scholarly journals Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Wang ◽  
Yang Zhao ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Bin Hu ◽  
Liang Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Deep Infection ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Distal Tibial Fractures ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background The treatment for distal tibial fractures remains controversial to date. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are well-accepted and effective methods for distal tibial fractures, but these methods were associated with complications. This study aimed to assess and compare the clinical and functional outcomes in patients with distal tibial fractures treated with MIPPO or IMN. Methods We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared MIPPO with IMN in patients with distal tibial fractures from inception till 15 August 2019. Also, quantitative summaries of time to reunion, rate of complications, and functional outcomes were evaluated. Results The pooled results suggested that patients in the MIPPO group had a longer time to reunion with a mean difference of 1.21 weeks [P = 0.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16–2.26)] than those in the IMN group. The overall union complications and deep infection between IMN and MIPPO were similar (P > 0.05). IMN had a significantly low risk of wound complications [risk ratio (RR) = 0.51, P = 0.00, 95% CI 0.34–0.77)]. The pooled functional outcomes of the two groups remained controversial by different evaluating scores. Conclusions Compared to MIPPO, IMN had a significantly low risk of wound complications and associated with limited time for reunion. Although the pooled functional outcomes of the two groups were controversial due to different evaluating scores, IMN was the preferred surgical technique than MIPPO for treating distal tibial fractures.

scholarly journals Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus intramedullary nail fixation for closed distal tibial fractures: a meta-analysis of the clinical outcomes

SICOT-J ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 58 ◽  
Author(s):  
En Lin Goh ◽  
Swathikan Chidambaram ◽  
Denise Eigenmann ◽  
Shaocheng Ma ◽  
Gareth G. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Distal Tibial Fractures ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Increased Risk

Introduction: Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) has emerged as a viable alternative for the treatment of distal tibial fractures. However, the clinical outcomes of this procedure compared to intramedullary (IM) nail fixation have yet to be established. The present meta-analysis aims to compare the clinical outcomes following MIPPO and IM nail fixation for closed distal tibial fractures. Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from date of inception to 10th April 2017. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MIPPO with IM nail fixation for closed and Gustilo Grade I distal tibial fractures were included. Outcomes assessed included time to union, complications and functional outcomes. Quality and risk of bias of the RCTs were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool. Results: Five RCTs comprising 497 patients were included. MIPPO was associated with a longer time to union (MD: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.26, 1.90, p = 0.010, I 2 = 84%) and increased risk of wound complications (RR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.01, 2.46, p = 0.04, I 2 = 0%). Both MIPPO and IM nail fixation had comparable risks of malunion, delayed union, non-union and deep infections, with similar functional outcomes. Discussion: Compared to IM nail fixation, a MIPPO fixation technique for distal tibial fractures is associated with a longer time to fracture union and an increased risk of wound complications. Neither technique demonstrates a clear advantage with regard to risk of malunion/non-union, or functional outcome. Assuming equivalent surgical expertise with both techniques, the results suggest that IM nail fixation is the treatment modality of choice for these challenging fractures.

scholarly journals Outcome of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in distal tibial fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 18-22
Author(s):  
Nabees Man Singh Pradhan ◽  
JA Khan ◽  
B Acharya ◽  
S Shrestha ◽  
R Tamrakar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Distal Tibia ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Type I ◽  
Distal Tibial Fractures ◽  
Non Union ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Distal tibial fractures present as a major challenge for the orthopedic trauma surgeons. Most non-operative treatments result in non-union or malunion and needs prolonged immobilization of the knee and ankle joints, with resulting stiffness. Open reduction and internal fixation as well as external fixation has high rate of infection and non-union. Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis has been shown to have a better outcome and has been the procedure of choice in most distal tibial fractures since the introduction of the locking compression plate. The objective of the study is to review the outcome of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Osteosynthesis (MIPO) in unstable distal tibial fractures.Methods: Charts of patients who underwent MIPO from the year 2008 to 2013 for unstable distal tibial fractures over five years at Patan Hospital and Om Hospital were reviewed. All displaced closed fractures and Gustillo Anderson Type I and II fractures were included in the study. Plates consisted of the anatomically contoured 4.5 mm LCP and 3.5 mm LCP-Pilon form plate. A simple uniplanar external fixator was used to retain the reduction till the plate was inserted and secured with locking screws. The outcome of MIPO in distal tibial fractures were followed up and evaluated.  Clinical and radiological assessments were performed at 6 weeks, and at 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months.Results: Of the 75 patients (45 male, 30 female) age ranging from 19 to 70 years (mean 47 years), 5 patients were lost to follow-up. 28 patients at 3 months, 32 at 6 months, and 8 at 9 months met the criteria for a healed fracture. Two patients required autologous bone grafting at 9 months for non-union ultimately resulting in the fracture union at 16 months. There was one malunion attributable to the loss of reduction during plate fixation. There were no deep infections, no soft tissue complications and no failures of fixation. The cause of fracture were RTA (n=35), fall from height (n=9), twisting of ankle as a result of fall from standing height (n=22), and others (n=11). The mean time for surgery from the time of injury was 5 (range, 2 to 14) days; the mean hospital stay was 10 (range, 7 to 21) days.Conclusion: MIPO is an effective treatment for closed, unstable fractures of the distal tibia, avoiding the complications associated with more traditional methods of internal fixation and/or external fixation.Journal of Society of Surgeons of NepalVol. 17, No. 2, 2014, Page: 7-11

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Distal Tibial Fractures

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pramod Devkota ◽  
Javed A Khan ◽  
Suman K Shrestha ◽  
Balakrishnan M Acharya ◽  
Nabeesman S Pradhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Distal Tibial Fractures

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis Does Not Increase Complication Rates in Extra-Articular Distal Tibial Fractures

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izzet Bingol ◽  
Nadir Yalcin ◽  
Vedat Bicici ◽  
Tolga Tulunay ◽  
Kaan Yuksel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Callus Formation ◽  
Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Full Weight Bearing ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Distal Tibial Fractures

Background : Selection of a treatment method in cases of unstable, nonarticular distal tibial fractures is still a matter of discussion. Intramedullary nailing, which is a “gold standard” for tibial shaft fractures, does not always work for this specific transition area between diaphysis and metaphysis. Instead, new minimally invasive techniques with special implants are popular. Aims : To determine the functional and radiological results of distal tibial fractures treated with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) technique. Study Design : Retrospective cohort analysis. Methods : Thirty distal tibial fractures treated with MIPPO method, between January 2006 and December 2010, were evaluated retrospectively. All patients were classified according to AO/OTA classification. Period of hospital stay, time of fracture union, time to allow full weight bearing, early and late complications were inquired. Functional outcomes were assessed by AOFAS scores. Results : There were 13 male and 17 female patients with an average age of 44.26 (range, 22-77 years). One superficial infection and one malunion were observed. Two patients were revised for the loss of reduction and healed uneventfully. According to the AO/OTA classification, 23 patients were 43-A1 (76.6%), 3 were 43-A2 (10%) and 4 were 43-A3 (13.3%). Post-operative mean stay of patients at the hospital was 2.6 ± 1.42 days (range, 1-7 days). Mean full weight-bearing period of the patients was found out as 13.16 ± 2.6 weeks (range, 10-22 weeks). The mean period of union of fracture for patients was found out as 19.8 ± 2.99 weeks (range, 16-34 weeks). Conclusion : Treatment of distal tibial fractures with MIPPO method provides a successful treatment strategy as long as used as per the technique, and it respects and does not harm soft tissues which allows early callus formation and rapid healing that enable the patient to walk as early as possible after the operation. The overall clinical and functional outcome is still good despite minor complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document