scholarly journals The appropriate dosing of erenumab for migraine prevention after multiple preventive treatment failures: a critical appraisal

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Ornello ◽  
Cindy Tiseo ◽  
Ilaria Frattale ◽  
Giulia Perrotta ◽  
Carmine Marini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Calcitonin Gene ◽  
Monthly Dose ◽  
Numerical Advantage

Abstract Background Erenumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, was approved for the prevention of episodic (EM) or chronic migraine (CM) at the monthly dose of 70 mg or 140 mg. We reviewed the available literature to understand if patients with prior preventive treatment failures benefit more from the 140 mg dose than the 70 mg. Main body We searched papers indexed in PubMed and conference abstracts published in the last 2 years which assessed the safety and efficacy of erenumab in patients with prior preventive treatment failures. We reviewed the results of 3 randomized controlled trials and their subgroup analyses and open-label extensions. The 140 mg monthly dose of erenumab had a numerical advantage over the 70 mg monthly dose in patients with prior preventive treatment failures, both in EM and CM (with or without medication overuse) during the double blind phases of the trials and their open-label extensions. The numerical difference between the two doses increased with the increase in the number of prior preventive treatment failures. Conclusions The available data suggest that erenumab 140 mg monthly might be preferred over the 70 mg monthly dose in patients with EM or CM and prior preventive treatment failures. Further data are needed to assess the long-term efficacy in clinical practice of the two doses of erenumab, while their safety profile is comparable.

Long-term cariprazine treatment for the prevention of relapse in patients with schizophrenia: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

2020 ◽  
pp. 27-37
Author(s):  
Suresh Durgam ◽  
Willie Earley ◽  
Rui Li ◽  
Dayong Li ◽  
Kaifeng Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Profile ◽  
Relapse Prevention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Time To Relapse

Cariprazine, a dopamine D3/D2 receptor partial agonist with preference for D3 receptors, has demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials in schizophrenia. This multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of cariprazine for relapse prevention in adults with schizophrenia; total study duration was up to 97 weeks. Schizophrenia symptoms were treated/stabilized with cariprazine 3—9 mg/d during 20-week open-label treatment consisting of an 8-week, flexible-dose run-in phase and a 12-week fixed-dose stabilization phase. Stable patients who completed open-label treatment could be randomized to continued cariprazine (3, 6, or 9 mg/d) or placebo for double-blind treatment (up to 72 weeks). The primary efficacy parameter was time to relapse (worsening of symptom scores, psychiatric hospitalization, aggressive/violent behavior, or suicidal risk); clinical measures were implemented to ensure safety in case of impending relapse. A total of 264/765 patients completed open-label treatment; 200 eligible patients were randomized to double-blind placebo (n = 99) or cariprazine (n = 101). Time to relapse was significantly longer in cariprazine — versus placebo-treated patients (P = .0010, log-rank test). Relapse occurred in 24.8% of cariprazine- and 47.5% of placebo-treated patients (hazard ratio [95% CI] = 0.45 [0.28, 0.73]). Akathisia (19.2%), insomnia (14.4%), and headache (12.0%) were reported in ≥ 10% of patients during open-label treatment; there were no cariprazine adverse events ≥ 10% during double-blind treatment. Long-term cariprazine treatment was significantly more effective than placebo for relapse prevention in patients with schizophrenia. The long-term safety profile in this study was consistent with the safety profile observed in previous cariprazine clinical trials. ClincalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01412060. Key words: schizophrenia; cariprazine; long-term treatment; relapse prevention; randomized controlled trial; oral antipsychotics

scholarly journals Two-year efficacy and safety of erenumab in participants with episodic migraine and 2–4 prior preventive treatment failures: results from the LIBERTY study

2021 ◽  
pp. jnnp-2021-327480
Author(s):  
Michel Dominique Ferrari ◽  
Uwe Reuter ◽  
Peter J Goadsby ◽  
Gabriel Paiva da Silva Lima ◽  
Subhayan Mondal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Episodic Migraine ◽  
Responder Rate ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Open Label Extension ◽  
Registration Number

ObjectiveTo evaluate individual and group long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in individuals with episodic migraine (EM) for whom 2–4 prior preventatives had failed.MethodsParticipants completing the 12-week double-blind treatment phase (DBTP) of the LIBERTY study could continue into an open-label extension phase (OLEP) receiving erenumab 140 mg monthly for up to 3 years. Main outcomes assessed at week 112 were: ≥50%, ≥75% and 100% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) as group responder rate and individual responder rates, MMD change from baseline, safety and tolerability.ResultsOverall 240/246 (97.6%) entered the OLEP (118 continuing erenumab, 122 switching from placebo). In total 181/240 (75.4%) reached 112 weeks, 24.6% discontinued, mainly due to lack of efficacy (44.0%), participant decision (37.0%) and adverse events (AEs; 12.0%). The ≥50% responder rate was 57.2% (99/173) at 112 weeks. Of ≥50% responders at the end of the DBTP, 36/52 (69.2%) remained responders at ≥50% and 22/52 (42.3%) at >80% of visits. Of the non-responders at the end of the DBTP, 60/185 (32.4%) converted to ≥50% responders in at least half the visits and 24/185 (13.0%) converted to ≥50% responders in >80% of visits. Change from baseline at 112 weeks in mean (SD) MMD was −4.2 (5.0) days. Common AEs (≥10%) were nasopharyngitis, influenza and back pain.ConclusionsEfficacy was sustained over 112 weeks in individuals with difficult-to-treat EM for whom 2–4 prior migraine preventives had failed. Erenumab treatment was safe and well tolerated, in-line with previous studies.Trial registration numberNCT03096834

Erenumab (AMG 334) in episodic migraine

Neurology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 89 (12) ◽  
pp. 1237-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Messoud Ashina ◽  
David Dodick ◽  
Peter J. Goadsby ◽  
Uwe Reuter ◽  
Stephen Silberstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Episodic Migraine ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Open Label Extension

Objective:To assess long-term safety and efficacy of anti–calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor erenumab in patients with episodic migraine (EM).Methods:Patients enrolled in a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (NCT01952574) who continued in an open-label extension (OLE) study will receive erenumab 70 mg every 4 weeks for up to 5 years. This preplanned interim analysis, conducted after all participants had completed the 1-year open-label follow-up, evaluated changes in monthly migraine days (MMD), achievement of ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reductions, Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) score, Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), and safety. Data reported as observed without imputation for missing data.Results:Of 472 patients enrolled in the parent study, 383 continued in the OLE with a median exposure to erenumab of 575 days (range 28–822 days). Mean (SD) MMD were 8.8 (2.6) at parent study baseline, 6.3 (4.2) at week 12 (beginning of OLE), and 3.7 (4.0) at week 64 (mean change from baseline [reduction] of 5.0 days). At week 64, 65%, 42%, and 26% achieved ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reduction in MMD, respectively. Mean HIT-6 scores were 60.2 (6.3) at baseline and 51.7 (9.2) at week 64. MSQ and MIDAS improvements from baseline were maintained through week 64. Safety profiles during the OLE were similar to those in the double-blind phase, which overall were similar to placebo.Conclusions:One-year efficacy, supported by functional improvements and favorable safety and tolerability profiles, supports further investigation of erenumab as a preventive treatment in patients with EM.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier:NCT01952574.Classification of evidence:This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with episodic migraine, erenumab reduces long-term MMD and improves headache-related disability and migraine-specific quality of life.

CGRP ligand and receptor monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention: Evidence review and clinical implications

Cephalalgia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 445-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W Dodick
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Peptide Receptor ◽  
Related Peptide ◽  
Calcitonin Gene ◽  
Open Label Extension

Background: Monoclonal antibodies that target calcitonin gene-related peptide or the canonical calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor have emerged as effective and well tolerated for the preventive treatment of migraine. These large molecules appear ideally suited for migraine prevention. They have an extended biological half-life, are administered either monthly or quarterly either by subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion, require minimal or no dose-titration and have the potential for a rapid onset of effect compared to conventional oral preventive drugs. There is high selectivity and they target an important mediator in the pathogenesis of migraine. Investigation: Phase II and pivotal phase III studies have all yielded positive results with a favorable adverse event profile. No serious treatment-related adverse outcomes have thus far been reported in controlled or long-term open-label extension studies. This tolerability profile promises to improve adherence and, possibly, long-term outcomes. Conclusions: Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies are effective and well tolerated for the preventive treatment of migraine. They have distinct advantages over currently available oral preventive drugs. While treatment-related serious adverse events have not been observed in open-label extension studies, long-term outcomes and safety will require broad exposure in heterogeneous patient populations in clinical practice. In addition, their safety in women, especially during pregnancy, will require longitudinal surveillance. Given the overlapping mechanism(s), the effectiveness of existing (triptans) and emerging (calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists) acute therapies in those using a calcitonin gene-related peptide mAb will require further study.

scholarly journals P.030 Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Atogepant 60 mg Following Once-Daily Dosing Over 1 Year for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (s3) ◽  
pp. S28-S29
Author(s):  
M Ashina ◽  
SJ Tepper ◽  
U Reuter ◽  
AM Blumenfeld ◽  
S Hutchinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tract Infection ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Safety Population ◽  
Calcitonin Gene ◽  
Hy’S Law

Background: The goal of the study was to assess the safety and tolerability of atogepant, an oral, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist in development for migraine preventive treatment, once daily over 1 year. Methods: Multicenter, open-label trial (NCT03700320). Adults with migraine were randomized 5:2 to atogepant or oral standard-of-care (SOC) migraine prevention. Results: 744 randomized participants (n=546 atogepant), 739 safety population participants (n=543 atogepant). Adverse events (AEs) were reported by 67.0% of atogepant participants; 18.0% had AEs considered related to atogepant. AEs reported by ≥5% of atogepant-treated participants were upper respiratory tract infection (10.3%), constipation (7.2%), nausea (6.3%), and urinary tract infection (5.2%). 4.4% of atogepant participants reported serious AEs that included various, common medical conditions; no event occurred in ≥1 participant and none were atogepant-related. Two deaths were reported in atogepant-treated participants (homicide victim; toxic shock syndrome); both were considered not treatment-related. 5.7% of atogepant participants discontinued due to AEs. Alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase levels ≥3X upper limit of normal were reported for 2.4% of atogepant participants (n=13/531) and 3.2% of SOC participants (n=6/190). No cases of potential Hy’s Law were reported. Conclusions: Once-daily use of atogepant for preventive treatment of migraine over 1 year was safe and well-tolerated with no safety concerns identified.

Short- and Long-Term Cardiovascular Effects of Mixed Amphetamine Salts Extended-Release in Adolescents With ADHD

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (S15) ◽  
pp. 22-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy E. Wilens ◽  
Thomas J. Spencer ◽  
Joseph Biederman
Keyword(s):  
Extended Release ◽  
Cardiovascular Effects ◽  
Dose Titration ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Open Label Extension ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Clinically Significant

AbstractObjectiveAssess cardiovascular effects of once-daily mixed amphetamine salts extended release (MAS XR) in adolescents (13–17 years of age) with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).MethodsBlood pressure (BP), pulse, and electrocardiograms were assessed in 327 healthy subjects during a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, forced dose-titration study. Placebo (n=69) or once-daily MAS XR(10, 20, 30, or 40 mg) was administered to subjects ≤75 kg (n=233); 50- and 60-mg MAS XR was administered to subjects >75 kg (n=25). One hundred thirty-eight subjects participated in a 6-month, open-label extension study.FindingsChanges in BP and QTcB (Bazett's formula) intervals at 4 weeks with MAS XR were not significantly different from the placebo group. Pulse increased by 5.0 and 8.5 bpm after 3 weeks with MAS XR 20 and 50 mg/day, respectively (P≤.002). After 6 months of open-label MAS XR treatment, mean increases in systolic BP (1.7 mm Hg; P=.0252) and pulse (4.4 bpm; P<.0001) were statistically, but not clinically, significant diastolic BP was not significantly changed (0.6 mm Hg) A decrease in QTcB interval (-4.6±19.9 msec) was statistically (P=.009), but not clinically, significant. There were no serious cardiovascular adverse events.ConclusionCardiovascular effects of short- and long-term MAS XR treatment (≤60 mg/day) were minimal in otherwise healthy adolescents with ADHD.

621 PL02.05 LONG-TERM TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH EOSINOPHILIC GASTRITIS AND/OR EOSINOPHILIC DUODENITIS WITH LIRENTELIMAB, A MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY AGAINST SIGLEC-8

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Peterson ◽  
Mirna Chehade ◽  
Joseph Murray ◽  
Gary Falk ◽  
Nirmala Gonsalves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mast Cells ◽  
Common Adverse Event ◽  
Symptom Improvement ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Symptom Scores

Abstract   Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), gastritis (EG), and/or duodenitis (EoD) are associated with accumulation and activation of eosinophils and mast cells in the esophagus, stomach, and/or duodenum, respectively. Lirentelimab (AK002), an antibody against siglec-8, depletes eosinophils and inhibits mast cells. We performed an open-label extension (OLE) study of subjects who completed ENIGMA (a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of lirentelimab in adults with symptomatic, biopsy-confirmed EG and/or EoD, with or without EoE) to evaluate long-term responses. Methods Subjects who received 4 monthly infusions of lirentelimab or placebo during ENIGMA (n = 59) were eligible for the OLE; they received monthly, escalating doses of lirentelimab (0.3 or 1 mg/kg escalating to 3 mg/kg). Symptoms were assessed weekly using an electronic daily patient-reported outcome questionnaire and total symptom scores (TSS) were calculated. Patients underwent upper endoscopy with biopsy at screening and at the end of ENIGMA (day 99, week 16, blinded); in the OLE, endoscopies were performed on day 323 (30 weeks after the first dose in the OLE). Histopathology was assessed by a single pathologist. Results Fifty-eight subjects entered the OLE; 45 completed ≥52 weeks lirentelimab (including exposure during ENIGMA) and 29 completed 70 weeks. Mean TSS improved through week 70 (Figure 1). Subjects receiving 70 weeks lirentelimab (ENIGMA+OLE) had further improvements in TSS from baseline (mean reductions: 68% at weeks 29–30, 70% at weeks 51–52, 75% at weeks 69–70). Symptom scores (abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, early satiety, appetite loss, abdominal cramping, bloating, diarrhea) decreased significantly from baseline. Treatment response was not associated with concomitant EoE. The most common adverse event was mild to moderate infusion-related reactions, usually with the first infusion. Conclusion In the OLE of the ENIGMA study, patients with EG and or EoD (with or without concomitant EoE) who received lirentelimab had sustained tissue eosinophil depletion and significant long-term symptom improvement. Symptoms continued to improve with duration of treatment. Lirentelimab appears to be a promising targeted treatment for EG and/or EoD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document