scholarly journals An economic evaluation of an intervention to increase demand for medical male circumcision among men aged 25–49 years in South Africa

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Holmes ◽  
R. Mukora ◽  
D. Mudzengi ◽  
S. Charalambous ◽  
C. M. Chetty-Makkan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Studies estimate that circumcising men between the ages of 20–30 years who have exhibited previous risky sexual behaviour could reduce overall HIV prevalence. Demand creation strategies for medical male circumcision (MMC) targeting men in this age group may significantly impact these prevalence rates. Objectives The objective of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of an implementation science, pre-post study designed to increase the uptake of male circumcision for ages 25–49 at a fixed MMC clinic located in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Methods A health care provider perspective was utilised to collect all costs. Costs were compared between the standard care scenario of routine outreach strategies and a full intervention strategy. Cost-effectiveness was measured as cost per mature man enrolled and cost per mature man circumcised. A cost-benefit analysis was employed by using the Bernoulli model to estimate the cases of HIV averted due to medical male circumcision (MMC), and subsequently translated to averted medical costs. Results In the 2015 intervention, the cost of the intervention was $9445 for 722 men. The total HIV treatment costs averted due to the intervention were $542,491 from a public care model and $378,073 from a private care model. The benefit-cost ratio was 57.44 for the public care model and 40.03 for the private care model. The net savings of the intervention were $533,046 or $368,628 - depending on treatment in a public or private setting. Conclusions The intervention was cost-effective compared to similar MMC demand interventions and led to statistically significant cost savings per individual enrolled.

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e0169710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Tchuenche ◽  
Eurica Palmer ◽  
Vibhuti Haté ◽  
Ananthy Thambinayagam ◽  
Dayanund Loykissoonlal ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e0160207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Tchuenche ◽  
Eurica Palmer ◽  
Vibhuti Haté ◽  
Ananthy Thambinayagam ◽  
Dayanund Loykissoonlal ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Grund ◽  
Candice M. Chetty-Makkan ◽  
Sibuse Ginindza ◽  
Reuben Munyai ◽  
Helen Kisbey-Green ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. e0195691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward I. Broughton ◽  
Esther Karamagi ◽  
Angella Kigonya ◽  
Anna Lawino ◽  
Lani Marquez ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 29116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hae-Young Kim ◽  
Limakatso Lebina ◽  
Minja Milovanovic ◽  
Noah Taruberekera ◽  
David W. Dowdy ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Colin Palfrey

This chapter examines the techniques used by health economists to evaluate the value for money of health promotion initiatives. It first provides an overview of concepts related to economics and health economics, including efficiency, equality, equity and accessibility. Efficiency can be evaluated in terms of cost-minimisation, cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit and cost-utility. The chapter then considers the various rationing strategies by which the NHS can try to reduce expenditure, the use of QALYs to compare the cost-effectiveness of health promotion projects, and conjoint analysis. It also explains how health economists calculate the cost to society of unhealthy lifestyles such as obesity and smoking, and goes on to tackle the question of prevention vs cure in health promotion, the expenditure on the NHS, and the limitations of health economics in evaluation of health promotion endeavours. The chapter concludes with an assessment of how to estimate the costs of health promotion.


2012 ◽  
Vol 155 ◽  
pp. 128-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew M. McConnachie ◽  
Richard M. Cowling ◽  
Brian W. van Wilgen ◽  
Dominic A. McConnachie

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document