scholarly journals Localising occult prostate cancer metastasis with advanced imaging techniques (LOCATE trial): a prospective cohort, observational diagnostic accuracy trial investigating whole–body magnetic resonance imaging in radio-recurrent prostate cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sola Adeleke ◽  
Arash Latifoltojar ◽  
Harbir Sidhu ◽  
Myria Galazi ◽  
Taimur T. Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Conventional Imaging ◽  
Biochemical Relapse ◽  
Reference Standard ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract Background Accurate whole-body staging following biochemical relapse in prostate cancer is vital in determining the optimum disease management. Current imaging guidelines recommend various imaging platforms such as computed tomography (CT), Technetium 99 m (99mTc) bone scan and 18F-choline and recently 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) for the evaluation of the extent of disease. Such approach requires multiple hospital attendances and can be time and resource intensive. Recently, whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) has been used in a single visit scanning session for several malignancies, including prostate cancer, with promising results, providing similar accuracy compared to the combined conventional imaging techniques. The LOCATE trial aims to investigate the application of WB-MRI for re-staging of patients with biochemical relapse (BCR) following external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy in patients with prostate cancer. Methods/design The LOCATE trial is a prospective cohort, multi-centre, non-randomised, diagnostic accuracy study comparing WB-MRI and conventional imaging. Eligible patients will undergo WB-MRI in addition to conventional imaging investigations at the time of BCR and will be asked to attend a second WB-MRI exam, 12-months following the initial scan. WB-MRI results will be compared to an enhanced reference standard comprising all the initial, follow-up imaging and non-imaging investigations. The diagnostic performance (sensitivity and specificity analysis) of WB-MRI for re-staging of BCR will be investigated against the enhanced reference standard on a per-patient basis. An economic analysis of WB-MRI compared to conventional imaging pathways will be performed to inform the cost-effectiveness of the WB-MRI imaging pathway. Additionally, an exploratory sub-study will be performed on blood samples and exosome-derived human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) dimer measurements will be taken to investigate its significance in this cohort. Discussion The LOCATE trial will compare WB-MRI versus the conventional imaging pathway including its cost-effectiveness, therefore informing the most accurate and efficient imaging pathway. Trial registration LOCATE trial was registered on ClinicalTrial.gov on 18th of October 2016 with registration reference number NCT02935816.

scholarly journals Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) reporting with the METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer (MET-RADS-P): inter-observer agreement between readers of different expertise levels

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Pricolo ◽  
Eleonora Ancona ◽  
Paul Summers ◽  
Jorge Abreu-Gomez ◽  
Sarah Alessi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Observer Agreement ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Lumbosacral Spine ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Body Regions ◽  
Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract Background The METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer (MET-RADS-P) guidelines are designed to enable reproducible assessment in detecting and quantifying metastatic disease response using whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in patients with advanced prostate cancer (APC). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the inter-observer agreement of WB-MRI examination reports produced by readers of different expertise when using the MET-RADS-P guidelines. Methods Fifty consecutive paired WB-MRI examinations, performed from December 2016 to February 2018 on 31 patients, were retrospectively examined to compare reports by a Senior Radiologist (9 years of experience in WB-MRI) and Resident Radiologist (after a 6-months training) using MET-RADS-P guidelines, for detection and for primary/dominant and secondary response assessment categories (RAC) scores assigned to metastatic disease in 14 body regions. Inter-observer agreement regarding RAC score was evaluated for each region by using weighted-Cohen’s Kappa statistics (K). Results The number of metastatic regions reported by the Senior Radiologist (249) and Resident Radiologist (251) was comparable. For the primary/dominant RAC pattern, the agreement between readers was excellent for the metastatic findings in cervical, dorsal, and lumbosacral spine, pelvis, limbs, lungs and other sites (K:0.81–1.0), substantial for thorax, retroperitoneal nodes, other nodes and liver (K:0.61–0.80), moderate for pelvic nodes (K:0.56), fair for primary soft tissue and not assessable for skull due to the absence of findings. For the secondary RAC pattern, agreement between readers was excellent for the metastatic findings in cervical spine (K:0.93) and retroperitoneal nodes (K:0.89), substantial for those in dorsal spine, pelvis, thorax, limbs and pelvic nodes (K:0.61–0.80), and moderate for lumbosacral spine (K:0.44). Conclusions We found inter-observer agreement between two readers of different expertise levels to be excellent in bone, but mixed in other body regions. Considering the importance of bone metastases in patients with APC, our results favor the use of MET-RADS-P in response to the growing clinical need for monitoring of metastasis in these patients.

scholarly journals Detection of Prostate Cancer Metastasis by Whole Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Bone Scintigraphy and PSA Levels

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 1052-1062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hengqing An ◽  
Ning Tao ◽  
Jia Li ◽  
Yonghui Guan ◽  
Wenguang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Bone Scintigraphy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Psa Nadir

Background/Aims: The combined role of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI), bone scintigraphy and prostate specific antigen (PSA) were considered in predicting metastases and prognosis of prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: Totally 38 PCa patients underwent WB-MRI, bone scintigraphy and PSA detections, and 34 benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) patients were checked with PSA. Pearson correlations were performed to determine associations among PSA, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and Gleason scoring. Specificity and sensitivity were for comparison of diagnostic accuracies. Patients' baseline PSA, PSA nadir and time to the prostate-specific antigen nadir (TTPN) were analyzed, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were also established. Results: ADC values were negatively correlated with PSA levels (rs = -0.389, P = 0.016) and Gleason scores (rs = -0.432, P = 0.006), while PSA levels were positively correlated with Gleason scoring (rs = 0.493, P = 0.002). Diagnostic efficacy of whole body-diffusion weighted imaging (WB-DWI) combined with PSA seemed the most favorable, and bone scintigraphy was advantageous in identifying bone metastasis. PSA levels (> 61.60 µg/L), Gleason scores (> 6) and ADC (< 0.81 × 10-3 mm2/s) could all predict pessimistic prognosis (HR = 7.65; HR = 6.09; HR = 7.28). Smaller PSA nadir (≤ 1.0 µg/L) and longer TTPN (> 3 months) were associated with increased 5-year survival rate (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The combined efficacies of WB-MRI, bone scintigraphy and PSA levels were desired in identifying PCa lesions and prognosis.

scholarly journals Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) with diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) in prostate cancer: Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental findings

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soma Kumasaka ◽  
Shunichi Motegi ◽  
Yuka Kumasaka ◽  
Tatsuya Nishikata ◽  
Masami Otomo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Incidental Findings ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Whole Body Imaging ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Body Imaging ◽  
Signal Suppression ◽  
Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract Background Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) is now recommended as a first-line staging modality in prostate cancer patients, and the widespread use of DWIBS may lead to an increased frequency of incidental findings. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of incidental findings detected on whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) with DWIBS in patients with prostate cancer. Methods Data from 124 patients (age, 76.5 ± 5.6 years; range, 60–90) with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer, who underwent WB-MRI between December 2016 and April 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. Findings unrelated to prostate cancer were considered as incidental findings and categorized into two groups based on their clinical implications, as follow: imaging follow-up or additional examinations was required (significant incidental findings) and no need to additional work-up (non-significant incidental findings). A Chi-square test was performed to compare the differences in the prevalence of significant incidental findings based on age (≤ 75 and > 75 years old). Results A total of 334 incidental findings were found, with 8.1% (n = 27) as significant incidental findings and 91.9% (n = 307) as non-significant incidental findings. Significant incidental findings were more frequent in patients over 75 years old than those of 75 years old or younger (28.6% vs 11.1%, p = 0.018). Nineteen of the 27 significant incidental findings (70.4%) were observed on non-DWIBS sequences. Conclusion Clinically significant incidental findings, which required imaging follow-up or additional examinations, were commonly observed in patients with prostate cancer on WB-MRI/DWIBS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document