Evaluating the effectiveness of care coordination interventions designed and implemented through a participatory action research process: Lessons learned from a quasi-experimental study in public healthcare networks in Latin America

Background Despite increasing recommendations for health professionals to participate in intervention design and implementation to effect changes in clinical practice, little is known about this strategy’s effectiveness. This study analyses the effectiveness of interventions designed and implemented through participatory action research (PAR) processes in healthcare networks of Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay to improve clinical coordination across care levels, and offers recommendations for future research. Methods The study was quasi-experimental. Two comparable networks, one intervention (IN) and one control (CN), were selected in each country. Baseline (2015) and evaluation (2017) surveys of a sample of primary and secondary care doctors (174 doctors/network/year) were conducted using the COORDENA® questionnaire. Most of the interventions chosen were based on joint meetings, promoting cross-level clinical agreement and communication for patient follow-up. Outcome variables were: a) intermediate: interactional and organizational factors; b) distal: experience of cross-level clinical information coordination, of clinical management coordination and general perception of coordination between levels. Poisson regression models were estimated. Results A statistically significant increase in some of the interactional factors (intermediate outcomes) -knowing each other personally and mutual trust- was observed in Brazil and Chile INs; and in some organizational factors -institutional support- in Colombia and Mexico. Compared to CNs in 2017, INs of Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico showed significant differences in some factors. In distal outcomes, care consistency items improved in Brazil, Colombia and Uruguay INs; and patient follow-up improved in Chile and Mexico. General perception of clinical coordination increased in Brazil, Colombia and Mexico INs. Compared to CNs in 2017, only Brazil showed significant differences. Conclusions Although more research is needed, results show that PAR-based interventions improved some outcomes regarding clinical coordination at network level, with differences between countries. However, a PAR process is, by definition, slow and gradual, and longer implementation periods are needed to achieve greater penetration and quantifiable changes. The participatory and flexible nature of interventions developed through PAR processes poses methodological challenges (such as defining outcomes or allocating individuals to different groups in advance), and requires a comprehensive mixed-methods approach that simultaneously evaluates effectiveness and the implementation process to better understand its outcomes.

COVID-19 data are messy: analytic methods for rigorous impact analyses with imperfect data

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an avalanche of scientific studies, drawing on many different types of data. However, studies addressing the effectiveness of government actions against COVID-19, especially non-pharmaceutical interventions, often exhibit data problems that threaten the validity of their results. This review is thus intended to help epidemiologists and other researchers identify a set of data issues that, in our view, must be addressed in order for their work to be credible. We further intend to help journal editors and peer reviewers when evaluating studies, to apprise policy-makers, journalists, and other research consumers about the strengths and weaknesses of published studies, and to inform the wider debate about the scientific quality of COVID-19 research. Results To this end, we describe common challenges in the collection, reporting, and use of epidemiologic, policy, and other data, including completeness and representativeness of outcomes data; their comparability over time and among jurisdictions; the adequacy of policy variables and data on intermediate outcomes such as mobility and mask use; and a mismatch between level of intervention and outcome variables. We urge researchers to think critically about potential problems with the COVID-19 data sources over the specific time periods and particular locations they have chosen to analyze, and to choose not only appropriate study designs but also to conduct appropriate checks and sensitivity analyses to investigate the impact(s) of potential threats on study findings. Conclusions In an effort to encourage high quality research, we provide recommendations on how to address the issues we identify. Our first recommendation is for researchers to choose an appropriate design (and the data it requires). This review describes considerations and issues in order to identify the strongest analytical designs and demonstrates how interrupted time-series and comparative longitudinal studies can be particularly useful. Furthermore, we recommend that researchers conduct checks or sensitivity analyses of the results to data source and design choices, which we illustrate. Regardless of the approaches taken, researchers should be explicit about the kind of data problems or other biases that the design choice and sensitivity analyses are addressing.

What Are We Measuring When We Evaluate Digital Interventions for Improving Lifestyle? A Scoping Meta-Review

Background: Lifestyle Medicine (LM) aims to address six main behavioral domains: diet/nutrition, substance use (SU), physical activity (PA), social relationships, stress management, and sleep. Digital Health Interventions (DHIs) have been used to improve these domains. However, there is no consensus on how to measure lifestyle and its intermediate outcomes aside from measuring each behavior separately. We aimed to describe (1) the most frequent lifestyle domains addressed by DHIs, (2) the most frequent outcomes used to measure lifestyle changes, and (3) the most frequent DHI delivery methods.Methods: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-ScR) Extension for Scoping Reviews. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science for publications since 2010. We included systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical trials using DHI to promote health, behavioral, or lifestyle change.Results: Overall, 954 records were identified, and 72 systematic reviews were included. Of those, 35 conducted meta-analyses, 58 addressed diet/nutrition, and 60 focused on PA. Only one systematic review evaluated all six lifestyle domains simultaneously; 1 systematic review evaluated five lifestyle domains; 5 systematic reviews evaluated 4 lifestyle domains; 14 systematic reviews evaluated 3 lifestyle domains; and the remaining 52 systematic reviews evaluated only one or two domains. The most frequently evaluated domains were diet/nutrition and PA. The most frequent DHI delivery methods were smartphone apps and websites.Discussion: The concept of lifestyle is still unclear and fragmented, making it hard to evaluate the complex interconnections of unhealthy behaviors, and their impact on health. Clarifying this concept, refining its operationalization, and defining the reporting guidelines should be considered as the current research priorities. DHIs have the potential to improve lifestyle at primary, secondary, and tertiary levels of prevention—but most of them are targeting clinical populations. Although important advances have been made to evaluate DHIs, some of their characteristics, such as the rate at which they become obsolete, will require innovative research designs to evaluate long-term outcomes in health.

Spot Stenting Combined With False Lumen Endovascular Occlusive Repair for Post-dissection Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Purpose: To introduce a new spot stenting, combined with a false lumen endovascular occlusive repair (SS-FLEVOR) technique for treating post-dissection abdominal aortic aneurysms. Technique: This technique is demonstrated in a 74-year-old man who received an initial thoracic endovascular aortic repair 7 years ago and suffered from distal aortic expansion during the follow-up session. All the tears located more than 15 mm away from the orifice of visceral arteries were excluded by spot stenting in the aortic true lumen. Then, a compliant stent-graft was implanted in the false lumen to seal the tears near the visceral arteries orifice from the outside. In addition, coils were deployed to block the potential backflow from the intercostal arteries and to induce false lumen thrombosis. Moreover, visceral arteries originated from false lumen were repaired by covered-stents implanted from the true lumen. The distal iliac arteries were sealed either with iliac extensions or cover-stents. This new technique has been applied in 5 patients, resulting in 100% technical success and encouraging intermediate outcomes. Conclusion: SS-FLEVOR is a feasible and safe technique to promote false lumen thrombosis in selected cases.

Quantitative Cerebrospinal Fluid Circulating Tumor Cells are a Potential Biomarker of Response for Proton Craniospinal Irradiation for Leptomeningeal Metastasis

Background Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) involves CSF seeding of tumor cells. Proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) is potentially effective for solid tumor LM. We evaluated whether circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the CSF (CTCCSF), blood (CTCblood), and neuroimaging correlates with outcomes after pCSI for LM. Methods We describe a single-institution consecutive case series of 58 patients treated with pCSI for LM. Pre-pCSI CTCs, the change in CTC post-pCSI (ΔCTC), and MRIs were examined. Central nervous system progression free survival (CNS-PFS) and overall survival (OS) from pCSI were determined using Kaplan Meier analysis, Cox proportional-hazards regression, time-dependent ROC analysis, and joint modeling of time-varying effects and survival outcomes. Results The median CNS-PFS and OS were 6 months (IQR:4-9) and 8 months (IQR:5-13), respectively. Pre-pCSI CTCCSF<53/3mL was associated with improved CNS-PFS (12.0 vs 6.0 months, p<0.01). Parenchymal brain metastases (n=34, 59%) on pre-pCSI MRI showed worse OS (7.0 vs 13 months, p=0.01). Through joint modeling, CTCCSF was significantly prognostic of CNS-PFS (p<0.01) and OS (p<0.01). A ΔCTC-CSF≥37 cells/3mL, the median ΔCTC-CSF at nadir, showed improved CNS-PFS (8.0 vs 5.0 months, p=0.02) and further stratified patients into favorable and unfavorable subgroups (CNS-PFS 8.0 vs 4.0 months, p<0.01). No associations with CTCblood were found. Conclusion We found the best survival observed in patients with low pre-pCSI CTCCSF and intermediate outcomes for patients with high pre-pCSI CTCCSF but large ΔCTC-CSF. These results favor additional studies incorporating pCSI and CTCCSF measurement earlier in the LM treatment paradigm.

Approaching Multimorbidity From a Translational Geroscience Perspective

Multimorbidity describes the accumulated burden of chronic disease. Multimorbidity erodes physiologic reserve, increasing the risk of frailty, disability and death. Most older adults have at least one chronic health condition by age 65. Once established, many age-related conditions progress and accumulate with age. Geroscience holds that there are key biologic pathways that explain the increase with age in multimorbidity, frailty and disability Translation of geroscience principles to human studies requires careful assessment of biomarkers of these pathways and multisystem outcomes. In this symposium, translational researchers in geriatric medicine and gerontology will present current work to elucidate biologic underpinnings of aging and potential intervention targets. We will address whether blood biomarkers of aging processes are prognostic using combinatorial techniques and explore the potential for proteomics to identify novel pathways for health aging. New insights into the role of inflammation will be discussed with an emphasis on its relationship to multimorbidity. Brain aging will be considered with respect to the interactions between external stressors and resilience evaluating the role of ketone bodies which have immunomodulatory effects particularly on innate immune cells. Finally, the role of multimorbidity as an intervention target and potential intermediate outcomes including biomarkers will be presented with discussion of next steps needed to realize the potential for translational geroscience clinical trials to improve health span.

A Call to Broaden Investment in Drinking Water Testing and Community Outreach Programs

Ensuring access to safe drinking water is a challenge in many parts of the world for reasons including, but not limited to, infrastructure age, source water impairment, limited community finances and limitations in Federal water protections. Water quality crises and the prevalence of impaired waters globally highlight the need for investment in the expansion of drinking water testing that includes public and private water systems, as well as community outreach. We provide justification including a case example to argue the merits of developing drinking water testing and community outreach programs that include drinking water testing and non-formal education (i.e., public outreach) regarding the importance of drinking water quality testing for human well-being and security. Organizers of drinking water testing programs should: (1) test drinking water quality; (2) develop drinking water quality databases; (3) increase public awareness of drinking water issues; (4) build platforms for improved community outreach; and (5) publish program results that illustrate successful program models that are spatially and temporally transferrable. We anticipate that short-term and intermediate outcomes of this strategy would improve access to drinking water testing, facilitate greater understanding of water quality and increase security through inclusive and equitable water quality testing and outreach programs.

Using Theory of Change to inform the design of the HIV+D intervention for integrating the management of depression in routine HIV care in Uganda

There is growing recognition of the burden of depression in people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA), associated with negative behavioural and clinical outcomes. Unfortunately, most HIV care providers in sub-Saharan Africa do not routinely provide mental health services to address this problem. This article describes the process of developing a model for integrating the management of depression in HIV care in Uganda. Theory of Change (ToC) methodology was used to guide the process of developing the model. Three successive ToC workshops were held with a multi-disciplinary group of 38 stakeholders within Wakiso district, in the Central region of Uganda. The first 2 workshops were for generating practical ideas for a feasible and acceptable model of integrating the management of depression in HIV care at all levels of care within the district healthcare system; while the third and final workshop was for consensus building. Following meaningful brainstorming and discussions, the stakeholders suggested improved mental wellbeing among PLWHA as the ultimate outcome of the program. This would be preceded by short-term and intermediate outcomes including reduced morbidity among persons with HIV attributable to depression, allocation of more resources towards management of depression, increased help-seeking among depressed PLWHA and more health workers detecting and managing depression. These would be achieved following several interventions undertaken at all levels of care. The participants further identified some indicators of successful implementation such as emphasis of depression management in the district healthcare plans, increased demand for anti-depressants etc; as well as various assumptions underlying the intervention. All these were graphically aligned in a causal pathway, leading to a ToC map, contextualizing and summarizing the intervention model. The ToC was a valuable methodology that brought together stakeholders to identify key strategies for development of a comprehensible contextualized intervention model for managing depression within HIV care in Uganda; allowing greater stakeholder engagement and buy-in.