scholarly journals Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy to treat localized and/or locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: oncological outcomes from a multicenter study

BMC Surgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Ye Liu ◽  
Ying-Bo Dai ◽  
Fang-Jian Zhou ◽  
Zhi Long ◽  
Yong-Hong Li ◽  
...  
Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (60) ◽  
pp. 101500-101508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuka Kubota ◽  
Shingo Hatakeyama ◽  
Toshikazu Tanaka ◽  
Naoki Fujita ◽  
Hiromichi Iwamura ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 946-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shogo Hosogoe ◽  
Shingo Hatakeyama ◽  
Ayumu Kusaka ◽  
Itsuto Hamano ◽  
Hiromichi Iwamura ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Radosław Piszczek ◽  
Łukasz Nowak ◽  
Wojciech Krajewski ◽  
Joanna Chorbińska ◽  
Sławomir Poletajew ◽  
...  

Abstract Background During the past two decades, laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) has been proposed as an alternative technique to open radical nephroureterectomy (ORNU) and has become increasingly accepted for the treatment of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Nevertheless, the oncologic efficacy of LRNU remains controversial, especially for the treatment of locally advanced (T3/T4 and/or N+) UTUC. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to cumulatively compare the oncological outcomes of LRNU versus ORNU. Materials and methods The present meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A search was conducted of three electronic databases, namely, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Outcome measurements of cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS), including hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were extracted and pooled. Results Eighteen articles published from 2007 to 2020 were included in the final quantitative analysis. One study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT), and the remaining articles had a retrospective design. Among a total of 10,730 participants in the selected papers, 5959 (55.5%) and 4771 (44.5%) underwent ORNU and LRNU, respectively. The results of pooled analyses revealed no significant differences in CSS (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.60–1.19, p = 0.33), OS (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.62–1.13, p = 0.25), IVRFS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.85–1.39, p = 0.52), and RFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.94–1.25, p = 0.26) between LRNU and ORNU groups. Furthermore, the results of subgroup analyses for pT3/T4 and pTany N+ populations did not confirm any statistically significant differences between LRNU and ORNU in terms of any survival parameter. Conclusions Our present meta-analysis of current evidence suggests that LRNU and ORNU have comparable oncological outcomes in patients with UTUC, even in those with locally advanced disease. Further multicenter RCTs with large sample sizes and uniform data regarding specific surgical procedures, such as bladder cuff excision, are required to establish definitive conclusions.


BJUI Compass ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Alhalabi ◽  
Matthew T. Campbell ◽  
Lianchun Xiao ◽  
Ana C. Adriazola ◽  
Nathaniel R. Wilson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document