scholarly journals Application of the critical incident technique in refining a realist initial programme theory

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Cunningham ◽  
A. De Brún ◽  
E. McAuliffe
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Una Cunningham ◽  
Aoife De Brún ◽  
Eilish McAuliffe

Abstract Abstract Introduction As realist methodology is still evolving, there is a paucity of guidance on how to conduct theory driven interviews. Novice realist researchers can therefore struggle to collect interview data that can make a meaningful contribution to refining their initial programme theory (IPT). In addition, researchers often face challenges when trying to conduct interviews with healthcare staff due to their busy work schedules. In this case study of team interventions in acute hospital contexts, we explore the benefits of using the Critical Incident Technique (CIT) in order to build and refine an IPT. Methods The five steps of the CIT were mapped against realist methods guidance and adapted into an interview framework. Specifications to identify an incident as “critical” were agreed. We embedded probes in the interview framework to confirm, refine and/or refute previous theories synthesised from the literature and to extrapolate new theories. Seventeen key informants were interviewed and recordings were transcribed and imported for analysis into NViVo software. Using RAMESES guidelines, Context-Mechanism-Outcomes configurations were extrapolated from a total of 31 incidents. Results We found that the CIT facilitated construction of an interview format that allowed KIs to reflect on specific positive or negative team interventions. We demonstrate how the CIT strengthened initial programme theory development as it facilitated the reporting of the specifics of team interventions and the contexts and mechanisms characteristic of those experiences. As new data emerged, it was possible to evolve previous theories synthesised from the literature as well as to explore new theories. Conclusions Utilising a CIT framework paid significant dividends in terms of the relevance and usefulness of the data for refining the IPT. Adapting the CIT questioning technique helped to focus the KIs on the specifics relating to an incident allowing the interviewers to concentrate on probes to explore theories during the interview process. The CIT interview format therefore achieved its purpose and the interview framework developed can be adapted for other research topics for use within realist methodology Key words: Critical Incident Interview, Realist, Programme Theory, Team, Intervention, Hospital, Methods


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Una Cunningham ◽  
Aoife De Brún ◽  
Eilish McAuliffe

Abstract Background: As realist methodology is still evolving, there is a paucity of guidance on how to conduct theory driven interviews. Realist researchers can therefore struggle to collect interview data that can make a meaningful contribution to refining their initial programme theory. Collecting data to inform realist IPTs in healthcare contexts is further compounded due to the healthcare workers’ busy work schedules. In this case study of team interventions in acute hospital contexts, we explore the benefits of using the Critical Incident Technique (CIT) in order to build and refine an initial programme theory. We contend that use of the CIT helps to draw on more specific experiences of “Key Informants” and therefore elicits richer and more relevant data for realist enquiry. Methods : The five steps of the CIT were mapped against realist methods guidance and adapted into an interview framework. Specifications to identify an incident as “critical” were agreed. Probes were embedded in the interview framework to confirm, refine and/or refute previous theories. Seventeen participants were interviewed and recordings were transcribed and imported for analysis into NVivo software. Using RAMESES guidelines, Context-Mechanism-Outcomes configurations were extrapolated from a total of 31 incidents. Results: We found that the CIT facilitated construction of an interview format that allowed participants to reflect on specific experiences of interest. We demonstrate how the CIT strengthened initial programme theory development as it facilitated the reporting of the specifics of team interventions and the contexts and mechanisms characteristic of those experiences. As new data emerged, it was possible to evolve previous theories synthesised from the literature as well as to explore new theories. Conclusions: Utilising a CIT framework paid dividends in terms of the relevance and usefulness of the data for refining the initial programme theory. Adapting the CIT questioning technique helped to focus the participants on the specifics relating to an incident allowing the interviewers to concentrate on probes to explore theories during the interview process. The CIT interview format therefore achieved its purpose and can be adapted for use within realist methodology


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 1065-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roderik F. Viergever

The critical incident technique (CIT) is a qualitative research tool that is frequently used in health services research to explore what helps or hinders in providing good quality care or achieving satisfaction with care provision. However, confusion currently exists on the nature of the CIT: Is it a method for data collection and analysis or a methodology? In this article, I explain why this distinction is important and I argue that the CIT is a methodology (and not a method) for the following reasons: Key methodological dimensions are described for the CIT; it has a clear focus; studies that apply this technique make use of various methods for data collection and analysis; it describes, explains, evaluates, and justifies the use of a specific format for those methods; it implies philosophical and practical assumptions; and studies that use the CIT cannot easily make use of additional methodologies simultaneously.


Author(s):  
Umar A. Altahtooh ◽  
Margaret W. Emsley

Almost all project management software has lack of displaying the outcomes of projects as a feature. This is because there is no recognized way of calculating the actual project duration compared to the authorized project duration. Data were collected through a mixed method using a Critical Incident Technique (CIT) and a survey. The study finds that time error can occur throughout the project execution phase. Findings suggest that challenged projects could be successful or failed projects using a model of IT Project Outcomes Testing (MITPOT). Thus, this model establishes a foundation of Project End Theory (PET).


2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Vianden

To affect college retention, academic advisors should act as agents of student relationship management by strengthening the connection between students and their institutions. Satisfaction and dissatisfaction with academic advising as perceived by 29 college students at 3 midwestern comprehensive institutions are described. Discussion is framed in the context of student relationship management theory and the critical incident technique. Recommendations for academic advising practice are offered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document