Inversion of induced polarization data

Geophysics ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (9) ◽  
pp. 1327-1341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas W. Oldenburg ◽  
Yaoguo Li

We develop three methods to invert induced polarization (IP) data. The foundation for our algorithms is an assumption that the ultimate effect of chargeability is to alter the effective conductivity when current is applied. This assumption, which was first put forth by Siegel and has been routinely adopted in the literature, permits the IP responses to be numerically modeled by carrying out two forward modelings using a DC resistivity algorithm. The intimate connection between DC and IP data means that inversion of IP data is a two‐step process. First, the DC potentials are inverted to recover a background conductivity. The distribution of chargeability can then be found by using any one of the three following techniques: (1) linearizing the IP data equation and solving a linear inverse problem, (2) manipulating the conductivities obtained after performing two DC resistivity inversions, and (3) solving a nonlinear inverse problem. Our procedure for performing the inversion is to divide the earth into rectangular prisms and to assume that the conductivity σ and chargeability η are constant in each cell. To emulate complicated earth structure we allow many cells, usually far more than there are data. The inverse problem, which has many solutions, is then solved as a problem in optimization theory. A model objective function is designed, and a “model” (either the distribution of σ or η)is sought that minimizes the objective function subject to adequately fitting the data. Generalized subspace methodologies are used to solve both inverse problems, and positivity constraints are included. The IP inversion procedures we design are generic and can be applied to 1-D, 2-D, or 3-D earth models and with any configuration of current and potential electrodes. We illustrate our methods by inverting synthetic DC/IP data taken over a 2-D earth structure and by inverting dipole‐dipole data taken in Quebec.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian S. Barfod* ◽  
Jakob Juul Larsen

<p>Exploring and studying the earth system is becoming increasingly important as the slow depletion of natural resources ensues. An important data source is geophysical data, collected worldwide. After gathering data, it goes through vigorous quality control, pre-processing, and inverse modelling procedures. Such procedures often have manual components, and require a trained geophysicist who understands the data, in order to translate it into useful information regarding the earth system. The sheer amounts of geophysical data collected today makes manual approaches impractical. Therefore, automating as much of the workflow related to geophysical data as possible, would allow novel opportunities such as fully automated geophysical monitoring systems, real-time modeling during data collection, larger geophysical data sets, etc.</p><p>Machine learning has been proposed as a tool for automating workflows related to geophysical data. The field of machine learning encompasses multiple tools, which can be applied in a wide range of geophysical workflows, such as pre-processing, inverse modeling, data exploration etc.</p><p>We present a study where machine learning is applied to automate the time domain induced polarization geophysical workflow. Such induced polarization data requires pre-processing, which is manual in nature. One of the pre-processing steps is that a trained geophysicist inspects the data, and removes so-called non-geologic signals, i.e. noise, which does not represent geological variance. Specifically, a real-world case from Grindsted Denmark is presented. Here, a time domain induced polarization survey was conducted containing seven profiles. Two lines were manually processed and used for supervised training of an artificial neural network. The neural net then automatically processed the remaining profiles of the survey, with satisfactory results. Afterwards, the processed data was inverted, yielding the induced polarization parameters respective to the Cole-Cole model. We discuss the limitations and optimization steps related to training such a classification network.</p>


Geophysics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaoguo Li ◽  
Douglas W. Oldenburg

Geological bodies are often linear structures that have well‐defined strike direction and dip angle. We develop a new model objective function that allows this important information to be incorporated into geophysical inversions. A rotation matrix is applied to the horizontal and vertical derivatives of the model so that the derivative in an arbitrary direction is obtained. A model objective function that measures the flatness with respect to the rotated derivatives favors models that have elongated features with the specified strike and dip angle. Formulations for both 2-D and 3-D cases are presented, and they are illustrated using examples from dc resistivity and induced polarization (IP) problems. Synthetic and field examples show that an inversion carried out using known dip information produces a model that has higher resolution and provides a better representation of the true structure.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurélie Gazoty ◽  
Esben Auken ◽  
Jesper Pedersen ◽  
Gianluca Fiandaca ◽  
Anders Vest Christiansen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document