scholarly journals The effect of removing plugs and adding arch support to foam based insoles on plantar pressures in people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tung-Liang Lin ◽  
Huey-Min Sheen ◽  
Chin-Teng Chung ◽  
Sai-Wei Yang ◽  
Shih-Yi Lin ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Collings ◽  
Jennifer Freeman ◽  
Jos M Latour ◽  
Joanne Paton

Abstract Background: Therapeutic footwear and insoles are preventative strategies to reduce elevated plantar pressures associated with diabetic foot ulcer risk. An insole intervention appropriate for chairside delivery optimizing plantar foot pressure reduction in people with diabetes has been developed. Aim: To explore the feasibility and acceptability of testing an optimized insole compared with an active control insole to reduce plantar pressures for people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.Methods: A double-blinded multicentre feasibility RCT with an embedded qualitative study. In addition to usual care, participants were randomized to either an optimized insole group (Intervention) or a standard cushioned insole group (Active control). Participants were assessed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months with clinical outcome of mean peak plantar pressure (MPPP) reduction. An embedded qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with 12 study participants and three podiatrists to explore their experiences of the intervention and trial procedures. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (quantitative data) and thematic analysis (qualitative data).Results: Screened were142 patients from which 61 were recruited; 30 participants were randomized to the Intervention group and 31 to the Active control group. Forty-two participants completed the study. At 12-months, 69% of the patient-reported questionnaires were returned and 68% of the clinical outcomes were collected. Mean difference in MPPP between the Intervention and Active control groups for all regions-of-interest combined favoured the Intervention, with increases from 87kPa at post-randomization to 255kPa at 12-months. Thematic analysis revealed three themes; accepting the study, behaviour and support during study procedures, and impact from study participation. Conclusion: The results of the feasibility RCT suggest that the optimized insole holds promise as an intervention, and that a full RCT to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of this intervention is feasible and warranted for people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Trial registration: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN16011830. Registered 9th October 2017, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16011830


PM&R ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 434-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn M. York ◽  
Karen L. Perell-Gerson ◽  
Michele Barr ◽  
Jayson Durham ◽  
Janice M. Roper

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iona Borg ◽  
Stephen Mizzi ◽  
Cynthia Formosa

Background: Elevated dynamic plantar pressures are a consistent finding in diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy, with implications for plantar foot ulceration. This study aimed to investigate whether a first-ray amputation affects plantar pressures and plantar pressure distribution patterns in individuals living with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy. Methods: A nonexperimental matched-subject design was conducted. Twenty patients living with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy were recruited. Group 1 (n = 10) had a first-ray amputation and group 2 (n = 10) had an intact foot with no history of ulceration. Plantar foot pressures and pressure-time integrals were measured under the second to fourth metatarsophalangeal joints, fifth metatarsophalangeal joint, and heel using a pressure platform. Results: Peak plantar pressures under the second to fourth metatarsophalangeal joints were significantly higher in participants with a first-ray amputation (P = .008). However, differences under the fifth metatarsophalangeal joint (P = .734) and heel (P = .273) were nonsignificant. Pressure-time integrals were significantly higher under the second to fourth metatarsophalangeal joints in participants with a first-ray amputation (P = .016) and in the heel in the control group (P = .046). Conclusions: Plantar pressures and pressure-time integrals seem to be significantly higher in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and a first-ray amputation compared with those with diabetic neuropathy and an intact foot. Routine plantar pressure screening, orthotic prescription, and education should be recommended in patients with a first-ray amputation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document