scholarly journals Abdominal sepsis in the surgical intensive care unit: a follow up study on quality of life, morbidity and mortality

Critical Care ◽  
10.1186/cc619 ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 3 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P246
Author(s):  
P Haraldsen ◽  
R Andersson
2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. e120-e128 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. K. Timmers ◽  
M. H. J. Verhofstad ◽  
K. G. M. Moons ◽  
L. P. H. Leenen

Background Readmission within 48 hours is a leading performance indicator of the quality of care in an intensive care unit. Objective To investigate variables that might be associated with readmission to a surgical intensive care unit. Methods Demographic characteristics, severity-of-illness scores, and survival rates were collected for all patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit between 1995 and 2000. Long-term survival and quality of life were determined for patients who were readmitted within 30 days after discharge from the unit. Quality of life was measured with the EuroQol-6D questionnaire. Multivariate logistic analysis was used to calculate the independent association of expected covariates. Results Mean follow-up time was 8 years. Of the 1682 patients alive at discharge, 141 (8%) were readmitted. The main causes of readmission were respiratory decompensation (48%) and cardiac conditions (16%). Compared with the total sample, patients readmitted were older, mostly had vascular (39%) or gastrointestinal (26%) disease, and had significantly higher initial severity of illness (P = .003, .007) and significantly more comorbid conditions (P = .005). For all surgical classifications except general surgery, readmission was independently associated with type of admission and need for mechanical ventilation. Long-term mortality was higher among patients who were readmitted than among the total sample. Nevertheless, quality-of-life scores were the same for patients who were readmitted and patients who were not. Conclusion The adverse effect of readmission to the intensive care unit on survival appears to be long-lasting, and predictors of readmission are scarce.


2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando J Abelha ◽  
Cristina C Santos ◽  
Paula C Maia ◽  
Maria A Castro ◽  
Henrique Barros

1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 70A
Author(s):  
Sandra Swoboda ◽  
Jennifer Dickerson ◽  
Tanya Mooney ◽  
Michelle Ylitalo ◽  
Pamela Lipsett

Heart & Lung ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth C. Parsons ◽  
Catherine L. Hough ◽  
Michael V. Vitiello ◽  
Douglas Zatzick ◽  
Dimitry S. Davydow

2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 120-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin J. Bittner ◽  
Eugene C. Rich ◽  
Paul D. Turner ◽  
William H. Arnold

Objective:To determine whether hand washing would increase with sustained feedback based on measurements of soap and paper towel consumption.Design:Prospective trial with a nonequivalent control group.Setting:Open multibed rooms in the Omaha Veterans Affairs Medical Center's Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) and Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU).Subjects:Unit staff.Intervention:Every weekday from May 26 through December 8,1998, we recorded daytime soap and paper towel consumption, nurse staffing, and occupied beds in the SICU (intervention unit) and the MICU (control unit) and used these data to calculate estimated hand washing episodes (EHWEs), EHWEs per occupied bed per hour, and patient-to-nurse ratios. In addition, from May 26 through June 26 (baseline period) and from November 2 through December 8 (follow-up period), live observers stationed daily for random 4-hour intervals in the MICU and the SICU counted actual hand washing episodes (CHWEs). The intervention consisted of posting in the SICU, but not in the MICU, a graph showing the weekly EHWEs per occupied bed per hour for the preceding 5 weeks.Results:Directly counted hand washing fell in the SICU from a baseline of 2.68 ± 0.72 (mean ± standard deviation) episodes per occupied bed per hour to 1.92 ± 1.35 in the follow-up period. In the MICU, episodes fell from 2.58 ± 0.95 (baseline) to 1.74 ± 0.69. In the MICU, the withdrawal of live observers was associated with a decrease in estimated episodes from 1.36 ± 0.49 at baseline to 1.01 ± 0.36, with a return to 1.16 ± 0.50 when the observers returned. In the SICU, a similar decrease did not persist throughout a period of feedback. Estimated hand washing correlated negatively with the patient-to-nurse ratio (r= -0.35 for the MICU,r= -0.46 for the SICU).Conclusions:Sustained feedback on hand washing failed to produce a sustained improvement. Live observers were associated with increased hand washing, even when they did not offer feedback. Hand washing decreased when the patient-to-nurse ratio increased.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document