scholarly journals Transoral robotic surgery in head and neck district: a retrospective study on 67 patients treated in a single center

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fraco Ionna ◽  
Agostino Guida ◽  
Luigi Califano ◽  
Gaetano Motta ◽  
Giovanni Salzano ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Magis Mandapathil ◽  
Jens E. Meyer

Abstract Purpose Since its introduction over a decade ago, the use of robotic surgery (RS) in head and neck surgery has widely spread around the globe, with very differential adoption of this novel surgical technique in different parts of the world. In this study, we analyze the acceptance and adoption of robotic surgery in the head and neck in Germany. Materials and methods A cross-sectional analysis using a questionnaire evaluating the acceptance and adoption of RS was performed. Questionnaires were distributed to all chairmen /-women of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Departments in Germany. Results A total of 107 respondents completed the questionnaire (65.2%). At university hospitals, 71.4% of the respondents indicated that a robotic system was available, and 21.4% responded that robotic surgery was performed at their institution; 22.7% and 0.04%, respectively, at non-university hospitals. The overall adoption rate was 0.8%. The most common cases performed were TORS resection in the oropharynx. Main reasons for not adopting this technique were costs, lack of interest and available co-operations. Conclusion This study provides evidence of the extent of adoption of TORS in Germany; main perceived barriers to adoption are costs with lack of cost-covering reimbursement and insufficient co-operations with other disciplines as well as hospital administration resulting in a very low adoption rate of this technique over the past decade. Results from this study may assist in decision-making processes on adopting this technique in the future.


Head & Neck ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikkel H. H. Larsen ◽  
Susanne I. Scott ◽  
Hani I. Channir ◽  
Anne K. Ø. Madsen ◽  
Birgitte W. Charabi ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 151 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. P164-P164
Author(s):  
Lane D. Squires ◽  
Toby O. Steele ◽  
Vincent L. Biron ◽  
Quang K. Luu ◽  
D. Gregory Farwell ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (7) ◽  
pp. 697-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Y. Kang ◽  
Peter T. Dziegielewski ◽  
Matthew O. Old ◽  
Enver Ozer

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 442-450
Author(s):  
R Mistry ◽  
A Walker ◽  
D Kim ◽  
E Ofo

Introduction Head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary represents 1–5% of all head and neck cancers and presents a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. In approximately 40% of cases, a primary tumour location remains unknown despite investigation. With advancements in our understanding of the role of high-risk human papilloma virus in head and neck cancer, transoral robotic surgery presents an option for diagnosis and therapy. Materials and methods This is a retrospective case series from a single centre. Case notes were reviewed for 28 patients who had transoral robotic surgery for head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary between May 2015 and July 2019. Results Transoral robotic surgery identified an oropharyngeal primary tumour in 19 of 28 (67.8%) patients. All oropharyngeal primaries were p16 positive. The base of tongue identification rate was 63.2%. Median length of inpatient stay postoperatively was 1.0 day. Normal oral intake resumed within 48 hours in 96% (27/28) of patients. Three patients (10.3%) suffered minor postoperative bleeds that were all managed conservatively. Discussion The base of tongue primary identification rate (63.2%) in this series is consistent with that previously reported (43–63%; 95% confidence interval). Primary tumour identification rate if a patient is p16 positive is 86.3% (19/22), with 100% of these being oropharyngeal. We suggest future investigation into p16 status as a means of stratifying patients with head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary for transoral robotic surgery. Conclusion Transoral robotic base of tongue mucosectomy (or lingual tonsillectomy) is a promising technique that offers a high yield of positive identification for the primary tumour. It is well tolerated with minimal associated morbidity. Our findings are comparable with those in the current literature.


2011 ◽  
Vol 145 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P24-P25
Author(s):  
Derrick T. Lin ◽  
Eric M. Genden ◽  
J. Scott Magnuson ◽  
Jesse Selber

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document