scholarly journals Impact of an integrated nutrition, health, water sanitation and hygiene, psychosocial care and support intervention package delivered during the pre- and peri-conception period and/or during pregnancy and early childhood on linear growth of infants in the first two years of life, birth outcomes and nutritional status of mothers: study protocol of a factorial, individually randomized controlled trial in India

Trials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunita Taneja ◽  
◽  
Ranadip Chowdhury ◽  
Neeta Dhabhai ◽  
Sarmila Mazumder ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. e0232197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoang T. Nga ◽  
Phi N. Quyen ◽  
Benjamin W. Chaffee ◽  
Nguyen T. Diep Anh ◽  
Tu Ngu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 110 (6) ◽  
pp. 1476-1490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Adubra ◽  
Agnes Le Port ◽  
Yves Kameli ◽  
Sonia Fortin ◽  
Tanimoune Mahamadou ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background In 2014, the World Food Programme added to an ongoing health and nutrition program named “Santé Nutritionnelle à Assise Communautaire dans la région de Kayes” (SNACK), the distribution of cash to mothers and/or lipid-based nutrient supplement (LNS) to children aged 6–23 mo, conditional upon attendance at community health centers (CHCs) during the first 1000 d of life. Objective We evaluated the additional impact of the distribution of cash and/or LNS on mean height-for-age z scores (HAZ; primary outcome), stunting (HAZ < −2), and on intermediate outcomes along the program impact pathways. Methods In a cluster-randomized controlled trial using a 2 × 2 factorial design, 76 CHCs were randomly assigned to deliver either SNACK, SNACK + Cash, SNACK + LNS, or SNACK + Cash + LNS. Cross-sectional surveys among 12- to 42-mo-old children and their mothers were conducted at baseline (2013, n = 5046) and at endline (2016, n = 5098). Results Factorial analysis showed no interaction between cash and LNS treatments for HAZ, but found an antagonistic interaction for stunting (OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.05, 2.31; P = 0.03). There were no impacts of the cash, LNS, or cash + LNS treatments, compared with the SNACK alone, on either HAZ or stunting (treatment × time interaction). There were significant impacts of the LNS and cash + LNS treatments on attendance at ≥1 growth monitoring (GM) session (OR: 3.95; 95% CI: 1.69, 9.24; OR: 3.90; 95% CI: 1.73, 8.81, respectively) and half the expected sessions (OR: 4.72; 95% CI: 1.47, 15.17; OR: 5.25; 95% CI: 1.82, 15.11, respectively), mothers’ knowledge on importance of GM (OR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.16, 3.39; OR: 3.12; 95% CI: 1.60, 6.09, respectively), and, only for the LNS group, appropriate timing for complementary feeding (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.09, 2.41). Conclusions Implementation constraints and suboptimal participation in program activities may explain the lack of impact on child linear growth in this rural region of Mali. This trial was registered at www.isrctn.com as ISRCTN08435964.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document