scholarly journals Improvements in newborn care and newborn resuscitation following a quality improvement program at scale: results from a before and after study in Tanzania

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Lulu Makene ◽  
Marya Plotkin ◽  
Sheena Currie ◽  
Dunstan Bishanga ◽  
Patience Ugwi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Newborn Care ◽  
Quality Improvement Program ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Newborn Resuscitation ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Before And After Study

scholarly journals Impact of a provincial quality-improvement program on primary health care in Ontario: a population-based controlled before-and-after study

CMAJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. E281-E289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Green ◽  
Stewart B. Harris ◽  
Susan Webster-Bogaert ◽  
Han Han ◽  
Jyoti Kotecha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Quality Improvement Program ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Before And After Study

Abstract 8: Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Program Participation and Clinical Outcomes for Medicare Beneficiaries

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Song ◽  
Gregg Fonarow ◽  
Wenqin Pan ◽  
DaiWai Olson ◽  
Adrian F Hernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Early Period ◽  
Quality Improvement Program ◽  
Administrative Claims ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Get With The Guidelines

Background: Get With The Guidelines (GWTG)-Stroke is a national, hospital-based quality improvement program developed by the American Heart Association. While studies have shown a beneficial effect of hospital participation in GWTG-Stroke upon processes of care, whether there are associated improvements in clinical outcomes has not been previously investigated. Methods: From among all acute care US hospitals, we matched 366 hospitals that joined the GWTG-Stroke program between April 2004 and December 2007, with 366 hospitals that did not. Matching was based on ischemic stroke case volume, calendar year, baseline hospital post-stroke 1-year all-cause mortality rates, teaching status, and geographic region. Outcomes of all acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients admitted to the study hospitals were abstracted from the CMS administrative claims database (65 years and older). Outcomes at matched hospitals were compared in the PRE-GWTG-Stroke period (-540 to -181 days before program launch), RUN-UP period (-180- to -1 day), EARLY period (0 to 180 days) and SUSTAINED period (181 to 540 days). Additional analysis was performed of the entire BEFORE (-540 to -1 days) and AFTER periods (0 to 540 days). The main analytical approach was stratified Cox proportional hazard modeling, with matched site ID at stratum. We adjusted for patient characteristics (age, gender, race, medical history) and hospital characteristics (rural vs. urban, # beds, annual IS discharges.) Results: The study analyzed 88,584 AIS admissions at the 366 GWTG-Stroke hospitals and 85,401 admissions at the 366 matched non-GWTG-Stroke hospitals. In adjusted analysis comparing BEFORE and AFTER periods, GWTG-Stroke hospitals achieved reduced 30 day mortality (30M - HR 0.911, p<0.0001), reduced 1 year mortality (1YM - HR 0.902, p<0.0001), reduced 30 day all-cause rehospitalization (HR 0.956, p=0.013), reduced 30 day stroke rehospitalization (HR 0.927, p=0.038), and reduced 1 year all-cause rehospitalization (HR 0.972, p=0.007). Conversely, matched, non-GWTG-Stroke hospitals showed only reduced 30M (HR 0.954, p=0.010) between the BEFORE and AFTER periods. Comparing the degree of change at GWTG-Stroke with non-GWTG Stroke hospitals, there were greater improvements in discharge to home (DCH), 30M, and 1YM at GWTG-Stroke hospitals in each of the intervention periods: EARLY: DCH, HR 1.090, p<0.0001; 30M, HR 0.894, p=0.0006; 1YM, HR 0.889, p<0.0001; SUSTAINED: DCH, HR 1.097, p<0.0001; 30M, HR 0.934, p=0.004; 1YM, HR 0.918, p<0.0001. Conclusions: Hospitals joining the GWTG-Stroke quality improvement program between 2004-2008 achieved significantly greater improvement in stroke patient outcomes than matched hospitals not joining the program, with lower all-cause mortality at 30 days and 1 year and higher rates of discharge directly to home.

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program as a Quality Improvement Tool: A Single Institution's Experience with Vascular Surgical Site Infections

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Compoginis ◽  
Steven G. Katz
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Quality Improvement Program ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Patient Morbidity ◽  
American College Of Surgeons ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Surgical Preparation ◽  
High Level

Vascular surgical site infections (VSSIs) result in significant patient morbidity and hospital cost. The objective of this study is to report a single hospital's experience using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) as an instrument to decrease VSSIs. After review of initial NSQIP data, changes in antibiotic dosage and timing, surgical preparation, patient warming, and oxygenation were put into practice. Records of all patients undergoing vascular surgical operations during a two-year period were reviewed and VSSIs were identified. Statistical comparisons were made between groups before and after implementation of these changes. A total of 478 cases met our criteria. Practice changes were introduced in October 2009 and fully implemented by January 2010. Two hundred forty-three cases were performed in 2009 and 235 in 2010. When operations during the two time periods were compared, significantly fewer VSSIs were identified in 2010 than in 2009 ( P = 0.036). NSQIP enabled our institution to identify an unacceptably high level of VSSIs. By implementing changes in our clinical practice, we were able to significantly lower our rate of VSSI.

Solutions to Intraoperative Wound Classification Miscoding in a Subset of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence E. Turrentine ◽  
Sarah B. Giballa ◽  
Puja M. Shah ◽  
David R. Jones ◽  
Traci L. Hedrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Quality Improvement Program ◽  
P Value ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Acs Nsqip ◽  
American College Of Surgeons ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Wound Classification ◽  
Operating Room Staff

Intraoperative wound classification is a predictor of postoperative infection. Therefore, accurately assigning the correct classification to a surgical wound is of particular importance. Our institution participates in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP), a national outcomes database that collects wound classification for all qualifying operative procedures, and we noted discrepancies when comparing ACS NSQIP wound classification coding with perioperative coding in our electronic medical record. We tested the effectiveness of an intervention that included staff educational sessions, informational posters, and postoperative debriefings on improving the accuracy of documented intraoperative wound classification. The χ2 test was used to compare proportions of wound classification miscodings before and after educational sessions and debriefings commenced. Baseline data revealed misclassification of wounds occurred 21 per cent (30 of 141) of the time in predominately colorectal procedures performed by two surgeons from April through August 2012. Errors decreased to 9 per cent (13 of 147) from August to December 2012, after our intervention of education sessions with operating room staff and the surgeons incorporating a statement confirming the wound classification at the end of the case debriefing. The χ2 statistic was 8.7589. The P value was significant at 0.003. Ensuring concordance of classification between the surgeon and nurse during a post-procedure debriefing as well as education of perioperative nursing staff through posters and seminars significantly improved the accuracy of intraoperative wound classification coding.

Upper Extremity Free Flap Transfers: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
George A. Beyer ◽  
Karan Dua ◽  
Neil V. Shah ◽  
Joseph P. Scollan ◽  
Jared M. Newman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Free Flap ◽  
Quality Improvement Program ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Flap Transfer ◽  
Free Flap Transfer ◽  
Reoperation Rates

Abstract Introduction We evaluated the demographics, flap types, and 30-day complication, readmission, and reoperation rates for upper extremity free flap transfers within the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Materials and Methods Upper extremity free flap transfer patients in the NSQIP from 2008 to 2016 were identified. Complications, reoperations, and readmissions were queried. Chi-squared tests evaluated differences in sex, race, and insurance. The types of procedures performed, complication frequencies, reoperation rates, and readmission rates were analyzed. Results One-hundred-eleven patients were selected (mean: 36.8 years). Most common upper extremity free flaps were muscle/myocutaneous (45.9%) and other vascularized bone grafts with microanastomosis (27.9%). Thirty-day complications among all patients included superficial site infections (2.7%), intraoperative transfusions (7.2%), pneumonia (0.9%), and deep venous thrombosis (0.9%). Thirty-day reoperation and readmission rates were 4.5% and 3.6%, respectively. The mean time from discharge to readmission was 12.5 days. Conclusion Upper extremity free flap transfers could be performed with a low rate of 30-day complications, reoperations, and readmissions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document