scholarly journals Outcomes of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia hospital-acquired pneumonia in intensive care unit: a nationwide retrospective study

Critical Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Guerci ◽  
◽  
Hugo Bellut ◽  
Mokhtar Mokhtari ◽  
Julie Gaudefroy ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There is little descriptive data on Stenotrophomonas maltophilia hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in critically ill patients. The optimal modalities of antimicrobial therapy remain to be determined. Our objective was to describe the epidemiology and prognostic factors associated with S. maltophilia pneumonia, focusing on antimicrobial therapy. Methods This nationwide retrospective study included all patients admitted to 25 French mixed intensive care units between 2012 and 2017 with hospital-acquired S. maltophilia HAP during intensive care unit stay. Primary endpoint was time to in-hospital death. Secondary endpoints included microbiologic effectiveness and antimicrobial therapeutic modalities such as delay to appropriate antimicrobial treatment, mono versus combination therapy, and duration of antimicrobial therapy. Results Of the 282 patients included, 84% were intubated at S. maltophilia HAP diagnosis for duration of 11 [5–18] days. The Simplified Acute Physiology Score II was 47 [36–63], and the in-hospital mortality was 49.7%. Underlying chronic pulmonary comorbidities were present in 14.1% of cases. Empirical antimicrobial therapy was considered effective on S. maltophilia according to susceptibility patterns in only 30% of cases. Delay to appropriate antimicrobial treatment had, however, no significant impact on the primary endpoint. Survival analysis did not show any benefit from combination antimicrobial therapy (HR = 1.27, 95%CI [0.88; 1.83], p = 0.20) or prolonged antimicrobial therapy for more than 7 days (HR = 1.06, 95%CI [0.6; 1.86], p = 0.84). No differences were noted in in-hospital death irrespective of an appropriate and timely empiric antimicrobial therapy between mono- versus polymicrobial S. maltophilia HAP (p = 0.273). The duration of ventilation prior to S. maltophilia HAP diagnosis and ICU length of stay were shorter in patients with monomicrobial S. maltophilia HAP (p = 0.031 and p = 0.034 respectively). Conclusions S. maltophilia HAP occurred in severe, long-stay intensive care patients who mainly required prolonged invasive ventilation. Empirical antimicrobial therapy was barely effective while antimicrobial treatment modalities had no significant impact on hospital survival. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03506191

2017 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 52-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Loubet ◽  
Guillaume Voiriot ◽  
Nadhira Houhou-Fidouh ◽  
Mathilde Neuville ◽  
Lila Bouadma ◽  
...  

Medwave ◽  
2013 ◽  
pp. e5637-e5637
Author(s):  
Liudmila Carnesoltas Suarez ◽  
Miguel Ángel Serra Valdés ◽  
Rosario O’Farrill Lazo

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothée Abaziou ◽  
Fanny Vardon-Bounes ◽  
Jean-Marie Conil ◽  
Antoine Rouget ◽  
Stéphanie Ruiz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To compare patients hospitalised in the intensive care unit (ICU) after surgery for community-acquired intra-abdominal infection (CA-IAI) and hospital-acquired intra-abdominal infection (HA-IAI) in terms of mortality, severity and complications.Methods: Retrospective study including all patients admitted to 2 ICUs within 48 hours of undergoing surgery for peritonitis.Results: 226 patients were enrolled during the study period. Patients with CA-IAI had an increased 28-day mortality rate compared to those with HA-IAI (30% vs 15%, respectively (p = 0.009)). At 90 days, the mortality rates were 36.7% and 37.5% in the CA-IAI group and HA-IAI group, respectively, with a similar APACHE II score on admission (median: 21 [15 – 25] vs. 21 [15 - 24] respectively, p = 0.63). The patients with HA-IAI had prolonged ICU and hospital stays (median: 17 [7 – 36] vs. 6[3 – 12] days, p < 0.001 and 41 [24 – 66] vs. 17 [7 – 32] days, p = 0.001), and experienced more complications (reoperation and reintubation) than those with CA-IAI. Conclusion: CA-IAI group had higher 28-day mortality rate than HA IAI group. Mortality was similar at 90 days but those with HA-IAI had a prolonged ICU and hospital stay. In addition, they developed more complications.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lise Crémet ◽  
Benjamin Gaborit ◽  
Marwan Bouras ◽  
Thomas Drumel ◽  
Florian Guillotin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothée Abaziou ◽  
Fanny Vardon-Bounes ◽  
Jean-Marie Conil ◽  
Antoine Rouget ◽  
Stéphanie Ruiz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To compare patients hospitalised in the intensive care unit (ICU) after surgery for community-acquired intra-abdominal infection (CA-IAI) and hospital-acquired intra-abdominal infection (HA-IAI) in terms of mortality, severity and complications. Methods Retrospective study including all patients admitted to 2 ICUs within 48 h of undergoing surgery for peritonitis. Results Two hundred twenty-six patients were enrolled during the study period. Patients with CA-IAI had an increased 28-day mortality rate compared to those with HA-IAI (30% vs 15%, respectively (p = 0.009)). At 90 days, the mortality rates were 36.7 and 37.5% in the CA-IAI group and HA-IAI group, respectively, with a similar APACHE II score on admission (median: 21 [15–25] vs. 21 [15–24] respectively, p = 0.63). The patients with HA-IAI had prolonged ICU and hospital stays (median: 17 [7–36] vs. 6[3–12] days, p < 0.001 and 41 [24–66] vs. 17 [7–32] days, p = 0.001), and experienced more complications (reoperation and reintubation) than those with CA-IAI. Conclusion CA-IAI group had higher 28-day mortality rate than HA-IAI group. Mortality was similar at 90 days but those with HA-IAI had a prolonged ICU and hospital stay. In addition, they developed more complications.


2002 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Hyung Lee ◽  
Sung Joon Shin ◽  
Young Chan Kim ◽  
Seung Il Oh ◽  
Mi Ok Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document