scholarly journals Value of 3D preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty based on artificial intelligence technology

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiabang Huo ◽  
Guangxin Huang ◽  
Dong Han ◽  
Xinjie Wang ◽  
Yufan Bu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Dysplasia ◽  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Component Size ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Digital Template

Abstract Background Accurate preoperative planning is an important step for accurate reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Presently, preoperative planning is completed using either a two-dimensional (2D) template or three-dimensional (3D) mimics software. With the development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, AI HIP, a planning software based on AI technology, can quickly and automatically identify acetabular and femur morphology, and automatically match the optimal prosthesis size. However, the accuracy and feasibility of its clinical application still needs to be further verified. The purposes of this study were to investigate the accuracy and time efficiency of AI HIP in preoperative planning for primary THA, compared with 3D mimics software and 2D digital template, and further analyze the factors that influence the accuracy of AI HIP. Methods A prospective study was conducted on 53 consecutive patients (59 hips) undergoing primary THA with cementless prostheses in our department. All preoperative planning was completed using AI HIP as well as 3D mimics and 2D digital template. The predicted component size and the actual implantation results were compared to determine the accuracy. The templating time was compared to determine the efficiency. Furthermore, the potential factors influencing the accuracy of AI HIP were analyzed including sex, body mass index (BMI), and hip dysplasia. Results The accuracy of predicting the size of acetabular cup and femoral stem was 74.58% and 71.19%, respectively, for AI HIP; 71.19% (P = 0.743) and 76.27% (P = 0.468), respectively, for 3D mimics; and 40.68% (P < 0.001) and 49.15% (P = 0.021), respectively, for 2D digital templating. The templating time using AI HIP was 3.91 ± 0.64 min, which was equivalent to 2D digital templates (2.96 ± 0.48 min, P < 0.001), but shorter than 3D mimics (32.07 ± 2.41 min, P < 0.001). Acetabular dysplasia (P = 0.021), rather than sex and BMI, was an influential factor in the accuracy of AI HIP templating. Compared to patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), the accuracy of acetabular cup in the non-DDH group was better (P = 0.021), but the difference in the accuracy of the femoral stem between the two groups was statistically insignificant (P = 0.062). Conclusion AI HIP showed excellent reliability for component size in THA. Acetabular dysplasia may affect the accuracy of AI HIP templating.

scholarly journals Value of 3D Preoperative Planning for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiabang Huo ◽  
Guangxin Huang ◽  
Dong Han ◽  
Xinjie Wang ◽  
Yufan Bu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Dysplasia ◽  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Component Size ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Digital Template

Abstract Background: Accurate preoperative planning is an important step for accurate reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Presently, preoperative planning is completed using either a two-dimensional (2D) template or three-dimensional (3D) mimics software. With the development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, AI HIP, a planning software based on AI technology can quickly and automatically identify acetabular and femur morphology, and automatically match the optimal prosthesis size. However, the accuracy and feasibility of its clinical application still needs to be further verified. The purposes of this study were to investigate the accuracy and time efficiency of AI HIP in preoperative planning for primary THA, compared with 3D mimics software and 2D digital template; and further analyze the factors that influence the accuracy of AI HIP.Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 53 consecutive patients (59 hips) undergoing primary THA with cementless prostheses in our department. All preoperative planning was completed using AI HIP as well as 3D mimics and 2D digital template. The predicted component size and the actual implantation results were compared to determine the accuracy. The templating time was compared to determine the efficiency. Furthermore, the potential factors influencing the accuracy of AI HIP were analyzed including sex, body mass index (BMI), and hip dysplasia.Results: The accuracy in predicting the acetabular cup and femoral stem was 74.58% and 71.19%, respectively, for AI HIP; 71.19% (P = 0.743) and 76.27% (P = 0.468), respectively, for 3D mimics; 40.68% (P < 0.001) and 49.15% (P = 0.021), respectively, for 2D digital templating. The templating time using AI HIP was 3.91±0.64 min, which was equivalent to 2D digital templates (2.96±0.48 min, P < 0.001), but shorter than 3D mimics (32.07±2.41 min, P < 0.001). Acetabular dysplasia(P = 0.021), rather than sex and BMI, was an influential factor in the accuracy of AI HIP templating. Compared to patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), the accuracy of acetabular cup in the non-DDH group was better (P = 0.021), but the difference in the accuracy of the femoral stem between the two groups was statistically insignificant (P = 0.062).Conclusion: AI HIP showed excellent reliability for component size in THA. Acetabular dysplasia may affect the accuracy of AI HIP templating.

scholarly journals Value of 3D Preoperative Planning for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiabang Huo ◽  
Guangxin Huang ◽  
Dong Han ◽  
Xinjie Wang ◽  
Yufan Bu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Dysplasia ◽  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Component Size ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Digital Template

Abstract Background: Accurate preoperative planning is an important step for accurate reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Presently, preoperative planning is completed using either a two-dimensional (2D) template or three-dimensional (3D) mimics software. With the development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, AI HIP, a planning software based on AI technology can quickly and automatically identify acetabular and femur morphology, and automatically match the optimal prosthesis size. However, the accuracy and feasibility of its clinical application still needs to be further verified. The purposes of this study were to investigate the accuracy and time efficiency of AI HIP in preoperative planning for primary THA, compared with 3D mimics software and 2D digital template; and further analyze the factors that influence the accuracy of AI HIP.Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 53 consecutive patients (59 hips) undergoing primary THA with cementless prostheses in our department. All preoperative planning was completed using AI HIP as well as 3D mimics and 2D digital template. The predicted component size and the actual implantation results were compared to determine the accuracy. The templating time was compared to determine the efficiency. Furthermore, the potential factors influencing the accuracy of AI HIP were analyzed including sex, body mass index (BMI), and hip dysplasia.Results: The accuracy of predicting the size of acetabular cup and femoral stem was 74.58% and 71.19%, respectively, for AI HIP; 71.19% (P = 0.743) and 76.27% (P = 0.468), respectively, for 3D mimics; 40.68% (P < 0.001) and 49.15% (P = 0.021), respectively, for 2D digital templating. The templating time using AI HIP was 3.91±0.64 min, which was equivalent to 2D digital templates (2.96±0.48 min, P < 0.001), but shorter than 3D mimics (32.07±2.41 min, P < 0.001). Acetabular dysplasia(P = 0.021), rather than sex and BMI, was an influential factor in the accuracy of AI HIP templating. Compared to patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), the accuracy of acetabular cup in the non-DDH group was better (P = 0.021), but the difference in the accuracy of the femoral stem between the two groups was statistically insignificant (P = 0.062).Conclusion: AI HIP showed excellent reliability for component size in THA. Acetabular dysplasia may affect the accuracy of AI HIP templating.

scholarly journals Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty using contralateral healthy hip results in decreased accuracy

2021 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 427-433
Author(s):  
Ittai Shichman ◽  
Or Shaked ◽  
Samuel Morgan ◽  
Simon Garceau ◽  
Nimrod Snir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Joint ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Component Size ◽  
Digital Templating ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Healthy Side

The accuracy of pre-operative digital templating for total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the diseased versus unaffected contralateral joint remains unclear. As such, we devised a study to compare templating precision between the operated hip joint versus the healthy side for patients with osteoarthritis (OA). The study hypothesis was that preoperative templating accuracy of THA on the ipsilateral diseased hip joint would be higher compared to the contralateral healthy hip in patients with OA. We retrospectively reviewed 100 patients who underwent THA for unilateral OA at our center from January 2018 to January 2020. Retrospective preoperative digital templating was performed separately on both the operated hip joint and the healthy contralateral hip joint by a single surgeon who was blinded by the in-situ components sizes. Accuracy of each group was compared to the implanted components. Assessment of the 100 included cases demonstrated superior acetabular component size prediction when templating was performed using the diseased hip compared to the healthy contralateral side (68.0% versus 51.0%, p<0.001). No differences between the cohorts were found regarding templating accuracy of femoral stem sizes (72.0% and 69.0%, p=0.375) or neck offset (73.0% and 69.0%, p=0.289). Templating acetabular cup size using the ipsilateral diseased hip is more accurate than using the contralateral healthy hip in patients with unilateral OA.

scholarly journals Value of 3D Preoperative Planning for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Based on Biplanar Weightbearing Radiographs

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Knafo ◽  
F. Houfani ◽  
B. Zaharia ◽  
F. Egrise ◽  
I. Clerc-Urmès ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Leg Length ◽  
Femoral Offset ◽  
Postoperative Result ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Planning Software ◽  
Navigated Surgery

Two-dimensional (2D) planning on standard radiographs for total hip arthroplasty may not be sufficiently accurate to predict implant sizing or restore leg length and femoral offset, whereas 3D planning avoids magnification and projection errors. Furthermore, weightbearing measures are not available with computed tomography (CT) and leg length and offset are rarely checked postoperatively using any imaging modality. Navigation can usually achieve a surgical plan precisely, but the choice of that plan remains key, which is best guided by preoperative planning. The study objectives were therefore to (1) evaluate the accuracy of stem/cup size prediction using dedicated 3D planning software based on biplanar radiographic imaging under weightbearing and (2) compare the preplanned leg length and femoral offset with the postoperative result. This single-centre, single-surgeon prospective study consisted of a cohort of 33 patients operated on over 24 months. The routine clinical workflow consisted of preoperative biplanar weightbearing imaging, 3D surgical planning, navigated surgery to execute the plan, and postoperative biplanar imaging to verify the radiological outcomes in 3D weightbearing. 3D planning was performed with the dedicated hipEOS® planning software to determine stem and cup size and position, plus 3D anatomical and functional parameters, in particular variations in leg length and femoral offset. Component size planning accuracy was 94% (31/33) within one size for the femoral stem and 100% (33/33) within one size for the acetabular cup. There were no significant differences between planned versus implanted femoral stem size or planned versus measured changes in leg length or offset. Cup size did differ significantly, tending towards implanting one size larger when there was a difference. Biplanar radiographs plus hipEOS planning software showed good reliability for predicting implant size, leg length, and femoral offset and postoperatively provided a check on the navigated surgery. Compared to previous studies, the predictive results were better than 2D planning on conventional radiography and equal to 3D planning on CT images, with lower radiation dose, and in the weightbearing position.

Automated preoperative planning of femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty from 3D CT data: Atlas-based approach and comparative study

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 415-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itaru Otomaru ◽  
Masahiko Nakamoto ◽  
Yoshiyuki Kagiyama ◽  
Masaki Takao ◽  
Nobuhiko Sugano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
3D Ct ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Ct Data

scholarly journals Long-Term results of total Hip Arthroplasty performed using a cementless expansive Acetabular Cup and Spotorno Femoral Stem

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Engin Çarkçı ◽  
Ayse Esin Polat ◽  
Yusuf Öztürkmen ◽  
Tolga Tüzüner
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Objective: In this study we aimed to investigate the long-term clinical and radiological results, revision rates and causes, and the rate of implant survival in total hip arthroplasty performed using CLS® expansion cup and Spotorno® cementless femoral stem. Methods: Clinical results of total hip arthroplasty performed on 131 hips of 114 patients in Istanbul Training and Research Hospital between 1993 and 2003 were retrospectively evaluated according to the Harris Hip Score. Revision rates were determined and implant survival rates were identified using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Results: Of the patients, 39 were males and 75 were females. The average age of the patients at surgery was 48.7±11.3 years. Patients were followed up for a mean period of 13.9±2.4 years. The mean Harris Hip Score was 34.35±6.09 preoperatively and 88.20±7.11 at the final follow-up (p<0.001). The Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimate for the cup at 13.9 years, taking revision for any reason as the end point was 95.6% (95% CI), while the 15th and 17th year survival rates were 90% and 85%, respectively. Conclusion: In total hip arthroplasty using a cementless expansive acetabular cup, a 95.6% survival rate is achieved after an average of 14 years, whereas the rate decreases to 85% after 17 years. Even if the incidence of cup breakage is reduced with proper implantation, particle disease and periacetabular osteolysis remains a problem for the long-term survival. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.3089 How to cite this:Carkci E, Polat AE, Ozturkmen Y, Tuzuner T. Long-Term results of total Hip Arthroplasty performed using a cementless expansive Acetabular Cup and Spotorno Femoral Stem. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(1):52-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.3089 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

scholarly journals Value of preoperative three-dimensional planning software (AI-HIP) in primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (11) ◽  
pp. 030006052110588
Author(s):  
Xuzhuang Ding ◽  
Bingshi Zhang ◽  
Wenao Li ◽  
Jia Huo ◽  
Sikai Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Stem Size ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Objective We performed a retrospective study to compare the accuracy of preoperative planning using three-dimensional AI-HIP software and traditional two-dimensional manual templating to predict the size and position of prostheses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of AI-HIP in preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty. Methods In total, 316 hips treated from April 2019 to June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. A typical preoperative planning process for patients was implemented to compare the accuracy of the two preoperative planning methods with respect to prosthetic size and position. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate the homogeneity between the actual prosthetic size and position and the preoperative planning method. Results When AI-HIP software and manual templating were used for preoperative planning, the stem agreement was 87.7% and 58.9%, respectively, and the cup agreement was 94.0% and 65.2%, respectively. The results showed that when AI-HIP software was used, an extremely high level of consistency (ICC > 0.95) was achieved for the femoral stem size, cup size, and femoral osteotomy level (ICC = 0.972, 0.962, and 0.961, respectively). Conclusion AI-HIP software showed excellent reliability for predicting the component size and implant position in primary total hip arthroplasty.

scholarly journals The accuracy of digital templating in cementless total hip arthroplasty in dysplastic hips

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emelie Kristoffersson ◽  
Volker Otten ◽  
Sead Crnalic
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Leg Length ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Digital Templating ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Implant Size ◽  
Crowe Classification

Abstract Background Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a complex procedure due to associated anatomical abnormalities. We studied the extent to which preoperative digital templating is reliable when performing cementless THA in patients with DDH. Methods We templated and compared the pre- and postoperative sizes of the acetabular and femoral components and the center of rotation (COR), and analysed the postoperative cup coverage, leg length discrepancy (LLD), and stem alignment in 50 patients (56 hips) with DDH treated with THA. Results The implant size exactly matched the template size in 42.9% of cases for the acetabular component and in 38.2% of cases for the femoral component, whereas the templated ±1 size was used in 80.4 and 81.8% of cases for the acetabular and femoral components, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between templated and used component sizes among different DDH severity levels (acetabular cup: p = 0.30 under the Crowe classification and p = 0.94 under the Hartofilakidis classification; femoral stem: p = 0.98 and p = 0.74, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between the planned and postoperative COR (p = 0.14 horizontally and p = 0.52 vertically). The median postoperative LLD was 7 (range 0–37) mm. Conclusion Digital preoperative templating is reliable in the planning of cementless THA in patients with DDH.

scholarly journals Quantitative and individualized assessment of the learning curve in preoperative planning of the acetabular cup size in primary total hip arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Waldstein ◽  
P. A. Bouché ◽  
C. Pottmann ◽  
M. Faschingbauer ◽  
P. R. Aldinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Cusum Test ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Cumulative Summation ◽  
Preoperative Plan ◽  
Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract Introduction The aim of the present study was to investigate the learning curves of 2 trainees with different experience levels to reach proficiency in preoperative planning of the cup size based on learning curve cumulative summation (LC-CUSUM) statistics and a cumulative summation (CUSUM) test. Materials and methods One-hundred-twenty patients who had undergone primary total hip arthroplasty with a cementless cup were selected. Preoperative planning was performed by an experienced orthopedic surgeon. Trainee 1 (student) and trainee 2 (resident) planned the cup size. The trainees were blinded to the preoperative plan and the definitive cup size. Only after a cup size was chosen, the trainees were unblinded to the preoperative plan of the surgeon. LC-CUSUM was applied to both trainees to determine when proficiency in determining the appropriate cup size was reached. A CUSUM test was applied to ensure retention of proficiency. Results With reference to the preoperative plan of the surgeon, LC-CUSUM indicated proficiency after 94 planning attempts for trainee 1 and proficiency after 66 attempts for trainee 2, respectively. Trainee 1 and 2 maintained proficiency thereafter. With reference to the definitive cup size, LC-CUSUM did not signal competency within the first 120 planning attempts for trainee 1. Trainee 2 was declared competent after 103 attempts and retained competency thereafter. Conclusions LC-CUSUM/CUSUM allow for an individualized, quantitative and continuous assessment of planning quality. Based on LC-CUSUM statistics, the two trainees of this study gain proficiency in planning of the acetabular cup size after 50–100 attempts when an immediate feedback is provided. Previous experience positively influences the performance. The study serves as basis for the medical education of students and residents in joint replacement procedures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document