Letter the editor: serious methodological concerns about a recently published meta-analysis on oxygen therapy
Keyword(s):
AbstractIn a recent paper, Chen et al. report the findings of a systematic review with meta-analysis concerning conservative versus conventional oxygen therapy for critically ill patients. We wish to commend the authors for their interest in the matter. However, the authors appear to misquote findings, fail to report results for all specified analyses, do not identify all relevant trials, have post hoc changed the eligibility criteria, and have seemingly switched directions of effects in analyses of secondary outcomes. These issues have led to incorrect conclusions concerning the effects of targeted oxygen therapy in critically ill patients.
Use of a helmet for oxygen therapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2020 ◽
Vol 48
(2)
◽
pp. 030006052090320
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
2021 ◽
pp. 115476
2014 ◽
Vol 40
(5)
◽
pp. 845-853
◽