National surveillance of stroke quality of care and outcomes by applying post-stratification survey weights on the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke patient registry

Abstract Background The U.S. lacks a stroke surveillance system. This study develops a method to transform an existing registry into a nationally representative database to evaluate acute ischemic stroke care quality. Methods Two statistical approaches are used to develop post-stratification weights for the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry by anchoring population estimates to the National Inpatient Sample. Post-stratification survey weights are estimated using a raking procedure and Bayesian interpolation methods. Weighting methods are adjusted to limit the dispersion of weights and make reasonable epidemiologic estimates of patient characteristics, quality of hospital care, and clinical outcomes. Standardized differences in national estimates are reported between the two post-stratification methods for anchored and non-anchored patient characteristics to evaluate estimation quality. Primary measures evaluated are patient and hospital characteristics, stroke severity, vital and laboratory measures, disposition, and clinical outcomes at discharge. Results A total of 1,388,296 acute ischemic strokes occurred between 2012 and 2014. Raking and Bayesian estimates of clinical data not available in administrative data are estimated within 5 to 10% of margin for expected values. Median weight for the raking method is 1.386 and the weights at the 99th percentile is 6.881 with a maximum weight of 30.775. Median Bayesian weight is 1.329 and the 99th percentile weights is 11.201 with a maximum weight of 515.689. Conclusions Leveraging existing databases with patient registries to develop post-stratification weights is a reliable approach to estimate acute ischemic stroke epidemiology and monitoring for stroke quality of care nationally. These methods may be applied to other diseases or settings to better monitor population health.

Download Full-text

National Surveillance of Stroke Quality of Care and Outcomes by Applying Post-Stratification Survey Weights on the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Patient Registry

10.21203/rs.3.rs-104624/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Boback Ziaeian ◽

Haolin Xu ◽

Roland A. Matsouaka ◽

Ying Xian ◽

Yosef Khan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Quality Of Care ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Care Quality ◽

Maximum Weight ◽

Get With The Guidelines ◽

Post Stratification

Abstract Background: The U.S. lacks a stroke surveillance system. This study develops a method to transform an existing registry into a nationally representative database to evaluate acute ischemic stroke care quality.Methods: Two statistical approaches were used to develop post-stratification weights for the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry by anchoring population estimates to the National Inpatient Sample. Post-stratification survey weights were estimated using a raking procedure and Bayesian interpolation methods. Weighting methods were adjusted to limit the dispersion of weights and make reasonable epidemiologic estimates of patient characteristics, quality of hospital care, and clinical outcomes. Standardized differences in national estimates were reported between the two post-stratification methods for anchored and non-anchored patient characteristics to evaluate estimation quality. Primary measures evaluated were patient and hospital characteristics, stroke severity, vital and laboratory measures, disposition, and clinical outcomes at discharge. Results: A total of 1,388,296 acute ischemic strokes occurred between 2012 and 2014. Raking and Bayesian estimates of clinical data not recorded in administrative databases were estimated within 5% to 10% of the margins of expected values. Median weights for the raking method were 1.386 and the weights at the 99th percentile were 6.881 with a maximum weight of 30.775. Median Bayesian weights were 1.329 and the 99th percentile weights were 11.201 with a maximum weight of 515.689. Conclusions: Leveraging existing databases with patient registries to develop post-stratification weights is a reliable approach to estimate acute ischemic stroke epidemiology and monitoring for stroke quality of care nationally. These methods may be applied to other diseases or settings to better monitor population health.

Download Full-text

Abstract 12: National Surveillance of Stroke Quality of Care and Outcomes Using Post-stratification Survey Weights on the Get With the Guidelines-stroke Patient Registry

Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes ◽

10.1161/hcq.13.suppl_1.12 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Boback Ziaeian ◽

Haolin Xu ◽

Roland Matsouaka ◽

Ying Xian ◽

Yosef Khan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Quality Of Care ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Stroke Patient ◽

Population Estimates ◽

Maximum Weight ◽

Get With The Guidelines ◽

Post Stratification

Background: The U.S. lacks an appropriate stroke surveillance system. This study developed and validated post-stratification weights for an existing stroke patient registry to represent the entire U.S. population across the nine U.S. Census divisions. Methods: Two statistical approaches were used to develop post-stratification weights for the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry by anchoring population estimates to the National Inpatient Sample to model the burden of acute ischemic stroke. Post-stratification survey weights were estimated using a raking procedure and Bayesian interpolation methods. Both strategies for developing weights were compared. Weighting methods were adjusted to limit dispersion of weights and make reasonable national estimates of patient characteristics, quality of hospital care, and clinical outcomes. Standardized differences in national population estimates were reported between the two post-stratification methods. Color treemaps were used to visualize the distribution of post-stratification weights across relevant sub-populations. Primary measures evaluated were patient and hospital characteristics, stroke severity, vital and laboratory measures, disposition, and clinical outcomes at discharge. Results: There were a total of 1,388,296 acute ischemic strokes between 2012 and 2014. Raking and Bayesian estimates of clinical data not recorded in administrative databases were estimated within 5 to 10% of the margins of reference values. Median weights for the raking method were 1.366 and the weights at the 99 th percentile were 6.881 with a maximum weight of 30.775. Median Bayesian weights were 1.329 and the 99 th percentile weights were 11.201 with a maximum weight of 515.689. Conclusions: Leveraging existing databases with patient registries to develop post-stratification weights is a reliable approach to estimate acute ischemic stroke epidemiology and monitoring for stroke quality of care nationally. Post-stratification weighting may be used as a basis for more advanced modeling relevant to understanding the burden of acute ischemic stroke and the quality of care delivered in U.S. hospitals. These methods may be applied to other diseases or settings to better monitor population health.

Download Full-text

Quality-of-care comparison of stroke: The reliability and robustness of ranking by process or outcome measures

International Journal of Stroke ◽

10.1177/17474930211053139 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 174749302110531

Author(s):

Jingkun Li ◽

Peng Qu ◽

Chao Wang ◽

Xi Li ◽

Shuang Hou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Quality Of Care ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator ◽

Care Quality ◽

Case Mix ◽

Hospital Variation ◽

Before And After ◽

Reliability And Robustness

Background and aim Discussion on the most rational types of performance measures for care quality comparisons has received increasing attention. The important consideration is to what extent will the measure detect a genuine difference in the underlying quality. In this study, we aimed to compare the ranking of hospitals on the performance of individual indicators, composite scores (CS, that were calculated by the method of opportunity-based score on patient-level), and in-hospital outcome of acute ischemic stroke across hospitals, and determined the reliability and robustness of the three types of ranking. Methods We analyzed data from 15,090 patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke who were treated at 184 large tertiary hospitals from January 2014 to May 2017. We ranked the hospital effects of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and CS and independence (modified Rankin Scale ≤2) at discharge based on fixed- and random-effects regression models before and after case-mix adjustment. We assessed the time-robustness of the hospital effects and calculated the rankability by relating the uncertainty within the hospital and the total hospital variation “beyond chance.” Results After case-mix and reliability adjustment, we estimated that 84.03% of the variance in CS between hospitals was due to true quality differences. The uncertainty within hospitals caused a poor (49.51%) rankability in rt-PA and moderate rankability (63.34%) in independence at discharge. The hospital rankings of CS were more robust across years compared with rt-PA and independence. Conclusions Our data indicated that CS is the optimal measure to indicate the quality-of-care variation of acute ischemic stroke between hospitals.

Download Full-text

International Comparison of Patient Characteristics and Quality of Care for Ischemic Stroke: Analysis of the China National Stroke Registry and the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines––Stroke Program

Journal of the American Heart Association ◽

10.1161/jaha.118.010623 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 7 (20) ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Runqi Wangqin ◽

Daniel T. Laskowitz ◽

Yongjun Wang ◽

Zixiao Li ◽

Yilong Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Quality Of Care ◽

International Comparison ◽

American Heart Association ◽

American Heart ◽

Heart Association ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Stroke Registry ◽

Get With The Guidelines

Download Full-text

Abstract 203: Use of Endovascular Therapy and Trends in Clinical Outcomes within the Nationwide Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Registry

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.46.suppl_1.203 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Bijoy K Menon ◽

Jeffrey L Saver ◽

Mayank Goyal ◽

Raul Noguiera ◽

Shyam Prabhakaran ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

National Registry ◽

Stroke Registry ◽

Large Size ◽

Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽

Independent Ambulation ◽

Get With The Guidelines

Purpose: To determine hospital and patient level characteristics associated with use of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke and to analyze trends in clinical outcome. Methods: Data were from Get With The Guidelines-Stroke hospitals from 4/1/2003 to 6/30/2013. We looked at secular trends in number of hospitals providing endovascular therapy, use of endovascular therapy in these hospitals, and clinical outcomes. We also analyzed hospital and patient characteristics associated with endovascular therapy utilization. Results: Of 1087 hospitals, 454 provided endovascular therapy to at least one patient in the study period. From 2003 to 2012, the proportion of hospitals providing endovascular therapy increased by 1.6%/year (from 12.9% to 28.9%), with a modest drop in 2013 to 23.4%. Use in these hospitals increased from 0.7% to 2% of all ischemic stroke patients (p<0.001) with a modest drop in 2013 to 1.9%. In multivariable analyses, patient outcomes after endovascular therapy improved over time, with reductions in in-hospital mortality (29.6% in 2004 to 16.2% in 2013; p=0.002); and from late 2010, reduction in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (11% in 2010 to 5% in 2013; p<0.0001) and increased independent ambulation at discharge (24.5% in 2010 to 33% in 2013; p<0.0001) and discharge home (17.7% in 2010 to 26.1% in 2013; p<0.0001) (Attached figure). Hospital characteristics associated with endovascular therapy use included large size, teaching status and urban location while patient characteristics included younger age, EMS transport, absence of prior stroke and white race. Conclusion: Use of endovascular therapy increased modestly in this national registry from 2003 to 2012 and decreased in 2013. Clinical outcomes improved notably from 2010 to 2013, coincident with the introduction of newer thrombectomy devices.

Download Full-text

Abstract W P287: Does Comprehensive Stroke Certification Demonstrate a Significant Effect on Volume and Quality of Care?

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.wp287 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Laurie Paletz ◽

Shlee Song ◽

Nili Steiner ◽

Betty Robertson ◽

Nicole Wolber ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Quality Of Care ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Turnaround Time ◽

Joint Commission ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

The Impact

Introduction/Background information: At the onset of acute stroke symptoms, speed, capability, safety and skill are essential-lost minutes can be the difference between full recoveries, poor outcome, or even death. The Joint Commission's Certificate of Distinction for Comprehensive Stroke Centers recognizes centers that make exceptional efforts to foster better outcomes for stroke care. While many hospitals have been surveyed, Cedars Sinai was the 5 th hospital in the nation to receive this certification. Researchable question: Does Comprehensive stroke certification (CSC) demonstrate a significant effect on volume and quality of care? Methods: We assembled a cross-functional, multidisciplinary expert team representing all departments and skill sets involved in treating stroke patients. We carefully screened eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke We assessed the number of patients treated at Cedars-Sinai with IV-T-pa t 6 months before and then 6 months after CSC and the quality of their care including medical treatment and door to needle time. Results: In the 6 months prior to Joint Commissions Stroke Certification we treated 20 of 395acute stroke patients with t-PA with an average CT turnaround time of 31±19minutes and an average Door to needle time (DTNT) of 68±32minutes. In the 6 months since Joint Commission Stroke Certification we have increased the number of acute stroke patients treated by almost double. There were 37 out of 489(P=0.02, Chi Square) patients treated with IV t-PA with an average CT turnaround time of 22±7minutes (p=0.08, t-test, compared to pre-CSC) and an average DTNT of 61± 23minutes (not different than pre-CSC). Conclusion: We conclude that Joint Commission Certification for stroke was associated with an increased rate of treatment with IV rt-PA in acute ischemic stroke patients. We were not able to document an effect on quality of care. Further studies of the impact of CSC certification are warranted.

Download Full-text