis. Baseline demographics, organ involvement and type of first line therapy are presented in Table1. The median estimated follow up for the entire cohort from start of initial therapy was 62.9 months (95% CI; 59.9, 67.3). The variables included in the univariate and multivariate analyses for factors predicting ER were age at diagnosis (≤ vs > 70 years ), revised mayo stage (I and II vs III and IV), bone marrow plasma cell percentage (BMPC; ≤ 10% vs > 10%), presence of any chromosomal abnormalities, trisomies or IgH translocations by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), multiorgan involvement [(>1 vs 1) (heart, liver, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, autonomic neuropathy), incorporation of ASCT in initial therapy. In univariate analysis, mayo stage (p<0.0001), multiorgan involvement (p=0.0008) and inclusion of ASCT as part of initial therapy (p<0.0001) were significantly associated with ER, while age (p=0.06), BMPC(p=0.9), FISH abnormalities (p=0.2) were not. However, in multivariate analysis, only mayo stage (III + IV vs I + II; p=0.01) and non-inclusion of ASCT in first line treatment (p=0.0001) were significantly predictive of ER. Conclusions Despite the introduction of ASCT and novel drugs, the early mortality in systemic AL amyloidosis remains high. This study demonstrates that patients with ER are older with higher prevalence of cardiac involvement and multiorgan involvement and higher Mayo stage (III and IV). Incorporation of ASCT as part of the initial therapy was associated with reduced early relapse, but it is difficult to separate the influence of the eligibility for ASCT from the effect of ASCT itself. This will help us in characterizing these patients to better understand their mechanisms of resistance to therapy and gives an insight to the type of initial therapy that benefits them. Disclosures Dispenzieri: GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jannsen: Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; pfizer: Research Funding. Kapoor:Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kesios: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Noxxon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Skyline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Patient Profile and Treatment Patterns in a Commercially Insured Population with Follicular Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127237 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5880-5880

Author(s):

Nathan H Fowler ◽

Yanni Hao ◽

Stephen Lim ◽

Guifang Chen ◽

Frank Li ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Third Line ◽

Line Of Therapy

Introduction: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the Western hemisphere. Patient characteristics and burden of FL are incomplete and vary from previous studies. This study evaluated patient profile, including patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and duration using real-world data. Methods: Using the Truven MarketScan® databases, patients with FL who were newly initiated with FL indicated regimens were identified from 1/1/2010-12/31/2013 (initial treatment identification period). Patients were selected if they were ≥18 years old, had 1 FL ICD-9 code (202.0) as primary or secondary diagnosis, at least 1 FL commonly prescribed systemic anti-cancer therapy after the diagnosis, and did not use any FL indicated regimen in the past 6 months prior to first agent included in the initial treatment identification period. These patents were followed ≥3 months or to June 30, 2018. Primary outcomes were the distribution of regimens by line, the number of patients who switched from first- to second-line therapies, and from second- to third-line therapies. The treatment duration by line of therapy and regimen were also analyzed. Discontinuation was defined as 3 months without receiving a regimen after treatment. Results: This study identified 4,970 patients who initiated treatment for FL. Of these patients, 48.1% were female (n=2,390), with a mean age of 62.0 (SD: 14.0) years. The average follow-up time was approximately 2 years (median: 733 days). In this analysis, 4,970 patients with FL received first-line therapy for 153 days (median: 94 days), 1,985 received second-line therapy (39.9% of patients who received first-line therapy) for 208 days (median: 80 days), and 664 received third-line therapy (13.4% of patients who received first-line therapy) for 117 days (median: 43 days). Of the 4,970 patients on first-line therapy, 453 (9.1%) remained on first-line therapy, 2,532 (51.0%) discontinued treatment, and 1,985 (39.9%) patients switched to the next line of therapy during the follow-up period. Of the 1,985 patients who switched to second-line therapy, 328 (16.5%) remained by the end of follow-up period, 993 (50.0%) discontinued, and 664 (33.4%) switched to the next line of therapy during the follow-up period. Of the 664 patients who switched to third-line therapy, 125 (18.8%) remained, 269 (40.5%) discontinued, and 270 (40.7%) switched to the next line of therapy. The most common first-line regimens in descending order received by patients were rituximab (n=1,478, 29.7%), R-CHOP (n=1,368, 27.5%), BR (n=1,050, 21.1%), R-CVP (n=371, 7.5%), and FCR (n=63, 1.3%). Second-line treatment regimens were (N=1,985) rituximab (n=992, 50.0%), BR (n=202, 10.2%), R-CHOP (n=138, 7.0%), and R-CVP (n=120, 6.1%). Third-line treatment regimens were (N=664) rituximab (n=228, 34.3%), BR (n=91, 13.7%), R-CHOP (n=75, 11.3%), cyclophosphamide (n=35, 5.3%) and R-CVP (n=31, 4.7%). Conclusion: This data set describes the percentage of patients that transition from first- to second-line and second- to third-line treatment for FL. The primary regimens used across the treatment lines conform to those recommended by the NCCN guidelines. In addition, smaller numbers of non-recommended regimens were reported. Disclosures Fowler: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ABBVIE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hao:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lim:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Chen:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Employment. Li:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Arcona:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment.

Download Full-text

Potentially Cured Follicular Lymphoma (PC-FL). an Analysis of 56 Cases with Prognostic Factors Evaluation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114896 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5328-5328

Author(s):

Samantha Ferrari ◽

Alessandra Tucci ◽

Gloria Valimberti ◽

Antonella Anastasia ◽

Chiara Bottelli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Duration ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Younger Age ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction: Advanced stage follicular lymphoma (FL) is generally considered incurable. Although multiple remissions after treatment are possible, relapse is considered the rule, and the time to progression tends to become shorter after each relapse (Johnson, JCO 1995). Over the last decades, after the introduction of monoclonal anti-CD20 antibodies and of better treatment programs, the prognosis of FL has markedly improved from a median OS of 7 years to a 10-year OS rate >80%. Moreover, clinical observations of patients (pts) experiencing very long progression-free periods despite more than one previous treatment failure, have become not rare, suggesting that some pts could achieve operational FL cure. To assess the frequency of those prolonged long-term remissions and search for potential predictive factors, we have retrospectively analyzed the consecutive series of pts with FL seen at our institution. Methods: FL pts, aged >18 years, in maintained remission for more than 5 years after at least two lines of treatment were selected as "potentially cured" FL (PC-FL) and analyzed in detail. Their main characteristics at diagnosis and at last relapse, the different lines of treatment received and the time intervals (time to next treatment: TTNT) between them, were recorded and compared with those of FL pts seen in the same period (control group). Treatment strategies used were grouped and defined as follows: radiotherapy or surgery, for stage I-II (local), anthracycline and/or alkylating agents regimens (Alk/Ant), purine analogues regimens (Pur), monoclonal antibodies/radioimmunoconjugates as single agent (MoAb), autologous transplantation (ASCT). Results and discussion: Among 385 consecutive FL pts seen from January 1987 to December 2011, 56 (14,5%) met criteria for PC-FL. Their clinicopathological features at diagnosis, compared to controls, are shown in Table I. There were no significant differences except for a younger age (51 vs 58 years, p<0.00016) and for a lower frequency of grade 3a histology (p=0.04) in PC-FL pts. First line treatment used did also not differ (p=0.29). Among PC-FL pts, 33 received two, 16 received 3 and 7 more than 3 treatment lines. The median duration of last complete remission was 118+ months, whereas the median duration of the remission preceding the last treatment had been 24 months; disease duration from diagnosis to the last relapse preceding long term remission had been 50,5 months. The last treatments received before long-term remission were variable including local in 10 (18%), Alk/Ant in 5 (9%), Pur in 11 (19%), MoAb in 10 (18%) and ASCT in 20 (36%). Pts characteristics at last relapse and remission duration were similar among different treatment subgroups, except that more pts in localized stage received local treatments. Comparing clinicopathological characteristics of PC-FL pts at diagnosis and at last relapse there were no differences except for FLIPI score, which was significantly lower at relapse (low FLIPI 34% at diagnosis, 68% at relapse, p=0.002). First-line and last treatments were similar except that more pts underwent ASCT as last treatment, as expected since frontline ASCT is not recommended. In 10 pts TTNT after first-line was longer than 5 years and 7 of them are still in prolonged remission (median 11+ years) after second-line treatment, representing a particularly favorable subgroup. In 26 (46%) of PC-FL pts TTNT was shorter than 24 months after first line therapy. Among 14 of them who received R-chemo at diagnosis (POD24, Casulo, JCO 2015), 8 (57%) obtained long remission after ASCT, given in second line in six. Conversely, ASCT was used in only 1 of 12 pts not receiving Rituximab at diagnosis. Conclusions: Approximately 15% of FL pts could currently achieve a very prolonged remission of about 10 years, even after multiple relapses. Its duration was 5x that of the last treatment line and more than twice that of active lymphoma, strongly suggesting the possibility of having achieved lymphoma cure. Younger age and grade 1-2 FL histology at diagnosis, and FLIPI low risk at relapse favored the achievement of PC-FL status. No specific treatment was associated with PC-FL and even an early relapse after first line treatment did not preclude to reach PC-FL, although early ASCT may be more effective for POD24 patients. Whether the achievement of PC-FL status may be related to biological factors will be interesting to be investigated in the next future. Disclosures Rossi: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria.

Download Full-text