scholarly journals A longitudinal analysis of patient satisfaction with care and quality of life in ambulatory oncology based on the OUT-PATSAT35 questionnaire

BMC Cancer ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thanh Vân France Nguyen ◽  
Amélie Anota ◽  
Anne Brédart ◽  
Alain Monnier ◽  
Jean-François Bosset ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 2454-2461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Ignacio Arraras ◽  
Jose Juan Illarramendi ◽  
Antonio Viudez ◽  
Berta Ibáñez ◽  
Maria Jose Lecumberri ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 20702-20702
Author(s):  
J. J. Stark ◽  
K. Campbell ◽  
L. Cain ◽  
K. Gilbert ◽  
C. G. Lis ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. ix475
Author(s):  
T.V.F. Nguyen ◽  
A. Brédart ◽  
J. Bosset ◽  
A. Monnier ◽  
M. Mercier

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002710
Author(s):  
Kenneth Mah ◽  
Nadia Swami ◽  
Brenda O'Connor ◽  
Breffni Hannon ◽  
Gary Rodin ◽  
...  

ObjectiveIn a cluster-randomised controlled trial of early palliative care (EPC) in advanced cancer, EPC was robustly associated with increased patient satisfaction with care. The present study evaluated mediational mechanisms underlying this EPC effect, including improved physical and psychological symptoms and quality of life, as well as relationships with healthcare providers and preparation for end of life.MethodParticipants with advanced cancer (n=461) completed measures at baseline and then monthly to 4 months. Mediational analyses, using a robust bootstrapping approach, focused on 3-month and 4-month follow-up data.ResultsAt 3 months, EPC decreased psychological symptoms, which resulted in greater satisfaction either directly (βindirect effect=0.05) or through greater quality of life (βindirect effect=0.02). At 4 months, EPC increased satisfaction through improved quality of life (βindirect effect=0.08). Physical symptom management showed no significant mediational effects at either time point. Better relationships with healthcare providers consistently mediated the EPC effect on patient satisfaction at 3 and 4 months, directly (βindirect effect=0.13–0.16) and through reduced psychological symptoms and/or improved quality of life (βindirect effect=0.00–0.02). At 4 months, improved preparation for end-of-life mediated EPC effects on satisfaction by enhancing quality of life (βindirect effect=0.01) or by reducing psychological symptoms and thereby increasing quality of life (βindirect effect=0.02).ConclusionEPC increases satisfaction with care in advanced cancer by attending effectively to patients’ emotional distress and quality of life, enhancing collaborative relationships with healthcare providers, and addressing concerns about preparation for end-of-life.Trial registration numberNCT01248624


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 704-711
Author(s):  
Tara M. Mackay ◽  
Lennart B. van Rijssen ◽  
Jurr O. Andriessen ◽  
Mustafa Suker ◽  
Geert-Jan Creemers ◽  
...  

Background: This study sought to assess patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) before and after treatment of pancreatic and periampullary cancer. Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter study of patients treated for pancreatic and periampullary cancer. General patient satisfaction was measured using the EORTC satisfaction with care questionnaire (IN-PATSAT32) at baseline and 3 months after treatment initiation, with a 10-point change on the Likert scale considered clinically meaningful. QoL was measured using the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). The influence of treatment (curative and palliative) on patient satisfaction and QoL was determined. Results: Of 100 patients, 71 completed follow-up questionnaires. General satisfaction with care decreased from 74.3 before treatment to 61.9 after treatment (P<.001), whereas global QoL increased from 68.4 to 71.4 (P=.39). Clinically meaningful reductions were also observed for the reported interpersonal skills of doctors (from 73.4 to 63.3) and exchange of information within the care team (from 63.5 to 52.5). Satisfaction scores were lower for patients treated with curative intent than for those treated with palliative intent regarding interpersonal skills of doctors (P=.01), information provision by doctors (P=.004), information provision by nurses (P=.02), availability of nurses (P=.004), exchange of information within the care team (P=.01), and hospital access (P=.02). In multivariable analysis, clinicopathologic or QoL factors were not independently associated with general patient satisfaction. Conclusions: Satisfaction with care, but not QoL, decreased after pancreatic cancer treatment. Improvements in communication and interpersonal skills are needed to maintain patient satisfaction after treatment.


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 20501-20501 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Cain ◽  
K. Campbell ◽  
K. Gilbert ◽  
J. J. Stark ◽  
C. G. Lis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document