Nutritional outcomes in patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancers compared to conventional open surgery. A systematic review

Head & Neck ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberley Anakapu ◽  
Michael Wilson ◽  
Merran Findlay ◽  
Teresa Brown ◽  
Judith Bauer
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Transoral Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Cancers ◽  
Conventional Open Surgery ◽  
Nutritional Outcomes

scholarly journals Transoral robotic surgery vs open surgery in head and neck cancer. A systematic review of the literature

2020 ◽  
pp. e599-e607
Author(s):  
À. Roselló ◽  
R. Albuquerque ◽  
X. Roselló-Llabrés ◽  
A. Marí-Roig ◽  
A. Estrugo-Devesa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Transoral Robotic Surgery ◽  
Review Of The Literature

scholarly journals Robotic surgery of head and neck cancers, a narrative review

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-303
Author(s):  
Farbood Kalantari ◽  
Shahin Rajaeih ◽  
Ali Daneshvar ◽  
Zahra Karbasi ◽  
Mohammad Mahdi Salem
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Transoral Robotic Surgery ◽  
The Body ◽  
Head And Neck Cancers ◽  
Organ Function ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages

Head and neck cancers are the most common cancers in the body. Treatments are determined on the basis of the location and stage of the primary tumor. The goal of treatment is to eliminate the tumor, prevent recurrence or metastasis, and maintain the quality of life. There are several treatments available for the management of head and neck cancers, including surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, new molecular agents, and a combination of them. Transoral robotic technique is a short-time operation using a type of robotic machine in which the patient undergoes anesthesia for a shorter time and the side effects of this operation and the time of hospitalization are less than open surgery. Due to the importance of speed and accuracy in head and neck cancer surgery and the importance of application of robotics in surgery, the present study was designed and implemented to review the application of robotics in the management of head and neck cancers. In this review study, the keywords: application, robotic, surgical, head cancer, transoral robotic surgery (TORS), and neck cancer, were searched in ISI, PubMed, Scopus, Google scholar databases. Related articles written domestically or abroad that have covered areas such as the background of transoral robotic surgery, maintaining organ function and approaches, the advantages and disadvantages of TORS, the affordability of TORS, the combination of TORS with other therapeutic approaches published from 2003 to 2019 were reviewed. The use of robotic surgery for precise operations such as head and neck cancers seems to be essential. More advanced robotic devices are expected to expand the surgery treatment for head and neck cancers as well as the results of using TORS for oncologic optimization and acceptability of results while maintaining organ function and patient's quality of life.

scholarly journals Robotic surgery of head and neck cancers, a narrative review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farbood Kalantari ◽  
Shahin Rajaeih ◽  
Ali Daneshvar ◽  
Zahra Karbasi ◽  
Mohammad Mahdi Salem
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Transoral Robotic Surgery ◽  
The Body ◽  
Head And Neck Cancers ◽  
Organ Function ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages

Head and neck cancers are the most common cancers in the body. Treatments are determined on the basis of the location and stage of the primary tumor. The goal of treatment is to eliminate the tumor, prevent recurrence or metastasis, and maintain the quality of life. There are several treatments available for the management of head and neck cancers, including surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, new molecular agents, and a combination of them. Transoral robotic technique is a short-time operation using a type of robotic machine in which the patient undergoes anesthesia for a shorter time and the side effects of this operation and the time of hospitalization are less than open surgery. Due to the importance of speed and accuracy in head and neck cancer surgery and the importance of application of robotics in surgery, the present study was designed and implemented to review the application of robotics in the management of head and neck cancers. In this review study, the keywords: application, robotic, surgical, head cancer, transoral robotic surgery (TORS), and neck cancer, were searched in ISI, PubMed, Scopus, Google scholar databases. Related articles written domestically or abroad that have covered areas such as the background of transoral robotic surgery, maintaining organ function and approaches, the advantages and disadvantages of TORS, the affordability of TORS, the combination of TORS with other therapeutic approaches published from 2003 to 2019 were reviewed. The use of robotic surgery for precise operations such as head and neck cancers seems to be essential. More advanced robotic devices are expected to expand the surgery treatment for head and neck cancers as well as the results of using TORS for oncologic optimization and acceptability of results while maintaining organ function and patient's quality of life.

Transoral Robotic Surgery with Laser for Head and Neck Cancers: A Feasibility Study

ORL ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 124-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Benazzo ◽  
Pietro Canzi ◽  
Antonio Occhini
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Feasibility Study ◽  
Transoral Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Cancers

scholarly journals Surgical, clinical and functional outcomes of transoral robotic surgery for supraglottic laryngeal cancers: A systematic review

Oral Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 104848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome R. Lechien ◽  
Nicolas Fakhry ◽  
Sven Saussez ◽  
Carlos-Miguel Chiesa-Estomba ◽  
Younes Chekkoury-Idrissi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Transoral Robotic Surgery

scholarly journals Acceptance and adoption of transoral robotic surgery in Germany

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magis Mandapathil ◽  
Jens E. Meyer
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Transoral Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Adoption Rate ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
Sectional Analysis

Abstract Purpose Since its introduction over a decade ago, the use of robotic surgery (RS) in head and neck surgery has widely spread around the globe, with very differential adoption of this novel surgical technique in different parts of the world. In this study, we analyze the acceptance and adoption of robotic surgery in the head and neck in Germany. Materials and methods A cross-sectional analysis using a questionnaire evaluating the acceptance and adoption of RS was performed. Questionnaires were distributed to all chairmen /-women of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Departments in Germany. Results A total of 107 respondents completed the questionnaire (65.2%). At university hospitals, 71.4% of the respondents indicated that a robotic system was available, and 21.4% responded that robotic surgery was performed at their institution; 22.7% and 0.04%, respectively, at non-university hospitals. The overall adoption rate was 0.8%. The most common cases performed were TORS resection in the oropharynx. Main reasons for not adopting this technique were costs, lack of interest and available co-operations. Conclusion This study provides evidence of the extent of adoption of TORS in Germany; main perceived barriers to adoption are costs with lack of cost-covering reimbursement and insufficient co-operations with other disciplines as well as hospital administration resulting in a very low adoption rate of this technique over the past decade. Results from this study may assist in decision-making processes on adopting this technique in the future.

scholarly journals Supraglottiskarzinom: Erfahrungen mit der transoralen Roboter-Chirurgie

2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (03) ◽  
pp. 143-144
Author(s):  
Markus Kapsreiter
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Laryngeal Cancer ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Transoral Robotic Surgery ◽  
Oncological Treatment ◽  
Transorale Roboterchirurgie

Karabulut B et al. Comparison of functional and oncological treatment outcomes after transoral robotic surgery and open surgery for supraglottic laryngeal cancer. J Laryngol Otol 2018; 132: 832–836 Die Behandlungsmöglichkeiten eines Supraglottiskarzinoms umfassen offene Supraglottis-Laryngektomie, transorale Lasertherapie, transorale Roboterchirurgie und Chemotherapie. Ärzte der HNO-Klinik des Ümraniye-Krankenhauses in Istanbul verglichen die Behandlungsergebnisse bei Patienten mit supraglottischen Tumoren des Larynxkarzinoms, die mittels einer transoralen robotischen Laryngektomie und einer offenen Laryngektomie behandelt wurden.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document