scholarly journals Development of a brief learning environment measure for use in healthcare professions education: the Healthcare Education Micro Learning Environment Measure (HEMLEM)

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Isba ◽  
C. Rousseva ◽  
K. Woolf ◽  
L. Byrne-Davis
Author(s):  
Veronica Montebello

Digitally mediated contexts are proliferating across all professional disciplines and also transverse social cultures in higher education worldwide. Malta is no exception. Financial pressures, keeping up with international advances, maintaining standards and changing patterns of lifelong learning are driving the education institutions to adopt online modes of communication, interaction and education. As expected, these changes can also be evidenced in the healthcare education sector. This inevitably brings with it a drive towards innovative modalities of interaction, carrying out research and in the pedagogy of teaching and learning. More importantly it necessitates an institutional shift towards prioritising the development of digital literacy among higher education students and academics alike. This does come with challenges – financial and logistical – but significant in the case of post-certification students is the varying degrees of digital literacy competences, combined with a packed curriculum, to be covered in a restrained timeframe, in combination with work and personal commitments. Additionally, a large percentage of these students have gone through their education in the traditional format, and therefore studying in a technology-centric environment presents unique difficulties. The following report presents recommendations envisaged to overcome the challenges around digital literacy in post-certification healthcare professionals. It is to be highlighted that many of the proposals are applicable to the development of digital literacy within the wider higher education community and are not restricted to post-certification healthcare professions alone.


2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (9) ◽  
pp. 859-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Isba

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (01-02) ◽  
pp. 21-33
Author(s):  
Ingrid Femdal ◽  
Eva Bjørg Antonsen ◽  
Bruce Burton ◽  
Margret Lepp

Author(s):  
Karey Cook ◽  
Judith Stoecker

Background: Stereotyping is one factor theorized to facilitate or inhibit effective interprofessional healthcare education and collaboration. The primary purpose of this paper is to systematically review the literature to determine what stereotypes are present among healthcare students about other healthcare students and practitioners. The secondary purpose of this paper is to identify the instruments most commonly used to measure stereotypes held by healthcare practitioners and students. Methods and Findings: A search of nine electronic databases identified studies that examined stereotypes among healthcare students. Studies were included if they met three search criteria: utilized quantitative methods; collected data on the stereotypes of healthcare students, including medical students, toward other healthcare students or healthcare practitioners; and included participants who were enrolled in a professional healthcare program. Thirteen studies were identified for this review. The results demonstrate that students of various healthcare professions hold stereotypes characterized by both positive and negative adjectives of students and practitioners in their own and other healthcare professions. Conclusions: The presence of stereotypes among students may have an influence on patterns of communication and collaboration during future practice in the healthcare environment. Key Words: Stereotypes, Interprofessional, Healthcare Students, Healthcare Education   


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niva Dolev ◽  
Lior Naamati-Schneider ◽  
Adaya Meirovich

In recent decades, it has been increasingly recognized that soft skills play an important role in healthcare education and must be developed alongside other professional skills. Furthermore, the contribution of emotional intelligence (EI) to the ability to adapt to the changing environment of the 21st century has been widely agreed upon. Yet, despite these findings, social–emotional intelligence (SEI) and related skills skills are not widely developed in healthcare education settings, and if at all, only in a limited way. The present chapter presents a model and a methodological tool (SE-SD) for the development of social–emotional skills (SEI) as part of existing healthcare curricula, applying a broad view of the healthcare professions and associated skills. Soft, social–emotional, skills are positioned as a relevant and integral part of healthcare courses, thereby avoiding the need for significant changes in existing curricula. The SEI development process is implemented in three stages: preparation, action and assessment. The tool allows learners to embark on a self-directed, yet supervised, learning and development process, and can be applied to a single course or through the entire study program. The incorporation of a soft skill development process into healthcare education programs could help health systems to adapt and to cope better with the challenges of the 21st century, both present and future.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuang Li ◽  
Simon Ching LAM ◽  
Summer Cho Nga Siu ◽  
Jessie Yuk Seng Chung ◽  
Hemio Chung Yan Lam ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Student engagement receives heightened research attention in traditional and contemporary education. This study aimed to develop and validate a Generic Student Engagement Scale (GSES) for the use in contemporary healthcare education including online, distance learning or e-learning.Methods:A 2-phased methodological study employed a cross-sectional design with repeated measures. Phase 1 aimed to develop the items of GSES for the use in generic learning environment of nursing students through item development/revision, content validation, face validation, and statement standardization. Phase 2 aimed to test the psychometric properties of the newly developed GSES on its internal consistency, stability, and factorial validity. Data was collected in 2016-2018. Results:Based on 45 items of the Distance Students Engagement Scale (i.e., 3-factor model), 39 items were revised and adapted to fit the generic learning environment in nursing education. Seven experts and 20 nursing students examined each items and indicated a satisfactory content (CVI = 0.71–1.00 except item G9) and face validity (100% comprehensibility and interpretability). By analyzing 451 valid data from nursing students, confirmatory factor analysis did not support this 3-factor model GSES. Exploratory factor analysis was used to explore the new internal structure of GSES. The 26-item 4-factor solution that accounted for a total of 41.0% variance was found the most optimal. The factors were labelled “self-regulated learning”, “cognitive strategy use”, “teacher-student interaction”, and “experienced emotion”. The internal consistency and stability of this new model was re-examined with satisfactory results.Conclusions:The newly developed 26-item 4-factor GSES is reliable and valid scale measuring student engagement among nursing students.


2000 ◽  
Vol 64 (8) ◽  
pp. 610-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
LS Behar-Horenstein ◽  
TA Dolan ◽  
FJ Courts ◽  
GS Mitchell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document