scholarly journals Association of shared decision-making with type of breast cancer surgery: a cross-sectional study

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Myung Kyung Lee ◽  
Dong Young Noh ◽  
Seok Jin Nam ◽  
Se Hyun Ahn ◽  
Byeong Woo Park ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Marta Maes-Carballo ◽  
Manuel Martín-Díaz ◽  
Luciano Mignini ◽  
Khalid Saeed Khan ◽  
Rubén Trigueros ◽  
...  

Objectives: To assess shared decision-making (SDM) knowledge, attitude and application among health professionals involved in breast cancer (BC) treatment. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study based on an online questionnaire, sent by several professional societies to health professionals involved in BC management. There were 26 questions which combined demographic and professional data with some items measured on a Likert-type scale. Results: The participation (459/541; 84.84%) and completion (443/459; 96.51%) rates were high. Participants strongly agreed or agreed in 69.57% (16/23) of their responses. The majority stated that they knew of SDM (mean 4.43 (4.36–4.55)) and were in favour of its implementation (mean 4.58 (4.51–4.64)). They highlighted that SDM practice was not adequate due to lack of resources (3.46 (3.37–3.55)) and agreed on policies that improved its implementation (3.96 (3.88–4.04)). The main advantage of SDM for participants was patient satisfaction (38%), and the main disadvantage was the patients’ paucity of knowledge to understand their disease (24%). The main obstacle indicated was the lack of time and resources (40%). Conclusions: New policies must be designed for adequate training of professionals in integrating SDM in clinical practice, preparing them to use SDM with adequate resources and time provided.


2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Sowa ◽  
Iwona Głowacka-Mrotek ◽  
Ewelina Monastyrska ◽  
Tomasz Nowikiewicz ◽  
Magdalena Mackiewicz-Milewska ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 212-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Menear ◽  
Mirjam Marjolein Garvelink ◽  
Rhéda Adekpedjou ◽  
Maria Margarita Becerra Perez ◽  
Hubert Robitaille ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad Alameddine ◽  
Reem AlGurg ◽  
Farah Otaki ◽  
Alawi A. Alsheikh-Ali

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad Ayob Ismail ◽  
Marhani Midin

Introduction: Shared decision-making (SDM) is recognized as a promising strategy for improving collaboration between clinicians and their patients in achieving recovery. In Malaysia, SDM among people with schizophrenia is still lacking both in practice and in research. This study aimed to determine the level of SDM and role preference and their associated factors among patients with schizophrenia in Malaysia.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 86 outpatient attendees with schizophrenia at a teaching hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The nine-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire and Control Preference Scale were used to assess perceived SDM experience and role preference, respectively. Linear and logistic regression models were used to analyze the factors associated with SDM and role preference, respectively. Factors with a p <0.25 from the simple regression analyses were controlled as the covariates in the multiple regression analyses.Results: The study respondents were predominantly female, single, and unemployed, with a mean age of 44 years. Only 35% of the participants reported having high SDM experiences, even though the majority (56%) preferred autonomous role preference. Among the participants who preferred autonomous roles, only 40% experienced high SDM. High SDM was found to be significantly associated with being younger (B = −0.33, 95% CI = −0.67 to −0.003) and being non-clozapine users (B = 19.90, 95% CI = 9.39–30.41), while autonomous role preference was significantly associated with a lower level of insight [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.72–0.99] and being on oral antipsychotic drugs only (AOR = 2.94, 95% CI = 1.10–7.82).Conclusion: The practice of SDM is still lacking in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia in Malaysia, even though many of them preferred to be involved in the decision-making pertaining to their treatment. This study indicates the need for clinicians to improve their patients' involvement in the treatment process. More research is needed on how SDM can be implemented in patients with schizophrenia, especially in Asian population settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document