scholarly journals Protocol for the development of a Core Outcome Set for trials on the prevention and treatment of Orthodontically induced enamel White Spot Lesions (COS-OWSL)

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Danchen Qin ◽  
Yunlei Wang ◽  
Colin Levey ◽  
Peter Ngan ◽  
Hong He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Core Outcome Set ◽  
White Spot ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
White Spot Lesions ◽  
Outcome Set ◽  
Prevention And Treatment ◽  
Dental Aesthetics ◽  
Orthodontic Patients ◽  
Dental Professionals

Abstract Background Enamel white spot lesions (WSLs), characterized by an opaque, matt, and chalky white appearance of enamel, are a sign of incipient caries. WSLs are common in orthodontic practice and can affect both the oral health and dental aesthetics of patients. Extensive studies have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of prevention or treatment for orthodontically induced enamel WSLs. However, substantial heterogeneity has been found in the outcomes used for the prevention and treatment of WSLs in literature, which prevents researchers from comparing and combining the results of different studies to draw more decisive conclusions. Therefore, we aim to develop a Core Outcome Set for trials on the prevention and treatment of Orthodontically induced enamel White Spot Lesions (COS-OWSL). Methods The development of COS-OWSL comprises four phases: (1) a scoping review to identify and summarize all existing outcomes that have been used in trials on the prevention or treatment of orthodontically induced WSLs; (2) qualitative interviews with orthodontic patients without (for prevention) and with WSL-affected teeth (for treatment) and relevant dental professionals to identify additional outcomes relevant to them; (3) Delphi surveys to collect opinions from key stakeholders including patients, dental professionals, and researchers and to reach a preliminary consensus; and (4) a consensus meeting to develop the final COS-OWSL. Discussion The COS-OWSL will be developed to facilitate the synthesis of evidence regarding the prevention and treatment of orthodontically induced WSLs and to promote the consistent use of relevant patient-important outcomes among future studies in this field. Trial registration Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative (the COS-WSL project) 1399

scholarly journals A Core Outcome Set for the prevention and treatment of fetal GROwth restriction: deVeloping Endpoints: the COSGROVE study

2019 ◽  
Vol 221 (4) ◽  
pp. 339.e1-339.e10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Healy ◽  
Sanne J. Gordijn ◽  
Wessel Ganzevoort ◽  
Irene M. Beune ◽  
Ahmet Baschat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Core Outcome Set ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
Outcome Set ◽  
Prevention And Treatment

scholarly journals Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for cauda equina syndrome: systematic literature review, qualitative interviews, Delphi survey and consensus meeting

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e024002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nisaharan Srikandarajah ◽  
Adam J Noble ◽  
Martin Wilby ◽  
Simon Clark ◽  
Paula R Williamson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Cauda Equina Syndrome ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Core Outcome Set ◽  
Cauda Equina ◽  
Consensus Meeting ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
The Core ◽  
Outcome Set

IntroductionCauda equina syndrome (CES) is a serious neurological condition most commonly due to compression of the lumbosacral nerve roots, which can result in significant disability. The evidence for acute intervention in CES is mainly from retrospective studies. There is heterogeneity in the outcomes chosen for analysis in these studies, which makes it difficult to synthesise the data across studies. This study will develop a core outcome set for use in future studies of CES, engaging with key stakeholders and using transparent methodology. This will help ensure that relevant outcomes are used in future and will facilitate attempts to summarise data across studies in systematic reviews.Methods and analysisA systematic literature review will document all the outcomes for CES after surgery mentioned in the literature. The qualitative interviews with patients with CES will be semistructured, audio recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed with the use of NVivo V.10 to identify outcomes and determine the themes described. The outcomes from the literature review and patient interviews will be combined and prioritised to determine what the most important outcomes are in CES research studies to patients and healthcare professionals. The prioritisation will be done through a two-round iterative Delphi survey and a consensus meeting. This process will decide the core outcome set for patients with CES.Ethics and disseminationREC and HRA approval was obtained on the 6/12/16 for the qualitative interviews from South Central—Hampshire A REC. REC reference 16/SC/0587. REC and HRA approval was obtained on 26/3/18 for the Delphi process and consensus meeting from North West—Greater Manchester Central REC. REC reference was 18/NW/0022. The final core outcome set will be published and freely available.Trial registration numberThis study is registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials database as study 824.

scholarly journals Development of a core outcome set for evaluative research into paediatric cerebral visual impairment (CVI), in the UK and Eire

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e051014
Author(s):  
Anna Pease ◽  
Trudy Goodenough ◽  
Cath Borwick ◽  
Rose Watanabe ◽  
Christopher Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Visual Impairment ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Core Outcome Set ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Consensus Meeting ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
Outcome Set ◽  
Cerebral Visual Impairment

ObjectivesCerebral visual impairment (CVI) comprises a heterogeneous group of brain-related vision problems. A core outcome set (COS) represents the most important condition-specific outcomes according to patients, carers, professionals and researchers. We aimed to produce a COS for studies evaluating interventions for children with CVI, to increase the relevance of research for families and professionals and thereby to improve outcomes for affected children.DesignWe used methods recommended by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative. These included a proportionate literature review of outcomes used in previous studies; qualitative interviews with children and families; a two-round Delphi survey involving parents, children and professionals and a consensus meeting to ratify the most important outcomes.SettingTelephone interviews and online Delphi surveys of participants who all lived in UK or Eire.ParticipantsEighteen parents and six young people were interviewed. Delphi participants (n=80 did both rounds) included professionals working with children who have CVI (teachers, orthoptists, ophthalmologists, optometrists, qualified teachers for visually impaired, family members (parents and siblings) and affected children.ResultsThe literature review included 13 studies yielding 37 outcomes. Qualitative interviews provided 22 outcomes. After combining and refining similar items, the first round contained 23 outcomes and the second 46. At the consensus meeting, 5 attendees recommended 27 outcomes for inclusion in the CVI COS, of which 15 were ratified as most important, including 4 related to vision; 1 to family well-being; 1 to adults around the child being informed about CVI and the rest to the child’s abilities to engage with people and surroundings.ConclusionsGood engagement from participants led to the development of a COS. Future research will be useful to identify the best ways to measure COS items and potentially to update this COS as more interventions for CVI are developed.Trial registration numberISRCTN13762177.

scholarly journals The outcomes of Perthes’ disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (5) ◽  
pp. 611-617
Author(s):  
Donato G. Leo ◽  
Helen Jones ◽  
Rebecca Murphy ◽  
Justin Wei Leong ◽  
Tina Gambling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Research ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Core Outcome Set ◽  
Consensus Meeting ◽  
Delphi Survey ◽  
Perthes Disease ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
Outcome Set ◽  
Life Impact

Aims To identify a suite of the key physical, emotional, and social outcomes to be employed in clinical practice and research concerning Perthes' disease in children. Methods The study follows the guidelines of the COMET-Initiative (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials). A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify a list of outcomes reported in previous studies, which was supplemented by a qualitative study exploring the experiences of families affected by Perthes’ disease. Collectively, these outcomes formed the basis of a Delphi survey (two rounds), where 18 patients with Perthes’ disease, 46 parents, and 36 orthopaedic surgeons rated each outcome for importance. The International Perthes Study Group (IPSG) (Dallas, Texas, USA (October 2018)) discussed outcomes that failed to reach any consensus (either ‘in’ or ‘out’) before a final consensus meeting with representatives of surgeons, patients, and parents. Results In total, 23 different outcome domains were identified from the systematic review, and a further ten from qualitative interviews. After round one of the Delphi survey, participants suggested five further outcome domains. A total of 38 outcomes were scored in round two of the Delphi. Among these, 16 outcomes were scored over the prespecified 70% threshold for importance (divided into six main categories: adverse events; life impact; resource use; pathophysiological manifestations; death; and technical considerations). Following the final consensus meeting, 14 outcomes were included in the final Core Outcome Set (COS). Conclusion Core Outcome Sets (COSs) are important to improve standardization of outcomes in clinical research and to aid communication between patients, clinicians, and funding bodies. The results of this study should be a catalyst to develop high-quality clinical research in order to determine the optimal treatments for children with Perthes’ disease. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(5):611–617.

scholarly journals A Core Outcome Set for Clinical Trials of First- and Second-Segree Perineal Tears Prevention and Treatment: A Study Protocol for a Systematic Review and a Delphi Survey

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Xiao ◽  
Lei Shi ◽  
Suting Liu ◽  
yuan yuan Luo ◽  
Jin hui Tian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Core Outcome Set ◽  
Delphi Survey ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
Perineal Tears ◽  
Key Stakeholders ◽  
Outcome Set ◽  
Prevention And Treatment

Abstract Background Perineal tear is a common consequence of vaginal births affecting females globally. Even mild perineal tears could cause short- and long-term complications for females. Though many studies of interventions to prevent or treat perineal tears to minimize the consequences have been conducted, however, there is significant heterogeneity in the outcomes measured and reported in existing studies, which makes meaningful comparison difficult and makes the generalizability to clinical practice challenging. Developing a core outcome set (COS) could solve these methodological concerns. In this paper, we report a protocol to develop a COS for clinical trials of mild perineal tears, which shall assist in establishing the evidence base and implementation of effective measures to reduce the incidence and minimize the consequences of mild perineal tears. Methods /Design: The development of this COS will be guided by a study advisory group composed of obstetricians, midwives, nursing managers, service users and methodologists. This study will include four stages: (1) a systematic review of the literature to identify outcomes reported in prior studies; (2) a semi-structured interview with key stakeholders to collect their opinions on important outcomes; (3) a panel of experts will be invited to conduct a three-round Delphi survey to prioritize these outcomes; (4) a consensus meeting with key stakeholders to determine the list of outcomes included in the final COS. Discussion The development of this COS will provide an international standards for the outcomes to be collected and reported in all clinical trials and audits of practice, that involve prevention and treatment of first- and second-degree perineal tears for women with vaginal delivery. This will facilitate comparing and contrasting of studies and allow for combining of appropriate studies with the ultimate goal of improved perineal care for women choosing vaginal delivery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document