scholarly journals Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for primary hip and knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingyi Li ◽  
Haibei Zhu ◽  
Ren Liao

Abstract Background With the substantially growing trend of the aging populations in China and the rest of the world, the number of total hip and total knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) cases are increasing dramatically. It is important to develop practical strategies to improve the quality of healthcare and better outcome for patients undergoing THA and TKA. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been reported to promote earlier recovery and be beneficial for patients. We propose the hypothesis that the ERAS pathway could reduce the length of stay (LOS) in hospital for patients undergoing primary THA or TKA. Methods/Design This trial is a prospective, open-labelled, multi-centered, randomized controlled trial that will test the superiority of the ERAS pathway in term of LOS in hospital for the patients undergoing primary THA or TKA compared to current non-ERAS clinical practice. A total of 640 patients undergoing primary THA or TKA will be randomly allocated to either ERAS pathway (ERAS group) or conventional care according to individual participating center (non-ERAS group). The primary outcome is the total LOS in hospital; the secondary outcomes include postoperative LOS, all-cause mortality by 30 days after operation, in-hospital complications, early mobilization, postoperative pain control, total in-hospital cost, and readmission rate by 30 days after discharge from the hospital. Discussion This trial is designed to evaluate the superiority of the ERAS pathway to conventional non-ERAS clinical practice in reducing the LOS. The results may provide new insight into the clinical applications of the ERAS pathway for THA and TKA. Trial registration National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry, NCT03517098. Registered on 4 May 2018.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingyi Li ◽  
Haibei Zhu ◽  
Ren Liao

Abstract Background: With the substantially growing trend of the aging populations in China and the rest of the world, the number of total hip and total knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) cases are increasing dramatically. It’s important to develop practical strategies to improve the quality of healthcare and better outcome for patients undergoing THA and TKA. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been reported to promote earlier recovery and be beneficial for patients. We propose the hypothesis that ERAS pathway could provide better recovery for patients undergoing primary THA or TKA. Methods/Design: This trial is a prospective, open-labelled, randomized controlled trial that will evaluate the length of stay (LOS) in hospital, and other end points of interest for the patients undergoing ERAS pathway as compared to current non-ERAS clinical practice. A total of 640 patients undergoing primary THA or TKA will be randomly allocated to either ERAS pathway (ERAS group) or conventional care according to individual participating center (non-ERAS group). The primary outcome is the total LOS in hospital, the secondary outcomes include Postoperative LOS, all-cause mortality by 30 days after operation, in-hospital complications, early mobilization, postoperative pain control, total in-hospital cost, and readmission rate by 30 days after discharge from the hospital. Discussion: This trial is designed to evaluate the superiority of the ERAS pathway to conventional non-ERAS clinical practice in reducing the LOS without increasing the incidence of complications or medical cost. The results will provide new insight into the clinical applications of ERAS pathway for total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Trial registration: The National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry, NCT03517098. Registered 04, May, 2018. https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/ SelectProtocol?sid=S0007YV7&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0001B4E&ts=2&cx=97eyz9


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingyi Li ◽  
Haibei Zhu ◽  
Ren Liao

Abstract Background: With the substantially growing trend of the aging populations in China and the rest of the world, the number of total hip and total knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) cases are increasing dramatically. It’s important to develop practical strategies to improve the quality of healthcare and better outcome for patients undergoing THA and TKA. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been reported to promote earlier recovery and be beneficial for patients. We propose the hypothesis that ERAS pathway could reduce the length of stay (LOS)in hospital for patients undergoing primary THA or TKA. Methods/Design:This trial is a prospective, open-labelled, multi-centered, randomizedcontrolledtrial that will test the superiority of ERAS pathway in term of LOS in hospital for the patients undergoing primary THA or TKAas compared to current non-ERAS clinical practice.A total of 640 patients undergoing primary THA or TKA will be randomly allocated to either ERAS pathway (ERAS group) or conventional care according to individual participating center(non-ERAS group).The primary outcome is the total LOS in hospital, the secondary outcomes include postoperative LOS, all-cause mortality by 30 days after operation, in-hospital complications, early mobilization, postoperative pain control, total in-hospital cost, and readmission rateby 30 days after discharge from the hospital. Discussion: This trial is designed to evaluate the superiority of the ERAS pathway to conventional non-ERAS clinical practice in reducing the LOS.The results may provide new insight into the clinical applications of ERAS pathway for total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Trial registration:The National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry, NCT03517098. Registered 04, May, 2018. https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/ SelectProtocol?sid=S0007YV7&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0001B4E&ts=2&cx=97eyz9


BMC Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anirudh Elayat ◽  
Sritam S. Jena ◽  
Sukdev Nayak ◽  
R. N. Sahu ◽  
Swagata Tripathy

Abstract Background Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal perioperative care bundle aimed at the early recovery of patients. Well accepted in gastric and pelvic surgeries, there is minimal evidence in neurosurgery and neurocritical care barring spinal surgeries. We wished to compare the length of intensive care unit (ICU) or high dependency unit (HDU) stay of patients undergoing elective craniotomy for supratentorial neurosurgery: ERAS protocol versus routine care. The secondary objective was to compare the postoperative pain scores, opioid use, glycemic control, and the duration of postoperative hospital stay between the two groups. Methods In this pragmatic non-randomized controlled trial (CTRI/2017/07/015451), consenting adult patients scheduled for elective supratentorial intracranial tumor excision were enrolled prospectively after institutional ethical clearance and consent. Elements-of-care in the ERAS group were- Preoperative –family education, complex-carbohydrate drink, flupiritine; Intraoperative – scalp blocks, limited opioids, rigorous fluid and temperature regulation; Postoperative- flupiritine, early mobilization, removal of catheters, and initiation of feeds. Apart from these, all perioperative protocols and management strategies were similar between groups. The two groups were compared with regards to the length of ICU stay, pain scores in ICU, opioid requirement, glycemic control, and hospital stay duration. The decision for discharge from ICU and hospital, data collection, and analysis was by independent assessors blind to the patient group. Results Seventy patients were enrolled. Baseline demographics – age, sex, tumor volume, and comorbidities were comparable between the groups. The proportion of patients staying in the ICU for less than 48 h after surgery, the cumulative insulin requirement, and the episodes of VAS scores > 4 in the first 48 h after surgery was significantly less in the ERAS group – 40.6% vs. 65.7%, 0.6 (±2.5) units vs. 3.6 (±8.1) units, and one vs. ten episodes (p = 0.04, 0.001, 0.004 respectively). The total hospital stay was similar in both groups. Conclusion The study demonstrated a significant reduction in the proportion of patients requiring ICU/ HDU stay > 48 h. Better pain and glycemic control in the postoperative period may have contributed to a decreased stay. More extensive randomized studies may be designed to confirm these results. Trial registration Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2018/04/013247), registered retrospectively on April 2018.


2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 174-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosei Takagi ◽  
Ryuichi Yoshida ◽  
Takahito Yagi ◽  
Yuzo Umeda ◽  
Daisuke Nobuoka ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document