scholarly journals Minimum 10 years clinical and radiological outcomes of acetabular revisions of total hip arthroplasties with tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacek Gagala
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Revision Arthroplasty ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Bone Graft Substitute ◽  
Acetabular Bone ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Acetabular Bone Defects ◽  
Bone Graft Substitutes ◽  
Hip Arthroplasties

Abstract Background Aseptic loosening is the most frequent indication for revision of total hip arthroplasty. Revision arthroplasty of acetabular component is a challenge for every surgeon because they have to simultaneously deal with the reconstruction of bone defects, adequate implant geometry and stable fixation. Allografts are the most frequently used materials in reconstruction of bone loss during revision surgeries. Because of an increasing number of revision hip arthroplasties and poor availability of allografts, we decided to use bone graft substitutes in acetabular revisions. Methods Between September 2005 and January 2010, 44 revision arthroplasties in 43 patients were performed with the use of bone graft substitutes for acetabular defect reconstruction in revision of total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular bone defects were classified according to Paprosky. Seventeen hips were classified as IIA, 3 hips IIB, 3 hips IIC, 10 hips IIIA and 11 hips IIIB. Acetabular bone defects were reconstructed with tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute - BoneSave. Clinical and radiological examination was performed after 3 months, 1 year and then annually. Harris hip score was used for clinical evaluation. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier method with aseptic loosening as the definition of endpoint. Results The average follow-up period is 12 (range from 10 to 15) years. During the follow-up, three patients died after 24 months because of causes not related to surgery. None of the patients was lost to follow-up. The evaluation of clinical results revealed an increase in pre-operative HHS from average 38.3 (range 25 to 55) points to average 86.3 (range 45 to 95) points at the most recent follow-up. Radiographic evaluation showed the migration of one revision cage 12 months after surgery. Revision arthroplasty performed after 14 months revealed the partial incorporation of bone graft substitute. There were not any cases of loosening of revision acetabular cup at the most recent follow up examination in the remaining 39 patients. Bone graft substitute was not absorbed in all of these patients. The survival after 10 years amounted to 97.56%. Conclusion Bone graft substitute Bone Save may be suitable for acetabular revision surgery, however preoperative bone defect is critical for success and determining of a surgical technique, so this is multifactorial in this challenge surgery.

Reconstruction of Severe Acetabular Bone Defects in Revision Hip Arthroplasty Management options and clinical outcomes

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 2217-2221
Author(s):  
Stefan Mogos ◽  
George Viscopoleanu ◽  
Monica Dascalu ◽  
Radu Orfanu
Keyword(s):  
Revision Arthroplasty ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Acetabular Bone ◽  
Type Iiia ◽  
Acetabular Bone Defects ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Acetabular Defects

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different surgical implants for the reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defects in revision arthroplasty of the hip. The current study is a retrospective study on 32 patients with Paprosky type IIIA or IIIB acetabular defects operated between January 2012-December 2015 in a single hospital. The mean follow-up was 21 months (12-43 months). Five different types of reconstruction methods were used: primary uncemented cups with or without screws, cemented acetabular cups, tantalum cups, metal augments and antiprotrusio cages. Bone allograft was available in all cases. Functional outcome after surgery was evaluated using Harris Hip Score. Based on Paprosky classification, the study included 16 type IIIA and 16 type IIIB acetabular defects. Bone graft was used in 71.8% of the cases (23 out of 32 patients). Tantalum cups were used in 15 cases (46.9%), being the preferred implant. Primary uncemented cups were used in 2 cases, cemented acetabular cups were used in 4 cases, trabecular metal augments were used in 5 cases and antiprotrusion cages were used in 6 cases. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 37.3�7.4 pre-operatively to 82.1�7.2 at final follow-up. In conclusion, the current study demonstrates that various methods of reconstruction are efficient in the short and medium-term.

scholarly journals The mid-long term results of reconstructional cage and morselized allografts combined application for the Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Xiao ◽  
Haoyang Wang ◽  
Kai Zhou ◽  
Duan Wang ◽  
Tingxian Ling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Revision Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Cancellous Bone Graft ◽  
Acetabular Bone ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Acetabular Bone Defects

Abstract Background Severe acetabular bone defects is a complex problem in revision hip arthroplasty, cage is one of the reconstruction options. The purpose of this study is to report the mid-long term clinical and radiographic results of Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects revised with reconstructional cage and morselized allogeneic cancellous bone graft without impaction. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 28 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty with reconstructional cage and allogeneic cancellous bone graft between January 2007 and January 2016. There were 13 Paprosky type IIIA bone defect patients and 15 Paprosky type IIIB bone defect patients and 4 patients of the 15 were also with pelvic discontinuity. Clinical assessment included Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Short Form-12 (SF-12). Radiographic assessment included center of rotation, cage migration, and bone graft incorporation. Results All patients were followed up with a mean follow-up of 79.5 months (range 38–141), HHS improved from 31.4 (13–43) points preoperatively to 84.6 (55–94) points at last follow-up and SF-12 also improved significantly. There was 1 re-revision for the cage loosening and screw breakage at 61 months after surgery, and 2 patients had nonprogressive radiolucency in zone III and the junction of zone II and zone III at the bone implant interface. Conclusion The reconstructional cage combining with morselized allografts without impaction achieves a good result with a high complete allograft incorporation rate in Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects.

Major Acetabular Defects Treated with the Burch-Schneider Antiprotrusion Cage and Impaction Bone Allograft in a Large Series: A 5- to 7- Year Follow-up Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 585-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Marx ◽  
Alexander Beier ◽  
Anne Richter ◽  
Christoph H. Lohmann ◽  
Andreas M. Halder
Keyword(s):  
Joint Infection ◽  
Revision Arthroplasty ◽  
Bone Allograft ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Hip Revision ◽  
Acetabular Bone ◽  
Acetabular Bone Defects

Introduction Major bone defects are the greatest challenge in hip revision arthroplasty. Methods In a prospective, consecutive nonrandomised study we followed up 74 patients with Type III (AAOS) acetabular bone defects who underwent revision hip arthroplasty with bone grafting and implantation of a Burch-Schneider anti-protrusion cage (APC). The patients were examined pre- and postoperatively according to a standardised clinical and radiological protocol. No patient was lost to follow-up. Results 9 patients died before follow-up. In 9 other patients the APC was revised within the follow-up period. In 4 of these patients the revision was necessary because of aseptic loosening. In the remaining 5 cases joint infection, recurrent dislocation and 1 trauma were the reasons for revision. 56 patients were included in the statistical analysis. In the follow-up group the mean Harris Hip Score increased from 39.9 preoperatively to 73.2. 85% of the patients assessed their operation result as good or excellent. Conclusions In a large consecutive series the Burch-Schneider anti-protrusion cage proved to be a valuable option in the treatment of major acetabular bone defects in hip revision surgery.

The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 2023-2030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanqing Mao ◽  
Chen Xu ◽  
Jiawei Xu ◽  
Huiwu Li ◽  
Fengxiang Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Bone ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Acetabular Bone Defects

Porous metal revision shells for management of contained acetabular bone defects at a mean follow-up of six years

2012 ◽  
Vol 94-B (2) ◽  
pp. 158-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Sternheim ◽  
D. Backstein ◽  
P. R. T. Kuzyk ◽  
G. Goshua ◽  
Y. Berkovich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Porous Metal ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Acetabular Bone ◽  
Acetabular Bone Defects

Impaction bone grafting in hip re-revision surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (3) ◽  
pp. 492-499
Author(s):  
Eduardo Garcia-Rey ◽  
Laura Saldaña ◽  
Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo
Keyword(s):  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Acetabular Component ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Bone Stock ◽  
Impaction Bone Grafting ◽  
Acetabular Bone ◽  
Acetabular Bone Defects

Aims Bone stock restoration of acetabular bone defects using impaction bone grafting (IBG) in total hip arthroplasty may facilitate future re-revision in the event of failure of the reconstruction. We hypothesized that the acetabular bone defect during re-revision surgery after IBG was smaller than during the previous revision surgery. The clinical and radiological results of re-revisions with repeated use of IBG were also analyzed. Methods In a series of 382 acetabular revisions using IBG and a cemented component, 45 hips (45 patients) that had failed due to aseptic loosening were re-revised between 1992 and 2016. Acetabular bone defects graded according to Paprosky during the first and the re-revision surgery were compared. Clinical and radiological findings were analyzed over time. Survival analysis was performed using a competing risk analysis. Results Intraoperative bone defect during the initial revision included 19 Paprosky type IIIA and 29 Paprosky type IIIB hips; at re-revision, seven hips were Paprosky type II, 27 type IIIA and 11 were type IIIB (p = 0.020). The mean preoperative Harris Hip Score was 45.4 (SD 6.4), becoming 80.7 (SD 12.7) at the final follow-up. In all, 12 hips showed radiological migration of the acetabular component, and three required further revision surgery. The nine-year cumulative failure incidence (nine patients at risk) of the acetabular component for further revision surgery was 9.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9 to 21.0) for any cause, and 7.5% (95% CI 1.9 to 18.5) for aseptic loosening. Hips with a greater hip height had a higher risk for radiological migration (odds ratio 1.09, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.17; p = 0.008). Conclusion Bone stock restoration can be obtained using IBG in revision hip surgery. This technique is also useful in re-revision surgery; however, a better surgical technique including a closer distance to hip rotation centre could decrease the risk of radiological migration of the acetabular component. A longer follow-up is required to assess potential fixation deterioration. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(3):492–499.

scholarly journals Catastrophic Failure and Metallosis of the Acetabular Component in Total Hip Arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
FIRAT OZAN ◽  
Murat Kahraman ◽  
Ali Baktır ◽  
Kürşat Gençer
Keyword(s):  
Revision Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Catastrophic Failure ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Catastrophic Failures ◽  
Revision Tha ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Hip Arthroplasties

Abstract Background: To evaluate the clinical features and results of the revision total hip arthroplasties (THA) in patients with catastrophic failures and metallosis. Methods: Fifteen hips of 14 patients with catastrophic failure and metallosis in hip arthroplasties were evaluated. They were followed for at least 4.2 years after the revision THA. Clinical evaluation was performed using Harris hip score. Osteolysis, loosening or presence of metallosis was evaluated with standard radiographs. Metallosis was evaluated intraoperatively according to the metallosis severity classification. Results: The mean time from failure until revision surgery was 9.4 years. It was observed that in the primary THA, metal-on-ceramic (MoC), ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) and metal-on-conventional polyethylene (MoCPE) bearings were used in 1, 3 and 11 hips, respectively. Grade III metallosis was observed in all patients during revision surgeries. The mean Harris hip score increased from 55 points before revision THA to 75 points at the final follow-up. In revision arthroplasty, MoCPE and CoC bearings were used in 13 and 2 hips, respectively. The femoral stem was replaced in 5 hips. All acetabular cups, except that of one hip, were revised. Conclusions: Revisions of THAs with catastrophic failures and metallosis are quite challenging. Routine follow-up of arthroplasty patients is beneficial to examine for osteolysis, loosening, and asymmetric wear.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document