scholarly journals Medial abrasion syndrome: a neglected cause of persistent pain after knee arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaw-Ruey Lyu ◽  
Chia-Chen Hsu ◽  
Jung-Pin Hung
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Outcome Study ◽  
Primary Arthroplasty ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Plateau Fracture ◽  
Advanced Stages ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Medial Release

Abstract Introduction Persistent post-operative pain (PPOP) has detracted from some otherwise successful knee arthroplasties. This study investigated medial abrasion syndrome (MAS) as a cause of PPOP after knee arthroplasty. The surgical techniques and outcomes of incorporating this concept into the management of both primary arthroplasty cases and patients suffering from unknown causes of PPOP after arthroplasties were presented. Materials and methods In a 1-year period, the author performed unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty (the UKA or TKA group) that also eliminated medial abrasion phenomenon (MAP) on 196 knees of 150 patients at advanced stages of knee osteoarthritis (OA). During the same year, 16 knees of 16 patients with unknown causes of PPOP after knee arthroplasties were referred to the author for the arthroscopic medial release procedure (the AMR group) after being diagnosed as MAS. Subjective satisfaction, Knee Society Score (KSS), and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) evaluations were used for outcome study. Results All 166 patients were followed for more than 3 years (mean 3.7 years, 3.1–4.2) for the outcome study. All knees receiving arthroplasty showed medial plicae with MAP at the time of surgery. Only 2 of them suffered from PPOP: one was a neglected tibial plateau fracture with residual varus deformity after UKA, and the other was a late infection after TKA and received revision. The satisfactory rate was 98.8% in the UKA group, 99.1% in the TKA group, and 100% in the AMR group. The Knee Society Scores and all subscales of KOOS were statistically improved in all groups. Conclusions MAS is a cause of pain in patients who have received knee arthroplasties, and MAP should be eliminated to ensure a successful knee arthroplasty. PPOP after knee arthroplasty can be caused by MAS, which can be managed by AMR.

scholarly journals Medial Abrasion Syndrome: A Neglected Cause of Persistent Pain After Knee Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaw-Ruey Lyu ◽  
Chia-Chen Hsu ◽  
Jung-Pin Hung
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Outcome Study ◽  
Primary Arthroplasty ◽  
Plateau Fracture ◽  
Advanced Stages ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Persistent Postoperative Pain ◽  
One Year

Abstract Introduction: Persistent postoperative pain (PPOP) has detracted from some otherwise successful knee arthroplasties. This study investigated medial abrasion syndrome (MAS) as a cause of PPOP after knee arthroplasty. The surgical techniques and outcomes of incorporating this concept into the management of both primary arthroplasty cases and patients suffering from unknown causes of PPOP after arthroplasties were presented. Materials and Methods: In a one-year period, the author performed unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty (the UKA or TKA group) that also eliminated medial abrasion phenomenon (MAP) on 196 knees of 150 patients at advanced stages of knee osteoarthritis (OA). During the same year, 16 knees of 16 patients with unknown causes of PPOP after knee arthroplasties were referred to the author for the arthroscopic medial release procedure (the AMR group) after being diagnosed as MAS. Subjective satisfaction, Knee Society Score (KSS), and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) evaluations were used for outcome study.Results: All 166 patients were followed for more than 3 years (mean: 3.7 years, 3.1-4.2) for outcome study. All knees receiving arthroplasty showed medial plicae with MAP at the time of surgery. Only 2 of them suffered from PPOP: one was a neglected tibial plateau fracture with residual varus deformity after UKA and the other was a late infection after TKA and received revision. The satisfactory rate was 98.8% in the UKA group, 99.1% in the TKA group, and 100% in the AMR group. The Knee Society scores and all subscales of KOOS were statistically improved in all groups.Conclusions: MAS is a cause of pain in patients who have received knee arthroplasties, and MAP should be eliminated to ensure a successful knee arthroplasty. PPOP after knee arthroplasty can be caused by MAS, which can be managed by AMR.

scholarly journals Medial Abrasion Syndrome:  A Neglected Cause of Persistent Pain After Knee Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaw-Ruey Lyu ◽  
Chia-Chen Hsu ◽  
Jung-Pin Hung
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Outcome Study ◽  
Plateau Fracture ◽  
Advanced Stages ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Persistent Postoperative Pain ◽  
One Year ◽  
Medial Release ◽  
Cause Of Pain

Abstract Background: Persistent postoperative pain (PPOP) has detracted from some otherwise successful knee arthroplasties. This study investigated medial abrasion syndrome (MAS) as a cause of PPOP after knee arthroplasty and presented the technique and outcome of arthroscopic medial release (AMR) procedure to treat such patients. Methods: In a one-year period, the author performed unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty (the UKA or TKA group) that also eliminated MAS on 196 knees of 150 patients at advanced stages of knee osteoarthritis (OA). During the same year, 16 knees of 16 patients with unknown causes of PPOP after knee arthroplasty were referred to the author for the AMR procedure (the AMR group). Subjective satisfaction, Knee Society Score (KSS), and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) evaluations were used for outcome study.Results: All 166 patients were followed up for more than 3 years (mean: 3.7 years, 3.1-4.2) for outcome study. All knees receiving arthroplasty showed pathologic medial plicae of various severities at the time of arthroplasty. Only 2 patients suffered PPOP: one was a neglected tibial plateau fracture with residual varus deformity after UKA and the other was a late infection after TKA and received revision. The satisfactory rate was 98.8% in the UKA group, 99.1% in the TKA group, and 100% in the AMR group. The Knee Society scores and all subscales of KOOS were statistically improved in all groups.Conclusion: MAS is a cause of pain in patients who have received knee arthroplasty, and MAS should be managed before wound closure to ensure a successful knee arthroplasty. PPOP after knee arthroplasty can be caused by MAS, which can be managed by AMR.

Primary Results of Medial Epicondylar Osteotomy in Patients with Severe Bilateral Varus Knee Candidate for Total Knee Replacement

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fardin Mirzatolooei ◽  
Ali Tabrizi ◽  
Hassan Taleb ◽  
Mohammad Khalegi Hashemian ◽  
Mir Bahram Safari
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Stress Test ◽  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Medial Release ◽  
Varus Angle

Background Total knee arthroplasty is a challenging task in patients with severe varus deformity. In most of these patients, an extensive medial release is needed that may lead to instability. Medial epicondylar osteotomy may be a better substitute for complete medial collateral release. Materials and Methods Fourteen patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis and severe varus deformity were enrolled in this study. In one side, the patients underwent medial epicondylar osteotomy for mediolateral imbalance if the only option was superficial medial collateral ligament (MCL) release. In contralateral side, the extensive medial release was performed and MCL was released either by pie-crusting technique or by subperiosteally release. The results of the two sides were compared. Patients were followed up for 12 months after the operation. Physical examination, clinical questionnaires, and radiography findings were recorded. Union of the osteotomies fragment and complications was evaluated. Results The mean varus angle before surgery was 21.6 ± 4.7 degrees, which was corrected to 8.6 ± 2.9 degrees after operation with an extensive medial release. The mean varus angle of contralateral side was 22.6 ± 1.7 degrees, which was corrected to 7.5 ± 2.3 degrees following medial femoral epicondyle osteotomy. There was no significant difference in varus correction (p = 0.1). Medial joint line opening in valgus stress test was 2.7 ± 0.4 mm in the osteotomized side and 3.5 ± 0.9 mm in contralateral side. Mean range of motion for the osteotomized side was 97.8 ± 4.3 degrees and 100.7 ± 2.7 degrees for contralateral side (p = 0.6). Nonunion occurred in a case in the osteotomized side and no medial instability was observed in medial release or osteotomies sides. No statistical difference was recorded based on clinical questionnaires (Oxford and WOMAC [Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index] scores). Conclusion Medial epicondylar osteotomy is a safe technique with the well-controlled medial extensive release in the patients with severe varus deformity during total knee arthroplasty.

scholarly journals Interesting Cases in Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

10.29007/fxxg ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Garbarino ◽  
Nipun Sodhi ◽  
Joseph Ehiorobo ◽  
Peter Gold ◽  
Kevin Marchand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Clinical History ◽  
Robotic Arm ◽  
Preoperative Ct ◽  
Plateau Fracture ◽  
Physical Examinations ◽  
Total Knee

Introduction:Robotic-arm assisted surgery allows for the execution of well-aligned knee arthroplasty regardless of pre-existing deformity. This case series is presented to show the utility of robotic-arm assisted TKA in achieving well-balanced, well-aligned results in a variety of challenging scenarios.Methods:We present seven challenging cases of robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty. There were two conversion TKAs following a previous surgery. One case featured a previous tibial plateau fracture treated with a plate and screws construct while another featured a prior femoral nail with significant bony overgrowth. Five cases of severe deformity were also identified, with one tibial nonunion, two valgus knees and one patient with two varus knees due psoriatic arthritis treated with staged bilateral TKAs. Patient clinical history, physical examinations, intraoperative surgical techniques and postoperative courses were recorded.Results:All cases were able to utilize effective preoperative planning to obtain precise intraoperative bone cuts and component positioning. Each of the seven cases achieved well-balanced, well-aligned arthroplasties. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. At latest follow up, all patients showed significant improvements in pain and ambulation compared to preoperative exams.Discussion:Robotic-arm assisted surgery allows for the integration of preoperative CT scans to establish and execute a surgical plan with precision. Despite the complexity of these cases, excellent results were achieved without the need for revision-type components. These cases display the ability of robotic-arm assisted surgery to achieve consistent well-aligned results with minimal bone loss in challenging total knee arthroplasty cases.

scholarly journals Assessing the Role of Minimal Medial Tissue Release during Navigation-Assisted Varus Total Knee Arthroplasty Based on the Degree of Preoperative Varus Deformity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seikai Toyooka ◽  
Hironari Masuda ◽  
Nobuhiro Nishihara ◽  
Wataru Miyamoto ◽  
Takashi Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Soft Tissue Release ◽  
Neutral Position ◽  
Valgus Stress ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Neutral Alignment ◽  
Medial Release

AbstractWe assessed the impact of a minimal medial soft-tissue release with complete peripheral osteophyte removal on the ability to attain manual preresection deformity correction during navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for varus osteoarthritis. We included 131 TKAs for 109 patients with medial compartment predominant osteoarthritis. The steps for achieving minimal medial soft-tissue release were performed as follows: (1) elevation of a periosteal sleeve to 5-mm distal to the joint line and (2) complete removal of peripheral osteophytes. The evaluation criteria of this study were as follows: (1) age, (2) height, (3) weight, (4) body mass index (BMI), (5) sex, (6) the preoperative femorotibial mechanical angle in the neutral position before medial release and (7) the mechanical angle in maximum manual valgus stress after the two-step medial-release procedure (measured on the navigation screens). Multiple regression analysis of the criteria was performed to determine the degree of varus deformity that allowed neutral alignment but required extensive medial release. The femorotibial mechanical angle in the neutral position before medial release and sex correlated with the mechanical angle in maximum manual valgus stress on the navigation screen after medial release (r = 0.72, p < 0.001). Based on the regression formula, the maximum degree of preoperative varus deformity that allowed neutral alignment by the minimum medial-release procedure was 5.3 degrees for males and 9.1 degrees for females. The magnitude of deformity which has an impact on the ability to correct varus deformity (by minimal soft-tissue release and complete osteophyte removal) was clarified. If the preoperative degree of varus deformity was within 5.3 degrees for males and 9.1 degrees for females, an extensive medial release was not required to obtain neutral alignment.

scholarly journals Robotic Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty in Presence of Extra-Articular Deformity

10.29007/t61k ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nipun Sodhi ◽  
Anton Khlopas ◽  
Joseph Ehiorobo ◽  
Caitlin Condrey ◽  
Robert Marchand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Tibial Fracture ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Robotic Arm ◽  
Operative Outcomes ◽  
Fracture Nonunion ◽  
Plateau Fracture ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Complex Cases

Introduction:There is a lack of data concerning the use of the robotic device for patients with other potentially complex surgical factors. Therefore, the purpose of this series was to present cases in which the robotic-arm assisted TKA (RATKA) application was used in the setting of extra-articular deformities to educate the surgeon community on this potentially useful method to address these complex cases.Methods:Three cases of patients who underwent RATKA in the setting of pre-operative extra-articular deformities were identified. One had femoral and tibial fracture malunion, another had proximal tibial fracture nonunion, and another with a healed tibial plateau fracture. Patient clinical histories, intra-operative surgical techniques, and post-operative outcomes were obtained. Specific focus was placed on the surgical management of the patient’s pre-existing deformity.Results:The robotic software was able to appropriately consider the extra-articular deformity in the pre-operative and real-time updated intra-operative plans. Doing so, the surgeon achieved a balanced and aligned TKA. No intra-operative or post-operative complications occurred. Antero-posterior and lateral radiographs demonstrated well fixed and aligned femoral and tibial components with no signs of loosening or osteolysis. On physical exam, all patients had excellent range of motion with mean flexion of 122 degrees (range: 120 to 125 degrees of flexion) at final follow-up.Discussion:Utilizing pre-operative CT-scans with a 3D plan for robotic-arm assisted surgery allowed for appropriate assessment of the deformity pre-operatively and execution of a plan for a balanced and aligned total knee arthroplasty. We have demonstrated excellent results utilizing robotic-arm assisted TKA in these complex cases.

scholarly journals Postoperative laxity of the lateral soft tissue is largely negligible in total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949902110020
Author(s):  
Seikai Toyooka ◽  
Hironari Masuda ◽  
Nobuhiro Nishihara ◽  
Takashi Kobayashi ◽  
Wataru Miyamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Mechanical Axis ◽  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Varus Knee ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Knee Deformity ◽  
Varus Stress ◽  
Total Knee

Purpose: To evaluate the integrity of lateral soft tissue in varus osteoarthritis knee by comparing the mechanical axis under varus stress during navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty before and after compensating for a bone defect with the implant. Methods: Sixty-six knees that underwent total knee arthroplasty were investigated. The mechanical axis of the operated knee was evaluated under manual varus stress immediately after knee exposure and after navigation-assisted implantation. The correlation between each value of the mechanical axis and degree of preoperative varus deformity was compared by regression analysis. Results: The maximum mechanical axis under varus stress immediately after knee exposure increased in proportion to the degree of preoperative varus deformity. Moreover, the maximum mechanical axis under varus stress after implantation increased in proportion to the degree of preoperative varus deformity. Therefore, the severity of varus knee deformity leads to a progressive laxity of the lateral soft tissue. However, regression coefficients after implantation were much smaller than those measured immediately after knee exposure (0.99 vs 0.20). Based on the results of the regression formula, the postoperative laxity of the lateral soft tissue was negligible, provided that an appropriate thickness of the implant was compensated for the bone and cartilage defect in the medial compartment without changing the joint line. Conclusion: The severity of varus knee deformity leads to a progressive laxity of the lateral soft tissue. However, even if the degree of preoperative varus deformity is severe, most cases may not require additional procedures to address the residual lateral laxity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document