Overshoot of FVIII activity in patients with acquired hemophilia A who achieve complete remission

2020 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 544-549
Author(s):  
Yoshiyuki Ogawa ◽  
Kunio Yanagisawa ◽  
Chiaki Naito ◽  
Hideki Uchiumi ◽  
Takuma Ishizaki ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 18-19
Author(s):  
Evan C. Chen ◽  
William J. Gibson ◽  
Paula Temoczko ◽  
Nathan T. Connell ◽  
Robert Handin ◽  
...  

Background Acquired hemophilia A is a rare bleeding disorder caused by autoantibodies that inhibit coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). The disorder is understudied given its rarity and there are no randomized prospective trials to guide therapy. In practice, treatment involves attaining hemostasis and eliminating the FVIII inhibitor, typically with high-dose steroids (1 mg/kg daily) and either cyclophosphamide or rituximab. However, current approaches carry risk of significant adverse events and delayed or inadequate responses. Emicizumab is a bispecific antibody that targets coagulation factors IXa and X to recapitulate the function of endogenous FVIII. We present a case series of patients with acquired hemophilia A who were successfully treated with a regimen consisting of rituximab and emicizumab. Methods We identified patients >18 years who were diagnosed with acquired hemophilia A and received treatment with rituximab and emicizumab at Brigham and Women's Hospital between 2019 and 2020. We performed a retrospective chart review. Data collected included the patients' clinical presentation, laboratory studies (including coagulation testing, FVIII activity, and FVIII inhibitor titer), and treatments received (including systemic therapies, recombinant factor VIIa [rFVIIa], red blood cell [RBC] transfusions, and vascular embolization). We recorded the time to normalization of the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and chromogenic FVIII activity following emicizumab and rituximab initiation, respectively. Activated prothrombin complex concentrate was avoided given the use of emicizumab. Results We identified 8 patients with acquired hemophilia A who received treatment with emicizumab and rituximab. The median patient age was 81 (range 47-93). All patients sought medical attention for extensive ecchymoses or bleeding and were found to have prolonged aPTT leading to FVIII inhibitor identification (Table 1). The median inhibitor titer was 18 Bethesda units (range 9.2-107.5). Patients concurrently received 4 weekly doses of rituximab 375mg/m2 and 4 weekly loading doses of emicizumab 3mg/kg. Patient (Pt) #1 continued emicizumab 3mg/kg every two weeks to complete three months of treatment. Pts #2, #3, and #8 received high-dose prednisone (1mg/kg) at the start of treatment for a range of 10-14 days. Pt #8 received 7 additional days of prednisone for an initial aPTT of 60.7 seconds before starting emicizumab and rituximab; she had no clinical response when treated with prednisone alone. Pts #2, #5, and #7 required vascular embolization. 7 patients (Pts #2 through #8) had aPTT retested within 1 week of starting emicizumab, and the aPTT for these patients normalized within 10 days of starting emicizumab (i.e. after only 1-2 doses; Figure 1). Except for Pt #5 who had recurrent hematuria from a persistent anatomic bladder defect that eventually required prostatic artery embolization, patients did not require rFVIIa or RBC transfusions for more than 7 days after starting emicizumab. Except for Pt #5 who required 28 doses of rFVIIa and 3 units of RBC transfusions after starting emicizumab, the median number of rFVIIa doses and RBC units given to the remaining 7 patients was zero (range 0-6 doses) and zero (range 0-4 units), respectively. Pts #2 and #3 had chromogenic FVIII levels obtained >30 days after starting rituximab with improvement in FVIII activity to 29% (day 71) and 86% (day 91), respectively. During a median follow-up of 102 days, no patients experienced recurrent bleeding. However, Pt #3 exhibited a slowly increasing aPTT that reached 46.3 seconds on day 233 of follow-up without symptoms; further diagnostic testing is pending. Conclusion Our case series demonstrates that the combination of rituximab and emicizumab can be an effective and safe regimen for the treatment of acquired hemophilia A. No thrombotic events or thrombotic microangiopathy occurred. Treatment with weekly emicizumab led to aPTT normalization after 1-2 doses and facilitated hemostasis, as reflected by a median usage of zero rFVIIA doses and zero RBC transfusions after starting emicizumab when excluding one patient with hematuria from an anatomic defect. This compares favorably to historical reports. While no patient has had recurrent bleeding, additional chromogenic FVIII activity testing for patients is needed to confirm long-term normalization of FVIII activity. Disclosures Gibson: Ampressa therapeutics: Current equity holder in private company; nference: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company; ImmPACT-Bio: Consultancy; Boston Clinical Research Institute: Consultancy. Parnes:Bayer: Consultancy; I-Mab: Consultancy; Sunovion: Consultancy; UniQure: Consultancy; Sigilon: Consultancy; Shire/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Geron: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. OffLabel Disclosure: Emicizumab is used off-label in our case series for the treatment of acquired hemophilia A.


Blood ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 669-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiji Nogami ◽  
Midori Shima ◽  
John C. Giddings ◽  
Kazuya Hosokawa ◽  
Masanori Nagata ◽  
...  

Abstract Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor antibodies are classified into 2 groups according to the kinetic pattern of FVIII inactivation. Type 2 antibodies are more commonly observed in patients with acquired hemophilia A and do not completely inhibit FVIII activity; in most cases, substantial levels of circulating FVIII are detected. Three type 2 autoantibodies from patients who had normal levels of FVIII antigen despite having low levels of FVIII activity were studied. The antibodies reacted exclusively with the light chain of FVIII but not with the C2 domain, and their epitopes were therefore ascribed to the regions in the A3-C1 domains. Heavy and light chains of FVIII were detected in plasma-derived immune complexes extracted by using protein G Sepharose. Direct binding assays using anhydro-activated protein C (anhydro-APC), a catalytically inactive derivative of activated protein C (APC) in which the active-site serine is converted to dehydroalanine, were used to examine the relation between immune complexes and APC. The intact FVIII, 80-kd light chain, and 72-kd light chain bound in a dose-dependent manner to anhydro-APC, with Kdvalues of 580, 540, and 310 nM, respectively, whereas no appreciable binding was detected for the heavy chain. The 3 autoantibodies blocked FVIII binding to anhydro-APC by approximately 80% and consequently inhibited APC-induced FVIII proteolytic inactivation. These antibodies also bound to a synthetic peptide, His2009-Val2018, which contains the APC binding site. The findings suggest that binding of type 2 autoantibodies, recognizing residues His2009 to Val2018, protects FVIII from APC-mediated proteolysis and might contribute to the presence of FVIII immune complexes in the circulation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (9) ◽  
pp. 2105-2112
Author(s):  
Christiane Dobbelstein ◽  
Georgios Leandros Moschovakis ◽  
Andreas Tiede

Abstract Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) is administered to patients with acquired hemophilia A (AHA) to eradicate autoantibodies against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Data from registries previously demonstrated that IST is often complicated by adverse events, in particular infections. This pilot study was set out to assess the feasibility of reduced-intensity, risk factor–stratified IST. We followed a single-center consecutive cohort of twenty-five patients with AHA receiving IST according to a new institutional treatment standard. Based on results from a previous study, GTH-AH 01/2020, patients were stratified into “poor risk” (FVIII < 1 IU/dl or inhibitor ≥ 20 Bethesda units (BU)/ml) or “good risk” (FVIII ≥ 1 IU/dl and inhibitor < 20 BU/ml). Outcomes were compared between the current cohort and the GTH registry as a historic control (n = 102). Baseline characteristics of the cohort were not different from the historic control. Partial remission, defined as FVIII recovered to > 50 IU/dl, was achieved by 68% of patients after a median time of 112 days, which was lower and significantly later than in the historic control (hazard ratio: 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.2–2.8). Complete remission, overall survival, and frequency of fatal infections were not different. Grade 3 and 4 infections were more frequent. The impact of risk factors that was observed in the historic cohort was no longer apparent, as partial and complete remission and overall survival were similar in “good risk” and “poor risk” patients. In conclusion, reduced-intensity, risk factor–stratified IST is feasible in AHA but did not decrease the risk of infections and mortality in this cohort.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Holstein ◽  
Xiaofei Liu ◽  
Andrea Smith ◽  
Paul Knöbl ◽  
Robert Klamroth ◽  
...  

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is due to autoantibodies against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) and most often presents with unexpected bleeding. In contrast to congenital hemophilia, the patient's residual FVIII activity does not seem to correlate with the risk of bleeding as suggested from previous studies. Risk factors for bleeding have not been described. We used data from the prospective GTH-AH 01/2010 study to assess the risk of bleeding and the efficacy of hemostatic therapy. FVIII activity was measured at baseline and weekly thereafter. Bleeding events were assessed by treating physicians. A total of 289 bleeds was recorded in 102 patients. 141 new bleeds starting after day 1 were observed in 59% of the patients, with a mean rate of 0.13 bleeds per patient-week in weeks 1 to 12, or 0.27 bleeds per patient-week before achieving partial remission. Weekly measured FVIII activity was significantly associated with the bleeding rate, but only achieving FVIII ≥50% abolished the risk of bleeding. A good WHO performance status assessed at baseline (score 0 vs. higher) was associated with a lower bleeding rate. Hemostatic treatment was reported to be effective in 96% of bleeds. In conclusion, the risk of new bleeds after a first diagnosis of AHA remains high until partial remission is achieved, and weekly measured FVIII activity may help to assess the individual risk of bleeding. These results will help to define future strategies for prophylaxis of bleeding in AHA.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Ibnu Purwanto

<p>Hemofilia A yang didapat adalah penyakit yang jarang terdiagnosis dan seringkali salah terdiagnosis namun berpotensi menyebabkan perdarahan yang mengancam nyawa. Penyakit autoimun akibat pembentukan autoantibodi (inhibitor) terhadap FVIII ini hampir setengahnya memiliki gangguan lain yang mendasari. Pemanjangan activated partial thromboplastin time, mixing test yang tidak terkoreksi, rendahnya aktivitas FVIII, dan bukti inhibitor FVIII mendukung penegakan diagnosis Hemofilia A yang didapat. Rintangan dalam manajemen pasien dimulai dari penegakan diagnosis hingga penentuan terapi, baik terapi hemostatik, imunosupresi, serta pengobatan penyakit penyerta. Pemilihan terapi serta pengendalian terhadap efek samping dari pengobatan memerlukan perhatian khusus agar tercapai hemostasis dan remisi yang bertahan lama.</p><p>Acquired Hemophilia A can potentially cause life-threatening conditions due to profuse bleeding, but this autoimmune disease is mostly underdiagnosed. Hemophilia A occurs due to the development of an antibody against FVIII, moreover up to half of these cases have underlying conditions. Prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time, uncorrected mixing test, low FVIII activity, and detection of FVIII inhibitors support the diagnosis of acquired Hemophilia A. However, several challenges lay within patients’ management strategy, such as diagnosis workup and therapeutical choices. Treatment for acquired hemophilia A encompasses hemostatic therapy, immunosuppression, and treatment of underlying disease. Moreover, therapeutical choice and side effects control require special consideration to achieve hemostasis and durable remission.</p>


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 348-348
Author(s):  
Patrick Ellsworth ◽  
Sheh-Li Chen ◽  
Christopher Wang ◽  
Nigel S Key ◽  
Alice Ma

Abstract Introduction Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disorder in which acquired auto-antibodies to endogenous Factor VIII (FVIII) resulting in decreased FVIII activity. AHA can lead to life-threatening bleeding, with effective treatment requiring both immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and bypassing agents such as recombinant activated Factor VII (rFVIIa) or activated prothrombin complex concentrates (APCC) (Tiede et al. Haematologica 2020). Some, including our group, have begun using emicizumab as well (Knoebl et al. Blood 2020). IST is required for inhibitor eradication, but regimens are heterogenous and have not been systematically compared in the literature. While there is no standard of care IST in these patients, most patients in the literature receive multiple agents, including corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, and/or rituximab in combination. We report in a prospective cohort that for IST, rituximab monotherapy is an effective strategy. An updated treatment algorithm is offered that has been effective for treatment of these patients at our institution, which adds emicizumab therapy after initial bleed control. Methods We analyzed clinical, pharmacy, and laboratory data from 24 patients treated with rpFVIII at the University of North Carolina for AHA from July 2015 to June 2021. All patients were initially treated according to our previously established dosing algorithm with recombinant porcine FVIII, and the last five patients have received emicizumab after initial factor dosing (see Figure 1). 17 of the patients who received rituximab and were followed at our center subsequently attained inhibitor eradication, six of those received only rituximab therapy. Investigational review board approval was obtained for our data collection and analysis. Patients who did not receive rituximab, failed to reach an inhibitor level &lt;0.5 BU, or who were lost to follow up were excluded from the analysis. For patients that fit the inclusion criteria, the time between date of the first rituximab infusion and the date of inhibitor eradication was calculated. Results All patients in our cohort who we followed until inhibitor eradication (17 of 24 patients) had eradication of inhibitors after a median of 143 days from initiation of immunosuppression. For patients treated with rituximab monotherapy for inhibitor eradication (6 of 17), this goal was reached in a median of 134.5 days (range 76-191 days). For those who received agents in addition to rituximab and have reached inhibitor eradication to date (9 of 17 patients), median days from initiation of immunosuppression to inhibitor eradication was 137.5 days (range 11-485) (P = 0.43 on Mann-Whitney test). Patients were treated as previously reported by our group per an algorithm that starts recombinant porcine FVIII without waiting for a porcine inhibitor and at lower than FDA recommended dosing. Subsequent doses for bleed control are titrated according to one-stage, clot based FVIII activity. This report also includes 5 new patients who, after initial bleed control per our algorithm, were initiated on emicizumab while awaiting inhibitor eradication. There was no correlation between time to rituximab initiation and time to inhibitor eradication in both those who received rituximab monotherapy and those who had multiple IST agents. There was also no significant difference in initial inhibitor titer between groups with median initial inhibitor titer of 104 BU in the rituximab monotherapy group, and 70 BU in the multiple IST agents group (see Figure 3). Conclusions Rituximab monotherapy appears to be an effective strategy for inhibitor eradication in acquired hemophilia A. In the context of bleed treatment with porcine factor, followed by emicizumab, a standardized, algorithmic approach can be effectively employed for these patients. Though any patients have inhibitor recurrence, as is described in the literature, with emicizumab available, bleeding can be avoided with regular monitoring. Emicizumab given while re-eradicating an inhibitor can prevent morbidity of this disease. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ellsworth: Takeda: Other: Salary supported as part of NHF-Takeda Clinical Fellowship Award. Key: Uniqure: Consultancy, Other: Participation as a clinical trial investigator; Grifols: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; BioMarin: Honoraria, Other: Participation as a clinical trial investigator; Sanofi: Consultancy. Ma: Accordant: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Emicizumab is not approved for use in Acquired Hemophilia A and this represents an OFF LABEL use of the drug.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (24) ◽  
pp. 6240-6249
Author(s):  
Patrick Ellsworth ◽  
Sheh-Li Chen ◽  
Raj S. Kasthuri ◽  
Nigel S. Key ◽  
Micah J. Mooberry ◽  
...  

Abstract Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disorder in which acquired autoantibodies to endogenous factor VIII (FVIII) decrease FVIII activity and lead to a bleeding phenotype. A substantial majority of individuals who develop AHA present with severe bleeding. Effective treatment requires both immunosuppressive therapy and prompt hemostatic treatment. Bleeding is commonly treated with bypassing agents (BPAs) such as recombinant activated FVII (rFVIIa) or activated prothrombin complex concentrates Disadvantages to BPAs include the inability to monitor response with standard laboratory assays, inconsistent hemostatic efficacy, and thrombosis. Recombinant porcine FVIII (rpFVIII: Obizur, Baxter, Deerfield, IL) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for bleed treatment in AHA in 2014, and has the advantage of laboratory monitoring of FVIII activity levels and known hemostatic efficacy in the presence of anti-human FVIII inhibitors and after failure of BPAs. Using an algorithm-based approach, rpFVIII has been used to successfully treat 18 patients with AHA at our center with substantially lower doses than the current FDA-recommended dosing. Additionally, data from our cohort show that the preexposure anti-porcine Bethesda titer does not reliably predict the clinical response to rpFVIII treatment and is not correlated with the anti-human Bethesda titer. We also present data showing lower total rpFVIII use for initial bleed resolution when rpVIII is used upfront, as compared with use as rescue therapy. We validated our dosing algorithm, which uses much lower than FDA-recommended doses with 14 more patients than in our previously reported patient series.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3509-3509
Author(s):  
Abiola Oladapo ◽  
Joshua Epstein ◽  
Aaron Novack ◽  
Heinrich D. Farin

Abstract Introduction: A significant unmet need in the management of acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a replacement therapy that can be used without consideration of anti-human FVIII titer and allows for the ability to measure FVIII levels. The ability to measure FVIII levels during treatment: (1) identifies treatment response and leads to the ability to individually tailor treatment; (2) reduces treatment safety concerns; and (3) optimizes the utilization of therapy during treatment to minimize cost impact. OBI-1 is a recombinant porcine sequence FVIII developed to meet this need. Objective: To determine the impact of FVIII monitoring on OBI-1’s utilization during the treatment phase in the OBI-1 Phase 2/3 trial in AHA. Methods: A post-hoc analysis of the utilization data from the prospective, open label, Phase 2/3 study of OBI-1 in AHA was conducted. Subjects were administered an initial dose of 200U/kg of OBI-1 and subsequent doses were based on subject’s post-infusion FVIII activity levels and clinical assessments. The impact of FVIII monitoring on OBI-1’s utilization was evaluated by comparing: (A) the initial administered dose to the subsequent doses infused in the treatment period; and (B) the initial total administered dose within the first 24 hours of treatment to the doses infused in the subsequent 24-hour period(s) in the treatment period. The magnitude and the statistical significance of the dose adjustment were determined using non-parametric statistics (signed rank test). Results: Of the 29 subjects enrolled in the study, 65.5% (n=19) were males and median (range) age was 70 (42-90) years. Twenty-eight of the enrolled subjects had AHA while presence of anti-human FVIII titer could not be confirmed in the twenty-ninth subject. Of the subjects with AHA, 27 had a serious bleeding episode while one was enrolled for hemostatic cover for a planned surgery. Two subjects (7.1%) successfully responded requiring only the initial administered dose (100U/kg; 200U/kg). Two additional subjects were successfully treated within the first 24 hours. After the initial dose, subsequent doses indicated a median (IQR) dose reduction of 41.2% (50%) [n=26, p<0.01]. After the first 24-hour period, subsequent 24-hour periods showed a median (IQR) dose reduction of 65.4% (32.5%) [n=24, p<0.0001]. Conclusion: Study data indicate a significant reduction in the treatment dose after the initial dose or subsequent daily dosing after the first 24 hours. The ability to measure and monitor FVIII activity levels allow for the tailoring of OBI-1’s treatment dose and regimen. This measurability likely has a significant impact on dosing decisions to control the bleed. Disclosures Oladapo: Baxter Healthcare Corporation: Employment. Epstein:Baxter Healthcare Corporation: Employment. Novack:Baxter Healthcare: Employment. Farin:Baxter Healthcare: Employment.


2017 ◽  
pp. 184-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Innao ◽  
Alessandro Allegra ◽  
Rosalba Morreale ◽  
Sabina Russo ◽  
Caterina Musolino

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Nicholas B. Abt ◽  
Michael B. Streiff ◽  
Christian B. Gocke ◽  
Thomas S. Kickler ◽  
Sophie M. Lanzkron

Objective. We present the case of a 73-year-old female, with no family or personal history of a bleeding disorder, who had a classic presentation for acquired hemophilia A. Factor VIII activity was low but detectable and a factor VIII inhibitor was undetectable.Methods. The patient’s plasma was comprehensively studied to determine the cause of the acquired coagulopathy. Using the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay, no factor VIII autoantibody was measureable despite varying the incubation time from 1 to 3 hours.Results. The aPTT was prolonged at 46.8 seconds, which did not correct in the 4 : 1 mix but did with 1 : 1 mix. Using a one stage factor VIII activity assay, the FVIII activity was 16% and chromogenic FVIII activity was also 16%. The patient was treated with recombinant FVII and transfusion, significantly reducing bleeding. Long-term therapy was initiated with cyclophosphamide and prednisone with normalization of FVIII activity.Conclusions. Physicians can be presented with the challenging clinical picture of an acquired factor VIII inhibitor without a detectable inhibitor by the Bethesda assay. Standard therapy for an acquired hemophilia A should be considered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document