scholarly journals Perceptions of primary care staff on a regional data quality intervention in Australian general practice: a qualitative study

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhijeet Ghosh ◽  
Sandra McCarthy ◽  
Elizabeth Halcomb
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Data Quality ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Regional Data ◽  
Australian General Practice ◽  
Primary Care Staff

scholarly journals Dementia case-finding in hospitals: a qualitative study exploring the views of healthcare professionals in English primary care and secondary care

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e020521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Marie Burn ◽  
Jane Fleming ◽  
Carol Brayne ◽  
Chris Fox ◽  
Frances Bunn
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Secondary Care ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Hospital Staff ◽  
Case Finding ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Dementia Case ◽  
Primary Care Staff ◽  
Views Of Healthcare Professionals

ObjectivesIn 2012–2013, the English National Health Service mandated hospitals to conduct systematic case-finding of people with dementia among older people with unplanned admissions. The method was not defined. The aim of this study was to understand current approaches to dementia case-finding in acute hospitals in England and explore the views of healthcare professionals on perceived benefits and challenges.DesignQualitative study involving interviews, focus groups and thematic content analysis.SettingPrimary care and secondary care across six counties in the East of England.ParticipantsHospital staff involved in dementia case-finding and primary care staff in the catchment areas of those hospitals.ResultsWe recruited 23 hospital staff and 36 primary care staff, including 30 general practitioners (GPs). Analysis resulted in three themes: (1) lack of consistent approaches in case-finding processes, (2) barriers between primary care and secondary care which impact on case-finding outcomes and (3) perceptions of rationale, aims and impacts of case-finding. The study shows that there were variations in how well hospitals recorded and reported outcomes to GPs. Barriers between primary care and secondary care, including GPs’ lack of access to hospital investigations and lack of clarity about roles and responsibilities, impacted case-finding outcomes. Staff in secondary care were more positive about the initiative than primary care staff, and there were conflicting priorities for primary care and secondary care regarding case-finding.ConclusionsThe study suggests a more evidence-based approach was needed to justify approaches to dementia case-finding. Information communicated to primary care from hospitals needs to be comprehensive, appropriate and consistent before GPs can effectively plan further investigation, treatment or care. Follow-up in primary care further requires access to options for postdiagnostic support. There is a need to evaluate the outcomes for patients and the economic impact on health and care services across settings.

scholarly journals Weight management in primary care: how can it be made more effective?

2005 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Maryon-Davis
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Weight Management ◽  
Eating Habits ◽  
Workforce Planning ◽  
Cultural Barriers ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Patient Groups ◽  
Primary Care Staff

Obesity is often difficult to tackle in primary care. Pressure of time in the consultation, a lack of appropriately-trained primary care staff, a shortage of community dietitians or nutritionists, the potentially enormous caseload, language or cultural barriers and the sheer intractability of patients' eating habits, exercise behaviour and their clinical condition, all conspire to make general practitioners, other team members and often the patients themselves lose heart and stop even trying. However, there are ways of overcoming these difficulties. Examples of changes that evidence suggests are able to support and enhance basic one-to-one interventions in general practice include: improved clinical guidelines; better training of primary care staff; at-risk patient registers; smarter database search tools; new quality incentives; closer working with dietitians, counsellors and pharmacists; more hospital outreach clinics; designated general practitioner specialists and practice clustering; expanded exercise referral schemes and links with leisure providers; subsidised referral to commercial slimming groups; better use of patient groups and voluntary and community workers. The present paper describes a proposed ‘triple-tier’ pathway for weight management incorporating most of the elements mentioned earlier. With a more joined-up and creative approach to the development and organisation of primary care, more comprehensive training and workforce planning, and better integration with social care, voluntary groups and the commercial sector, weight management in general practice has the potential to be much more effective.

scholarly journals Overdose Education and Naloxone for Patients Prescribed Opioids in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Staff

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1837-1844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid A. Binswanger ◽  
Stephen Koester ◽  
Shane R. Mueller ◽  
Edward M. Gardner ◽  
Kristin Goddard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Primary Care Staff

scholarly journals Qualitative and quantitative approach to assess of the potential for automating administrative tasks in general practice

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e032412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Willis ◽  
Paul Duckworth ◽  
Angela Coulter ◽  
Eric T Meyer ◽  
Michael Osborne
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Job Roles ◽  
Available Technology ◽  
Process Prediction ◽  
Administrative Tasks ◽  
Primary Care Staff

ObjectiveTo identify the extent to which administrative tasks carried out by primary care staff in general practice could be automated.DesignA mixed-method design including ethnographic case studies, focus groups, interviews and an online survey of automation experts.SettingThree urban and three rural general practice health centres in England selected for differences in list size and organisational characteristics.ParticipantsObservation and interviews with 65 primary care staff in the following job roles: administrator, manager, general practitioner, healthcare assistant, nurse practitioner, pharmacy technician, phlebotomist, practice nurse, pharmacist, prescription clerk, receptionist, scanning clerk, secretary and medical summariser; together with a survey of 156 experts in automation technologies.Methods330 hours of ethnographic observation and documentation of administrative tasks carried out by staff in each of the above job roles, followed by coding and classification; semistructured interviews with 10 general practitioners and 6 staff focus groups. The online survey of machine learning, artificial intelligence and robotics experts was analysed using an ordinal Gaussian process prediction model to estimate the automatability of the observed tasks.ResultsThe model predicted that roughly 44% of administrative tasks carried out by staff in general practice are ‘mostly’ or ‘completely’ automatable using currently available technology. Discussions with practice staff underlined the need for a cautious approach to implementation.ConclusionsThere is considerable potential to extend the use of automation in primary care, but this will require careful implementation and ongoing evaluation.

Team and personal coaching in general practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 22-25
Author(s):  
Dave Hancock
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Personal Coaching ◽  
Primary Care Staff

NHS primary care staff can now access coaching for themselves and for managing a team. Dave Hancock explores some of the available options

FRAILTY AND SARCOPAENIA TRIALS IN PRIMARY CARE – IDENTIFYING AND OVERCOMING KEY BARRIERS TO SUCCESSFUL CLINICIAN PARTICIPATION

2015 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
A. SINCLAIR
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Target Population ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Long Term Conditions ◽  
Primary Care Research ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Primary Care Practitioners ◽  
Primary Care Staff

Primary care research involving older people brings together a wide range of primary care practitioners. Key areas of activity include: health promotion, disease prevention, screening and early diagnosis, as well as the management of common and long-term conditions such as frailty and sarcopaenia which are under-researched domains of health in this setting. Few interventional studies have identified frail or sarcopaenic patients as the target population based on recent definitions of either condition. Several barriers to successful research in the primary care area exist and overcoming such barriers is not straightforward but involves a multidimensional approach that attempts to enhance the confidence and opportunity to engage in research of primary care staff and the consideration of factors that allow external leads of research to coordinate their programme.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document