PAR1 Antagonists Development and Clinical Utility

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. SCI-10-SCI-10
Author(s):  
Shaun Coughlin

Abstract Thrombin is a potent activator of platelets and other cells. The mechanism by which thrombin, a protease, regulates cellular behaviors like a hormone was revealed by expression cloning of a G protein-coupled receptor now known as protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1). Thrombin activates PAR1 by cleaving its N-terminal ectodomain to reveal a new N-terminus that then serves as a tethered peptide ligand, binding to the heptahelical domain to trigger G protein activation. A synthetic hexapeptide mimicking this new N-terminus activates PAR1 without receptor cleavage. Point mutations that prevent receptor cleavage render PAR1 unactivatable by thrombin without altering activation by exogenous tethered ligand peptide. Replacement of the thrombin cleavage site with sites for other proteases allows PAR1 to signal in response to those other proteases. Removal of sequence N-terminal to the cleavage site and creation of the new protonated amino group at N-terminal of the tethered ligand sequence is necessary for its function, explaining how the tethered ligand is silent in the intact receptor and activated by receptor cleavage. Thus, PARs are, in essence, peptide receptors that carry their own ligands, which can be unmasked by receptor cleavage. Mammalian cells utilize four PARs to respond to coagulation proteases and other proteases with trypsin-like specificity. Three, PAR1, PAR3 and PAR4 can mediate responses to thrombin, with PAR3 and PAR4 mediating platelet activation by thrombin in mice and PAR1 and PAR4 platelet activation in humans. Inhibition of thrombin signaling via PARs in platelets decreases thrombus formation in animal models of platelet-dependent thrombosis. These and other studies led to development of the PAR1 antagonist vorapaxar (Zontivity), a first-in-class antiplatelet agent approved for secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events in selected patients with prior myocardial infarction and peripheral arterial disease. What was and was not learned from animal and human studies and remaining questions related to clinical utility of PAR inhibition will be discussed. The structure-function studies outlined above support the tethered ligand model, but a structure that reveals how the tethered ligand binds and how binding leads to transmembrane signaling and G protein activation is needed. Vorapaxar provided a tool for stabilizing PAR1 protein during solubilization, purification and crystallization. In collaboration with Brian Kobilka and colleagues, we solved a crystal structure of off-state PAR1 in complex with its antagonist vorapaxar, which explains pharmacological properties of vorapaxar and efforts to solve a complementary on-state structure are ongoing. Disclosures Coughlin: Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (19) ◽  
pp. 6194-6199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah M. Stoveken ◽  
Alexander G. Hajduczok ◽  
Lei Xu ◽  
Gregory G. Tall

The large class of adhesion G protein-coupled receptors (aGPCRs) bind extracellular matrix or neighboring cell-surface ligands to regulate organ and tissue development through an unknown activation mechanism. We examined aGPCR activation using two prototypical aGPCRs, GPR56 and GPR110. Active dissociation of the noncovalently bound GPR56 or GPR110 extracellular domains (ECDs) from the respective seven-transmembrane (7TM) domains relieved an inhibitory influence and permitted both receptors to activate defined G protein subtypes. After ECD displacement, the newly revealed short N-terminal stalk regions of the 7TM domains were found to be essential for G protein activation. Synthetic peptides comprising these stalks potently activated GPR56 or GPR110 in vitro or in cells, demonstrating that the stalks comprise a tethered agonist that was encrypted within the ECD. Establishment of an aGPCR activation mechanism provides a rational platform for the development of aGPCR synthetic modulators that could find clinical utility toward aGPCR-directed disease.


1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 2954-2962 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Schneider ◽  
W. A. Eckert ◽  
A. R. Light

Schneider, S. P., W. A. Eckert III, and A. R. Light. Opioid-activated postsynaptic, inward rectifying potassium currents in whole cell recordings in substantia gelatinosa neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 2954–2962, 1998. Using tight-seal, whole cell recordings from isolated transverse slices of hamster and rat spinal cord, we investigated the effects of the μ-opioid agonist (d-Ala2, N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol)-enkephalin (DAMGO) on the membrane potential and conductance of substantia gelatinosa (SG) neurons. We observed that bath application of 1–5 μM DAMGO caused a robust and repeatable hyperpolarization in membrane potential ( V m) and decrease in neuronal input resistance ( R N) in 60% (27/45) of hamster neurons and 39% (9/23) of rat neurons, but significantly only when ATP (2 mM) and guanosine 5′-triphosphate (GTP; 100 μM) were included in the patch pipette internal solution. An ED50 of 50 nM was observed for the hyperpolarization in rat SG neurons. Because G-protein mediation of opioid effects has been shown in other systems, we tested if the nucleotide requirement for opioid hyperpolarization in SG neurons was due to G-protein activation. GTP was replaced with the nonhydrolyzable GTP analogue guanosine-5′- O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTP-γ-S; 100 μM), which enabled DAMGO to activate a nonreversible membrane hyperpolarization. Further, intracellular application of guanosine-5′- O-(2-thiodiphosphate) (GDP-β-S; 500 μM), which blocks G-protein activation, abolished the effects of DAMGO. We conclude that spinal SG neurons are particularly susceptible to dialysis of GTP by whole cell recording techniques. Moreover, the depletion of GTP leads to the inactivation of G-proteins that mediate μ-opioid activation of an inward-rectifying, potassium conductance in these neurons. These results explain the discrepancy between the opioid-activated hyperpolarization in SG neurons observed in previous sharp electrode experiments and the more recent failures to observe these effects with whole cell patch techniques.


2001 ◽  
Vol 276 (22) ◽  
pp. 18748-18756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen M. Kajkowski ◽  
C. Frederick Lo ◽  
Xiaoping Ning ◽  
Stephen Walker ◽  
Heidi J. Sofia ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 280 (5) ◽  
pp. H2069-H2075 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. P. Thompson ◽  
C. P. Weiner

We hypothesized that pregnancy modulates receptor-mediated responses of the uterine artery (UA) by altering G protein activation or coupling. Relaxation and contraction to NaF (0.5–11.5 mM), acetylcholine (10−9–10−5 M), and bradykinin (10−12–3 × 10−5 M) were measured in isolated UA of pregnant and nonpregnant guinea pigs. Responses were measured in the presence and absence of either cholera toxin (2 μg/ml) or pertussis toxin (Gαs and Gαiinhibitors, respectively). NaF relaxation was endothelium dependent and nitro-l-arginine sensitive (a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor). Relaxation to NaF, acetylcholine, and bradykinin were potentiated by pregnancy. Cholera but not pertussis toxin increased relaxation to acetylcholine and bradykinin in UA from nonpregnant animals, had no effect in UA from pregnant animals, and abolished the pregnancy-induced differences in acetylcholine relaxation. Cholera toxin potentiated the bradykinin-induced contraction of UA of both pregnant and nonpregnant animals, whereas pertussis toxin inhibited contraction of UA from pregnant animals only. Therefore, pregnancy may enhance agonist-stimulated endothelium-dependent relaxation and bradykinin-induced contraction of UA by inhibiting GTPase activity or enhancing Gαs but not Gαi activation in pregnant animals. Thus the diverse effects of pregnancy on UA responsiveness may result from hormonal modulation of G proteins coupled to their specific receptors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document