Circulating factor VIII immune complexes in patients with type 2 acquired hemophilia A and protection from activated protein C–mediated proteolysis

Blood ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 669-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiji Nogami ◽  
Midori Shima ◽  
John C. Giddings ◽  
Kazuya Hosokawa ◽  
Masanori Nagata ◽  
...  

Abstract Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor antibodies are classified into 2 groups according to the kinetic pattern of FVIII inactivation. Type 2 antibodies are more commonly observed in patients with acquired hemophilia A and do not completely inhibit FVIII activity; in most cases, substantial levels of circulating FVIII are detected. Three type 2 autoantibodies from patients who had normal levels of FVIII antigen despite having low levels of FVIII activity were studied. The antibodies reacted exclusively with the light chain of FVIII but not with the C2 domain, and their epitopes were therefore ascribed to the regions in the A3-C1 domains. Heavy and light chains of FVIII were detected in plasma-derived immune complexes extracted by using protein G Sepharose. Direct binding assays using anhydro-activated protein C (anhydro-APC), a catalytically inactive derivative of activated protein C (APC) in which the active-site serine is converted to dehydroalanine, were used to examine the relation between immune complexes and APC. The intact FVIII, 80-kd light chain, and 72-kd light chain bound in a dose-dependent manner to anhydro-APC, with Kdvalues of 580, 540, and 310 nM, respectively, whereas no appreciable binding was detected for the heavy chain. The 3 autoantibodies blocked FVIII binding to anhydro-APC by approximately 80% and consequently inhibited APC-induced FVIII proteolytic inactivation. These antibodies also bound to a synthetic peptide, His2009-Val2018, which contains the APC binding site. The findings suggest that binding of type 2 autoantibodies, recognizing residues His2009 to Val2018, protects FVIII from APC-mediated proteolysis and might contribute to the presence of FVIII immune complexes in the circulation.

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 348-348
Author(s):  
Patrick Ellsworth ◽  
Sheh-Li Chen ◽  
Christopher Wang ◽  
Nigel S Key ◽  
Alice Ma

Abstract Introduction Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disorder in which acquired auto-antibodies to endogenous Factor VIII (FVIII) resulting in decreased FVIII activity. AHA can lead to life-threatening bleeding, with effective treatment requiring both immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and bypassing agents such as recombinant activated Factor VII (rFVIIa) or activated prothrombin complex concentrates (APCC) (Tiede et al. Haematologica 2020). Some, including our group, have begun using emicizumab as well (Knoebl et al. Blood 2020). IST is required for inhibitor eradication, but regimens are heterogenous and have not been systematically compared in the literature. While there is no standard of care IST in these patients, most patients in the literature receive multiple agents, including corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, and/or rituximab in combination. We report in a prospective cohort that for IST, rituximab monotherapy is an effective strategy. An updated treatment algorithm is offered that has been effective for treatment of these patients at our institution, which adds emicizumab therapy after initial bleed control. Methods We analyzed clinical, pharmacy, and laboratory data from 24 patients treated with rpFVIII at the University of North Carolina for AHA from July 2015 to June 2021. All patients were initially treated according to our previously established dosing algorithm with recombinant porcine FVIII, and the last five patients have received emicizumab after initial factor dosing (see Figure 1). 17 of the patients who received rituximab and were followed at our center subsequently attained inhibitor eradication, six of those received only rituximab therapy. Investigational review board approval was obtained for our data collection and analysis. Patients who did not receive rituximab, failed to reach an inhibitor level <0.5 BU, or who were lost to follow up were excluded from the analysis. For patients that fit the inclusion criteria, the time between date of the first rituximab infusion and the date of inhibitor eradication was calculated. Results All patients in our cohort who we followed until inhibitor eradication (17 of 24 patients) had eradication of inhibitors after a median of 143 days from initiation of immunosuppression. For patients treated with rituximab monotherapy for inhibitor eradication (6 of 17), this goal was reached in a median of 134.5 days (range 76-191 days). For those who received agents in addition to rituximab and have reached inhibitor eradication to date (9 of 17 patients), median days from initiation of immunosuppression to inhibitor eradication was 137.5 days (range 11-485) (P = 0.43 on Mann-Whitney test). Patients were treated as previously reported by our group per an algorithm that starts recombinant porcine FVIII without waiting for a porcine inhibitor and at lower than FDA recommended dosing. Subsequent doses for bleed control are titrated according to one-stage, clot based FVIII activity. This report also includes 5 new patients who, after initial bleed control per our algorithm, were initiated on emicizumab while awaiting inhibitor eradication. There was no correlation between time to rituximab initiation and time to inhibitor eradication in both those who received rituximab monotherapy and those who had multiple IST agents. There was also no significant difference in initial inhibitor titer between groups with median initial inhibitor titer of 104 BU in the rituximab monotherapy group, and 70 BU in the multiple IST agents group (see Figure 3). Conclusions Rituximab monotherapy appears to be an effective strategy for inhibitor eradication in acquired hemophilia A. In the context of bleed treatment with porcine factor, followed by emicizumab, a standardized, algorithmic approach can be effectively employed for these patients. Though any patients have inhibitor recurrence, as is described in the literature, with emicizumab available, bleeding can be avoided with regular monitoring. Emicizumab given while re-eradicating an inhibitor can prevent morbidity of this disease. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ellsworth: Takeda: Other: Salary supported as part of NHF-Takeda Clinical Fellowship Award. Key: Uniqure: Consultancy, Other: Participation as a clinical trial investigator; Grifols: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; BioMarin: Honoraria, Other: Participation as a clinical trial investigator; Sanofi: Consultancy. Ma: Accordant: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Emicizumab is not approved for use in Acquired Hemophilia A and this represents an OFF LABEL use of the drug.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Nicholas B. Abt ◽  
Michael B. Streiff ◽  
Christian B. Gocke ◽  
Thomas S. Kickler ◽  
Sophie M. Lanzkron

Objective. We present the case of a 73-year-old female, with no family or personal history of a bleeding disorder, who had a classic presentation for acquired hemophilia A. Factor VIII activity was low but detectable and a factor VIII inhibitor was undetectable.Methods. The patient’s plasma was comprehensively studied to determine the cause of the acquired coagulopathy. Using the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay, no factor VIII autoantibody was measureable despite varying the incubation time from 1 to 3 hours.Results. The aPTT was prolonged at 46.8 seconds, which did not correct in the 4 : 1 mix but did with 1 : 1 mix. Using a one stage factor VIII activity assay, the FVIII activity was 16% and chromogenic FVIII activity was also 16%. The patient was treated with recombinant FVII and transfusion, significantly reducing bleeding. Long-term therapy was initiated with cyclophosphamide and prednisone with normalization of FVIII activity.Conclusions. Physicians can be presented with the challenging clinical picture of an acquired factor VIII inhibitor without a detectable inhibitor by the Bethesda assay. Standard therapy for an acquired hemophilia A should be considered.


2020 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 544-549
Author(s):  
Yoshiyuki Ogawa ◽  
Kunio Yanagisawa ◽  
Chiaki Naito ◽  
Hideki Uchiumi ◽  
Takuma Ishizaki ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srikanth Seethala ◽  
Sumit Gaur ◽  
Elizabeth Enderton ◽  
Javier Corral

A 36-year-old female started having postpartum vaginal bleeding after normal vaginal delivery. She underwent hysterectomy for persistent bleeding and was referred to our institution. An elevation of PTT and normal PT made us suspect postpartum acquired hemophilia (PAH), and it was confirmed by low factor VIII activity levels and an elevated factor VIII inhibitor. Hemostasis was achieved with recombinant factor VII concentrates and desmopressin, and factor eradication was achieved with cytoxan, methylprednisolone, and plasmapheresis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna A. Jalowiec ◽  
Martin Andres ◽  
Behrouz Mansouri Taleghani ◽  
Albulena Musa ◽  
Martina Dickenmann ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Acquired hemophilia A is a rare autoimmune disease with clinically often significant bleeding diathesis resulting from circulating autoantibodies inhibiting coagulation factor VIII. Half of acquired hemophilia A cases are associated with an underlying disorder, such as autoimmune diseases, cancer, or use of certain drugs, or occur during pregnancy and in the postpartum period. In the other half, no underlying cause is identified. An association of acquired hemophilia A with plasma cell neoplasm seems to be extremely rare. Case presentation We describe a case of a 77-year-old Swiss Caucasian man who was diagnosed with acquired hemophilia A and smoldering multiple myeloma as an underlying cause. Acquired hemophilia A was treated with prednisolone, cyclophosphamide, and immunoadsorption. Extensive workup revealed a plasma cell neoplasm as the only disorder associated with or underlying the acquired hemophilia A. For long-term control of acquired hemophilia A, we considered treatment of the plasma cell neoplasm necessary, and a VRD (bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone) regimen was initiated. Due to multiple complications, VRD was reduced to VRD-lite after two cycles. After nine cycles of induction therapy and five cycles of consolidation therapy, the patient is in complete remission of his acquired hemophilia A and very good partial remission of the plasma cell neoplasm. We conducted a literature review to identify additional cases of this rare association and identified 15 other cases. Case descriptions, including the sequence of occurrence of acquired hemophilia A and plasma cell neoplasm , treatment, evolution, and outcome are presented. Discussion and conclusions Our case, together with 15 other cases described in the literature, underscore the possibility of plasma cell neoplasm as an underlying cause of acquired hemophilia A. Physicians should consider including protein electrophoresis, immunofixation, and analysis of free light chains in laboratory diagnostics when treating a patient with acquired hemophilia A. The occurrence of excessive and unexplained bleeding in patients diagnosed with plasma cell neoplasm should raise suspicion of secondary acquired hemophilia A and trigger the request for coagulation tests, particularly in patients treated with immunomodulatory drugs such as thalidomide or lenalidomide. Additionally, early intervention with immunoadsorption can be lifesaving in cases with high-titer factor VIII inhibitors, especially when surgical interventions are necessary.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Halet Türkantoz ◽  
Christoph Königs ◽  
Paul Knöbl ◽  
Robert Klamroth ◽  
Katharina Holstein ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document