scholarly journals Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the polish version of the Oxford Shoulder Score in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Bejer ◽  
Magdalena Szczepanik ◽  
Jędrzej Płocki ◽  
Daniel Szymczyk ◽  
Marek Kulczyk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Cultural Adaptation ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Oxford Shoulder Score ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Polish Version ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Shoulder Score

Abstract Background The Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) is a simple and reliable, joint-specific, self-reported outcome measure. It can be applied in patients with shoulder disease other than instability. The purpose of this study was to perform a translation, cultural adaptation of the Polish version of the OSS and to evaluate its selected psychometric properties in patients after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods Sixty-nine subjects participated in the study, with a mean age 55.5 (ranging from 40 to 65 years). The OSS has been translated using the widely accepted guidelines. All patients completed the Polish version of OSS (OSS-PL), the short version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH), the Short Form-36 v. 2.0 (SF-36) and the 7-point Global Rating of Change Scale (GRC). Results High internal consistency of 0.96 was found using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Reliability of the OSS resulted in Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) = 0.99, Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) = 1.14 and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) = 3.15. The validity analysis showed a moderate (General health r = 0.34) to high (Physical role functioning r = 0.82) correlation between the OSS-PL and SF-36 and a high correlation between the OSS-PL and the QuickDASH (r = − 0.92). Conclusions The Polish version of OSS is a reliable and valid, self-reported questionnaire, which can be applied in patients with a rotator cuff tear undergoing reconstruction surgery. The very good psychometric properties of the Polish version of the OSS indicate that it can be used in clinical practice and scientific research.

scholarly journals Early and Delayed Postoperative Rehabilitation after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 190-194
Author(s):  
Sungwook Choi ◽  
Kyu Bum Seo ◽  
Seungjae Shim ◽  
Ju Yeon Shin ◽  
Hyunseong Kang
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Constant Score ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Shoulder Score

Background: The duration of immobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and the optimal time to commence rehabilitation are still the subject of ongoing debates. This study was undertaken to evaluate the functional outcome and rotator cuff healing status after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair by comparing early and delayed rehabilitation.Methods: Totally, 76 patients with small, medium, and large sized rotator cuff tears underwent arthroscopic repair using the suture-bridge technique. In early rehabilitation group, 38 patients commenced passive range of motion at postoperative day 2 whereas 38 patients assigned to the delayed rehabilitation group commenced passive range of motion at postoperative week 3. At the end of the study period, clinical and functional evaluations (Constant score, the University of California, Los Angeles [UCLA] shoulder score) were carried out, subsequent to measuring the range of motion, visual analogue scale for pain, and isokinetic dynamometer test. Rotator cuff healing was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging at least 6 months after surgery.Results: No significant difference was obtained in range of motion and visual analogue scale between both groups. Functional outcomes showed similar improvements in the Constant score (early: 67.0?88.0; delayed: 66.9?91.0; <i>p</i><0.001) and the UCLA shoulder score (early: 20.3?32.3; delayed: 20.4?32.4; <i>p</i><0.001). Furthermore, rotator cuff healing showed no significant differences between the groups (range, 6?15 months; average, 10.4 months).Conclusions: Delayed passive rehabilitation does not bring about superior outcomes. Therefore, early rehabilitation would be useful to help patients resume their daily lives.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears: analysis and functional outcome

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 256
Author(s):  
Rejo V. Jacob ◽  
Prateek Girotra ◽  
K. Prashanth Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Arthroscopic Repair ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Daily Routine ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Shoulder Score

<p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Background: </span></strong>Rotator cuff injuries are common injuries occurring around the shoulder with an incidence ranging from 5 to 39%. Rotator cuff tears can be either partial thickness or full thickness. If remains untreated, may lead to persistent shoulder pain, functional limitation and decreased quality of life. In the present study, we assess the functional outcome following arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears. We also assess the various parameters affecting the functional outcome following repair.</p><p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Methods: </span></strong>15 patients with rotator cuff tears were subjected to this study. Preoperative evaluation of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score and University of California and Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score was done. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using single row repair with suture anchors was done. The patients were followed up at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months where ASES score and UCLA score were assessed<span lang="EN-US">.<strong></strong></span></p><p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Results: </span></strong>Of the 15 patients, 14 had supraspinatus tear, 2 patients had infraspinatus tear and 2 patients had subscapularis tear. According to UCLA scoring system 22% patients had excellent, 43% patients had good results, 23% patients had fair results and 12% patients had poor results. ASES score also showed progressive improvement at subsequent follow ups at 3 and 6 months.</p><p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Conclusions: </span></strong>From our present study we conclude that arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a good modality showing excellent functional outcome with less morbidity, minimal postoperative pain, better cosmesis and early resumption of daily routine activities.</p><p> </p>

scholarly journals Comparing the Predictors of Functional Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Modified Frailty Index, Clinical Frailty Scale, and Charlson Comorbidity Index

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 232596712110050
Author(s):  
Vikaesh Moorthy ◽  
Merrill Lee ◽  
Benjamin Fu Hong Ang ◽  
Jerry Yongqiang Chen ◽  
Denny Tjiauw Tjoen Lie
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Frailty Index ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Comorbidity Index ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Shoulder Score

Background: The incidence of rotator cuff tears increases with age, and operative management is usually required in patients with persistent symptoms. Although several studies have analyzed the effect of age and comorbidities on outcomes after rotator cuff repair, no study has specifically examined the consequence of frailty. Purpose: To determine the best frailty/comorbidity index for predicting functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of 340 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at a tertiary hospital between April 2016 and April 2018. All patients had undergone arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair with subacromial decompression by a single fellowship-trained shoulder surgeon. Patient frailty was measured using the Modified Frailty Index (MFI), Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), calculated through retrospective chart review based on case notes made just before surgery; patient age and sex were also noted preoperatively. Functional outcomes using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Score, and visual analog scale for pain were measured preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Results: The MFI was a consistent significant predictor in all functional outcome scores up to 24 months postoperatively ( P < .05), unlike the CFS and CCI. Sex was also a significant predictor of postoperative OSS, CSS, and UCLA Shoulder Score, with male sex being associated with better functional outcomes. Patients with higher MFI scores had slower functional improvement postoperatively, but they eventually attained functional outcome scores comparable with those of their counterparts with lower MFI scores at 24 months postoperatively. Conclusion: The MFI was found to be a better tool for predicting postoperative function than was the CFS or CCI in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The study findings suggest that a multidimensional assessment of frailty (including both functional status and comorbidities) is important in determining functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

scholarly journals Clinical outcome in patients with hand lesions associated with complex regional pain syndrome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takaki Imai ◽  
Masafumi Gotoh ◽  
Keiji Fukuda ◽  
Misa Ogino ◽  
Hidehiro Nakamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)-related hand lesions are one of the complications following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with CRPS-related hand lesions following ARCR.Methods: Altogether, 103 patients with ARCR were included in this study (mean age, 63.6±8.2 years; 66 males and 37 females; follow-up period, preoperative to 12 months postoperative). Clinical assessment included the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, Constant score, 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) score, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score from preoperative to 12 months postoperatively. The patients were either assigned to the CRPS group or non-CRPS group depending on CRPS diagnosis until the final follow-up, and clinical outcomes were then compared between the groups.Results: Of 103 patients, 20 (19.4%) had CRPS-related hand lesions that developed entirely within 2 months postoperatively. Both groups showed significant improvement in JOA, UCLA, and Constant scores preoperatively to 12 months postoperatively (P<0.0001). Comparisons between the two groups were not significantly different, except for SF-36 “general health perception” (P<0.05) at 12 months postoperatively. At final follow-up, three patients had residual CRPS-related hand lesions with limited range of motion and finger edema.Conclusions: CRPS-related hand lesions developed in 19.4% of patients following ARCR. Shoulder or upper-limb function improved in most cases at 12 months, with satisfactory SF-36 patient-based evaluation results. Patients with residual CRPS-related hand lesions at the last follow-up require long-term follow-up.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Improves Sleep Disturbance and Quality of Life: A Prospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 3797
Author(s):  
Umile Giuseppe Longo ◽  
Vincenzo Candela ◽  
Sergio De Salvatore ◽  
Ilaria Piergentili ◽  
Nicolò Panattoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Sleep Quality ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Sleep Disturbances ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Shoulder Score

Sleep disturbances are very common in patients with rotator cuff injury. Improvement of sleep quality in these patients can be considered a significant factor for healing in conjunction with surgery. The primary objective of this prospective study was to evaluate changes in sleep quality after surgery in patients with rotator cuff repair by analyzing the PSQI (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) score. The secondary aim was to evaluate the improvement in quality of life in terms of functional limitations and shoulder pain after surgery. Fifty-eight patients with rotator cuff tears treated by arthroscopic surgery were included. All the patients completed the PSQI, the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and the Constant-Murley Score (Constant) before and at one, three and six months after surgery. Overall improvement in all the scores analyzed (p < 0.001) was found. Preoperative and postoperative PSQI scores correlated with SF-36, SST, ASES and Constant scores at each follow-up. Preoperative and one-month postoperative OSS correlated with the PSQI score. Using the Friedman test, we found an overall improvement in all score analyses (p < 0.001). The results prove that after rotator cuff repair, sleep disturbances improve three to six months after surgery improving the quality of life of these patients.

scholarly journals The Use of a Patient-Based Questionnaire (The Oxford Shoulder Score) to Assess Outcome After Rotator Cuff Repair

2008 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 326-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
LM Olley ◽  
AJ Carr
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Postal Questionnaire ◽  
Shoulder Surgery ◽  
Oxford Shoulder Score ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Outcome Information ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Shoulder Score

INTRODUCTION It is increasingly important for surgeons to monitor the outcome of their practice for the purpose of audit. The main difficulty has been the lack of appropriate methods of assessing outcome. Outcome has traditionally been assessed by clinical means which can be inaccurate, irreproducible and subject to surgeon bias. In addition, the perspective of the patient and surgeon may differ with respect to outcome and interest has grown in patient-based scoring systems. The Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) is one such patient-based scoring system. The main aim of this study was to assess whether a patient-based questionnaire, in this case the OSS, could be effectively used to audit outcome from shoulder surgery. A secondary aim was to assess the value of gathering outcome information by post. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 24 patients (14 male; median age 59 years; age range, 43–73 years) who had completed a pre-operative OSS questionnaire and had undergone rotator cuff repair were included in the study. Participants were assessed postoperatively at regular intervals using the OSS at hospital visits and by postal questionnaire. RESULTS The completion level for the OSS was 97% and the response rate to the postal questionnaire was 96%. At 3 months' post-surgery, 21 of 24 patients had improved; at final review (16–37 months), 23 patients had improved following surgery. The OSS was observed to be a robust tool for the quantitative assessment and tracking of patient outcomes after surgery. CONCLUSIONS This study shows the value of using a postal questionnaire to follow-up patients after surgery and demonstrates the successful use of a patient-based questionnaire to audit the outcome from shoulder surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document