scholarly journals Effect of timing of intubation on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized cohort studies

Critical Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Papoutsi ◽  
Vassilis G. Giannakoulis ◽  
Eleni Xourgia ◽  
Christina Routsi ◽  
Anastasia Kotanidou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Detectable Difference

Abstract Background Although several international guidelines recommend early over late intubation of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), this issue is still controversial. We aimed to investigate the effect (if any) of timing of intubation on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 by carrying out a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods PubMed and Scopus were systematically searched, while references and preprint servers were explored, for relevant articles up to December 26, 2020, to identify studies which reported on mortality and/or morbidity of patients with COVID-19 undergoing early versus late intubation. “Early” was defined as intubation within 24 h from intensive care unit (ICU) admission, while “late” as intubation at any time after 24 h of ICU admission. All-cause mortality and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) were the primary outcomes of the meta-analysis. Pooled risk ratio (RR), pooled mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. The meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020222147). Results A total of 12 studies, involving 8944 critically ill patients with COVID-19, were included. There was no statistically detectable difference on all-cause mortality between patients undergoing early versus late intubation (3981 deaths; 45.4% versus 39.1%; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99–1.15, p = 0.08). This was also the case for duration of MV (1892 patients; MD − 0.58 days, 95% CI − 3.06 to 1.89 days, p = 0.65). In a sensitivity analysis using an alternate definition of early/late intubation, intubation without versus with a prior trial of high-flow nasal cannula or noninvasive mechanical ventilation was still not associated with a statistically detectable difference on all-cause mortality (1128 deaths; 48.9% versus 42.5%; RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.99–1.25, p = 0.08). Conclusions The synthesized evidence suggests that timing of intubation may have no effect on mortality and morbidity of critically ill patients with COVID-19. These results might justify a wait-and-see approach, which may lead to fewer intubations. Relevant guidelines may therefore need to be updated.

scholarly journals Gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis for critically ill patients: a clinical practice guideline

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. l6722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhikang Ye ◽  
Annika Reintam Blaser ◽  
Lyubov Lytvyn ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Gordon H Guyatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Weak Recommendation ◽  
Guideline Panel ◽  
Bleeding Prophylaxis

AbstractClinical questionWhat is the role of gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis (stress ulcer prophylaxis) in critically ill patients? This guideline was prompted by the publication of a new large randomised controlled trial.Current practiceGastric acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) is commonly done to prevent gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. Existing guidelines vary in their recommendations of which population to treat and which agent to use.RecommendationsThis guideline panel makes a weak recommendation for using gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis in critically ill patients at high risk (>4%) of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding, and a weak recommendation for not using prophylaxis in patients at lower risk of clinically important bleeding (≤4%). The panel identified risk categories based on evidence, with variable certainty regarding risk factors. The panel suggests using a PPI rather than a H2RA (weak recommendation) and recommends against using sucralfate (strong recommendation).How this guideline was createdA guideline panel including patients, clinicians, and methodologists produced these recommendations using standards for trustworthy guidelines and the GRADE approach. The recommendations are based on a linked systematic review and network meta-analysis. A weak recommendation means that both options are reasonable.The evidenceThe linked systematic review and network meta-analysis estimated the benefit and harm of these medications in 12 660 critically ill patients in 72 trials. Both PPIs and H2RAs reduce the risk of clinically important bleeding. The effect is larger in patients at higher bleeding risk (those with a coagulopathy, chronic liver disease, or receiving mechanical ventilation but not enteral nutrition or two or more of mechanical ventilation with enteral nutrition, acute kidney injury, sepsis, and shock) (moderate certainty). PPIs and H2RAs might increase the risk of pneumonia (low certainty). They probably do not have an effect on mortality (moderate certainty), length of hospital stay, or any other important outcomes. PPIs probably reduce the risk of bleeding more than H2RAs (moderate certainty).Understanding the recommendationIn most critically ill patients, the reduction in clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding from gastric acid suppressants is closely balanced with the possibility of pneumonia. Clinicians should consider individual patient values, risk of bleeding, and other factors such as medication availability when deciding whether to use gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis. Visual overviews provide the relative and absolute benefits and harms of the options in multilayered evidence summaries and decision aids available on MAGICapp.

scholarly journals Association Between Cytomegalovirus Reactivation and Clinical Outcomes in Immunocompetent Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Lachance ◽  
Justin Chen ◽  
Robin Featherstone ◽  
Wendy I Sligl
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Health Resource ◽  
Health Resource Utilization ◽  
Cytomegalovirus Reactivation ◽  
Cmv Reactivation

Abstract Background The aim of our systematic review was to investigate the association between cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and outcomes in immunocompetent critically ill patients. Methods We searched electronic databases and gray literature for original studies and abstracts published between 1990 and October 2016. The review was limited to studies including critically ill immunocompetent patients. Cytomegalovirus reactivation was defined as positive polymerase chain reaction, pp65 antigenemia, or viral culture from blood or bronchoalveolar lavage. Selected patient-centered outcomes included mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), and nosocomial infections. Health resource utilization outcomes included intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay. Results Twenty-two studies were included. In our primary analysis, CMV reactivation was associated with increased ICU mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.87–3.47), overall mortality (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.60–2.56), duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference 6.60 days; 95% CI, 3.09–10.12), nosocomial infections (OR, 3.20; 95% CI, 2.05–4.98), need for RRT (OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.31–4.31), and ICU length of stay (mean difference 8.18 days; 95% CI, 6.14–10.22). In addition, numerous sensitivity analyses were performed. Conclusions In this meta-analysis, CMV reactivation was associated with worse clinical outcomes and greater health resource utilization in critically ill patients. However, it remains unclear whether CMV reactivation plays a causal role or if it is a surrogate for more severe illness.

scholarly journals Brain Natriuretic Peptide to Predict Successful Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Deschamps ◽  
Sarah K. Andersen ◽  
Jordan Webber ◽  
Robin Featherstone ◽  
Meghan Sebastianski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Brain Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Spontaneous Breathing Trial ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Alternate Test

Abstract Background: Predicting successful liberation from mechanical ventilation (MV) in critically ill patients is challenging. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) has been proposed to help guide decision-making for readiness to liberate from MV following a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Methods : We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and prospective observational studies that measured BNP levels at the time of SBT in patients receiving MV. The primary endpoint was successful liberation from MV (absence of re-intubation or non-invasive ventilation at 48h). Statistical analyses included bi-variate and Moses-Littenberg models, and DerSimonian-Laird pooling of areas under ROC curve (AUROC). Results: A total of 731 articles were screened. Eighteen adult and 2 pediatric studies were fulfilled pre-specified eligibility. The measure of the relative variation of BNP during SBT (DBNP%) after exclusion of SBT failure by clinical criteria in adults yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 0.889 [0.831-0.929] and 0.828 [0.730-0.896] for successful liberation from MV respectively, with a pooled AUROC of 0.92 [0.88-0.97]. The pooled AUROC for any method of analysis for absolute variation of BNP (DBNP), pre-SBT BNP and post-SBT BNP were 0.89 [0.83-0.95], 0.77 [0.63-0.91], and 0.85 [0.80-0.90], respectively.Conclusion: The relative change in BNP during a SBT has potential value as an incremental tool after successful SBT to predict successful liberation from MV in adults. There is insufficient data to support the use of BNP in children or as an alternate test to clinical indices of SBT or the use of DBNP, BNP-pre and BNP-post as an alternate or incremental test.Trial registration number: PROSPERO CRD42018087474 (2018-02-06)

scholarly journals Epidemiology, clinical characteristics and treatment of critically ill patients with COVID-19): a protocol for a living systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e042008
Author(s):  
Lazar Milovanovic ◽  
Erin Hessey ◽  
Meghan Sebastianski ◽  
Diana Keto-Lambert ◽  
Ben Vandermeer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Search Strategy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Case Fatality ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Epidemiological Characteristics

IntroductionIn December 2019, the first cases of COVID-19 associated with SARS-CoV-2 viral infection were described in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. Since then, it has spread rapidly affecting 188 countries and was declared a pandemic by the WHO on 11 March 2020. Preliminary reports suggest up to 30% of patients require intensive care unit (ICU) admission and case fatality rate estimate is 2.3%–7.2%. The primary reason for ICU admission is hypoxaemic respiratory failure, while factors associated with ICU admission include increased age, presence of comorbidities and cytokine storm. Case series and retrospective trials initially assessed proposed treatments with randomised controlled trials now reporting early outcomes. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify epidemiological factors, treatments and complications that predict mortality among critically ill patients with COVID-19.Methods and analysisOur comprehensive search strategy was developed in consultation with a research librarian. We will search electronic databases: Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Wiley Cochrane Library. The search strategy combines concepts from COVID-19, validated COVID-19 search filters and geographical locations of large outbreaks. Citation screening, selection, quality assessment and data abstraction will be performed in duplicate. Clinically homogenous epidemiological characteristics, interventions and complications will be pooled in statistical meta-analysis. Within the framework of a living systematic review, the search and data analysis will be updated every 6 months.Ethics and disseminationOur systematic review will synthesise literature on risk factors and interventions associated with mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Results will be presented at national and international conferences and submitted for peer-reviewed publication. The pooled analysis can provide guidance to inform clinical guidelines for care of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Iterative updates will be made public through open access. Research ethics approval is not required.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020176672.

scholarly journals A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of D-Dimer Levels in Patients Hospitalized with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agam Bansal ◽  
Achintya D Singh ◽  
Vardhmaan Jain ◽  
Manik Aggarwal ◽  
Samiksha Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
End Point ◽  
Cochrane Database ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
D Dimer

AbstractAimTo determine if the d-dimer levels are elevated in individuals with COVID 19 having worse clinical outcomes including all-cause mortality, ICU admission or ARDSMethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane database through April 9, 2020 for studies evaluating the d-dimer levels in patients with and without a worse clinical outcome (all-cause mortality, ICU admission and ARDS). A total of 6 studies included in the meta-analysis.ResultsThe values of d-dimer were found to be significantly increased in patients with the composite clinical end point than in those without (SMD, 1.67 ug/ml (95% CI, 0.72-2.62 ug/ml). The SMD of the studies (Tang et al, Zhou et al, Chen et al), which used only mortality as an outcome measure was 2.5 ug/mL (95% CI, 0.62-4.41).ConclusionThe results of this concise meta-analysis suggest that d-dimer is significantly increased in patients having a worse clinical outcome (all-cause mortality, ICU admission or ARDS).

scholarly journals Brain Natriuretic Peptide to Predict Successful Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Deschamps ◽  
Sarah K. Andersen ◽  
Jordan Webber ◽  
Robin Featherstone ◽  
Meghan Sebastianski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Brain Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Spontaneous Breathing Trial ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Clinical Indices

Abstract Background Predicting successful liberation from mechanical ventilation (MV) in critically ill patients is challenging. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) has been proposed to help guide decision-making for readiness to liberate from MV following a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT).Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and prospective observational studies that measured BNP levels at the time of SBT in patients receiving MV. The primary endpoint was successful liberation from MV (absence of re-intubation or non-invasive ventilation at 48h). Statistical analyses include bi-variate and Moses-Littenberg models, and DerSimonian-Laird pooling of areas under ROC curve (AUROC).Results A total of 731 articles were screened. After pre-specified inclusion criteria, 18 adult and 2 pediatric studies were included. The measure of the relative variation of BNP during SBT (ΔBNP%) after exclusion of SBT failure by clinical criteria in adults yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 0.889 [0.831-0.929] and 0.828 [0.730-0.896] respectively, with a pooled AUROC of 0.92 [0.88-0.97] for successful liberation from MV. The pooled AUROC for any method of analysis for absolute variation of BNP (ΔBNP), pre-SBT BNP and post-SBT BNP were 0.89 [0.83-0.95], 0.77 [0.63-0.91], and 0.85 [0.80-0.90], respectively.Conclusion The ΔBNP during a SBT is an accurate incremental tool after SBT success by clinical indices to predict successful liberation from MV in adults. There is insufficient data to support its use as an alternate test to clinical indices of SBT or the use of ΔBNP, BNP-pre and BNP-post as an alternate or incremental test, or in pediatric patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document