scholarly journals Prediction of outcome in patients with suspected acute ischaemic stroke with CT perfusion and CT angiography: the Dutch acute stroke trial (DUST) study protocol

BMC Neurology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom van Seeters ◽  
Geert Jan Biessels ◽  
Irene C van der Schaaf ◽  
Jan Willem Dankbaar ◽  
Alexander D Horsch ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant Mair ◽  
◽  
Rüdiger von Kummer ◽  
Alessandro Adami ◽  
Philip M. White ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e043665
Author(s):  
Srinivasa Rao Kundeti ◽  
Manikanda Krishnan Vaidyanathan ◽  
Bharath Shivashankar ◽  
Sankar Prasad Gorthi

IntroductionThe use of artificial intelligence (AI) to support the diagnosis of acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) could improve patient outcomes and facilitate accurate tissue and vessel assessment. However, the evidence in published AI studies is inadequate and difficult to interpret which reduces the accountability of the diagnostic results in clinical settings. This study protocol describes a rigorous systematic review of the accuracy of AI in the diagnosis of AIS and detection of large-vessel occlusions (LVOs).Methods and analysisWe will perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of AI models for diagnosing AIS and detecting LVOs. We will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Protocols guidelines. Literature searches will be conducted in eight databases. For data screening and extraction, two reviewers will use a modified Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies checklist. We will assess the included studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies guidelines. We will conduct a meta-analysis if sufficient data are available. We will use hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves to estimate the summary operating points, including the pooled sensitivity and specificity, with 95% CIs, if pooling is appropriate. Furthermore, if sufficient data are available, we will use Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations profiler software to summarise the main findings of the systematic review, as a summary of results.Ethics and disseminationThere are no ethical considerations associated with this study protocol, as the systematic review focuses on the examination of secondary data. The systematic review results will be used to report on the accuracy, completeness and standard procedures of the included studies. We will disseminate our findings by publishing our analysis in a peer-reviewed journal and, if required, we will communicate with the stakeholders of the studies and bibliographic databases.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020179652.


2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 398-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristian Barlinn ◽  
Zeljko Zivanovic ◽  
Limin Zhao ◽  
Maruthi Kesani ◽  
Clotilde Balucani ◽  
...  

Trials ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Sandercock ◽  
◽  
Richard Lindley ◽  
Joanna Wardlaw ◽  
Martin Dennis ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 406-409
Author(s):  
Alejandro M Brunser ◽  
Menglu Ouyang ◽  
Hisatomi Arima ◽  
Pablo M Lavados ◽  
Thompson Robinson ◽  
...  

BackgroundAlthough the Head Positioning in acute Stroke Trial (HeadPoST) showed no effect of the flat head position (FP; vs sitting up head position (SUP)) on functional outcome, we hypothesised that it could still offer benefits if commenced early in those with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) of at least moderate severity.MethodsSubgroup analysis of HeadPoST in participants with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores ≥7, ≥10 and ≥14, randomised to FP or SUP <4.5 hours of AIS onset on functional outcomes defined by a shift in scores on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) and death/disability (mRS scores 3–6), and any cardiovascular serious adverse event. Logistic regression analyses were undertaken adjusted for study design and baseline risk factors.ResultsThere was no significant differential treatment effect in patient subgroups defined by increasing baseline NIHSS scores: adjusted OR and 95% CI for ordinal shift and binary (3–6) mRS scores: for NIHSS ≥7 (n=867) 0.92 (0.67 to 1.25) and 0.74 (0.52 to 1.04); NIHSS ≥ 10 (n=606) 0.80 (0.58 to 1.10) and 0.77 (0.49 to 1.19); NIHSS ≥14 (n=378) 0.82 (0.54 to 1.24) and 1.22 (0.69 to 2.14).ConclusionsEarly FP had no significant effect in patients with moderate–severe AIS.Trial registration numberNCT02162017.


2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (9) ◽  
pp. 731.e21-731.e25 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Griffin ◽  
D. Herlihy ◽  
R. Hayden ◽  
M. Murphy ◽  
J. Walsh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document