Substance Use and Misuse: A Pilot Study to Improve Screening and Interventions at a Comprehensive Cancer Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 601-604
Author(s):  
Gretchen McNally ◽  
Fayona James ◽  
Jodi Gilliam-Harmon ◽  
Saquena Atkins ◽  
Dori Klemansky
2020 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. 149-156
Author(s):  
John K. Yue ◽  
Ryan R.L. Phelps ◽  
Ethan A. Winkler ◽  
Hansen Deng ◽  
Pavan S. Upadhyayula ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 260-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilse N. Beaufort ◽  
Gerdien H. De Weert-Van Oene ◽  
Victor A.J. Buwalda ◽  
J. Rob J. de Leeuw ◽  
Anna E. Goudriaan

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 555-565
Author(s):  
Wadih Maalouf ◽  
Milos Stojanovic ◽  
Matthew Kiefer ◽  
Giovanna Campello ◽  
Hanna Heikkila ◽  
...  

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S84-S84
Author(s):  
M. Munn ◽  
C. Phillips ◽  
J. Laraya ◽  
G. Boivin-Arcouette

Introduction: Intoxicated patients with decreased Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) are common presentations to emergency departments. These patients are often intubated due to presumed full stomachs and perceived aspiration risk. Gastric ultrasound (GUS) -- a simple, non-invasive and objective option -- could be applied to this problem. This pilot study uses GUS alongside usual care at a music festival; a bounded, intoxication-dense environment where airways are often managed using non-invasive airway strategies. We aim to (1) clarify the gastric contents of any intubated patients, and (2) assess if patients managed without intubation go on to have a lack of aspiration sequelae because of empty stomachs or in spite of full stomachs. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at a multi-day music festival. Patients presenting to on-site medical services with GCS ≤ 13 and known or suspected substance use were included. Patients with trauma, instability, metabolic derangements or additional aspiration risk factors (eg morbid obesity, pregnancy) were excluded. Standard GUS was performed by a trained provider and results were categorized according to convention as FS (full stomach, ie solids or liquids >1.5mL/kg) or ES (empty stomach, ie empty or liquids <1.5mL/kg). Additional patient data were extracted from linked medical records post event. Results: 33 patients met inclusion criteria and 27 remained after exclusions were applied and consent obtained. 25 patients reported substance use and 19 polysubstance use. The FS group had 15 patients (7 solid & 8 liquid > 1.5), and the ES group had 12 patients (5 empty & 12 liquid < 1.5). The median low GCS documented for FS and ES was 7 and 11 respectively, and 10 patients total had a GCS of 8 or less (6 FS & 4 ES). No patients were intubated and all were managed conservatively according to usual care. 3 patients (2 FS, 1 ES) were transferred to hospital. No patients re-registered at medical for clinically significant aspiration. Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates the potential utility of GUS in stratifying aspiration risk in intoxicated patients with decreased GCS. “Empty” stomachs might avoid intubation, while the implications and true risks of “full” stomachs for aspiration sequelae in the absence of intubation remain unclear. Due to the small numbers in this pilot study and the quoted GUS sensitivity (only 95%), further research is needed to evaluate the safe application of this modality to clinical decision-making in intoxicated patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document