Primary Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma of the Colon: Surgery for Local Disease Control Does Not Improve Outcome.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3444-3444
Author(s):  
Rajini Katipamula ◽  
Kay Ristow ◽  
Joseph P. Colgan ◽  
Thomas M. Habermann ◽  
Patrick B. Johnston ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: Primary colorectal large B-cell lymphoma is rare and accounts for less than 1% of all malignancies in the colon. Standard treatment for limited stage diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) includes systemic therapy combined with involved field radiation therapy. However, radiation therapy may often not be feasible in patients with primary colon lymphoma. For primary DLBCL of the colon particularly the cecum, surgical resection prior to the administration of systemic chemotherapy has been considered to improve local control. The goal of this study was therefore to determine whether surgical resection improves the outcome of patients with primary DLBCL of the colon. Methods: Clinical information and outcomes on all the patients with primary DLBCL of the colon seen at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between January 1980 and June 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: There were 28 patients identified with primary colon DLBCL. Pre-existing conditions like colon polyps, Crohn’s disease and diverticulosis were uncommon. The most common presenting symptom was bleeding per rectum seen in 13 patients (46.5%). Other symptoms included abdominal pain, diarrhea and anemia. All patients had early stage disease (stage1–22 patients, stage2–6 patients) at diagnosis. Of the 28 patients, 16 underwent initial surgery followed by chemotherapy, 7 were treated with chemotherapy alone, and 5 patients had inadequate data to determine time to progression or overall survival. Chemotherapy was anthracycline based, with the most common regimen being CHOP (Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Prednisone). There was no difference in overall survival or time to progression between the 16 patients who received combined modality therapy compared to the 7 patients who received chemotherapy alone. Of the 16 patients who underwent surgical resection followed by chemotherapy, all 5 patients who relapsed, relapsed at other sites in the colon. Conclusion: Surgery as part of combined modality therapy did not appear to improve the outcome of patients with primary DLBCL of the colon. Systemic chemotherapy with an anthracycline-based regimen in combination with rituximab is therefore likely to be sufficient treatment for these patients. Follow-up for these patients should include a colonoscopy to monitor for recurrences at other sites in the colon.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Qin ◽  
Shiyu Jiang ◽  
Peng Liu ◽  
Jianliang Yang ◽  
Sheng Yang ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4956-4956
Author(s):  
Darcie Deaver ◽  
Kenneth S. Zuckerman ◽  
Celeste M. Bello ◽  
Eduardo M. Sotomayor ◽  
Salvador Bruno ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4956 Background: The incidence of ocular adnexal lymphoma (OAL) is rare and usually presents in the setting of central nervous system (CNS) involvement. There are no rigid guidelines for the treatment of OAL, most probably because of the variety of characteristics of the disease. Objectives: To analyze clinical pathological features, therapy and outcomes of patients with primary and secondary OAL. Research Design and Methods: Retrospective chart review of 17 consecutive patients diagnosed with OAL at Moffitt Cancer Center from 2004–2011. Characteristics of the participants were median age 68 years, 15 (88%) white, 2 (12%) Hispanic, and 11 (65%) male. Chlamydia serology testing was negative in all patients tested. Secondary OAL patients were staged per the Ann Arbor Staging System, 2 (22%) stage III and 7 (78%) stage IV. The primary OAL patients were staged utilizing the TNM staging system for OALs (Coupland et al, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2009). Six (75%) patients were stage T1 and 2 (25%) patients were stage T2. Results: Seventeen patients with a diagnosis of OAL were evaluated in our institution. Patients with OAL are commonly stratified into 2 groups, primary and secondary. Eight (50%) of the patients were diagnosed with primary OAL; of these there were 4 (50%) marginal zone, 3 (37%) diffuse large B cell, and 1 (12%) follicular lymphoma. Nine (50%) patients were diagnosed with secondary OAL; 4 (44%) marginal zone, 1 (11%) diffuse large B cell, 1 (11%) mantle cell, 1 (11%) CLL, and 2 (22%) progressed from low grade to diffuse large B cell lymphoma. In the primary OAL, radiation in combination with systemic chemotherapy was the preferred treatment in diffuse large B cell lymphoma and radiation was preferred in patients with low-grade lymphoma. In secondary OAL, systemic chemotherapy was the preferred treatment for aggressive lymphoma. The choice of systemic Rituximab, radiation, or observation was the preferred treatment of low-grade lymphoma. Aggressive primary OAL had a relapse rate of 2 (66%) patients with a median time to progression of 8 months. Aggressive secondary OAL demonstrated a relapse rate of 50% with median time to progression 6 months. All patients who experienced relapsed disease received salvage chemotherapy. No cases of relapse were observed in the low-grade, primary or secondary, OAL patients. Median duration of response in low-grade primary lymphoma was 6 months and the low-grade secondary lymphoma was 54 months. Conclusion: In our patient population diffuse large B cell lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma were the most common diagnoses. Ocular adnexal lymphoma has been associated with the presence of CNS disease and it is estimated that 80–90% of patients diagnosed with OAL will experience progression to the CNS. Treatment depends on the extent of disease and the subtype of lymphoma that is histologically identified. Treatment may consist of involved field radiation in localized disease and has approximately less than 10% local recurrence rate. Intravitreal methotrexate and itraorbital injections of Rituximab or a combination of localized radiation and systemic high dose methotrexate are also options for treatment. In the event that there is systemic disease, single agent IV Rituximab or standard chemotherapy regimens such as CHOP-R or CVP-R in conjunction with ocular directed therapy. When disease is localized to the ocular compartment, the burden of disease is low and there is a greater chance of eradicating the disease. The delay in diagnosis increase the risk of CNS involvement and decreases overall survival. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5110-5110
Author(s):  
Haiwen Huang ◽  
Tianwen Fu ◽  
Qiangli Wang ◽  
Ting Xu ◽  
Xiaochen Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Clinically, primary gastric diffuse large B cell lymphoma (PG-DLBCL) is not encountered commonly. The optimal treatment of PG-DLBCL remains controversial. Whether patients should receive surgical resection, Rituximab or not was most concerned about. Here we analized 83 patients with PG-DLBCL retrospectivly and evaluated the effect of surgical option and Rituximab in the treatment of PG-DLBCL. Methods From January 2009 to December 2014, 83 cases of PG-DLBCL patients in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were retrospectively studied. Forty cases received surgical resection plus chemotherapy (group A) and 43 patients underwent chemotherapy alone (group B). The operation mode is decided by the surgeon according to the patients¡¯ current condition and the chemotherapy regimens of two groups were CHOP or R-CHOP. Patients¡¯ characteristics were listed in Table 1. The main outcomes of overall survival (OS) and the progression free survival (PFS) were analized by using the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method. Results The K-M analysis showed that the 3-year PFS and OS in group A were 66.7% and 68.4%, respectively. On the other hand, the 3-year PFS and OS of group B were 82.6%and 85.7%, respectively. There is no significant difference between the two groups. For patients received CHOP or R-CHOP, the 5-year OS were 77.7% and 78.2% (p=0.178). And the 3-year PFS were 74.9% and 75.5% (p=0.347). The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. In group A, the 5-year PFS of R-CHOP group and CHOP group is 62.5% and 71.2% £¨p=0.747£©, the 5-year OS of R-CHOP group and CHOP group is 64.2% and 73.6% (p=0.853). In group B, the 5-year PFS of R-CHOP group and CHOP group is 83.4% and 81.8% £¨p=0.706£©, the 5-year OS of R-CHOP group and CHOP group is 85.7% and 83.5% (p=0.753). The univariate analyses indicated that age and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level were related to prognosis. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors with a Cox model showed that IPI was the only independent prognostic factor. Conclusions This study shows that PG-DLBCL patients have a similar long-term survival rate when adopted surgery plus chemotherapy. Therefore, resection of the primary tumor before systemic chemotherapy does not improve the survival of the patients with PG-DLBCL. At the same time, the addition of Rituximab to chemotherapy doesn¡¯t make difference for the survival of PG-DLBCL. More prospective clinical trials about the effect of surgical operation and rituximab are needed to confirm the results of our study. Table 1. Patients¡¯ baseline characteristics Patients £¨%£© P value With surgical resection(Group A, n£½40£© Without chemotherapy (Group B, n £½ 43 £© Gender Male 19£¨47.5%£© 24£¨55.8%£© 0.449 Female 21£¨52.5%£© 19£¨44.2%£© Age ¡Ü60 15£¨37.5%£© 22£¨51.2%£© 0.211 £¾60 25£¨62.5%£© 21£¨48.8%£© Ann Arbor Stage I/II 13£¨32.5%£© 7£¨16.3%£© 0.084 Stage III/IV 27£¨67.5%£© 36£¨83.7%£© ECOG £¼2 19£¨47.5%£© 22£¨51.2%£© 0.739 ¡Ý2 21£¨52.5%£© 21£¨48.8%£© Treatment plan R-CHOP 23£¨57.5%£© 24£¨55.8%£© 0.887 CHOP 17£¨42.5%£© 19£¨44.2%£© LDH ¡Ü245 24£¨60.0%£© 27£¨62.8%£© 0.794 £¾245 16£¨40.0%£© 16£¨37.2%£© IPI ¡Ü2 13£¨32.5%£© 15£¨34.9%£© 0.818 £¾2 27£¨67.5%£© 28£¨65.1%£© ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; CHOP: cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone; R-CHOP: rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeeyun Lee ◽  
Won Seog Kim ◽  
Kihyun Kim ◽  
Jin Seok Ahn ◽  
Chul Won Jung ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 376-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Saito ◽  
Kencho Miyashita ◽  
Yosuke Miura ◽  
Shinpei Harada ◽  
Reiki Ogasawara ◽  
...  

Gastrosplenic fistula (GSF) is a rare condition arising from gastric or splenic lymphomas. Surgical resection is the most common treatment, as described in previous reports. We report two cases of GSF in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients that were successfully treated with chemotherapy and irradiation without surgical resection. Case 1 was of a 63-year-old man who had primary gastric DLBCL with a large lesion outside the stomach wall, leading to a spontaneous fistula in the spleen. Case 2 was of a 59-year-old man who had primary splenic DLBCL, which proliferated and infiltrated directly into the stomach. In both cases, chemotherapy comprising rituximab + dose-adjusted EPOCH regimen (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin) was administered. Case 1 had significant bleeding from the lesion of the stomach during the treatment cycle; however, endoscopic hemostasis was achieved. Case 2 developed a fistula between the stomach and the spleen following therapeutic chemotherapy; however, no complications related to the fistula were observed thereafter. In both cases, irradiation was administered, and complete remission was achieved.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document